Skip to main content

The best Automox alternatives deliver cloud-native endpoint management with reliable patch automation, broad OS support, and strong security controls. If you’re searching for Automox alternatives, you likely need a platform that can handle complex, distributed environments without adding overhead or risk. 

With threats evolving and IT teams stretched thin, choosing the right solution is essential for maintaining uptime, compliance, and control. This list will help you compare leading options so you can find a tool that fits your organization’s needs and keeps your endpoints secure.

What is Automox?

Automox is a cloud-native endpoint management platform designed to automate patching, configuration, and security updates across multiple operating systems. IT teams use Automox to manage and secure endpoints from a single dashboard, regardless of location. The platform supports Windows, macOS, and Linux devices, helping organizations reduce vulnerabilities and maintain compliance. Automox is valued for its scalability, secure remote access, and ability to simplify routine endpoint maintenance tasks.

Best Automox Alternatives Summary

This comparison chart summarizes pricing details for my top Automox alternative selections to help you find the best one for your budget and business needs.

Why Trust Our Software Reviews

Best Automox Alternatives Reviews

Below are my detailed summaries of the best Automox alternatives that made it onto my shortlist. My reviews offer a detailed look at the features, capabilities, and best use cases of each platform to help you find the best one for you.

Best for cross-platform device and identity management

  • 30-day free trial + free demo available
  • From $9/user/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.6/5

JumpCloud offers a unified platform for managing devices and user identities across Windows, macOS, and Linux environments. It’s a strong choice for IT teams that need to enforce security policies and control access from a single cloud-based console. If you’re looking to simplify cross-platform endpoint and identity management, JumpCloud addresses both needs in one solution.

Who Is JumpCloud Best For?

JumpCloud is a good fit for IT teams in midsize businesses that need to manage devices and user identities across multiple operating systems from a single cloud-based platform.

Why JumpCloud Is a Good Automox Alternative

I picked JumpCloud because it combines device management and identity management in a single cloud-native platform, which is something Automox doesn’t natively provide. With JumpCloud, you can manage Windows, macOS, and Linux devices alongside user access controls from one dashboard. I also appreciate its directory services, which let you enforce security policies and manage authentication without relying on separate tools. For IT teams that want unified control over both endpoints and user identities, JumpCloud offers a practical alternative to Automox.

JumpCloud Key Features

Some other features that make JumpCloud a strong option for cloud-native endpoint management include:

  • Zero Trust security policies: Enforce device and user authentication requirements based on real-time risk assessments.
  • Patch management automation: Schedule and deploy OS and application updates across all managed devices.
  • Remote command execution: Run scripts and commands on endpoints without requiring a VPN connection.
  • Reporting and auditing: Generate detailed logs and reports on device status, user activity, and policy compliance.

JumpCloud Integrations

Integrations include Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Okta, Salesforce, Slack, Dropbox, Atlassian, Zendesk, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Enforces Zero Trust security policies natively
  • Provides built-in directory and SSO features
  • Manages devices and identities in one platform

Cons:

  • Mobile device management features are basic
  • Fewer third-party integrations

Best for remote patching on distributed endpoints

  • Free plan available
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.9/5

Action1 is a SaaS patch management platform designed for IT teams managing distributed or remote endpoints. It’s especially useful for organizations that need to maintain security and compliance across devices outside traditional office networks. If you’re looking for a solution that simplifies remote patching without requiring on-premises infrastructure, Action1 is worth considering.

Who Is Action1 Best For?

Action1 is a strong fit for IT teams in mid-sized businesses and MSPs that need to manage patching for remote or distributed endpoints across multiple locations.

Why Action1 Is a Good Automox Alternative

What sets Action1 apart as an Automox alternative is its focus on remote patching for distributed endpoints. I picked it because it allows IT teams to deploy and manage patches across devices that aren’t connected to a corporate network, which is essential for supporting remote and hybrid workforces. The platform’s cloud-native design means you don’t need on-premises servers or VPNs to keep endpoints secure and compliant. If you’re managing endpoints in multiple locations or for clients with remote staff, Action1’s remote patching capabilities make it a strong choice.

