The 25 Best Patch Management Software Of 2024
10 Best Patch Management Software Shortlist
Here's my pick of the 10 best software from the 25 tools reviewed.
Our one-on-one guidance will help you find the perfect fit.
Navigating patch updates and vulnerability management is a challenge for IT teams. Patch management software streamlines this process, offering real-time notifications, software updates, and remote monitoring for everything from Windows Server to mobile devices. It solves key pain points by automating updates, providing patch status insights, and integrating with ticketing systems, security vulnerabilities, and all from a web-based platform. If you're an admin dealing with a mix of on-premises and third-party applications, this is the tool you need.
What Is A Patch Management Software?
Patch management software is an essential tool for IT departments, providing a centralized software deployment, and web-based platform that automates the deployment of patch updates to laptops, Windows servers, workstations, and even mobile devices running Android or iOS. If you're an admin for cybersecurity and juggling multiple tasks, from ensuring third-party applications are up-to-date to managing bandwidth, this software offers a comprehensive solution.
It helps you stay on top of missing patches, monitor patch status, and handle remote monitoring and management, all while integrating with ticketing systems and configuration managers. It gives you a level of control that simplifies vulnerability management across on-premises and virtual machines, allowing you to schedule patching and get real-time notifications. In short, it takes the headache out of managing third-party software (3rd party), third-party patches, patch updates, and the technical needs of end-users.
Need expert help selecting the right tool?
With one-on-one help, we guide you to your top software options. Narrow down your software search & make a confident choice.
Best Patch Management Software Summary
| Tools | Price | |
|---|---|---|
| Atera | From $79/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
| Action1 | From $10/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
| Automox | From $3/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
| Ivanti | From $12/user/month (min 5 seats) | Website |
| ITarian | From $4/user/month | Website |
| ConnectWise Automate | Pricing upon request | Website |
| ManageEngine Patch Management Plus | From $34/user/month (min 10 seats) | Website |
| N-central Patch Management | From $10/user/month (billed annually, min 5 seats) | Website |
| SolarWinds Patch Manager | From $50/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
| Acronis | From $59/user/year (billed annually) | Website |
Compare Software Specs Side by Side
Use our comparison chart to review and evaluate software specs side-by-side.
Compare SoftwareBest Patch Management Software Reviews
Atera is designed as an all-in-one IT management solution aimed at IT consultants and service providers. Its flexible pricing and customization make it especially useful for this target group.
Why I Picked Atera: I chose Atera because of its tailored approach for IT consultants and service providers. In terms of unique offerings, its customizability and flexible pricing models make it distinct. It's best for IT consultants and service providers who require a flexible, customizable tool.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Atera offers remote monitoring, patch management, and an integrated help desk. Its automated scripts are particularly useful for IT service providers.
The tool has native integrations with popular PSAs and RMM solutions, as well as Windows operating systems.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- A high degree of customizability
- Offers integrated help desk and RMM
- Tailored for IT consultants and service providers
Cons:
- Higher starting price point.
- Might be too specialized for general business use
- Billed annually, not monthly
Action1 is a cloud-based patch management solution designed to assist businesses in automating the deployment of software patches to remote workforces. This is particularly beneficial for companies with many remote employees who require consistent patching, making it best for remote workforce patch management.
Why I Picked Action1: I selected Action1 for this compilation because of its cloud-based architecture that effectively allows businesses to manage patches across remote workforces. It stands out for its ability to maintain the security and performance of distributed endpoints.
Thus, it cuts the best tool for companies needing remote workforce patch management.
Standout Features & Integrations:
The most vital features of Action1 include automated patch assessments, real-time reporting, and multi-platform support, offering businesses greater flexibility in managing patches across various operating systems. It also integrates with commonly used systems like Active Directory and SCCM, making it more adaptable for businesses with existing infrastructure.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Multi-platform support covers a broad range of operating systems.
- Real-time reporting gives immediate insights into patch compliance.
- Cloud-based architecture is ideal for managing remote workforces.
Cons:
- Limited features compared to some other enterprise-level solutions.
- Could be a learning curve for teams new to patch management.
- Minimum seat requirements may not suit smaller organizations.
Automox automates patch management in the cloud, from discovery to deployment. It's flexible and scalable, perfect for securing remote endpoints.
Why I Picked Automox: I chose Automox for this list because of its comprehensive, cloud-native approach to patch management. In a world where remote work is becoming increasingly common, having a tool that is designed from the ground up to handle cloud-based operations is incredibly valuable.
