Skip to main content

Mastering UI elements, Xcode, and app automation has been crucial in my journey through mobile app development. Integrating languages like PHP, ensuring smooth playback, and efficient test management are non-negotiable, especially for web apps.

The best mobile testing tools offer more than technical prowess; they tackle black-box testing issues head-on. These tools simplify testing and resolve common challenges, helping developers deliver flawless apps. If bugs and inconsistent UI behaviors frustrate you, it's time to explore these solutions.

What Are Mobile Testing Tools?

Mobile testing tools provide solutions for developers and QA professionals to rigorously evaluate mobile applications' functionality, usability, and performance. These software solutions simulate different devices, operating systems, and network conditions, ensuring applications run smoothly across various scenarios.

They're primarily used by software development teams, quality assurance testers, and sometimes product managers to catch potential issues before the app reaches the end-users. Identifying and rectifying these concerns helps deliver a consistent, high-quality user experience across diverse mobile platforms and environments.

Best Mobile Testing Tools Summary

Tools Price
UserTesting Pricing available upon request
BrowserStack From $29/month
pCloudy From $35/user/month (billed annually)
Katalon Studio From $25/month
Loadmill From $745/month
Appium Free to use
Ranorex Mobile Automation Testing From $119/user/month (billed annually)
Perfecto Mobile App Testing Tool Pricing upon request
Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing (UFT) Pricing upon request
Testim Pricing upon request
Preview Image - <h2 class="c-block__title b-summary-table__title c-listicle__title h3" > Compare Software Specs Side by Side</h2>

Compare Software Specs Side by Side

Use our comparison chart to review and evaluate software specs side-by-side.

Compare Software

Best Mobile Testing Tools Reviews

Best for qualitative feedback from real users

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing available upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.5/5

UserTesting is a platform that allows companies to obtain direct feedback from real users regarding their products or services. This tool focuses on the qualitative aspects of user experience, making it invaluable for those who prioritize genuine user insights and sentiments.

Why I Picked UserTesting: While sifting through numerous tools, UserTesting caught my eye due to its emphasis on harnessing genuine user perspectives. I chose it because, compared to other platforms, UserTesting provides a unique avenue to tap into raw, unfiltered feedback from actual users. This makes it different and invaluable. Given its robust approach to capturing qualitative data, it stands as the best tool for sourcing detailed feedback from real users.

Standout features & integrations:

UserTesting boasts real-time video feedback, where businesses can see and hear users interact with their products. They also offer segmented user panels, ensuring feedback is sourced from relevant user demographics.

Integrations-wise, UserTesting syncs well with tools like Jira for actionable feedback-to-task translation and various platforms for mobile application testing, catering to both iOS and Android devices.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Effective integrations, especially with Jira, streamline the feedback loop and action items.
  • Provides access to segmented user panels, ensuring that feedback is relevant and actionable.
  • Offers real-time video feedback, allowing businesses to visually and audibly understand user interactions.

Cons:

  • The platform might require a slight learning curve for those unfamiliar with user experience testing tools.
  • Focused on qualitative feedback, it might not cater to those looking for extensive quantitative data.
  • May not be as cost-effective for small businesses or startups.

Best for real device testing

  • Free trial available
  • From $29/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4.5/5

BrowserStack is a software testing platform that offers access to authentic desktop and mobile devices for real-time testing. It's ideal for developers and QA teams looking to evaluate websites and mobile applications across multiple browsers and devices. Its extensive infrastructure makes it particularly useful for real device testing.

Why I Picked BrowserStack: In the course of determining the best tools for the list, BrowserStack consistently stood out. One of the pivotal reasons I chose it was due to its unmatched library of real mobile devices and browsers. Its capability to provide a genuine, tangible testing environment on both Android and iOS devices is unparalleled, which solidified my opinion that it's the best for real device testing.

Standout features & integrations:

BrowserStack offers a vast array of real devices, ensuring the compatibility and performance testing of applications is genuine. It supports both manual testing and automation testing, making it versatile for different testing needs.

When it comes to integrations, BrowserStack works harmoniously with Jenkins for continuous testing, ties with Jira for bug tracking, and supports WebDriver for creating browser automation scripts.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Offers integrations with popular tools like Jenkins, Jira, and WebDriver.
  • Enables both manual and automation testing on its platform.
  • Provides access to a wide variety of real devices from Android to iOS.

Cons:

  • Real device availability can sometimes be limited during peak usage times.
  • The vast number of features might be overwhelming for some new users.
  • Might be considered costly for smaller teams with limited budgets.

