Etter å ha utforsket verdenen innen statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet har jeg forstått hvor uunnværlig dette er for å automatisere identifiseringen av sikkerhetssårbarheter i kodelinjer. Slike verktøy dekker ikke bare det grunnleggende, men går også i dybden på komplekse cybersikkerhetsområder. De bidrar til å håndtere feilkonfigurasjoner og tilbyr omfattende sårbarhetshåndtering.
Som sikkerhetsekspert har jeg sett både lokale løsninger og programtillegg som fungerer sammen med dynamisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet for å styrke beskyttelsen. Ikke senk årvåkenheten; velg det riktige verktøyet for å styrke programvarens sikkerhet.
Hva er et verktøy for statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet?
Verktøy for statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet, ofte forkortet SAST, er spesialiserte programvareverktøy som er utviklet for å analysere kildekode, bytekode eller binærkode i applikasjoner uten å kjøre dem. Utviklere, sikkerhetseksperter og organisasjoner integrerer SAST i livssyklusen for programvareutvikling for å håndtere og redusere sikkerhetsfeil proaktivt, slik at applikasjonene opprettholder et sterkt forsvar mot cybertrusler.
Det er mer enn bare et verktøy – det er en viktig alliert som hjelper utviklingsteam med å sikre kode og håndtere sikkerhetsproblemer under kodegjennomgangen, lenge før de eskalerer. Ved å integrere disse verktøyene i utviklingssyklusen kan du flytte sikkerheten til et tidligere stadium og gå i dybden med hvitboks-testing for å oppdage og utbedre sårbarheter, fra bufferoverflyt til skripting på tvers av nettsteder, selv i mobilapplikasjoner.
Hvorfor du kan stole på våre programvareanbefalinger
6,700+
Reviews
20
Industry experts
16+
Evaluation factors
14
Years
Teamet vårt har testet og anmeldt programvare siden 2012. Vi er selv teknologiledere, så vi vet hvor vanskelig og hvor viktig det er å velge riktig programvare.
I denne guiden har vi vurdert verktøyene gjennom praktisk testing og uavhengig research og gitt dem poeng ut fra våre utvelgelseskriterier.
Anmeldelsene våre bygger på vår egen redaksjonelle vurdering. De er ikke et salgsargument.
Ekspertanmeldere:
- Paulo Gardini MiguelTech Director
Tim FisherVP of AI
Gabriel RosasTech Lead & Software Architect
Christhian GruhnTech Lead & Platform Architect
Sammendrag av de beste verktøyene for statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for AI-powered vulnerability triage | Free plan available | From $350/month | Website | |
| 2 | Best for zero-noise risk prioritization | 7-day free trial + free demo available | From $399/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 3 | Best for reducing false positives | Free plan available | From $200/month | Website | |
| 4 | Best for advanced taint analysis | Free trial available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 5 | Best for real-time threat detection | 15-day free trial | From $7/month | Website | |
| 6 | Best for open-source code insights | Free plan + free demo available | From $25/contributing developer/month | Website | |
| 7 | Best for integrated DevOps security | Free plan available | From $29/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 8 | Best for holistic application security | From $40/user/month (billed annually) | Website | ||
| 9 | Best for scalable enterprise solutions | Free demo available | From $29/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 10 | Best for detecting sensitive data leaks | Pricing upon request. | Website |
Anmeldelser av de beste verktøyene for statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet
Best for AI-powered vulnerability triage- Free plan available
- From $350/month
Visit WebsiteCustomer Rating:4.7/5
Aikido Security provides a unified dashboard to triage and filter issues by type, severity, and scan source. Aikido Security is a platform that scans your source code to identify security vulnerabilities before they become issues. By analyzing your codebase, it detects weaknesses like SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and buffer overflows, providing clear guidance on how to address them.
