Skip to main content

With so many different backlog management tools available, figuring out which is right for you is tough. You know your product development projects become complex to manage, but need to figure out which tool is best to help you out. I've got you! In this post I'll help make your choice easy, sharing my personal experiences using dozens of different backlog management tools with large teams and projects, with my picks of the best backlog management tools.

With features like user-friendly messaging, timely notifications, and even a free plan accommodating unlimited users, navigating product backlogs and sprint backlogs becomes intuitive. If you're an agile team looking to simplify iterations, permissions, and teamwork metrics, these tools offer the solution.

Why Trust Our Work Management Tool Reviews

We’ve been testing and reviewing various IT and software development tools since 2023. As technology specialists ourselves, we know how critical and difficult it is to make the right decision when selecting software.

We invest in deep research to help our audience make better software purchasing decisions. We’ve tested more than 2,000 tools for different use cases and written over 1,000 comprehensive software reviews. Learn how we stay transparent & our hybrid cloud solution review methodology.

Best Backlog Management Tools Summary

Tools Price
Backlog From $35/month for up to 30 users
Productboard From $20/user/month (billed annually)
Confluence From $5.75/user/month
Yodiz From $5/user/month
Axosoft From $25/5 users/month
Redmine Free (open-source)
Jira From $7.50/user/month (billed annually).
Hansoft Pricing upon request
ClickUp From $5/user/month
Trello From $5/user/month (billed annually), Trello offers its Standard plan, which includes unlimited boards, cards, lists, checklists, and attachments. There's also a Premium plan at $10/user/month (billed annually) and an Enterprise plan for larger organizations, which requires custom pricing.
Preview Image - <h2 class="c-block__title b-summary-table__title c-listicle__title h3" > Compare Software Specs Side by Side</h2>

Compare Software Specs Side by Side

Use our comparison chart to review and evaluate software specs side-by-side.

Compare Software

How To Choose Backlog Management Tools

As you're shortlisting, trialing, and selecting backlog management tools, consider the following:

  • What problem are you trying to solve - Start by identifying the backlog management feature gap you're trying to fill to clarify the features and functionality the tool needs to provide.
  • Who will need to use it - To evaluate cost and requirements, consider who'll be using the tool and how many licenses you'll need. You'll need to evaluate if it'll just be the product department, or the whole organization that will require access. When that's clear, it's worth considering if you're prioritizing ease of use for all, or speed for your technical power users.
  • What other tools it needs to work with - Clarify what tools you're replacing, what tools are staying, and the tools you'll need to integrate with. This could include your existing backlog management system, project and task management tools, and your overall tech stack. You might also need to decide if the tools will need to integrate together, or alternatively, if you can replace multiple tools with one consolidated backlog management solution.
  • What outcomes are important - Consider the result that the tool needs to deliver to be considered a success. Think about what capability you want to gain, or what you want to improve, and how you will be measuring success. You could compare backlog management tool features until you’re blue in the face, but if you aren’t thinking about the outcomes you want to drive, you could be wasting a lot of valuable time.
  • How it would work within your organization - Consider the solutions alongside your workflows and delivery methodology. Evaluate what's working well, and the areas that are causing issues that need to be addressed. Remember every business is different — don’t assume that because a tool is popular that it'll work in your organization.

Best Backlog Management Tool Reviews

Best for tracking projects, tasks, and bugs in one place

  • 30-day free trial
  • From $35/month for up to 30 users
Visit Website
Rating: 4.5/5

Backlog presents itself as a centralized platform that intertwines project management, task tracking, and bug resolution. It aptly consolidates these functionalities, making it invaluable for teams who want an integrated solution for their varying operational challenges.

Why I Picked Backlog:

In my search for tools that offer a cohesive experience, Backlog prominently emerged. I chose it after judging its capability to merge different operational needs into a single platform. Given its integrative features, it’s my determination that Backlog is best suited for teams keen on tracking projects, tasks, and bugs from one hub.