Best for parallel test execution

  • From $35/user/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.5/5

pCloudy is an advanced mobile application testing platform offering a comprehensive suite for evaluating apps on real mobile devices. Its capability to run tests concurrently across multiple devices is a key strength, establishing its status as best for parallel test execution.

Why I Picked pCloudy: When comparing and judging various mobile application testing tools, pCloudy's feature of parallel test execution immediately caught my attention. By evaluating its capacity to save time and resources while executing multiple test cases simultaneously, it became evident why pCloudy deserved a spot on this list. For teams looking to maximize efficiency in testing processes, especially on both Android and iOS devices, pCloudy stands as a top contender.

Standout features & integrations:

One of pCloudy's most notable features is its support for scriptless automation, allowing even those without deep programming knowledge to conduct tests. Moreover, it offers real-time debugging and boasts compatibility with emulators and real devices.

Regarding integrations, pCloudy is adaptable with Jenkins for continuous testing, and it also interfaces effectively with tools like Jira and Selenium, improving the flexibility of the testing platform.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Scriptless automation allows a wider range of users to conduct tests.
  • Integrates effortlessly with popular tools such as Jenkins, Jira, and Selenium.
  • Supports parallel test execution on a wide array of devices, from iOS to Android.

Cons:

  • Initial setup and configuration might demand more time than simpler platforms.
  • Subscription cost may be on the higher side for smaller teams or startups.
  • The platform's extensive feature set might be overwhelming for beginners.

Best for codeless automation testing

  • Freemium plan
  • From $25/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

Katalon Studio offers a comprehensive platform for software testing, both for web and mobile applications. Emphasizing ease of use, Katalon shines in its ability to provide robust testing solutions without requiring users to write a single line of code, making it especially beneficial for those seeking codeless automation testing.

Why I Picked Katalon Studio: If you're looking for an automation testing solution that doesn't require coding, Katalon Studio is a great choice. It's user-friendly and straightforward to use.

Standout features & integrations:

One of Katalon's most distinguishing features is its intuitive interface, tailored to guide users through the testing process with plain English commands. Complementing this, it offers compatibility for both iOS and Android applications, ensuring wide-reaching mobile test automation.

As for integrations, Katalon collaborates with Jenkins for continuous testing, Jira for task management, and ties into Selenium and Appium frameworks, further bolstering its capabilities.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Deep integrations with widely-used tools like Jenkins and Jira
  • Compatibility across multiple platforms, including iOS devices and Android devices
  • Intuitive no-code testing platform suitable for all users

Cons:

  • Some advanced features might be locked behind higher pricing tiers.
  • Limited custom scripting opportunities due to its codeless nature
  • Might require some initial orientation for complete novices

Best for simulating real user network conditions

  • 14-day free trial
  • From $745/month

Loadmill offers a solution that taps into the very core of mobile application testing: understanding how an app performs under genuine network conditions. As a mobile testing platform, it goes beyond mere emulation by simulating how real users would experience an app across various network scenarios.

Why I Picked Loadmill: After comparing and evaluating different mobile testing tools, Loadmill stands out as the best option due to its ability to accurately replicate real-world network conditions. Loadmill guarantees a real-time and authentic user experience, making it the best choice for simulating real user network conditions.

Standout features & integrations:

At its heart, Loadmill thrives on features like load testing and API testing. This allows developers and testers to assess mobile app's frontend and backend performance concurrently. Furthermore, it smoothly aligns with CI/CD processes, courtesy of its integrations with platforms like Jenkins, making continuous testing and deployment a straightforward process. Additionally, its Jira integration streamlines bug tracking and task management, improving the software development lifecycle.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Strong integrations with CI/CD tools like Jenkins
  • Integrated tools for both API and load testing
  • Accurately mirrors real-world network conditions

Cons:

  • Complex test configurations might necessitate robust hardware setups.
  • Restricted to specific programming languages, such as Java and JavaScript
  • Initial setup might be challenging for novices

Best for open-source community support

  • Free to use

Appium is an open-source tool for automating native, mobile web, and hybrid applications on iOS and Android platforms. Recognized for its flexibility, Appium's strength lies in the extensive support it receives from its thriving community.

Why I Picked Appium: In my journey of selecting tools, Appium emerged distinctly due to its robust open-source nature and the immense backing of its community. I chose Appium because it provides an avenue for collaborative input from global developers and testers, making it different from proprietary platforms. Given its active community and continuous evolution, I'm confident in asserting that Appium stands unrivaled when it comes to open-source community support.