Why I Picked Aikido Security: Aikido's SAST engine focuses exclusively on security, filtering out non-security issues such as code readability and style. This means you'll only receive alerts that matter, reducing distractions and allowing your team to concentrate on genuine vulnerabilities. Additionally, Aikido supports all major programming languages, ensuring comprehensive coverage across diverse codebases.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Other features include an AI-powered auto-triage system that prioritizes vulnerabilities, dismisses false positives, and provides actionable advice. It also offers dependency scanning, integrated IDE support, runtime protection, cloud posture management, open source dependency scanning, secrets detection, and infrastructure as code scanning.
Integrations include Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure Cloud, Drata, Vanta, AWS Elastic Container Registry, Docker Hub, Jira, Asana, and GitHub.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Has a comprehensive dashboard and customizable reports
- Offers actionable insights
- Scalable for growing teams
Cons:
- Ignores vulnerabilities if no fix is available
- Only available in English
Learn more about Aikido Security:
Best for zero-noise risk prioritization- 7-day free trial + free demo available
- From $399/month (billed annually)
Xygeni SAST dashboard displaying prioritized vulnerabilities by severity, with a detailed SQL injection issue view showing CWE classification, propagation path, and AI-assisted remediation options. For developers and security teams seeking a reliable solution for static application security testing, Xygeni provides AI-powered SAST, contextual risk analysis, and AI-assisted remediation across application code and the software supply chain. It's designed to help you detect vulnerabilities early, prioritize them based on real-world exposure, and address them directly within your development workflows. The platform focuses on reducing alert noise while improving the accuracy of security triage.
Why I Picked Xygeni
I picked Xygeni because of its zero-noise risk prioritization powered by AI-driven triage and contextual analysis. The platform evaluates vulnerabilities based on reachability, exploitability, dependency context, and exposure analysis, helping your team focus on issues that pose real risk rather than surface-level findings. Its AI-assisted remediation capabilities also help resolve certain issues automatically, reducing manual effort and supporting faster secure development cycles.
Xygeni Key Features
In addition to its standout features, Xygeni offers other capabilities that cater to your security needs:
- AI Triage & Customizable Risk Funnel: Automatically triages findings and allows you to tailor prioritization criteria based on your environment and risk tolerance.
- Context-Based Prioritization: Uses reachability, exploitability, dependency analysis, and exposure context to rank vulnerabilities according to actual risk.
- AI-powered SAST: Scans source code for vulnerabilities and provides remediation guidance within IDEs and pull requests.
- Real-Time Malware Detection in Application Code: Scans proprietary and open-source code to identify malicious behaviors, suspicious patterns, and software supply chain threats.
- Automated Asset Inventory: Maintains an up-to-date inventory of software components and dependencies across projects.
Xygeni Integrations
Integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Slack, Jira, and GitHub Ticketing.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Real-time detection minimizes security risk
- Function-level analysis prioritizes vulnerabilities
- Privacy-first scanning ensures data safety
Cons:
- Limited integrations compared to competitors
- Pricing may be steep for some teams
Learn more about Xygeni:
Best for reducing false positives- Free plan available
- From $200/month
Visit WebsiteCustomer Rating:4.5/5
Zeropath offers a comprehensive dashboard for monitoring application security. For organizations striving to fortify their application security, Zeropath offers a sophisticated AI-driven Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solution. Ideal for innovative companies, this platform excels in identifying and auto-fixing code vulnerabilities, compliance violations, and security issues, offering a seamless integration into your existing development workflow.
Why I Picked Zeropath
I picked Zeropath for its AI-powered approach to static application security testing, which stands out in its ability to drastically reduce false positives. This feature is crucial for development teams seeking accuracy and efficiency in vulnerability detection. Additionally, its seamless integration with developer tools such as GitHub and GitLab provides instant feedback and AI-generated fixes, streamlining the security review process. Zeropath's ability to offer contextual triage further ensures that your team can prioritize and address the most critical vulnerabilities swiftly.
Zeropath Key Features
Aside from its standout AI capabilities, Zeropath offers several other valuable features:
- Deep Vulnerability Detection: The platform thoroughly scans code to identify complex security vulnerabilities that might be missed by other tools.
- Risk Management Capabilities: It provides a comprehensive view of potential security risks, allowing your team to manage and mitigate them effectively.