Action1 Key Features

Some other features that stand out for IT teams considering Action1 include:

  • Automated Patch Approval Policies: Set rules to automatically approve or reject patches based on severity, vendor, or product.
  • Real-Time Endpoint Inventory: View up-to-date hardware and software details for every managed device in your environment.
  • Role-Based Access Controls: Assign granular permissions to users and groups to control who can manage, deploy, or view patches.
  • Detailed Audit Logs: Track all patching actions and changes for compliance and security auditing.

Action1 Integrations

Integrations include Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Duo, Microsoft Intune, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Automated patch approval workflows
  • Real-time patch compliance reporting
  • Free for up to 200 endpoints

Cons:

  • Reporting exports lack advanced customization
  • Patch deployment speed can lag at times

Best for multi-OS patch automation across networks

  • 30-day free trial
  • From $245/month (billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is designed for teams providing IT services that need centralized patch management across diverse operating systems. It stands out for organizations managing both on-premises and remote endpoints in mixed-OS environments. If you’re looking for granular control and automation beyond what most cloud-native platforms offer, this tool is worth considering.

Who Is ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Best For?

IT administrators in mid-sized to large organizations managing mixed Windows, macOS, and Linux environments across multiple locations will find this platform especially useful.

Why ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Is a Good Automox Alternative

For teams that need to automate patching across Windows, macOS, and Linux networks, Patch Manager Plus offers strong multi-OS support. I picked it because it lets you schedule, test, and deploy patches to endpoints both inside and outside your corporate network. The platform’s automated patch scanning module and deployment workflows help reduce manual effort and missed updates. Its ability to handle remote and distributed devices makes it a practical choice for organizations with complex, hybrid environments.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Key Features

Some other features worth noting for teams considering Patch Manager Plus include:

  • Third-Party Patching: Patch a wide range of third-party applications alongside operating systems from the same dashboard.
  • Automated Patch Testing: Test patches in a controlled environment before deployment to minimize disruption and compatibility issues.
  • Custom Deployment Policies: Create and enforce custom patch policies based on department, location, or device group.
  • Detailed Compliance Reporting: Generate reports on patch status, compliance levels, and audit trails for regulatory needs.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Integrations

Integrations include Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7, CrowdStrike Falcon Spotlight, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Offers granular scheduling and deployment policies
  • Includes third-party application patch management
  • Supports patching for Windows, macOS, and Linux

Cons:

  • Remote patching setup can be complex
  • Lacks real-time patch status dashboards

Best for large-scale patching in complex enterprises

  • Free trial available
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

HCL BigFix is an endpoint management and patching platform built for organizations with complex, distributed IT environments. It’s a strong choice for enterprises that need to manage thousands of endpoints across multiple operating systems and locations. If you’re looking for a solution that can handle large-scale patching and compliance across diverse device fleets, BigFix offers capabilities that go beyond many cloud-native competitors.

Who Is HCL BigFix Best For?

HCL BigFix is a good fit for large enterprises and public sector organizations that need to manage and secure endpoints across complex, multi-platform environments.

Why HCL BigFix Is a Good Automox Alternative

For organizations facing the challenge of patching thousands of endpoints across complex, distributed environments, HCL BigFix stands out. I picked it because it supports patch management for Windows, macOS, Linux, and UNIX, all from a single console, which is rare among cloud-native competitors. BigFix’s real-time visibility and automated remediation help IT teams keep large, diverse device fleets secure and compliant. Its ability to scale across global networks makes it a valuable IT management solution for enterprises with demanding compliance needs.

HCL BigFix Key Features

Some other features that make HCL BigFix a strong option for enterprise endpoint management include:

  • Custom Policy Enforcement: Create and enforce custom security and configuration policies across all managed endpoints.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Assign granular permissions to different IT roles for secure delegation and oversight.
  • Automated Software Distribution: Deploy and update software packages to endpoints automatically based on defined schedules or triggers.
  • Integrated Compliance Reporting: Generate detailed compliance reports to support audits and regulatory requirements directly from the platform.

