Skip to main content

Keeping your systems safe is an ongoing challenge. Intrusion detection software acts as an early warning system—monitoring your network, spotting unusual activity, and alerting your team before threats spread.

This guide shares expert-curated insights to help you choose the right tool for your organization, based on security features, usability, and reliability.

Best Intrusion Detection Software Summary

Best Intrusion Detection Software Reviews

Best for user and entity behavior analytics

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.2/5

ManageEngine Log360 is a comprehensive security information and event management (SIEM) solution designed to enhance organizational security by integrating essential capabilities such as User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA), Data Loss Prevention (DLP), and Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB).

Why I Picked ManageEngine Log360: Log360 aggregates data from various sources, including Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), firewalls, and Active Directory, to provide immediate alerts on potential intrusions. The platform also leverages advanced analytics and machine learning to detect anomalous behavior, which is essential for identifying insider threats and sophisticated cyber-attacks that traditional methods might miss. The UEBA feature also uses machine learning to identify unusual patterns and behaviors, providing deeper insights into potential security threats.

Standout features & integrations:

The platform's integrated compliance management ensures that organizations meet regulatory requirements, providing real-time notifications of compliance violations. It also offers automated incident response workflows to simplify the process of addressing security incidents. Integrations include Microsoft Exchange, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Azure, and Active Directory.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Provides real-time monitoring and alerting
  • Effective for auditing all IT levels in an organization
  • Excellent visibility across systems

Cons:

  • Potential performance issues with large data volumes
  • Initial setup can be complex

Best for centralized event management

  • 30-day free trial
  • From $2,877/year
Visit Website
Rating: 4.3/5

SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM) is designed to simplify the process of identifying and responding to security threats, failed audits, and operational issues. The tool stands out for its ability to centralize and interpret high volumes of log data from multiple sources.

Why I Picked SolarWinds Security Event Manager: During my evaluation, SolarWinds SEM's approach to centralizing events caught my attention. In my judgment, and after comparing it with several other platforms, I determined that it offers a differentiated and efficient solution for organizations that grapple with data sprawl. Its prowess in centralized event management makes it an invaluable tool for many security professionals.

Standout features & integrations:

The core strength of SolarWinds SEM lies in its log correlation technology, which quickly pinpoints potential issues by analyzing patterns. Additionally, its integrations with other SolarWinds products allow organizations to have a broader, more holistic view of their IT environments.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Supports numerous device and application logs
  • Streamlined event visualization tools
  • Efficient log correlation capabilities

Cons:

  • Some users report performance lags with high data volumes
  • Reporting capabilities may need enhancements
  • The learning curve for new users

Best for real-time incident response

  • Pricing upon request

RSA NetWitness stands out for its prowess in facilitating prompt reactions to security breaches. Its design focuses on accelerating the response time from the moment an incident is detected, aligning it well with real-time incident management demands.

Why I Picked RSA NetWitness: The need for rapid incident response led me to evaluate several solutions, and RSA NetWitness presented a superior capability in this regard. Its emphasis on real-time monitoring and swift response mechanisms was a determining factor in my selection. For teams that prioritize instantaneous action upon breach detection, RSA NetWitness appears to be the prime choice.

Standout features & integrations:

At the heart of RSA NetWitness lies its real-time analytics engine, geared towards immediate incident insights. Moreover, its integration capabilities encompass a vast array of third-party tools, enhancing its situational awareness and response speed.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface for streamlined incident management
  • Broad integration capabilities with third-party tools
  • Focused real-time analytics for swift incident insights

Cons:

  • Network traffic-heavy operations might demand robust hardware configurations.
  • Advanced features require dedicated training sessions
  • Pricing might be on the higher side for smaller entities

Best for network traffic analysis

  • From $9/user/month (billed annually)

Zeek, formerly known as Bro, has established itself as a heavyweight in the realm of network security monitoring. It delves deep into network traffic, extracting valuable data that aids in understanding and securing your environment. For those prioritizing comprehensive traffic analysis, Zeek is a natural choice.