Automox stands out because it manages and secures remote endpoints, making it best for organizations operating in cloud-native environments.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Automox provides features like automatic system discovery, continuous vulnerability assessment, and policy-based automation. These features make it easier to manage patches and reduce the security risks associated with outdated software.
Additionally, Automox integrates with popular third-party tools such as Slack, Jira, and Webhooks, allowing for better communication and coordination across your organization.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Integrates with popular third-party tools for better communication and coordination.
- Policy-based automation to streamline patch management tasks.
- Cloud-native platform, designed for modern, distributed organizations.
Cons:
- Requires some technical knowledge for setup and configuration.
- Pricing is on an annual basis, which might not be ideal for some businesses.
- Might be less suitable for organizations not fully operating in the cloud.
Ivanti's Patch Management software aims to automate patching while ensuring network security. Its tight integration with other Ivanti products makes it particularly beneficial for businesses already invested in the Ivanti ecosystem.
Why I Picked Ivanti: I chose Ivanti for this list because of its synergistic value to businesses already using Ivanti’s products. It stands apart for its native integration capabilities, which provide a unified experience across all Ivanti solutions. That's why I consider this tool best for those looking to integrate patch management with their existing Ivanti products.
Standout Features & Integrations:
The most important features include automated vulnerability assessments and remediation, customizable policies, and detailed reporting capabilities.
Integration-wise, Ivanti Patch Management works exceptionally well with other Ivanti offerings, such as Ivanti Endpoint Manager and Ivanti Service Manager, adding value through unified workflows and data sharing.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Detailed reporting provides insights into patch compliance and vulnerabilities
- Customizable patching policies offer flexible management
- Strong native integration with other Ivanti products
Cons:
- The learning curve may be steep for those new to Ivanti products.
- Limited value for those not already invested in Ivanti's ecosystem
- Minimum seat requirement might be restrictive for small businesses
Itarian is a cloud-based IT management platform that offers a range of services including patch management. Its affordability and streamlined feature set make it ideal for small businesses on a budget.
Why I Picked Itarian: I selected Itarian because its platform provides a budget-friendly option for small businesses without sacrificing essential features. What sets it apart is its cost-effectiveness combined with utility. It is best for small businesses on a budget, providing a solution that balances cost and functionality effectively.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Itarian offers automated patch management, vulnerability assessment, and remote monitoring. The platform also provides real-time alerts to keep administrators informed.
The tool integrates with popular operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS, and offers API support for extended functionality.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Supports multiple operating systems
- Includes basic features like vulnerability assessment
- Budget-friendly for small businesses
Cons:
- No native integration with popular business apps.
- Interface can be complex for beginners
- Limited advanced features
ConnectWise Automate is designed to help Managed Service Providers (MSPs) manage and automate all aspects of patch management. Its customizable nature means you can tailor the tool's features to better align with your unique operational requirements, making it ideal for MSPs that require extensive customization.
Why I Picked ConnectWise Automate: In selecting tools for this list, customization was a key criterion. ConnectWise Automate offers extensive customizability, allowing MSPs to adapt the software to fit specific client needs or niche markets.
This unique capability justifies its position as best for MSPs who demand extensive customization options in their patch management solutions.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Key features include role-based security, automated patch testing, and customizable reporting tools, providing MSPs with the capability to fine-tune their patch management processes.
ConnectWise Automate also integrates with other solutions from the ConnectWise suite, as well as third-party tools like LabTech, ScreenConnect, and SQL Server, thereby offering a comprehensive ecosystem for MSPs.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- A comprehensive ecosystem with various integrations for better operational flow.
- Role-based security ensures granular control over the system.
- Extensive customization capabilities allow for niche deployments.
Cons:
- May require additional training to fully utilize all customization options.
- Base fees and annual billing may pose a financial burden for some businesses.
- Complexity could make the system daunting for small teams.
Best for centralized control of heterogeneous networks
ManageEngine Patch Management Plus is designed to offer centralized patch management across a variety of network environments. Its strength lies in unifying patch processes across diverse systems, making it ideal for centralized control of heterogeneous networks.
Why I Picked ManageEngine Patch Management Plus: I chose ManageEngine Patch Management Plus for its robust capability to centralize control across varied network systems. This specialization differentiates it from other tools. It's particularly suited for organizations with diverse networks that require centralized patch management.
Standout Features & Integrations:
The tool provides automated patch deployments, detailed network scans, and vulnerability assessments. Moreover, it supports a multitude of operating systems, from Windows and macOS to various Linux distributions.