HCL BigFix Integrations

Integrations include HCL AppScan, HCL iControl, HCL Connections, HCL Domino, HCL Notes, HCL SafeLinx, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Scales to manage hundreds of thousands of endpoints
  • Custom policy enforcement for compliance needs
  • Real-time endpoint visibility and reporting

Cons:

  • Limited cloud-native features
  • Complex setup for multi-site deployments

Best for integration with Microsoft 365 environments

  • 30-day free trial available
  • From $4/user/month (billed annually)

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based endpoint management platform built for organizations that rely on Microsoft 365 and Azure. It’s a strong fit for IT teams needing MDM capabilities for Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android devices in environments where Microsoft integration is a priority. If you need an all-in-one approach to unified policy enforcement across a Microsoft-centric ecosystem, Intune addresses those needs directly.

Who Is Microsoft Intune Best For?

IT teams in mid-sized to large organizations that standardize on Microsoft 365 and Azure for productivity and security management will get the most value from Intune.

Why Microsoft Intune Is a Good Automox Alternative

I picked Microsoft Intune because it offers deep, native integration with Microsoft 365 environments, which is a priority for many organizations already invested in Microsoft’s ecosystem. Intune lets you manage device compliance, application deployment, and security policies directly alongside your Microsoft 365 and Azure resources. This tight integration centralizes identity management and conditional access, making it easier to enforce security standards across all endpoints. For teams that want unified endpoint management without leaving the Microsoft stack, Intune is the best alternative to Automox.

Microsoft Intune Key Features

Some other features that stand out for IT teams considering Microsoft Intune include:

  • Remote Device Wipe: Remotely erase data from lost or compromised devices to protect sensitive information.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Assign granular permissions to IT staff based on job function or responsibility.
  • Mobile Application Management: Manage and secure corporate apps on both managed and unmanaged devices.
  • Automated OS Updates: Schedule and enforce operating system updates across all enrolled endpoints.

Microsoft Intune Integrations

Integrations include Microsoft 365, Microsoft Entra ID, OneDrive, SharePoint, Exchange, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Automated device enrollment for Azure AD
  • Built-in conditional access and compliance policies
  • Deep integration with Microsoft 365 services

Cons:

  • Reporting features lack customization options
  • Limited patch management for third-party apps

Best for centralized patching in Windows environments

  • 30-day free trial
  • Pricing upon request

SolarWinds Patch Manager is designed for IT professionals who need to manage patching across large Windows environments. It appeals to organizations that rely on Microsoft technologies and want granular control over patch deployment and compliance. If you’re looking for a patch management solution that integrates with Windows Server Update Services and Microsoft System Center, this tool addresses those needs directly.

Who Is SolarWinds Patch Manager Best For?

SolarWinds Patch Manager is a strong choice for IT administrators in midsize to large organizations that manage primarily Windows-based IT infrastructure.

Why SolarWinds Patch Manager Is a Good Automox Alternative

For organizations that need centralized patching in Windows environments, SolarWinds Patch Manager stands out as a focused solution. I picked it because it integrates directly with Windows Server Update Services and Microsoft System Center, giving you granular control over patch deployment and scheduling. The tool also provides detailed patch compliance reporting, which helps IT teams meet audit and regulatory requirements. If your environment is heavily invested in Microsoft technologies, SolarWinds Patch Manager offers targeted features that Automox doesn’t natively provide.

SolarWinds Patch Manager Key Features

Some other features that make SolarWinds Patch Manager useful for IT management include:

  • Third-party application patching: Patch a wide range of non-Microsoft applications alongside Windows updates.
  • Automated patch approval workflows: Set rules for automatic approval or rejection of specific patches.
  • Customizable alerting: Receive notifications for patch failures, pending updates, or compliance issues.
  • Role-based access control: Assign granular permissions to different users or teams within the platform.

SolarWinds Patch Manager Integrations

Integrations include Microsoft WSUS, Microsoft SCCM, SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Provides automated patch approval workflows
  • Enables patching of offline and virtual machines
  • Integrates natively with WSUS and SCCM

Cons:

  • No cloud-native agent for remote endpoints
  • Limited support for non-Windows operating systems

Best for customizable software deployment workflows

  • 14-day free trial
  • Pricing upon request

PDQ Deploy is a deployment automation tool designed for IT professionals who need granular control over software distribution. It’s especially useful for organizations with complex or custom deployment requirements across Windows environments. If you’re looking for a solution that supports advanced scripting and flexible deployment schedules, PDQ Deploy offers capabilities that go beyond many cloud-native endpoint management platforms.

Who Is PDQ Deploy Best For?