Why I Picked Zeek: I selected Zeek after an intensive review of network analysis tools. Its unique ability to transform raw network traffic into high-fidelity logs caught my attention. I believe that for those who prioritize detailed network traffic insights, Zeek is unmatched in its depth and clarity.

Standout features & integrations:

Zeek excels in its script-based approach, enabling customizable analysis and logging of network traffic. This offers the flexibility to adapt to diverse and evolving threat landscapes. Integration-wise, Zeek complements a variety of SIEM systems and threat intelligence platforms, reinforcing its utility in complex security architectures.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Robust compatibility with multiple SIEM systems
  • High-fidelity logs provide detailed insights
  • Script-based approach for tailored traffic analysis

Cons:

  • Lacks out-of-the-box dashboards for visual analysis
  • Resource-intensive for larger network environments
  • Scripting may pose challenges for beginners

Best for system integrity monitoring

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing upon request

Tripwire is a renowned security solution, primarily recognized for its system integrity monitoring capabilities. It helps organizations maintain their system's integrity by continuously monitoring and detecting changes that could indicate potential breaches.

Why I Picked Tripwire: In the process of selecting a tool for reliable system integrity monitoring, Tripwire immediately stood out. I determined its prowess in this area by comparing its features and reviews against other competitors. Given the increasing importance of system integrity in today's dynamic cyber landscapes, Tripwire is best suited for organizations prioritizing this aspect.

Standout features & integrations:

Tripwire's key strength lies in its file integrity monitoring, which is adept at detecting unauthorized changes in real-time. Furthermore, its integration with popular SIEM tools enhances its monitoring capabilities, allowing for a more holistic security overview.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integrates well with many SIEM tools
  • Supports regulatory compliance needs
  • Efficient real-time change detection

Cons:

  • The licensing model may be confusing for some users
  • Might generate false positives if not tuned properly
  • Configuration can be complex for beginners

Best for open-source enthusiasts

  • Free demo available
  • From $29.99/year (billed annually)

Snort stands as one of the pioneers in intrusion detection, with its robust and open-source nature allowing for in-depth network protection. Catering to those who value transparency and customization, Snort's open-source model offers users a direct line of sight into its inner workings, making it a prime choice for enthusiasts.

Why I Picked Snort: I chose Snort because, in my journey of comparing various intrusion detection tools, its open-source nature stood out. This tool has garnered respect and loyalty in the cybersecurity community for its adaptability and transparency. Given its commitment to providing a platform that enthusiasts can both trust and tinker with, I determined that Snort is best for those who deeply value open-source paradigms.

Standout features & integrations:

Snort's rule-driven language allows users to fine-tune detection protocols, while its capabilities in real-time traffic analysis ensure timely insights into network activity. Beyond its core features, Snort integrates well with other security platforms and databases, enhancing its usability and scope within larger cybersecurity frameworks.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Real-time traffic analysis captures anomalies swiftly
  • Rule-driven language for tailored detection
  • The open-source nature ensures transparency

Cons:

  • Lacks a graphical user interface out of the box.
  • Regular updates might demand frequent configuration tweaks
  • Initial setup can be complex for novices

Best for log management and analysis

As a powerful open-source host-based intrusion detection system, OSSEC specializes in dissecting logs to unveil security incidents. It stands as a guardian for your systems, analyzing logs with precision, making it indispensable for log management aficionados.

Why I Picked OSSEC: In determining the best tools for log analysis, OSSEC's proficiency became evident. Its capabilities in correlating and analyzing diverse log sources set it apart. For those who want to dive deep into log management and analysis, my judgment leans heavily toward OSSEC's meticulous approach.

Standout features & integrations:

OSSEC provides granular log analysis with alerting mechanisms for potential security breaches. Its active response feature automates reactions to specific threats, streamlining security workflows. OSSEC boasts integration capabilities with popular SIEM tools and visualization platforms, ensuring coherent data representation and actionable insights.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integrates with popular visualization tools
  • Active response automates threat countermeasures
  • Granular log analysis for precise insights

Cons:

  • Lacks a user-friendly interface for non-tech individuals.
  • May require additional tools for comprehensive visualization
  • Configuration can be intricate

Best for integrated threat intelligence

  • Pricing upon request

McAfee's IDS rises above by not just detecting intrusions but by providing integrated threat intelligence to inform timely countermeasures. This integration results in an enriched understanding of threats, placing it high on the list for businesses prioritizing intelligence-driven defense.