Standout features & integrations:

Backlog shines with its built-in bug-tracking system, ensuring issues are identified and resolved quickly. Additionally, it facilitates visual project timelines and offers extensive collaborative features such as shared wikis. Key integrations encompass Slack, Typetalk, and Jenkins for enhanced operational fluidity.

Pros and cons


  • Visual Gantt chart and burndown chart features
  • Built-in wiki system for team knowledge sharing
  • Comprehensive dashboard with project, task, and bug views


  • Mobile experience could be enhanced
  • Limited customization options in comparison to competitors
  • The interface may be less intuitive for first-time users

Best for product management and roadmap visualization

  • 15-day free trial
  • From $20/user/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.3/5

Every effective product team requires a streamlined process to visualize and manage their roadmap. ProductBoard delivers on this, providing a platform where product management intertwines perfectly with visualization tools. Its prowess in displaying product management phases, along with roadmap visualization, sets it apart for those who like seeing the big picture.

Why I Picked ProductBoard:

While examining numerous platforms, I chose ProductBoard because it struck a balance between product management and roadmap clarity. Comparing its interface and capabilities to others, it stood out with its unique product-centered view. My judgment on ProductBoard is founded on its ability to make product management and roadmap visualization cohesive, thereby ensuring it's the best for product teams requiring this synergy.

Standout features & integrations:

ProductBoard excels with its feature prioritization tools, allowing teams to weigh and decide on the most impactful changes. Its portal for user feedback ensures products are continually aligned with customer needs. Integration-wise, it connects with tools like Jira, Trello, and Slack, making data flow easy and actionable.

Pros and cons


  • Direct portal for gathering user feedback
  • Effective feature prioritization tools
  • Clear product roadmap visualization


  • Annual billing might deter some users
  • Requires a learning curve for full utilization
  • Might be overkill for very small teams

Best for integrated documentation collaboration

  • Free for 10 users, no trial period
  • From $5.75/user/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4.1/5

At the heart of every efficient team lies a robust documentation system. Confluence stands out as a dedicated platform for this, helping teams document, collaborate, and share work. Its primary strength lies in integrated documentation collaboration, making it an ideal choice for teams that prioritize structured and collaborative document management.

Why I Picked Confluence:

In the vast sea of collaborative tools, I selected Confluence because of its distinguished approach to documentation. After comparing and judging multiple platforms, Confluence emerged distinctively due to its emphasis on creating an integrated documentation environment. This central focus on documentation, backed by user reviews and its extensive features, firmly planted my opinion that it's genuinely the best for teams seeking a collaborative documentation hub.

Standout features & integrations:

Confluence champions in offering customizable templates, ensuring teams can maintain consistent documentation standards. The real-time editing feature is another highlight, allowing multiple team members to cohesively work on a document. Integration-wise, it synergizes well with Atlassian’s ecosystem, including Jira, Trello, and Bitbucket. Moreover, its extensive marketplace ensures teams have a plethora of plugins to customize their workspace.

Pros and cons


  • A wide array of plugins in the marketplace
  • Real-time editing facilitates simultaneous collaboration
  • Customizable templates for standardized documentation


  • Cost becomes a consideration for very large teams
  • Initial setup might require some learning
  • Could be daunting for smaller teams or solo users

Best for agile project management with visual boards

  • 30-day free trial
  • From $5/user/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

For teams steeped in agile methodologies, visual boards become an indispensable asset. Yodiz presents itself as a potent solution for agile project management using vivid, intuitive boards. With its emphasis on visual representations of agile processes, Yodiz resonates with teams that prefer a graphic touch to their workflows.

Why I Picked Yodiz:

Navigating the landscape of agile management tools, Yodiz caught my attention due to its pronounced visual capabilities. I determined that its visual boards are not only appealing but functionally superior, simplifying complex agile processes. This combination solidified my opinion that Yodiz is best for teams in pursuit of a visually charged agile management experience.