ManageEngine Patch Management Plus integrates with Windows, macOS, and Linux systems, as well as common software applications like Microsoft Office.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Detailed vulnerability assessments
- Supports a variety of operating systems
- Comprehensive centralized control
Cons:
- Limited third-party integrations.
- Steeper learning curve
- Minimum 10-seat purchase required
N-central Patch Management is a tool designed for centralized patch management across various operating systems. Its functionalities are geared towards automating the deployment and management of patches, which aligns well with its strength in automating routine patch tasks.
Why I Picked N-central Patch Management: I chose N-central Patch Management for its focus on automating the often tedious and error-prone process of patch management. In comparing it with other solutions, its specialized features for automation really make it stand out. It's best for automating routine patch tasks, thanks to its centralized approach that minimizes manual intervention and human error.
Standout Features & Integrations:
The tool offers bulk deployment capabilities and detailed patch compliance reports, facilitating both deployment and compliance tracking. In addition, the tool has a built-in scheduling feature that can deploy patches during off-peak hours to minimize disruption.
In terms of integrations, N-central Patch Management is compatible with Windows, Linux, and macOS operating systems. It also interfaces well with other SolarWinds products, and third-party management tools, providing a more unified IT management experience.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Effective integration with SolarWinds products and third-party tools
- Detailed patch compliance reports for regulatory adherence
- Centralized management for multiple operating systems
Cons:
- May be too comprehensive for smaller organizations with less complex needs.
- Annual billing cycle instead of monthly
- Minimum 5-seat purchase required for the entry-level pricing
SolarWinds Patch Manager is designed to simplify patch management across complex enterprise networks. With its ability to scale effortlessly, it is well-suited to meet the demands of large enterprise environments, justifying its tag as best for large enterprise scalability.
Why I Picked SolarWinds Patch Manager: I picked SolarWinds Patch Manager because its architecture is geared towards scalability and complexity, allowing it to handle the varied requirements of large enterprises. It stands out due to its extensive reporting capabilities and customization options, which make it invaluable for large-scale operations.
Hence, this tool is best for large enterprises that require scalability in their patch management efforts.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Key features of SolarWinds include its detailed patch compliance reporting, role-based administration, and extensive customization options that provide better control over patching processes. It integrates well with various SolarWinds products and with Microsoft WSUS and SCCM, offering a way to scale patch management across large enterprises.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Strong customization options to fit enterprise needs.
- Detailed compliance reporting allows for rigorous oversight.
- Robust scalability is suitable for large enterprises.
Cons:
- Annual billing might be a drawback for some businesses.
- Complexity may require specialized staff for full utilization.
- High costs may deter smaller organizations.
Acronis offers a unique combination of data backup solutions along with patch management. This two-in-one approach makes it particularly useful for those requiring both backup and patch management capabilities.
Why I Picked Acronis: I chose Acronis because it uniquely combines backup and patch management in a single tool. This dual functionality makes it stand out from the competition. It is best suited for businesses that require backup solutions along with their patch management.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Key features include real-time backup, scheduled patching, and ransomware protection. Acronis also offers customizable alerts for system health.
Acronis integrates well with Windows and has API support for extending its capabilities further.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Customizable alerts for system health
- Offers ransomware protection
- Combines backup and patch management
Cons:
- Might be too feature-rich for small enterprises.
- Higher starting price point
- Minimum 5-seat purchase required
Other Noteworthy Patch Management Software
Below is a list of additional patch management software that I shortlisted, but did not make it to the top 10. These are definitely worth checking out.
- NinjaOne
For simplified patch compliance reporting
- Scalefusion
For automated patch deployment
- Freshservice
For ITIL-aligned organizations
- PDQ
Good for automated deployments of third-party updates
- Qualys Patch Management
Good for organizations requiring real-time threat intelligence
- Patch My PC
Good for lightweight patching needs
- Comodo IT and Security Manager
Good for companies needing a comprehensive security suite
- Datto RMM Patch Management
Good for managed service providers looking for scalable options
- Lumension Patch and Remediation
Good for focusing on compliance and remediation
- GoTo Resolve
Good for remote patching via a simple interface
- Shavlik
Good for VMware environments
- Microsoft Defender for IoT
Good for IoT devices requiring high-security standards
- Kaseya VSA
Good for centralized management with compliance reporting
- Syxsense
Good for cloud-based patch management
- GFI Languard
Good for businesses needing network security scans
Other Deployment Management Software Reviews
Selection Criteria For Choosing Patch Management Software
Choosing the right patch management software is a complex task that requires balancing a multitude of factors. Having tested and researched dozens of these tools, I was particularly keen on specific functionalities like automation capabilities, centralized control, and user-friendliness. In the following sections, I'll elaborate on the criteria that were most crucial during my evaluation process.