- Compliance Reporting: Zeropath includes robust compliance reporting tools to help your organization stay aligned with industry standards and regulations.
- Executive Dashboards: These dashboards offer high-level insights into your security posture, facilitating informed decision-making for stakeholders.
Zeropath Integrations
Integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jira, Slack, Linear, and Azure DevOps.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- It catches logic flaws and hidden risks you might miss in normal scans.
- Cuts down noisy findings so your team can focus on real issues.
- Gives you clear fixes that speed up your security reviews.
Cons:
- Potential for missed vulnerabilities if AI is not configured correctly.
- You may need time to adjust your workflow around its automation.
Learn more about Zeropath:
Best for advanced taint analysis- Free trial available
- Pricing upon request
Visit WebsiteCustomer Rating:4.4/5
SonarQube is a SAST platform that automates code analysis and detects vulnerabilities across languages. SonarQube is a static application security testing (SAST) platform that delivers automated code analysis, vulnerability detection, and customizable rule enforcement across a wide range of programming languages. It integrates into development workflows to help teams identify and remediate security issues before deployment.
Who Is SonarQube Best For?
Development and DevOps teams in midsize to large organizations that require automated code security and quality checks integrated into CI/CD pipelines.
Why I Picked SonarQube
I picked SonarQube for its advanced taint analysis capabilities, which help detect data flow vulnerabilities across applications. It identifies how untrusted inputs move through code and highlights potential injection risks or unsafe patterns. Combined with customizable quality gates, this allows teams to enforce security standards before merging code.
SonarQube Key Features
- Multi-language support: Analyze code in over 30 programming languages from a single platform.
- Quality gates: Enforce pass/fail standards for security and maintainability before merging.
- Pull request analysis: Scan pull requests and surface issues directly in version control workflows.
- Custom rule creation: Build and apply organization-specific static analysis rules.
SonarQube Integrations
SonarQube integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, and Bamboo. It supports CI/CD workflows and provides an API for custom integrations.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Integrates with major CI/CD platforms
- Offers customizable quality gates and rules
- Detects security vulnerabilities in multiple languages
Cons:
- Configuration can be complex for large projects
- Advanced features require paid editions
Learn more about SonarQube:
Dynatrace static application security testing tool Dynatrace offers a sophisticated application performance and monitoring solution, designed not only to gauge performance but also to identify and address security threats in real time. The platform's commitment to instantaneous threat detection makes it a crucial asset for businesses aiming to maintain a secure digital environment without compromising on agility.
Why I Picked Dynatrace: When determining which tools to include on this list, the immediacy with which Dynatrace operates caught my attention. In comparing various platforms, I found that the real-time aspect of Dynatrace's threat detection was both unique and invaluable.
Considering the evolving nature of cyber threats and the need for businesses to respond promptly, I came to the conclusion that Dynatrace stands out as "best for real-time threat detection."
Standout Features & Integrations:
Dynatrace shines with features like full-stack monitoring, root cause analysis, and AI-assisted problem resolution, which not only detect but also aid in mitigating threats swiftly.
When it comes to integrations, Dynatrace offers compatibility with a host of cloud platforms, CI/CD tools, and container orchestration systems, ensuring security oversight across diverse environments.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Robust integration capabilities with popular cloud and DevOps tools
- Comprehensive full-stack monitoring provides deep insights
- AI-assistance aids in quick threat mitigation
Cons:
- Pricing might not align with smaller budgets
- The vast array of features could pose an initial learning challenge
- Might be overkill for smaller-scale operations
6Best for open-source code insightsSnyk
- Free plan + free demo available
- From $25/contributing developer/month
Visit WebsiteCustomer Rating:4.6/5
Snyk's insights dashboard Snyk is a prominent security platform tailored to detect and resolve vulnerabilities in open-source libraries and containers. By focusing on the nuances of open-source codebases, Snyk provides teams with invaluable insights, ensuring safer application development and deployment.