Standout features & integrations:

Appium excels with features like support for multiple programming languages including Java, Python, and Ruby, and the ability to test on both emulators and real mobile devices. It's also known for its compatibility with both iOS and Android applications.

Regarding integrations, Appium works with tools like Selenium Webdriver for added functionality, Jenkins for continuous testing, and it supports integration with test automation frameworks such as cucumber.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integration with other tools like Jenkins and Selenium improves its utility.
  • Compatibility with both iOS and Android platforms ensures a broad testing spectrum.
  • Multi-language support, catering to a diverse range of developers.

Cons:

  • Requires additional setup and configuration compared to some out-of-the-box solutions.
  • Since it's community-supported, issue resolution might not be as fast as commercial platforms.
  • Might have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its extensive features.

Best for cross-platform support

  • From $119/user/month (billed annually)

Ranorex is a robust mobile application testing tool that facilitates the automated testing of mobile apps across diverse platforms. The tool’s proficiency in ensuring consistent testing experiences across both Android and iOS underpins its commendation as best for cross-platform support.

Why I Picked Ranorex Mobile Automation Testing: When it comes to testing mobile applications, there are plenty of tools available, but I found Ranorex to be the best option. After evaluating and comparing various tools, I was impressed with Ranorex's versatility and comprehensive coverage across multiple platforms. Its ability to support both Android and iOS devices with accuracy is particularly impressive and sets it apart from its competitors.

Standout features & integrations:

Ranorex excels with features like scriptless test creation, facilitating both novices and experts in the testing process. The platform boasts an impressive IDE for test script generation using programming languages like C# and VB.NET. Ranorex aligns with Jenkins for continuous testing and Jira for agile project management, improving the overall testing process when considering integrations.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integration capabilities with Jenkins and Jira streamline the testing workflow.
  • Intuitive IDE for generating test scripts with programming languages.
  • Comprehensive cross-platform support including iOS and Android devices.

Cons:

  • Some users might find the script generation process intricate compared to purely scriptless tools.
  • Higher-tier features come at an increased cost.
  • Steeper learning curve for beginners due to its array of features.

Best for enterprise-grade security

  • Pricing upon request

Perfecto is a cloud-based mobile application testing tool that provides an environment to test apps across various mobile devices and browsers. Geared towards large enterprises, Perfecto focuses on ensuring applications function correctly and do so with robust security measures in place, making it optimal for companies requiring enterprise-grade security in their testing processes.

Why I Picked Perfecto Mobile App Testing Tool: After careful consideration of various tools, I found Perfecto to be a top contender. Its strong focus on security during testing phase sets it apart from other platforms. Its unwavering dedication to delivering enterprise-level security makes it an ideal choice for companies that demand the highest level of security.

Standout features & integrations:

Perfecto is renowned for its real mobile device testing capabilities, ensuring genuine compatibility and performance results. The platform supports manual and automated testing, with features like performance testing and real-time debugging.

Its integrations are extensive, notably with Jenkins for continuous testing, Jira for bug tracking, and Selenium for browser automation.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Comprehensive integrations with Jenkins, Jira, and Selenium.
  • Offers testing on real mobile devices for accurate compatibility results.
  • Emphasizes robust security measures, suitable for enterprises.

Cons:

  • The focus on security might introduce additional layers of complexity during setup.
  • Can be overwhelming for beginners due to its extensive features.
  • Pricing information is not transparent and may be on the higher side for small businesses.

Best for integrated API testing

  • Pricing upon request

Micro Focus UFT is a dependable software testing solution that can handle GUI and API testing. It has expertise in API testing, making it an ideal choice for organizations looking to simplify their API testing procedures.

Why I Picked Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing: When I was determining which tool to add to this list, Micro Focus UFT stood out due to its holistic approach to software testing. I chose it not only for its impressive GUI testing capabilities but also for its integrated API testing feature. Its adeptness in the API testing domain is what makes it truly unique, hence my opinion that it is the best for integrated API testing.

Standout features & integrations:

Micro Focus UFT excels with its comprehensive testing capabilities which include both GUI and API testing under a single platform. This dual functionality allows testers to execute test cases across user interfaces and backend systems without switching tools.

Integrations wise, UFT can easily connect with other popular software testing tools and platforms such as Jenkins for continuous testing, Jira for bug tracking, and Selenium for additional browser compatibility checks.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Offers test automation framework that can be leveraged across different programming languages.
  • Robust integration capabilities with popular DevOps and testing tools.
  • Single platform for both GUI and API testing simplifies the testing process.