PDQ Deploy is a strong patching solution for IT administrators in mid-sized organizations that need to automate and customize software deployments across Windows devices.

Why PDQ Deploy Is a Good Automox Alternative

What makes PDQ Deploy a strong Automox alternative is its focus on customizable software deployment workflows. I picked it because it lets you build detailed deployment packages using scripts, variables, and multi-step processes, which is ideal for organizations with unique or complex requirements. You can schedule deployments, set up triggers, and control update rollouts with a high degree of precision. For IT teams that need more than basic patching and want to tailor deployments to their environment, PDQ Deploy offers flexibility that many cloud-native endpoint management platforms don’t match.

PDQ Deploy Key Features

Some other features that set PDQ Deploy apart for IT teams managing endpoints:

  • Centralized Deployment Console: Manage all deployment tasks and monitor progress from a single dashboard.
  • Pre-Built Software Library: Access a catalog of ready-to-deploy application packages for common software.
  • Deployment History Tracking: Review detailed logs of past deployments for auditing and troubleshooting.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Assign permissions to users or groups to control who can create, schedule, or approve deployments.

PDQ Deploy Integrations

Integrations include PDQ Inventory, PowerShell, MSI installers, Windows Task Scheduler, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Large library of pre-built software packages
  • Extensive scripting support for custom tasks
  • Highly granular control over deployment steps

Cons:

  • No built-in patch management for OS updates
  • Windows-only, no macOS or Linux support

Best for integrated patch and asset management

  • 30-day free trial
  • Pricing upon request

baramundi Patch Management offers a unified approach to patching and asset management for IT teams managing diverse device fleets. It’s a strong fit for organizations that want to centralize software updates and hardware inventory in one platform. If you need detailed oversight of both patch status and asset data, baramundi helps you keep systems secure and up to date.

Who Is baramundi Patch Management Best For?

baramundi Patch Management is a good fit for midsize to large organizations that need centralized control over both patching and IT asset management.

Why baramundi Patch Management Is a Good Automox Alternative

I chose baramundi Patch Management because it combines patch management and asset management in a single platform, which is something many cloud-native solutions don’t offer natively. This integration lets you track hardware and software inventory alongside patch status, so you always know which devices need attention and what’s installed where. I also like that baramundi supports automated patch deployment for a wide range of third-party applications, not just operating systems. For IT teams that want a unified view of both assets and patch compliance, baramundi stands out as a practical alternative to Automox.

baramundi Patch Management Key Features

Some other features that make baramundi Patch Management a strong option for endpoint management include:

  • Role-based access control: Assign granular permissions to different IT roles for secure delegation and oversight.
  • Remote device management: Manage and update endpoints outside the corporate network without requiring a VPN.
  • Integrated vulnerability scanning: Identify and prioritize vulnerabilities across all managed devices.
  • Reporting dashboard: Visualize patch status, compliance, and asset data in real time.

baramundi Patch Management Integrations

Integrations are not publicly listed.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Includes integrated vulnerability scanning tools
  • Offers remote patching without a VPN required
  • Combines patch management with asset inventory

Cons:

  • Initial setup can be complex for large sites
  • Limited documentation for advanced configurations

Best for granular patching of Windows servers

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing upon request

Ivanti Security Controls is designed for IT teams that need advanced control over patch management and endpoint security. It appeals to organizations with complex Windows server environments and strict compliance requirements. If you’re looking for a solution that goes beyond basic patching and offers detailed visibility into vulnerabilities, Ivanti Security Controls is worth considering.

Who Is Ivanti Security Controls Best For?

Ivanti Security Controls is a strong fit for IT administrators in mid-sized to large enterprises that manage complex Windows server infrastructures.

Why Ivanti Security Controls Is a Good Automox Alternative

When you need precise control over patching for Windows servers, Ivanti Security Controls stands out among Automox alternatives. I picked it because it lets you target patches at the OS, third-party apps, and even virtual machines with detailed scheduling and approval workflows. The platform also offers agentless and agent-based scanning to improve your patch management process without extra overhead. For IT teams that require granular patch deployment and visibility into patch status across complex infrastructures, Ivanti Security Controls delivers capabilities that go beyond basic endpoint management.