Why I Picked Snyk: I chose Snyk after closely comparing several tools that cater to open-source security. Snyk distinctly stood out because of its in-depth vulnerability database and the clarity of its code insights. These unique features positioned Snyk as a tool that is undeniably "best for open-source code insights."
Standout Features & Integrations:
At the core of Snyk's offering is its expansive vulnerability database that is regularly updated, allowing for precise and timely threat detection. Additionally, Snyk offers license compliance checks and remediation advice, which are invaluable for open-source projects.
Integration-wise, Snyk supports a broad spectrum of platforms, from GitHub and Bitbucket to popular CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that security checks are easily incorporated into development workflows.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Extensive integration capabilities streamline the development process
- License compliance features ensure legal protection
- Comprehensive vulnerability database tailored for open-source projects
Cons:
- Without clear pricing details, budgeting can be challenging
- The depth of insights might overwhelm newcomers
- Targeted primarily at open-source projects, which might not be suitable for all types of applications
Learn more about Snyk:
Best for integrated DevOps security- Free plan available
- From $29/user/month (billed annually)
GitLab security dashboard GitLab is a comprehensive DevOps platform that consolidates source code management, continuous integration, and continuous delivery (CI/CD) into one interface. Its inclusion of built-in security functionalities ensures that the software development process remains safeguarded at every stage, making it ideal for teams desiring an integrated security solution.
Why I Picked GitLab: In my quest to find an all-encompassing DevOps tool with a keen emphasis on security, GitLab emerged as a frontrunner. Its unified approach to the software development lifecycle and inbuilt security components differentiate it from many standalone tools. The way GitLab merges development and security easily is the key reason I believe it's "best for integrated DevOps security."
Standout Features & Integrations:
GitLab offers automated security scans in its CI/CD pipelines, ensuring code is assessed for vulnerabilities before deployment. Additionally, its container security capabilities protect Docker containers and Kubernetes clusters.
As for integrations, GitLab supports a vast array of tools such as Jenkins, JIRA, and Kubernetes, allowing teams to preserve their existing tech stacks while leveraging GitLab's capabilities.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Vast integration possibilities with popular development tools
- Robust container security features for modern application deployment
- Consolidated DevOps and security in a singular platform
Cons:
- Some advanced security features are restricted to higher pricing tiers
- Performance might vary depending on the scale of the projects
- Steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive feature set
Learn more about GitLab:
Synopsys application security testing tool reports and dashboards Synopsys delivers a comprehensive application security platform that caters to various aspects of software assurance, from code analysis to threat intelligence. The holistic nature of its offerings ensures that companies have a thorough overview and can address vulnerabilities at every stage of the software lifecycle.
Why I Picked Synopsys: In the process of selecting tools for this compilation, Synopsys distinguished itself with its all-encompassing approach to application security. Through my research and comparison, I identified its capability to provide an end-to-end solution as a primary differentiator.
With the growing need for businesses to ensure robust security across the entirety of their application's life, I believe Synopsys genuinely fits the bill as "best for holistic application security."
Standout Features & Integrations:
At its core, Synopsys boasts features like static code analysis, software composition analysis, and penetration testing. These facilitate early and continuous detection of vulnerabilities. Integration-wise, Synopsys collaborates smoothly with a range of development and operation tools, ensuring that security becomes an inherent part of the software delivery process.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Integrates well with popular DevOps tools
- Supports early detection of vulnerabilities with its static code analysis
- Provides a comprehensive suite of application security tools
Cons:
- The breadth of tools might lead to redundancy for certain use cases
- Comprehensive features could be overwhelming for smaller teams
- May have a steeper learning curve for beginners
Learn more about Synopsys:
Best for scalable enterprise solutions- Free demo available
- From $29/user/month (billed annually)
HCL AppScan dashboard HCL AppScan is a comprehensive software security solution that aids enterprises in identifying, fixing, and preventing vulnerabilities in their applications. As organizations grow, their need for scalable security solutions increases, positioning AppScan as a vital tool for large-scale businesses.