Standout features & integrations:

Yodiz offers a scalable scrum board, catering to teams of varying sizes and complexity. Its epic and release management features are commendable, offering a broad perspective on projects. As for integrations, Yodiz supports connections with popular platforms like Slack, GitHub, and Jenkins, enhancing its operational versatility.

Pros and cons


  • A broad range of third-party integrations
  • Comprehensive epic and release management
  • Scalable and intuitive visual boards


  • Initial setup requires time and patience
  • Customization has its limits
  • The interface can feel dense at times

Best for software development teams and release planning

  • 14-day free trial
  • From $25/5 users/month

In the realm of software development, precise release planning is paramount. Axosoft emerges as a dedicated tool in this space, offering features tailored for developers and aiding in precise release cycles.

Why I Picked Axosoft:

When determining a tool tailored for software development teams, Axosoft consistently stood out. I chose it because of its profound focus on aiding developers in managing release cycles effectively. In drawing comparisons, it became apparent that Axosoft is best for development teams that require precision in their release planning.

Standout features & integrations:

Axosoft is lauded for its scrum software planning, which streamlines agile methodologies. Its burndown charts and capacity planning tools ensure teams stay on track. Integration-wise, Axosoft connects well with repositories like Git and Subversion, as well as with customer support tools like Help Scout.

Pros and cons


  • Effective release management capabilities
  • Robust scrum and agile planning tools
  • Tailored features for software developers


  • Some features might seem complex for smaller teams
  • The interface can take time to familiarize with
  • Might not cater to non-development teams

Best for open-source project management

  • Free (open-source)

Open-source solutions bring flexibility and customization, and Redmine captures these benefits in the realm of project management. As an open-source tool, Redmine offers adaptability and freedom, making it ideal for teams that prioritize customization and direct control.

Why I Picked Redmine:

I selected Redmine for this list after considering its strong community support and open-source nature. It became evident that its potential for customization and extensibility outshines many proprietary tools. Given these strengths, I judge Redmine as the best for organizations or teams that appreciate open-source freedoms.

Standout features & integrations:

Redmine boasts a modular architecture, allowing teams to plug in various features as needed. It supports multiple projects, offers a range of tracking tools, and possesses a robust issue management system. As for integrations, its open-source nature means it can be integrated with a plethora of tools, though popular ones include Git, Subversion, and LDAP.

Pros and cons


  • Modular architecture for specific feature sets
  • Strong community support
  • Highly customizable due to its open-source nature


  • Limited official support
  • The user interface feels dated
  • Might require technical expertise to setup

Best for detailed software project management

  • 7-day free trial
  • From $7.50/user/month (billed annually).

Jira, an Atlassian product, has long been a forerunner in the software project management landscape. It provides detailed tools catered to the software development lifecycle, making it the go-to for development teams needing robust oversight of their projects.

Why I Picked Jira:

Upon weighing the strengths of various tools, Jira stood out in the domain of software project management. I chose it because of its tried-and-true reputation in the software industry. Reflecting on its features, I believe Jira is the best tool for teams seeking an in-depth approach to software project management.

Standout features & integrations:

Jira is renowned for its customizable workflows that adapt to varying development methodologies. Its issue and project tracking, combined with agile reporting tools, offers detailed project oversight. Notable integrations include Confluence, Bitbucket, and Slack, fortifying its position in the software ecosystem.

Pros and cons


  • Integration with other Atlassian products
  • Robust issue tracking and agile reporting tools
  • Customizable workflows cater to different methodologies


  • Pricing can get steep for larger teams.
  • Configuration can be time-consuming
  • Might be overkill for smaller projects

Best for large-scale agile projects

  • Pricing upon request

Hansoft, by Perforce, carves out a niche for itself in managing large-scale agile projects. It's tailored to assist sprawling teams with detailed agile frameworks, making it a strong contender for organizations with vast projects that necessitate agile methodologies.