Cons:

  • Legacy feel in some parts of the UI might be off-putting for some users.
  • The pricing structure can be on the higher side for small to mid-sized businesses.
  • Might come with a steeper learning curve for newcomers.

Best for machine learning test maintenance

  • Pricing upon request

Testim is an automation testing platform designed to help teams create reliable end-to-end tests quickly. A significant feature that differentiates Testim from other testing platforms is its use of machine learning to streamline test maintenance.

Why I Picked Testim: I found Testim during my search for tools to add to my list. Its innovative use of machine learning in the testing process sets it apart from similar tools. This feature is particularly impressive and makes Testim the ideal choice for maintaining tests, especially in dynamic development environments.

Standout features & integrations:

Testim's core strength lies in its machine learning-driven test authoring and maintenance, which reduces the time traditionally spent on updating test scripts. Beyond that, its real-time debugging and the ability to reuse test cases across various platforms make it incredibly versatile.

The platform integrates with Jenkins for continuous testing, Jira for issue tracking, and Selenium for its renowned browser automation capabilities.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Extensive integrations with tools like Jenkins, Jira, and Selenium, improving its utility in the software development lifecycle.
  • Ability to reuse test cases improves testing efficiency.
  • Machine learning-driven approach aids in auto-correcting tests and reducing maintenance time.

Cons:

  • Pricing transparency could be improved for better decision-making for potential users.
  • Not the most suitable for teams only seeking basic testing without advanced maintenance features.
  • Might have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with machine learning concepts.

Other Mobile Testing Tools To Consider

  1. LambdaTest

    Best for scalable cloud-based infrastructure

  2. Kobiton

    Best for device cloud management

  3. Sauce Labs

    Good for continuous integration workflows

  4. testRigor

    Good for minimal code test creation

  5. Espresso

    Good for native Android UI testing

  6. Genymotion

    Good for virtual device testing

  7. Sofy

    Good for AI-powered test scenarios.

  8. Robot Framework

    Good for keyword-driven testing

  9. Selendroid

    Good for hybrid Android app testing

  10. Waldo

    Good for visual testing automation

  11. Global App Testing

    Good for crowd-based testing solutions

  12. MonkeyTalk

    Good for behavior-driven testing

  13. TestComplete Mobile

    Good for script-free test design

Selection Criteria For Choosing Mobile Testing Tools

Having delved deep into the world of mobile testing tools, I've evaluated dozens of tools. In this journey, I specifically honed in on the capabilities critical for comprehensive app testing. Here are the core criteria I found indispensable:

Core Functionality

  • Cross-Browser Testing: Ability to test apps across various browsers, ensuring compatibility and uniform functionality.
  • Simulator and Real Device Testing: The tool should allow testing both on simulators and real smartphones, as each has its unique use-cases.
  • Regression Testing: Capability to check that recent code changes haven't adversely impacted existing functionalities.
  • Security Testing: Probing apps for vulnerabilities, ensuring data protection and adherence to security standards.
  • Hybrid App Testing: Ability to test apps that run on multiple platforms, like both Apple's iOS and Windows.

Key Features

  • UI Automator: Automate the user interface tests for an app, simulating user interactions.
  • Playback: Allows recording of test scripts and playing them back to automate testing processes.
  • Cross-Platform Testing: Test on iOS and Android, covering many devices and OS versions.
  • SDK Integration: The tool should allow integration with software development kits for advanced testing capabilities.
  • Tutorials: Guidance and training materials are available to help users leverage the tool's functionalities fully.

Usability

  • Intuitive Interface: A streamlined and organized interface is crucial for a mobile testing tool. It should offer quick access to different test environments, be it simulators, real devices, or hybrid platforms.
  • Drag-and-Drop Functionality: A drag-and-drop interface can significantly simplify the process if the tool involves creating test cases or scripts.
  • Role-Based Access: Especially for team-based projects, the software should offer easy-to-configure role-based access, ensuring only relevant team members can modify or access specific tests.
  • Onboarding Program: Given the complexity of some of these tools, a dedicated onboarding or training program is essential. It should guide users through the tool's features, perhaps supplemented by a library of tutorials or a help wiki.
  • Responsive Customer Support: Prompt and helpful customer support can be a game-changer, particularly when dealing with intricate testing scenarios or unexpected tool behaviors.

Considering these criteria can guide you towards a tool that fits your needs and ensures comprehensive and efficient mobile app testing.