Why I Picked IDS by McAfee: Upon comparing various tools, the intelligence fusion within McAfee's IDS caught my attention. This integration, a differentiator in its league, led me to judge it superior for those keen on coupling detection with actionable intelligence. If integrated threat insights are the goal, IDS by McAfee aligns perfectly with such demands.

Standout features & integrations:

McAfee's IDS takes pride in its adaptive threat detection mechanisms, refining its processes with real-time intelligence feeds. Its cloud-based analytics further elevate its detection accuracy. For integrations, it pairs effectively with other McAfee security products and a range of third-party SIEM systems.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Wide-ranging compatibility with SIEM solutions
  • Cloud-enhanced analytics for precise detection
  • Real-time threat intelligence integration

Cons:

  • Licensing complexities for expansive deployments.
  • Reliance on the cloud may not suit all organizations
  • Some learning curve for full feature utilization

Best for advanced threat intelligence

  • Pricing upon request

FireEye Network Security serves as a comprehensive platform that focuses on advanced threat detection, prevention, and investigation. What differentiates this tool is its rich threat intelligence, offering insights that many other platforms might miss.

Why I Picked FireEye Network Security: After deliberating on various security platforms and their offerings, I gravitated towards FireEye due to its renowned advanced threat intelligence capabilities. I believe that in the evolving threat landscape, FireEye's approach to detecting and tackling sophisticated threats places it ahead of many competitors.

Standout features & integrations:

FireEye's strength is its MVX architecture which identifies and blocks complex threats in real-time. Furthermore, its integration capabilities with third-party solutions make it versatile in diverse IT environments.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Ability to sandbox suspicious content for analysis
  • Comprehensive threat analytics and reporting
  • Strong emphasis on zero-day and new threat vectors

Cons:

  • Requires careful configuration for optimal results
  • May generate false positives if not tuned properly
  • Can be resource-intensive

Best for versatility in threat detection

  • Pricing upon request

Juniper IDP is known for its extensive threat detection methodologies, making it a preferred choice for organizations that require varied approaches to safeguard their digital infrastructure. Its ability to adapt to different threat landscapes proves it's truly built for versatile detection.

Why I Picked Juniper IDP: In the process of selecting a tool that offers a broad spectrum of threat detection techniques, Juniper IDP emerged as a prominent security software contender. The versatility it exhibited in its detection methods compared favorably against its peers. For organizations that face multifaceted threat vectors and need a flexible solution, I believe Juniper IDP fits the bill.

Standout features & integrations:

Juniper IDP boasts signature-based, anomaly-based, and behavior-based detection techniques, offering a layered defense strategy. It integrates effectively with Juniper's broader security portfolio, ensuring a more cohesive approach to threat management.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Customizable detection rules for specialized environments
  • Integration within Juniper's ecosystem
  • Comprehensive threat detection methodologies

Cons:

  • Software updates may occasionally disrupt configurations
  • Potential for false positives with aggressive settings
  • Requires a steep learning curve for maximum efficiency

Other Intrusion Detection Software

Below is a list of additional intrusion detection software that I shortlisted, but did not make it to the top 10. Definitely worth checking them out.

  1. Cisco IDS

    For large enterprise environments

  2. Check Point IDS

    For multi-layered security strategies

  3. Trend Micro Deep Discovery

    For targeted attack identification

  4. LogRhythm

    Good for comprehensive log management

  5. Ntopng

    Good for network traffic insights

  6. WatchGuard Network Security

    Good for modular security solutions

  7. Hillstone Network-Based IDS

    Good for layered threat prevention

  8. Kismet

    Good for wireless network detection

  9. Vectra Cognito

    Good for automating threat detection

  10. Darktrace

    Good for AI-driven threat detection

  11. Fortinet FortiGate

    Good for broad security integrations

  12. Nagios Core

    Good for infrastructure monitoring

  13. Security Onion

    Good for intrusion detection, enterprise security monitoring, and log management

  14. Flowmon

    Good for network behavior analysis

  15. Fidelis Network

    Good for deep session inspection

Intrusion Detection Software Selection Criteria

When selecting the best intrusion detection software to include in this list, I considered common buyer needs and pain points like network security and threat detection. I also used the following framework to keep my evaluation structured and fair:

Core Functionality (25% of total score)
To be considered for inclusion in this list, each solution had to fulfill these common use cases:

  • Detecting unauthorized access
  • Monitoring network traffic
  • Alerting on suspicious activity
  • Logging security events
  • Supporting compliance requirements

Additional Standout Features (25% of total score)
To help further narrow down the competition, I also looked for unique features, such as:

  • Advanced threat intelligence
  • Real-time data analysis
  • Customizable detection rules
  • Integration with other security tools
  • Machine learning capabilities

Usability (10% of total score)
To get a sense of the usability of each system, I considered the following:

  • Intuitive user interface
  • Easy navigation
  • Customizable dashboards
  • Minimal learning curve
  • Responsive design

Onboarding (10% of total score)
To evaluate the onboarding experience for each platform, I considered the following:

  • Availability of training videos
  • Interactive product tours
  • Access to webinars
  • Step-by-step setup guides
  • Supportive chatbots

Customer Support (10% of total score)
To assess each software provider’s customer support services, I considered the following:

  • 24/7 support availability
  • Access to live chat
  • Comprehensive knowledge base
  • Responsive email support
  • Dedicated account managers

Value For Money (10% of total score)
To evaluate the value for money of each platform, I considered the following:

  • Competitive pricing
  • Transparent billing practices
  • Flexible subscription plans
  • Cost versus feature set
  • Discounts for annual billing

Customer Reviews (10% of total score)
To get a sense of overall customer satisfaction, I considered the following when reading customer reviews:

  • Positive feedback on reliability
  • User satisfaction with features
  • Comments on ease of use
  • Feedback on support quality
  • Overall product recommendation

How to Choose Intrusion Detection Software

It’s easy to get bogged down in long feature lists and complex pricing structures. To help you stay focused as you work through your unique software selection process, here’s a checklist of factors to keep in mind:

FactorWhat to Consider
ScalabilityCan the software grow with your team? Consider the number of devices and users you plan to add over the next few years. Make sure it supports future needs.
IntegrationsCheck if the tool integrates with your existing systems like firewalls, SIEMs, or other security tools. Avoid compatibility issues that disrupt workflows.
CustomizabilityLook for tools that let you tailor alerts and monitoring to your specific security policies. Avoid rigid systems that don’t adapt to your needs.
Ease of useIs the interface intuitive for your team? Test demos to ensure low training time and easy navigation. Don’t overlook user-friendliness in complex systems.
Implementation and onboardingHow smooth is the setup process? Consider time, resources, and support needed to get started. Avoid tools with complex, lengthy onboarding phases.
CostCompare the total cost, including hidden fees. Consider your budget for setup, maintenance, and future upgrades. Don’t just look at the sticker price.
Security safeguardsEnsure the tool has strong encryption and data protection measures. Check for compliance with industry standards like GDPR or HIPAA. Don’t compromise on security.
Support availabilityAssess the vendor’s support options. Is there 24/7 help available? Consider response times and support channels like chat, phone, or email.

What Is Intrusion Detection Software?

Intrusion detection software is a tool that monitors network or system activities for malicious activities or policy violations. IT security professionals and network administrators typically use these tools to protect sensitive data and ensure network security.

Real-time monitoring, alerting, and logging capabilities help with identifying threats, responding quickly, and maintaining compliance. Overall, these tools provide essential security by detecting and mitigating potential threats before they cause harm.