Why I Picked Hansoft:

In evaluating tools for comprehensive project management, Hansoft distinguished itself. My selection of Hansoft stems from its ability to handle the complexities of large projects while maintaining agile principles. Thus, I stand by the view that Hansoft is the ideal tool for entities needing a comprehensive solution for sizeable agile initiatives.

Standout features & integrations:

Hansoft excels with its combined backlog and timeline management, enabling simultaneous high-level and granular views. It also offers resource allocation and real-time collaboration tools, enhancing team synergy. On the integration front, Hansoft merges well with Jira, Perforce Helix Core, and Jenkins.

Pros and cons


  • Real-time collaboration fosters team communication
  • In-depth resource allocation tools
  • Combines backlog and timeline views for improved oversight


  • The interface may seem dense for simple projects
  • The pricing model may not be transparent
  • The steeper learning curve for newcomers

Best for all-in-one project management solutions

  • From $5/user/month

In the vast sphere of project management, ClickUp stands as a comprehensive tool, offering a suite of features for a diverse range of needs. It’s designed to encompass all aspects of project management, which supports its position as a preferred choice for teams seeking an all-in-one solution.

Why I Picked ClickUp:

Navigating through a myriad of project management tools, I settled on ClickUp primarily for its holistic approach. When comparing its breadth of features and adaptability to other platforms, ClickUp clearly differentiated itself. I am of the opinion that ClickUp is the best fit for teams who want an encompassing project management tool without juggling multiple platforms.

Standout features & integrations:

ClickUp excels with its custom views ranging from lists, and boards, to calendar displays. Its goal-tracking and mind-mapping capabilities further enhance the project planning process. Integrations are vast, with ClickUp connecting effortlessly to tools such as Slack, GitHub, and Google Drive.

Pros and cons


  • Extensive integration options
  • Customizable views for personalized management
  • A comprehensive set of features for varied needs


  • Some advanced features behind paywalls
  • The mobile app experience can be improved
  • Might feel overwhelming for new users

Best for simple, card-based task organization

  • From $5/user/month (billed annually), Trello offers its Standard plan, which includes unlimited boards, cards, lists, checklists, and attachments. There's also a Premium plan at $10/user/month (billed annually) and an Enterprise plan for larger organizations, which requires custom pricing.

In the realm of task organization, simplicity often trumps complexity. Trello epitomizes this with its card-based system, allowing teams to manage tasks in a straightforward, drag-and-drop environment. Its commitment to simplicity, coupled with card-based organization, is why it's a favorite for those seeking a clutter-free task management experience.

Why I Picked Trello:

Through a process of selection and judgment, Trello emerged as a tool that masters the art of simplicity. In my comparisons, Trello’s card-based organization was unmatched in its ability to simplify complex workflows. I believe Trello is unequivocally the best for those who seek a straightforward, no-fuss task organization method.

Standout features & integrations:

Trello’s strength lies in its boards, lists, and cards, which offer a clear structure for task management. The Power-Ups feature, which lets teams integrate and automate their workflows, is a game-changer. On the integration front, Trello connects smoothly with tools like Dropbox, Google Drive, and Slack, enriching its ecosystem.

Pros and cons


  • Numerous integration options
  • Power-Ups add versatility to boards
  • Intuitive card-based system


  • Collaboration tools can be basic for larger teams
  • Might lack depth for complex projects
  • Advanced features behind paywalls

Best for real-time collaboration and workload management

  • Free plan available
  • From $9.80/user/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4.2/5

Wrike champions itself as a hub for real-time collaboration, effectively bridging teams and streamlining project workflows. Its focus on workload management ensures that tasks are equitably distributed, catering to teams that aim for balanced work dynamics.

Why I Picked Wrike:

Through comparisons, I found Wrike’s emphasis on real-time collaboration to be its standout trait. I selected it, judging by its proficiency in enhancing team synergies and its dynamic workload management capabilities. My opinion stands firm that Wrike is the optimal choice for teams that prioritize real-time collaboration and balanced workload distribution.