Ivanti Security Controls Key Features

Some other features worth noting for IT teams considering Ivanti Security Controls include:

  • Patch Content Repository: Access a regularly updated library of patches for Microsoft and third-party applications.
  • Role-Based Access Control: Assign granular permissions to different IT staff based on their responsibilities.
  • Vulnerability Assessment: Scan endpoints to identify missing patches and security vulnerabilities before deployment.
  • PowerShell Automation: Use built-in PowerShell scripts to automate repetitive patch management and security tasks.

Ivanti Security Controls Integrations

Integrations include Microsoft SCCM, VMware, Red Hat Satellite, ServiceNow, Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7, Splunk, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Includes built-in vulnerability assessment tools
  • Offers granular patch targeting for Windows servers
  • Supports agentless and agent-based patching workflows

Cons:

  • Interface can feel dated and non-intuitive
  • Limited support for macOS and Linux endpoints

Best for real-time visibility and control of endpoints

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing upon request

Tanium Patch offers a unified endpoint management and security platform designed for organizations that need granular control and instant insight across their device fleet. It’s a strong fit for IT teams in large enterprises or regulated industries that require real-time data and rapid response to threats or compliance gaps. If you’re looking for a solution that combines endpoint visibility with actionable controls for your IT operations, Tanium addresses challenges that many cloud-native competitors don’t.

Who Is Tanium Patch Best For?

Tanium is a good fit for large enterprises and government organizations that need real-time endpoint visibility and control across complex, distributed environments.

Why Tanium Patch Is a Good Automox Alternative

I picked Tanium Patch because it delivers real-time visibility and control over endpoints, which is essential for organizations managing large, distributed device fleets. Its platform lets you instantly query endpoints, deploy patches, and enforce policies across thousands of devices without waiting for scheduled scans. I also appreciate how Tanium’s architecture enables IT teams to detect and remediate threats as they emerge, rather than relying on delayed reporting. For buyers who need immediate insight and action across their environment, Tanium offers a level of responsiveness that many cloud-native competitors can’t match.

Tanium Patch Key Features

Some other features that make Tanium Patch a strong option for endpoint management include:

  • Role-based access controls: Assign granular permissions to different IT roles for secure delegation and oversight.
  • Automated software deployment: Schedule and push software updates or new applications to endpoints from a central console.
  • Integrated vulnerability assessment: Continuously scan endpoints for known vulnerabilities and missing patches.
  • Audit logging: Track all administrative actions and endpoint changes for compliance and forensic analysis.

Tanium Patch Integrations

Integrations include ServiceNow, ScreenMeet, Splunk, IBM QRadar, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Automated remediation for detected vulnerabilities
  • Custom policy enforcement for compliance needs
  • Real-time endpoint data and patch status

Cons:

  • Reporting customization can be restrictive
  • Limited cloud-native deployment options

Other Automox Alternatives

Here are some additional Automox alternatives that didn’t make it onto my shortlist, but are still worth checking out:

  1. Workspace ONE UEM

    For unified management of diverse device types

  2. NinjaOne

    For rapid deployment in MSP and IT teams

  3. Pulseway

    For mobile-first patch management control

  4. Scalefusion

    For patching Windows devices in remote teams

  5. Tenable

    For integrating patching with vulnerability scanning

  6. ConnectWise Automate

    For scripting and automation flexibility

  7. Heimdal

    For automated vulnerability remediation workflows

  8. SecOps Solution

    For compliance-driven patch management

  9. ThreatLocker

    For application whitelisting with patching

  10. N‑central® RMM

    For MSP-focused patch management

  11. SysAid Patch Management

    For ITSM-integrated patch management

  12. Vicarius vRx

    For risk-based patch prioritization

Automox Alternatives Selection Criteria

When selecting the best Automox alternatives to include in this list, I considered common buyer needs and pain points related to cloud-native endpoint management platform products, like managing patching across diverse device fleets and ensuring real-time visibility into endpoint compliance. I also used the following framework to keep my evaluation structured and fair:

Core Functionality (25% of total score)
To be considered for inclusion in this list, each solution had to fulfill these common use cases:

  • Deploy patches and updates to endpoints
  • Monitor endpoint compliance status
  • Automate patch scheduling and approvals
  • Support remote device management
  • Generate audit and compliance reports