Features

When selecting intrusion detection software, keep an eye out for the following key features:

  • Real-time monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic to detect suspicious activities as they occur, helping prevent potential breaches before they escalate.
  • Alerting system: Sends instant notifications to security teams when anomalies or threats are detected, allowing for quick response and mitigation.
  • Logging capabilities: Records detailed logs of network activities, providing valuable data for analysis and compliance reporting.
  • Threat intelligence: Utilizes up-to-date threat data to identify known and emerging threats, enhancing the accuracy of threat detection.
  • Customizable rules: Allows users to set specific detection parameters tailored to their organization's security policies, ensuring relevant threat identification.
  • Integration support: Connects with existing security tools and systems to provide a unified and comprehensive security infrastructure.
  • File integrity monitoring: Tracks changes to critical files and system configurations, alerting users to unauthorized modifications that may indicate a security breach.
  • Sandboxing: Isolates and analyzes suspicious files in a controlled environment to understand their behavior without risking the network.
  • Advanced threat detection: Employs techniques like anomaly detection to identify sophisticated threats that traditional methods might miss.
  • User-friendly interface: Offers an intuitive design that simplifies navigation and operation, reducing the learning curve for security teams.

Benefits

Implementing intrusion detection software provides several benefits for your team and your business. Here are a few you can look forward to:

  • Enhanced security: By monitoring network traffic in real-time, intrusion detection software helps identify and neutralize threats before they cause damage.
  • Quick response: Instant alerts enable security teams to react promptly to potential breaches, minimizing the impact on your systems.
  • Compliance support: Detailed logging and reporting aid in meeting regulatory requirements, ensuring your business stays compliant with industry standards.
  • Resource efficiency: Automating threat detection processes reduces the need for manual monitoring, freeing up your team to focus on other tasks.
  • Improved threat detection: Advanced threat intelligence and customizable rules allow for more accurate identification of both known and emerging threats.
  • Data protection: By tracking changes to critical files, these tools help safeguard sensitive information from unauthorized access.
  • Integration capabilities: Seamless integration with existing security tools creates a comprehensive security ecosystem, improving overall protection.

Costs & Pricing

Selecting intrusion detection software requires an understanding of the various pricing models and plans available. Costs vary based on features, team size, add-ons, and more. The table below summarizes common plans, their average prices, and typical features included in intrusion detection software solutions:

Plan Comparison Table for Intrusion Detection Software

Plan TypeAverage PriceCommon Features
Free Plan$0Basic monitoring, limited alerts, and community support.
Personal Plan$10-$30/user/monthReal-time alerts, basic reporting, and user-friendly interface.
Business Plan$50-$100/user/monthAdvanced threat detection, integration support, and customizable dashboards.
Enterprise Plan$150-$300/user/monthFull packet capture, compliance reporting, and dedicated support services.

Intrusion Detection Software FAQs

How is an IDS different from a firewall?

An IDS detects and alerts on suspicious activity, while a firewall blocks or allows network traffic based on rules. IDS focuses on detection, not prevention.

Can IDS stop attacks automatically?

Not on its own. IDS detects threats, while intrusion prevention systems (IPS) block them. Using both provides stronger protection.

How often should IDS be updated?

Regularly. Frequent updates ensure your system recognizes the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

What are the main challenges of using IDS?

False positives, complex configurations, and high resource use can occur if not tuned properly. Regular review and maintenance help minimize these issues.

Do small businesses need IDS?

Yes. Even small networks face security risks. Lightweight or cloud-based IDS options offer affordable, effective protection.

What’s Next:

If you're in the process of researching intrusion detection software, connect with a SoftwareSelect advisor for free recommendations.

You fill out a form and have a quick chat where they get into the specifics of your needs. Then you'll get a shortlist of software to review. They'll even support you through the entire buying process, including price negotiations.

Paulo Gardini Miguel
By Paulo Gardini Miguel

Paulo is the Director of Technology at the rapidly growing media tech company BWZ. Prior to that, he worked as a Software Engineering Manager and then Head Of Technology at Navegg, Latin America’s largest data marketplace, and as Full Stack Engineer at MapLink, which provides geolocation APIs as a service. Paulo draws insight from years of experience serving as an infrastructure architect, team leader, and product developer in rapidly scaling web environments. He’s driven to share his expertise with other technology leaders to help them build great teams, improve performance, optimize resources, and create foundations for scalability.