Standout features & integrations:

Wrike boasts a dynamic request form feature that streamlines task creation. Its interactive drag-and-drop Gantt chart offers visual clarity on project timelines. Integrations are expansive, with Wrike syncing with platforms like Salesforce, Tableau, and Microsoft Teams.

Pros and cons


  • Visual dashboards for instant project insights
  • Time tracking capabilities for resource management
  • Dynamic request forms streamline task assignments


  • Dependency visualization might feel limited
  • Task filtering can be more refined
  • The learning curve may deter some users

Best for customizable workflow automation

  • Free plan available
  • From $10/user/month has been a prominent name in the project management space, often credited for its customizable workflow automation capabilities. It promotes flexibility in how teams manage tasks, making it a preferred choice for organizations keen on crafting their automation processes.

Why I Picked

When determining tools that offer both structure and adaptability, clearly emerged. I picked it after judging its extensive customization options, which empower teams to tailor their workflows. Consequently, I firmly believe that is unmatched for entities prioritizing malleable workflow automation.

Standout features & integrations: impresses with its color-coded boards and visual project tracking. Moreover, it boasts automation recipes, allowing teams to define trigger-action sequences. Integrations are abundant, with supporting connections with platforms like Slack, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams.

Pros and cons


  • A rich integration ecosystem enhances tool interoperability
  • Extensive automation recipes to fine-tune workflows
  • Intuitive color-coded boards for easy task visualization


  • Initial setup might demand time investment.
  • Can seem overwhelming due to the plethora of options
  • Advanced features may come at a premium cost

Other Backlog Management Tools

Below is a list of additional backlog management tools that I shortlisted, but did not make it to the top 12. Definitely worth checking them out.

  1. ProWorkflow

    Best fortime tracking and resource management

  2. Scoro

    Best forcombining CRM and project management

  3. Teamhood

    Best forvisual task board organization

  4. OpenProject

    Best forcomprehensive open-source collaboration

  5. Pivotal Tracker

    Best foragile software development teams

If you still haven't found what you're looking for here, check out these other types of tools that we've tested and evaluated.

Selection Criteria For Backlog Management Tools

Selecting the right backlog management tool hinges on a variety of factors, and will depend on your context. Through personal trials and extensive research, I've developed a set of criteria to guide my evaluation process. This way I ensure that the selected tools not only offer comprehensive functionality but also align with the unique use cases. Here are my selection criteria:

Core Backlog Management Tool Functionality: 25% of total weighting score

To be considered for inclusion on my list of the best backlog management tools, the solution had to support the ability to fulfill common use cases. These include:

  • Effective prioritization of tasks and bugs
  • Organizing tasks into sprints and milestones
  • Tracking progress and completion rates
  • Facilitating team collaboration and communication
  • Integrating with other development and project management tools

Additional Standout Features: 25% of total weighting score

  • Innovative features such as AI-based prioritization suggestions, automated sprint planning, or advanced analytics for predictive project management.
  • Unique collaboration enhancements, like in-app messaging systems that integrate with external communication platforms.
  • Features for roadmapping, customer feedback integration, or built-in quality assurance testing capabilities.

Usability: 10% of total weighting score

  • Interfaces that offer intuitive navigation and logical organization of features, such as drag-and-drop functionality for task management.
  • Solutions that balance power and complexity with simplicity, making advanced features accessible without overwhelming users.

Onboarding: 10% of total weighting score

  • Availability of comprehensive training resources, including video tutorials, interactive product tours, and template libraries.
  • Ease with which new users can migrate existing data into the tool and begin realizing value, supported by responsive customer service and guided onboarding programs.

Customer Support: 10% of total weighting score

  • Responsive, knowledgeable support teams who are accessible via multiple channels (e.g., chat, email, phone).
  • A robust knowledge base or community forum that allows users to troubleshoot issues independently.

Value For Money: 10% of total weighting score

  • Comparing pricing structures against the feature set and scalability of each tool, ensuring that costs are justified by the value delivered.
  • Considering the flexibility of pricing plans, including the availability of free tiers or discounts for startups and non-profits.