Why I Picked HCL AppScan: In comparing various security tools, I found that HCL AppScan offers robust features suitable for large enterprises. Its unique selling proposition lies in its ability to scale as the organization grows, ensuring security without impeding growth. I'm confident that it's "best for scalable enterprise solutions" given its track record and capacity to handle expansive security demands.
Standout Features & Integrations:
HCL AppScan offers dynamic and static application security testing, ensuring that apps are safe at both the code and runtime levels. Additionally, its Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) bridges the gap between static and dynamic testing.
For integrations, AppScan provides connections with CI/CD pipelines, thus promoting secure DevOps practices.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Designed for scalability, making it suitable for large organizations
- Efficient integration with CI/CD tools
- Supports both dynamic and static application security testing
Cons:
- The expansive feature set can be intimidating for new users
- Requires skilled personnel for optimal utilization
- Might be an overkill for small businesses or startups
Learn more about HCL AppScan:
GitGuardian activity overview GitGuardian specializes in monitoring codebases and detecting inadvertent leaks of sensitive information, such as API keys or credentials. With an increasing number of breaches originating from exposed secrets in public repositories, GitGuardian serves as a critical line of defense for organizations.
Why I Picked GitGuardian: I selected GitGuardian after a meticulous examination of several tools aimed at safeguarding code repositories. GitGuardian's focused approach to identifying exposed secrets and its robust detection algorithms made it a clear front-runner. Its precision in pinpointing potential data leaks is why I believe it is "best for detecting sensitive data leaks."
Standout Features & Integrations:
One of GitGuardian's most crucial features is its ability to continuously scan public and private repositories for over 200 types of secrets. Furthermore, its incident response platform allows teams to act promptly on detected vulnerabilities.
In terms of integrations, GitGuardian smoothly connects with platforms like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, ensuring comprehensive coverage across various development environments.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Swift incident response platform ensures timely action on vulnerabilities
- Supports both public and private repository scans
- Dedicated focus on detecting sensitive data leaks
Cons:
- Dependency on third-party integrations might affect detection efficacy in non-supported platforms
- Without transparent pricing, it may be challenging for teams to budget accurately
- The specificity of the tool may not cater to broader security needs
Learn more about GitGuardian:
Andre bemerkelsesverdige verktøy for statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet
Nedenfor finner du en liste over flere verktøy for statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet som jeg vurderte, men som ikke kom med blant de 12 beste. De er absolutt verdt å undersøke.
- 11Parasoft JTestBest for Java application testing
- 12CodePeerBest for in-depth Ada language analysis
- 13Legit SecurityBest for unified security control
- 14GuardRailsBest for continuous security feedback
- 15EmboldBest for identifying anti-patterns
- 16Mend.ioBest for modern web app security
- 17GitHubGood for native integration with repository management
- 18AppknoxGood for mobile app security checks
- 19CheckmarxGood for comprehensive vulnerability detection
- 20DeepSourceGood for continuous analysis in CI/CD
- 21KlocworkGood for architectural risk analysis
- 22Qualys Web Application ScanningGood for cloud-based web app scans
- 23SemgrepGood for custom rule creation
- 24Contrast SecurityGood for real-time code analysis
Utvalgskriterier for å velge de beste verktøyene for statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet
I jakten på de beste verktøyene for statisk testing av applikasjonssikkerhet nøyde jeg meg ikke med overfladiske vurderinger. Jeg gikk grundig til verks, testet og undersøkte en rekke verktøy for å finne frem til de beste innen dette området. På bakgrunn av denne omfattende vurderingen identifiserte jeg flere avgjørende kriterier, der spesifikk funksjonalitet sto sentralt i beslutningen.
Her er en detaljert oversikt over det jeg har konkludert med at betyr mest:
Kjernefunksjonalitet
- Sårbarhetsdeteksjon: Det primære formålet med ethvert SAST-verktøy. Det bør effektivt og nøyaktig identifisere potensielle sikkerhetsfeil i kildekoden.
- Kompatibilitet med kodebasen: Mulighet til å skanne flere programmeringsspråk og rammeverk for å sikre at ingen deler av applikasjonen forblir ukontrollert. Dette betyr at programvaren forblir kompatibel, enten du sikrer verktøy for statisk kodeanalyse for Java eller Python.