Core Functionality
- Automated Patching: Ability to automatically download and install updates without manual intervention.
- Reporting and Analytics: Generate comprehensive reports to provide insights into the patching process.
- Scheduled Patching: This allows you to set specific times for the software to search for and apply updates.
- Vulnerability Assessment: Scans the environment to identify and prioritize software vulnerabilities.
- Compliance Management: Ensures that systems are in line with organizational or regulatory requirements.
Key Features
- Centralized Dashboard: A single interface to view and manage the status of all endpoints, making it easier to maintain an overview.
- Rollback Capability: Ability to revert changes in case a patch has unintended consequences.
- Integration with Security Tools: Links with existing antivirus or other security solutions for a more coordinated approach.
- Multi-Platform Support: Compatibility with various operating systems and software applications, including third-party programs.
- Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous monitoring for new vulnerabilities or compliance issues.
Usability
- Intuitive Interface: The software should have a dashboard that allows easy navigation between different functionalities, rather than a cluttered or overly complex layout.
- Onboarding Guides: A knowledge base or quick-start guide to help users get acquainted with the tool without a steep learning curve.
- Role-Based Access: Clearly defined user roles to allow for limited or extensive access based on job responsibilities.
- Responsive Customer Support: An accessible and knowledgeable customer support team to address queries or issues in a timely manner.
Most Common Questions Regarding Patch Management Software
What are the benefits of using patch management software?
Using patch management software provides several advantages:
- Security Enhancement: These tools keep your system up-to-date with the latest security patches, reducing vulnerabilities.
- Compliance Maintenance: Many industries require regular patching for compliance with laws and regulations. A patch management tool can automate this process.
- Resource Efficiency: Automated patching frees up IT staff to focus on other important tasks rather than the manual labor of updating each system.
- Operational Continuity: By preventing downtime through scheduled patching, these tools help in maintaining operational efficiency.
- Centralized Management: A single dashboard allows you to manage and monitor patching across multiple systems and platforms.
How much do patch management tools generally cost?
The cost of patch management software varies widely based on features, the number of endpoints, and the vendor. Pricing models commonly seen include per-user, per-device, or per-endpoint charges.
What are the common pricing models for these tools?
Patch management tools usually follow one of these pricing models:
- Per-User Pricing: Charged based on the number of users who will access the software.
- Per-Endpoint Pricing: Costs are calculated based on the number of devices managed.
- Feature-Based Pricing: Some vendors offer tiered pricing based on the features you need.
- Enterprise Plans: Customized plans for large organizations with complex requirements.
What is the typical range of pricing for patch management software?
Pricing can start as low as $2 per endpoint per month and go up to $50 or more for more advanced features and functionalities.
Which are the cheapest and most expensive patch management software options?
The cheapest options often start at around $2-5 per endpoint per month, like “Patch My PC.” The most expensive options, often designed for enterprise-level needs, can exceed $50 per endpoint per month, such as “Qualys Patch Management.”
Are there any free patch management tools?
Yes, some vendors offer free versions of their patch management tools, like “Itarian.” However, these free versions are usually limited in features and are best suited for very small businesses or individual use.
Summary
Selecting the right patch management software can be a crucial decision for any organization, affecting security, compliance, and operational efficiency. The marketplace offers a range of options, each with its own set of features, usability factors, and pricing models. Informed decisions can only be made when you have a clear understanding of your specific needs and how various tools can meet them.
Key Takeaways
- Match core functionality to your needs: Not all patch management tools are created equal. Assess your unique requirements, such as the types of systems you need to patch and compliance mandates you need to meet, before making a selection.
- Consider usability and support: The user interface should be straightforward, especially if non-IT staff will be using the tool. Check the availability of training resources, customer support, and community forums that can assist in problem-solving.
- Understand pricing models: There are multiple pricing structures—per-user, per-endpoint, feature-based, and enterprise plans. Be clear about what is and isn't included in the pricing, and look for any hidden or additional costs like setup fees.
What Do You Think?
If you feel there are patch management tools that should be on this list but were overlooked, I invite you to share your suggestions. Your input can provide valuable insights and help make this guide more comprehensive and useful for everyone. Thank you for reading, and I look forward to your contributions.