Os 10 Melhores Softwares de Gestão de Correções de 2026

Avaliações dos melhores softwares de gestão de patches

1. 

   1

   NinjaOne

   Best for simplified patch compliance reporting

   • Free trial available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.7/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   NinjaOne is a unified IT operations solution that includes streamlined patch management. Its patch compliance reporting is simplified and straightforward, catering to organizations that require this specific feature.

   Why I Picked NinjaOne: I chose NinjaOne because it offers an intuitive approach to patch compliance reporting. This particular aspect sets it apart, making it best for those who need simplified reporting in compliance settings.

   Standout Features & Integrations:

   NinjaOne provides automated patching, custom scripting, and real-time monitoring. The platform also includes intuitive dashboards that simplify compliance reporting.

   The tool integrates with popular RMM and PSA tools, as well as cloud storage solutions like Dropbox and Google Drive.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Low starting price point
   • Custom scripting options
   • Simplified patch compliance reporting

   Cons:

   • Dashboards can be cluttered.
   • Fewer advanced features
   • Limited support for non-Windows platforms
   Learn more about NinjaOne:

   • Check out NinjaOne on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of NinjaOne
2. 

   2

   Freshservice

   Best for AI-powered ITSM with smart patching

   • 14-day free trial
   • From $19/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.6/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Freshservice is an ITSM platform that combines service management with automated patch management capabilities. It helps you manage incidents, assets, and changes while using AI-driven workflows to streamline patch deployment and device oversight.

   Why I Picked Freshservice: I picked Freshservice because it combines AI-powered IT service management with automated patch testing and deployment in a single system. Its intelligent automation supports ticket routing and service workflows, while built-in patch management tools help you identify, test, and deploy updates across devices without relying on separate software.

   Standout Features & Integrations:

   Freshservice offers features like auto-discovery of devices, automated patch testing, and deployment. Furthermore, it has a built-in CMDB for better asset management.

   It integrates with popular ITSM tools, IT operations tools, and software like Jira and Slack.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Flexible integrations
   • Built-in CMDB for asset management
   • ITIL compliance

   Cons:

   • Limited patch-specific features.
   • Overkill for non-ITIL organizations
   • Pricier starting point
   Learn more about Freshservice:

   • Check out Freshservice on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Freshservice
3. 

   3

   Atera

   Best for multi-OS patch management

   • Free trial available
   • From $149/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.6/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Atera is a complete solution for IT professionals and managed service providers, offering tools for remote monitoring and management. It's designed to simplify your workload by automating various processes, including multi-OS patch management.

   Why I Picked Atera: I picked Atera because it automates patch installations across multiple operating systems, which can save you a lot of time. Whether you're dealing with Windows, macOS, or Linux, Atera has you covered with its automated scheduling and installation features. This ensures that your systems are always up to date without you having to manually intervene.

   Another reason Atera stands out is its ability to handle reboots and manage patch-related tasks without disrupting your work. This means you can focus on more critical tasks while knowing that your patch management is being handled efficiently. These features make it a reliable choice for keeping your systems secure.

   Standout Features & Integrations:

   Features include automated patch management that covers Windows, macOS, and Linux, There's an option for offline agent execution, so patches can be applied even when machines aren't connected to the internet. Additionally, Atera offers detailed reporting on patch statuses.

   The tool integrates with Microsoft Teams, Slack, ServiceNow, Okta, Jira Software Cloud, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Outlook, WhatsApp Notifications, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud, Google Sheets, ChatGPT (OpenAI), and monday.com.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Custom scripts and real-time dashboards offer visibility into patch workflows
   • Combines patch management, remote access, and help desk features
   • Unlimited endpoint coverage under a single technician license makes it cost-effective for MSPs

   Cons:

   • Interface can feel clunky when managing large device fleets or running bulk actions
   • Compliance and audit reporting may fall short for heavily regulated industries
   • Patch rollback options are minimal compared to enterprise-grade tools
   Learn more about Atera:

   • Check out Atera on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Atera
   • Explore best alternatives to Atera
4. 

   4

   Heimdal

   Best with real-time asset visibility

   • Free trial + free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   

   Heimdal's patch management software stands out as a versatile solution for businesses aiming to enhance their cybersecurity posture. It is particularly appealing to IT professionals and managed service providers (MSPs) who need to manage software updates seamlessly across various platforms. By automating the patch deployment process, Heimdal addresses the challenge of keeping systems secure and compliant with industry regulations, making it an ideal choice for sectors like healthcare, education, and government.

   Why I Picked Heimdal

   I picked Heimdal for its ability to automate the patch deployment process, which significantly reduces manual workload and ensures timely updates. With support for over 350 third-party applications, Heimdal provides comprehensive coverage to keep your systems secure and compliant. Its integration with Heimdal's Unified Security Platform further enhances your organization's cybersecurity strategy, making it a practical choice for those in need of effective patch management.