- Kontinuerlig integrasjon: Enkel integrasjon i CI/CD-pipelinen, slik at regelmessige og automatiserte kodekontroller kan gjennomføres som en del av utviklingsprosessen.
- Risikoprioritering: Det handler ikke bare om å finne sårbarheter, men også om å rangere dem etter alvorlighetsgrad slik at de mest kritiske håndteres først.
Viktige funksjoner
- Oppretting av egendefinerte regler: Gjør det mulig for brukere å definere sitt eget regelsett, tilpasset de spesifikke behovene til applikasjonen.
- Skanning av binærkode: Noen verktøy tilbyr muligheten til å evaluere kompilerte applikasjoner og vurdere dem uten den opprinnelige kildekoden.
- Tilbakemelding i sanntid: Umiddelbar tilbakemelding mens utviklere skriver eller lagrer kode, fremmer en proaktiv tilnærming til sikkerhet.
- Skybaserte skanninger: Gir fleksibilitet og skalerbarhet, noe som er spesielt viktig for større virksomheter eller virksomheter med distribuerte team.
Brukervennlighet
- Intuitivt kontrollpanel: For et SAST-verktøy er en visuell fremstilling av sårbarheter, komplett med filbaner og oversikter over alvorlighetsgrad, avgjørende. Dette gjør det enklere å raskt forstå applikasjonens sikkerhetsstatus.
- Enkle integrasjonspunkter: SAST-verktøy bør ha integrasjoner med populære IDE-er og versjonskontrollsystemer som kan tas i bruk uten omfattende konfigurering, slik at konflikter i utviklingsprosessen reduseres.
- Rollebasert tilgang: Sikrer at tilgangen til skanneresultater og konfigurasjoner er begrenset til autorisert personell, noe som styrker sikkerheten i sikkerhetsverktøyet.
- Omfattende dokumentasjon: På grunn av verktøyenes tekniske natur er en omfattende kunnskapsbase, med vanlige bruksområder og tips for feilsøking, avgjørende for introduksjon av brukere og løpende støtte.
Vanligste spørsmål om verktøy for statisk applikasjonssikkerhetstesting (FAQ-er)
Hva er fordelene ved å bruke et SAST-verktøy?
Bruk av et SAST-verktøy gir flere fordeler:
- Tidlig oppdagelse: Identifiser sårbarheter tidlig i utviklingsforløpet, selv før koden kjøres.
- Kostnadseffektivitet: Det er vanligvis mindre kostbart å løse problemer tidlig enn å rette dem etter utrulling.
- Forbedret sikkerhetsnivå: Få en helhetlig oversikt over applikasjonens sikkerhet, noe som muliggjør bedre risikostyring.
- Opplæring av utviklere: Tilbakemeldinger i sanntid lærer utviklere om beste praksis innen sikkerhet og forbedrer kodestandardene.
- Etterlevelse av regelverk: Mange verktøy bidrar til å oppfylle bransjespesifikke krav til sikkerhet og etterlevelse.
Hvor mye koster disse verktøyene vanligvis?
Kostnaden for SAST-verktøy kan variere betydelig avhengig av funksjonalitet, skalerbarhet og målmarkedet (virksomheter kontra individuelle utviklere). Prisene kan variere fra noen få dollar per måned for grunnleggende verktøy til flere tusen dollar årlig for løsninger på virksomhetsnivå.
Hvilke prismodeller er vanlige for SAST-verktøy?
SAST-leverandører benytter flere prismodeller:
- Per bruker/utvikler: Prisen baseres på antall brukere eller utviklere som har tilgang til verktøyet.
- Per skanning: Prisen baseres på antall gjennomførte skanninger.
- Abonnementsbasert: Månedlige eller årlige abonnementer som tilbyr ubegrenset antall skanninger i perioden.
- Trinnvis prising: Ulike prisnivåer basert på funksjoner, antall skanninger eller størrelsen på kodebasen.