Customer Reviews: 10% of total weighting score

  • Analyzing feedback from current and past users to gauge satisfaction levels and identify common issues or highly praised features.
  • Paying close attention to reviews that detail user experiences with specific features relevant to the core needs of backlog management, such as ease of use, integration capabilities, and the effectiveness of customer support.

Through this criteria-driven approach, I aim to identify backlog management tools that not only excel in their core functionalities but also offer additional value.

In 2024, backlog management tools are continuing to evolve to meet the changing needs of software development teams. Product updates, press releases, and release logs from the most future-focused and popular tools reveal a clear trajectory towards more integrated, intelligent, and user-centric solutions.

These changes not only reflect the current trends in technology but also highlight the shifting demands of software developers. Let's explore some of these trends and how they're showing up as features, functionalities, and solutions for your team:

  • Decline of Manual Task Management: Manual entry and management of tasks are becoming less important, with automation and AI taking precedence. This shift indicates a move towards more efficient, error-free project management practices.
  • Reduced Emphasis on Email Notifications: As in-app notifications and integrations with messaging platforms improve, the reliance on email for updates and alerts is diminishing, reflecting a shift towards more immediate and contextually relevant communication methods.
  • Integration with AI and Machine Learning: Tools are increasingly leveraging AI and machine learning to enhance prioritization and task estimation, suggesting an industry-wide emphasis on automating decision-making processes to save time and increase project accuracy.
  • Enhanced Collaboration Features: There's a notable trend towards improving remote collaboration capabilities, including real-time updates, in-app messaging, and integration with external communication platforms, signaling the industry's adaptation to the remote and hybrid work models.
  • Advanced Analytics and Reporting: Tools are introducing more sophisticated analytics and reporting features, offering deeper insights into project performance, team productivity, and predictive forecasting. This reflects the growing need for data-driven decision-making in software development.

As software development projects become more complex and teams more distributed, the demand for tools that can offer intelligent insights, foster collaboration, and streamline workflows is paramount. At the same time, features that fail to adapt to these changing needs—such as manual task management and reliance on traditional communication methods—are seeing a decrease in importance. This evolution is shaping a future where backlog management tools are not just about managing tasks but about empowering teams to work more efficiently, collaboratively, and intelligently.

What are Backlog Management Tools?

Backlog management tools are specialized software applications designed to help teams organize, prioritize, and track tasks or work items that are pending completion. Primarily used by product managers, software developers, and teams practicing agile methodologies, these tools facilitate the smooth progression of tasks from inception to completion.

They aid in ensuring that critical tasks are addressed promptly, resources are allocated efficiently, and projects progress in alignment with the defined objectives, making them indispensable for businesses striving for effective project management.

Features of Backlog Management Tools

Here are some of the most important features I look for in backlog management tools to ensure organization, prioritization, and efficiency in managing software development projects:

  1. Task assignment: The ability to assign tasks to individuals or teams.
  2. Progress tracking: Monitoring the status of tasks, milestones, and overall project health.
  3. Resource allocation: A system to distribute and manage resources efficiently, ensuring no over-allocations.
  4. Collaboration tools: A platform where team members can communicate, share files, and discuss tasks in real time.
  5. Reporting tools: Features that allow the creation of visual reports for performance analysis, insights and future planning.
  6. Time management: Tools that track time spent on tasks, helping in efficiency and billing.
  7. Role-based access: This ensures that only authorized individuals can view or edit specific parts of a project.
  8. Flexible categorization: Allows teams to organize tasks into categories, epics, sprints, and other defined work items.
  9. Prioritization: Enables teams to set priorities for tasks based on urgency, value, or complexity.
  10. Real-time notifications: Keeps team members informed about changes to the backlog and task statuses.
  11. Customizable views and filters: Allows users to customize how they view the backlog and filter tasks based on different criteria.
  12. Reporting and analytics: Provides insights into the team's progress, task completion rates, and other key performance indicators.