Additional Standout Features (25% of total score)
To help further narrow down the competition, I also looked for unique features, such as:

  • Risk-based patch prioritization
  • Integration with vulnerability management tools
  • Support for third-party application patching
  • Role-based access controls
  • Automated remediation workflows

Usability (10% of total score)
To get a sense of the usability of each system, I considered the following:

  • Intuitive dashboard and navigation
  • Clear status indicators and alerts
  • Customizable views and filters
  • Minimal clicks to complete common tasks
  • Modern and user-friendly interface

Onboarding (10% of total score)
To evaluate the onboarding experience for each platform, I considered the following:

  • Availability of step-by-step setup guides
  • Access to training videos and webinars
  • Interactive product tours or demos
  • Pre-built templates for common policies
  • Responsive onboarding support or chatbots

Customer Support (10% of total score)
To assess each software provider’s customer support services, I considered the following:

  • 24/7 support availability
  • Multiple support channels like chat, phone, and email
  • Access to a searchable knowledge base
  • Fast response times to inquiries
  • Community forums or user groups

Value For Money (10% of total score)
To evaluate the value for money of each platform, I considered the following:

  • Transparent and predictable pricing
  • Flexible plans for different business sizes
  • No hidden fees or surprise charges
  • Features included at each pricing tier
  • Free trial or demo availability

Customer Reviews (10% of total score)
To get a sense of overall customer satisfaction, I considered the following when reading customer reviews:

  • Consistency of positive feedback across sources
  • Reports of reliable patch deployment
  • Comments on ease of integration
  • Feedback on support responsiveness
  • Noted limitations or frustrations with the tool

Why Look For an Automox Alternative?

While Automox is a good choice of cloud-native endpoint management platform, there are a number of reasons why some users seek out alternative solutions. You might be looking for an Automox alternative because…

  • Needing support for legacy or non-Windows operating systems
  • Wanting more granular patch scheduling options
  • Requiring on-premises deployment instead of cloud-only
  • Seeking deeper integration with Microsoft tools
  • Looking for more advanced compliance reporting
  • Needing a solution available in restricted regions

If any of these sound like you, you’ve come to the right place. My list contains several cloud-native endpoint management platform options that are better suited for teams facing these challenges with Automox and looking for alternative solutions.

Features

Here are some of the key features of Automox, to help you contrast and compare what alternative solutions offer:

  • Cross-platform patch management: Automox lets you deploy patches to Windows, macOS, and Linux devices from a single cloud-based console, making it easier to manage diverse device fleets.
  • Automated policy enforcement: Set up custom policies to automate patch deployment, software updates, and configuration changes across all endpoints, reducing manual intervention.
  • Real-time device visibility: Monitor the status of every managed endpoint in real time, including patch compliance, update history, and device health metrics.
  • Remote device management: Manage and update endpoints regardless of their location, supporting remote and hybrid workforces without requiring VPN access.
  • Third-party application patching: Patch a wide range of non-OS applications, such as browsers and productivity tools, to reduce vulnerabilities beyond just operating systems.
  • Custom scripting support: Use PowerShell, Bash, or Shell scripts to automate complex tasks, remediate issues, or enforce configurations across endpoints.
  • Role-based access control: Assign granular permissions to users and groups, ensuring only authorized personnel can perform sensitive actions or access critical data.
  • API access: Integrate Automox with other IT and security tools using its RESTful API, enabling workflow automation and data sharing across platforms.
  • Detailed compliance reporting: Generate reports on patch status, policy compliance, and remediation actions to support audits and regulatory requirements.
  • Cloud-native architecture: Manage endpoints without on-premises infrastructure, leveraging a scalable and secure cloud platform for centralized control.
Paulo Gardini Miguel
By Paulo Gardini Miguel

Paulo is the Director of Technology at the rapidly growing media tech company BWZ. Prior to that, he worked as a Software Engineering Manager and then Head Of Technology at Navegg, Latin America’s largest data marketplace, and as Full Stack Engineer at MapLink, which provides geolocation APIs as a service. Paulo draws insight from years of experience serving as an infrastructure architect, team leader, and product developer in rapidly scaling web environments. He’s driven to share his expertise with other technology leaders to help them build great teams, improve performance, optimize resources, and create foundations for scalability.