Hva er det typiske prisintervallet for disse verktøyene?
Prisintervallet kan være svært bredt. For individuelle utviklere eller små prosjekter kan prisene starte så lavt som $10-$50 per måned. For større virksomheter eller mer omfattende verktøy kan prisen variere fra $1,000 til $5,000 per år eller mer.
Hvilke programvarealternativer er blant de billigste og dyreste?
Blant de rimeligste alternativene finner vi verktøy som Semgrep eller DeepSource, som tilbyr konkurransedyktige priser for individuelle utviklere eller små team. På den andre siden ligger løsninger på virksomhetsnivå, som Checkmarx eller Veracode Static Analysis, vanligvis i den øvre delen av prisskalaen på grunn av de omfattende funksjonene og skalerbarheten.
Finnes det gratis SAST-verktøy?
Ja, det finnes gratis SAST-verktøy, ofte som åpen kildekode-prosjekter. Semgrep tilbyr for eksempel et gratisnivå, og det finnes andre alternativer med åpen kildekode, som FlawFinder eller Brakeman for Ruby on Rails-applikasjoner. Gratisversjoner kan imidlertid ha begrensninger når det gjelder funksjoner eller antall skanninger.
Er prisen for disse verktøyene en engangsavgift eller en løpende kostnad?
De fleste SAST-verktøy benytter en løpende prismodell, enten månedlig, kvartalsvis eller årlig. Noen kan tilby alternativer med engangskjøp, men dette er mindre vanlig i bransjen.
Tilbyr disse verktøyene vanligvis prøveperioder eller demonstrasjoner?
Ja, mange SAST-verktøy tilbyr prøveperioder, slik at brukerne kan teste funksjonene og effektiviteten før de bestemmer seg for å kjøpe. Denne prøveperioden kan vare fra én uke til én måned, avhengig av verktøyet.
Andre anmeldelser av programvare for sikkerhetstesting
Sammendrag
Å velge det beste verktøyet for statisk applikasjonssikkerhetstesting (SAST) er et viktig steg for å sikre kildekoden til en applikasjon. I denne veiledningen har jeg gått grundig gjennom kjernefunksjonalitet, viktige funksjoner, brukervennlighet og avgjørende kriterier som er viktigst når man skal velge riktig SAST-løsning.
Det riktige verktøyet kan gjøre mer enn bare å identifisere sårbarheter: Det kan gi uvurderlig innsikt, fremme bedre kodingsvaner blant utviklere og sikre etterlevelse av regelverk.
Viktige punkter
- Tidlig oppdagelse er viktig: Den største fordelen med SAST-verktøy er at de kan oppdage sårbarheter tidlig i utviklingslivssyklusen, noe som gjør det kostnadseffektivt og forbedrer det overordnede sikkerhetsnivået.
- Brukervennlighet og brukeropplevelse: I tillegg til funksjonalitet bør du vurdere verktøyets utforming, hvor enkelt det er å komme i gang, grensesnittet og kundestøtten. Et effektivt SAST-verktøy bør passe inn i utviklerens arbeidsflyt.
- Pris kontra verdi: Selv om pris er en viktig faktor, er det avgjørende å veie kostnaden opp mot verdien som tilbys. Noen verktøy kan være dyre, men de omfattende funksjonene, skalerbarheten og nøyaktigheten kan gi høyere avkastning på investeringen.
Hva synes du?
Selv om jeg har gjort omfattende undersøkelser og testing for å sette sammen denne listen, er fagområdet statisk sikkerhetstesting av applikasjoner omfattende og i stadig utvikling. Hvis det finnes andre verktøy for statisk analyse av applikasjoner eller analyse av programvaresammensetning som du har hatt nytte av, men som jeg ikke har tatt med, vil jeg gjerne høre fra deg. Del gjerne forslagene eller erfaringene dine i kommentarfeltet, så kan vi gjøre denne ressursen enda mer omfattende for alle. Innsikten din kan være avgjørende for å hjelpe andre med å finne sitt ideelle SAST-verktøy.