Most Common Questions Regarding Mobile Testing Tools (FAQs)

What are the benefits of using mobile testing tools?

Using mobile testing tools offers a variety of advantages:

  • Efficiency: Automated testing tools can execute repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention and ensuring faster test cycles.
  • Coverage: They offer cross-browser and cross-platform testing, ensuring apps function correctly across various devices, OS versions, and screen sizes.
  • Accuracy: Human error is minimized as these tools provide precise test execution, ensuring accurate results every time.
  • Cost-Effective: Over time, automated tests can be rerun at no additional costs, saving money in the long run.
  • Consistency: With these tools, tests are executed in the exact same way each time, ensuring consistency in testing.

How much do these mobile app testing tools typically cost?

The pricing of mobile app testing tools can vary widely based on their features, integrations, and the scale of testing required. Some tools offer monthly subscriptions, while others have annual plans or pricing based on the number of test executions or virtual devices used.

What are the common pricing models for these tools?

Mobile app testing tools adopt several pricing models:

  • Subscription-Based: Monthly or yearly subscription fees, often tiered based on features or usage limits.
  • Usage-Based: Pricing depends on the number of tests executed or virtual devices used.
  • Freemium: A basic version is free, with advanced features available at a cost.
  • One-Time Purchase: Pay once and own the software indefinitely, with occasional fees for updates or support.

What's the typical range of pricing for these tools?

While some basic or open-source tools can be free or under $20/month, premium tools with extensive features and integrations can range from $50 to several hundred dollars per month. Large enterprises with extensive testing needs might find themselves investing even more.

Which are the cheapest and most expensive mobile app testing software options?

While it’s hard to pinpoint without specifics, tools like Robotium or Calabash can be more affordable (or even free), given they’re open-source. On the other hand, comprehensive solutions like Micro Focus UFT can be on the higher end of the spectrum.

Are there any free mobile app testing tools available?

Yes, there are several free mobile app testing tools available. Popular options include Robotium for Android application testing, Calabash for Android and iOS apps, and Appium, an open-source tool for testing across various platforms.

Is it worth investing in a premium mobile app testing tool?

Absolutely. While free tools provide basic functionalities, premium tools often come with advanced features, integrations, dedicated support, and more. Investing in a premium tool can save time, reduce bugs, and improve the overall quality of the application.

Can I integrate these mobile app testing tools with other software in my DevOps pipeline?

Most modern mobile app testing tools offer integrations with popular DevOps and software development tools. For instance, many can be integrated with Jenkins for continuous testing, Jira for defect tracking, and platforms like GitHub for version control.

Other Mobile Testing Tools Reviews

Summary

Selecting the ideal mobile testing tools is a pivotal decision for developers and businesses. The core functionalities, including cross-browser testing, security assessments, and the ability to test on both simulators and real devices, lay the foundation for comprehensive app testing. Meanwhile, features like UI Automator, playback, and SDK integration refine and improve the testing process. Having an intuitive user interface and robust support structures is equally vital, ensuring a streamlined user experience and smooth problem resolution.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Prioritize Core Functionalities: Before getting entangled in advanced features, ensure your chosen tool satisfies essential testing needs, from regression to hybrid app testing.
  2. Invest in Usability: A tool's features are only as good as its usability. An intuitive interface, role-based access, and dedicated onboarding will save time and reduce potential frustrations.
  3. Consider Long-Term Support: Consider the software's evolutionary path beyond immediate needs. Responsive customer support, regular updates, and a repository of tutorials can prove invaluable in the long run.

What Do You Think?

Absolutely! While I've done my best to curate this list based on experience and extensive research, the tech world is vast, and there are always new and emerging tools. If you've come across a mobile testing tools that has impressed you or think there's a tool that deserves a mention, please share it with me.

Your suggestions and insights are invaluable, and together we can create a more comprehensive and helpful resource for everyone in the community.

Paulo Gardini Miguel
By Paulo Gardini Miguel

Paulo is the Director of Technology at the rapidly growing media tech company BWZ. Prior to that, he worked as a Software Engineering Manager and then Head Of Technology at Navegg, Latin America’s largest data marketplace, and as Full Stack Engineer at MapLink, which provides geolocation APIs as a service. Paulo draws insight from years of experience serving as an infrastructure architect, team leader, and product developer in rapidly scaling web environments. He’s driven to share his expertise with other technology leaders to help them build great teams, improve performance, optimize resources, and create foundations for scalability.