   Heimdal Key Features

   In addition to automated patch deployment, I also found that Heimdal offers several other valuable features:

   • Vulnerability Management: Continuously scans your systems to identify and address potential security threats.
   • Asset Management: Provides real-time visibility into your organization's IT assets, helping you track and manage them effectively.
   • Customizable Patching Schedules: Allows you to set patch deployment times that minimize disruptions to your operations.
   • Priority Server Updates: Optimizes patch distribution for bandwidth-limited environments, ensuring critical updates reach priority endpoints first.

   Heimdal Integrations

   Native integrations are not currently listed by Heimdal; however, the platform supports API-based custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Detailed asset and license visibility
   • Strong vulnerability and threat detection
   • Automates patching across endpoints

   Cons:

   • Interface requires onboarding time
   • No native integrations available
   Learn more about Heimdal:

   • Check out Heimdal on their website
5. 

   5

   Rippling IT

   Best for HR-driven patch policy enforcement

   • 14-day free trial
   • From $8/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.7/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Rippling IT is a unified IT platform that combines MDM, identity and access management, OS patch enforcement for Mac and Windows, device inventory, helpdesk, and automated compliance in a single console.

   Who Is Rippling IT Best For?

   Rippling IT suits lean IT teams at small-to-mid-sized companies that want device policy enforcement tied directly to HR events like hiring, role changes, and offboarding.

   Why I Picked Rippling IT

   I've included Rippling IT in my top picks because its OS patch enforcement is wired directly into HR events: when someone changes roles or gets offboarded, device policies update automatically without me touching a thing. I particularly like how Apple OS updates are pushed through Declarative Device Management (DDM), using Apple's GDMF feed as the source of truth for consistent, real-time enforcement across macOS fleets. The compliance reporting also holds up well, with automated SOC 2 and NIST evidence collection built in.

   Rippling IT Key Features

   • Role-based policy enforcement: Security and OS update policies are assigned by employee attributes like department, role, and location, and update automatically when those attributes change.
   • Zero-touch device enrollment: Devices are pre-staged through Apple Business Manager and Windows Autopilot, so remote employees receive ready-to-use hardware without IT manual setup.
   • No-code compliance reporting: A report builder generates real-time dashboards combining device and employee data, mapped to SOC 2 and NIST frameworks for audit evidence collection.
   • Custom script deployment: Bash and PowerShell scripts are supported for deploying custom or private apps outside of Rippling's standard software catalog.

   Rippling IT Integrations

   Rippling IT offers integrations with SentinelOne, Drata, Vanta, Apple Business Manager, Windows Autopilot, Okta, and Microsoft Entra ID. It also connects with HR systems including ADP, BambooHR, Gusto, UKG, Paycom, Paylocity, and Workday.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Audit dashboards map device posture to frameworks
   • Mac and Windows updates enforce remotely
   • HR events automate patch policy changes

   Cons:

   • CVE prioritization and rollback remain undocumented
   • No Linux or server patch support
   Learn more about Rippling IT:

   • Check out Rippling IT on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Rippling IT
   • Explore best alternatives to Rippling IT
6. 

   6

   SecPod (Saner Platform)

   Best with unified risk detection and patching

   • 30-day free trial + free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.5/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   SecPod's Saner Platform is a cloud-native patch management and vulnerability exposure solution that combines continuous risk detection, automated patch deployment, and compliance reporting across Windows, macOS, Linux, and 550+ third-party applications.

   Who Is SecPod (Saner Platform) Best For?

   Security and IT operations teams at mid-to-large enterprises that need vulnerability detection and patch remediation managed from a single platform.

   Why I Picked SecPod (Saner Platform)

   SecPod (Saner Platform) earns its spot as one of the best on my shortlist because it collapses two typically separate workflows, vulnerability detection and patch deployment, into one agent-driven platform. I particularly like how it layers SSVC business-context scoring, EPSS exploit probability, and CISA KEV data together to surface which patches actually need urgent action. The single-click rollback is genuinely useful when a patch causes issues in a production environment and you need to restore a stable state fast.

   SecPod (Saner Platform) Key Features

   • Automated multi-OS patching: Continuously applies patches across Windows, macOS, Linux, and 550+ third-party apps from a single console.
   • Custom patch packaging: Lets admins deploy organization-specific or in-house developed patches alongside vendor updates.
   • Compliance reporting: Generates exportable, audit-ready reports mapped to regulatory frameworks like HIPAA, PCI, and SOC 2.
   • Cloud-native agent architecture: Enables patching and vulnerability management for distributed and remote endpoints without relying on VPNs.

   SecPod (Saner Platform) Integrations

   Native integrations are not clearly documented. An API is available for custom integrations.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Supports 550+ third-party application patches
   • Risk-based patch prioritization using real threat data
   • Unified vulnerability detection and patch remediation

   Cons:

   • Limited third-party integration options available
   • Reporting interface can feel overwhelming initially
   Learn more about SecPod (Saner Platform):

   • Check out SecPod (Saner Platform) on their website
7. 

   7

   Atera

   Best for IT consultants and service providers

   • 30-day free trial available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:5/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Atera is designed as an all-in-one IT management solution aimed at IT consultants and service providers. Its flexible pricing and customization make it especially useful for this target group.