Choosing a tool with the right mix of these features can significantly impact the success of software development initiatives, leading to improved productivity and product quality.

Benefits of Backlog Management Tools

Backlog management tools are essential for teams and organizations looking to streamline their project development processes. These tools offer a structured platform to prioritize, track, and manage tasks efficiently. Let's dive deeper into the top benefits that backlog management tools provide for your team:

1. Enhanced prioritization: These tools allow users to prioritize tasks effectively, ensuring the most critical projects are addressed first. By facilitating a clear view of task urgency and importance, backlog management software helps teams focus on high-priority activities, improving overall project efficiency and delivery times.

2. Improved visibility: Backlog management tools offer a centralized platform for all project-related information, enhancing visibility for all team members. This transparency ensures that everyone is aware of the project's status, upcoming tasks, and any potential bottlenecks, fostering better communication and collaboration within the team.

3. Increased productivity: By streamlining the task management process, these tools minimize manual tracking and administrative work, freeing up time for the core activities that directly contribute to project success. This leads to a more efficient use of resources and increased productivity across the organization.

4. Better planning and forecasting: With comprehensive data on past and current projects, backlog management tools enable more accurate planning and forecasting. Teams can analyze trends, estimate timelines more effectively, and allocate resources more efficiently, leading to smoother project execution and reduced risk of overruns.

5. Enhanced flexibility and adaptability: These tools support agile methodologies, making it easier for teams to adapt to changes and pivot strategies when necessary. The ability to quickly re-prioritize tasks and adjust plans in response to evolving project requirements or external factors ensures that the organization can remain resilient and responsive in a dynamic environment.

Costs & Pricing For Backlog Management Tools

Many backlog management tools offer a range of functionalities designed to streamline task prioritization, tracking, and team collaboration. With several plan options available, it's important for software buyers to understand the different pricing and features each plan offers.

Plan Comparison Table for Backlog Management Tools

Here's a breakdown of the typical plan options for backlog management tools to help guide your decision:

Plan TypeAverage PriceCommon Features
Free$0Basic task management, Limited users, Access to essential features only, Community support
Basic$10-20 per user/monthEnhanced task management capabilities, More users, Project tracking, Basic integration options, Email support
Standard$20-50 per user/monthAdvanced project management features, Unlimited users (with tiered pricing), Custom workflows, Comprehensive integration options, Priority support
Premium$50-100 per user/monthFull feature access, Advanced reporting and analytics, Customizable dashboards, Advanced security options, 24/7 support, Training and onboarding services
EnterpriseCustom pricingAll Premium features plus, Customizable user roles, Dedicated account manager, Enterprise-grade security, Custom billing, On-premise options for large teams

When considering which plan to choose, software buyers should weigh the features they need against their budget and the size of their team. It's important to start with a clear understanding of your project management requirements and future scalability to ensure you select a plan that not only fits your current needs but also accommodates future growth.

Backlog Management Tools Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to some of the top questions related to backlog management solutions.

What do you think?

While I've put in considerable effort to curate this list based on my research and experience, the world of backlog management tools is vast. If you've come across a standout tool that hasn't made it to this guide or have personal experiences with one you believe deserves mention, please share it with us. Your feedback is invaluable in ensuring this guide remains comprehensive and up-to-date. Let's collaborate to make this resource even better.

By Paulo Gardini Miguel

Paulo is the Director of Technology at the rapidly growing media tech company BWZ. Prior to that, he worked as a Software Engineering Manager and then Head Of Technology at Navegg, Latin America’s largest data marketplace, and as Full Stack Engineer at MapLink, which provides geolocation APIs as a service. Paulo draws insight from years of experience serving as an infrastructure architect, team leader, and product developer in rapidly scaling web environments. He’s driven to share his expertise with other technology leaders to help them build great teams, improve performance, optimize resources, and create foundations for scalability.