   Why I Picked Atera: I chose Atera because of its tailored approach for IT consultants and service providers. In terms of unique offerings, its customizability and flexible pricing models make it distinct. It's best for IT consultants and service providers who require a flexible, customizable tool.

   Standout Features & Integrations:

   Atera offers remote monitoring, patch management, and an integrated help desk. Its automated scripts are particularly useful for IT service providers.

   The tool has native integrations with popular PSAs and RMM solutions, as well as Windows operating systems.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • A high degree of customizability
   • Offers integrated help desk and RMM
   • Tailored for IT consultants and service providers

   Cons:

   • Higher starting price point.
   • Might be too specialized for general business use
   • Billed annually, not monthly
   Learn more about Atera:

   • Check out Atera on their website
8. 

   8

   Action1

   Best for remote workforce patch management

   • Free plan + free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.9/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Action1 is a cloud-based patch management solution designed to assist businesses in automating the deployment of software patches to remote workforces. This is particularly beneficial for companies with many remote employees who require consistent patching, making it best for remote workforce patch management.

   Why I Picked Action1: I selected Action1 for this compilation because of its cloud-based architecture that effectively allows businesses to manage patches across remote workforces. It stands out for its ability to maintain the security and performance of distributed endpoints.

   Thus, it cuts the best tool for companies needing remote workforce patch management.

   Standout Features & Integrations:

   The most vital features of Action1 include automated patch assessments, real-time reporting, and multi-platform support, offering businesses greater flexibility in managing patches across various operating systems. It also integrates with commonly used systems like Active Directory and SCCM, making it more adaptable for businesses with existing infrastructure.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Multi-platform support covers a broad range of operating systems.
   • Real-time reporting gives immediate insights into patch compliance.
   • Cloud-based architecture is ideal for managing remote workforces.

   Cons:

   • Limited features compared to some other enterprise-level solutions.
   • Could be a learning curve for teams new to patch management.
   • Minimum seat requirements may not suit smaller organizations.
   Learn more about Action1:

   • Check out Action1 on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Action1
9. 

   9

   Automox

   Best for cloud-native environments

   • 15-day free trial + free demo available
   • From $1/endpoint/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.7/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Automox automates patch management in the cloud, from discovery to deployment. It's flexible and scalable, perfect for securing remote endpoints.

   Why I Picked Automox: I chose Automox for this list because of its comprehensive, cloud-native approach to patch management. In a world where remote work is becoming increasingly common, having a tool that is designed from the ground up to handle cloud-based operations is incredibly valuable.

   Automox stands out because it manages and secures remote endpoints, making it best for organizations operating in cloud-native environments.

   Standout Features & Integrations:

   Automox provides features like automatic system discovery, continuous vulnerability assessment, and policy-based automation. These features make it easier to manage patches and reduce the security risks associated with outdated software.

   Additionally, Automox integrates with popular third-party tools such as Slack, Jira, and Webhooks, allowing for better communication and coordination across your organization.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Integrates with popular third-party tools for better communication and coordination.
   • Policy-based automation to streamline patch management tasks.
   • Cloud-native platform, designed for modern, distributed organizations.

   Cons:

   • Requires some technical knowledge for setup and configuration.
   • Pricing is on an annual basis, which might not be ideal for some businesses.
   • Might be less suitable for organizations not fully operating in the cloud.
   Learn more about Automox:

   • Check out Automox on their website
   • Read my in-depth review of Automox
   • Explore best alternatives to Automox
10. 

    10

    PDQ Connect

    Best with automated CVE remediation

    • Free trial + demo available
    • From $12/device/year

    Visit Website

    Customer Rating:4.6/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

    

    PDQ Connect is a cloud-based patch management platform for Windows devices that offers automated patch deployment, remote device inventory, custom package creation, and role-based access controls.

    Who Is PDQ Connect Best For?

    IT teams in small to midsize organizations managing Windows devices across distributed or remote environments.

    Why I Picked PDQ Connect

    I picked PDQ Connect as one of the best because it automates CVE remediation, letting my team quickly address vulnerabilities as soon as they’re identified. I like that it pulls in CVE data, matches it to our Windows devices, and pushes patches without manual intervention. This approach means we can stay ahead of threats and reduce the window of exposure across our environment.

    PDQ Connect Key Features

    • Remote device inventory: View and manage all Windows devices in your environment from a single dashboard.
    • Custom package deployment: Build and deploy custom software packages to targeted devices.
    • Role-based access control: Assign permissions and roles to team members for secure management.
    • Real-time reporting: Generate up-to-date reports on patch status and device compliance.

    PDQ Connect Integrations

    Native integrations are not clearly documented. PDQ Connect provides an API for custom integrations.

    Pros and Cons

    Pros:

    • Detailed compliance and audit reporting
    • Automated patch scheduling for Windows devices
    • Real-time device inventory and status updates

    Cons:

    • Reporting customization options are limited
    • Lacks built-in vulnerability scanning features
    Learn more about PDQ Connect:

    • Check out PDQ Connect on their website
    • Read my in-depth review of PDQ Connect