10 Best BAS Software Shortlist
Here's my pick of the 10 best software from the 22 tools reviewed.
Our one-on-one guidance will help you find the perfect fit.
Navigating the intricacies of vulnerability management in both on-premise and cloud environments can be a daunting task. That's where BAS software comes into play. It's essentially the best accounting software tailored for modern businesses, offering an integrated solution that manages everything from credit card transactions to inventory management and time tracking.
With cloud-based and on-premise options, you're granted the flexibility to choose what fits best for your specific needs. I've sifted through countless options to pinpoint the ones that truly address the primary pain points businesses face daily. So, if you're searching for a tool that can bridge the gap between time tracking, credit card management, and vulnerability detection, look no further.
What Is A BAS Software?
Breach and attack simulation (BAS) software offers organizations a proactive approach to assess their cybersecurity defenses by simulating real-world cyber-attacks on their networks, systems, and applications. These simulations help identify vulnerabilities and weak points without causing actual damage.
Typically used by cybersecurity professionals and IT teams, BAS software provides insights into potential risks and offers actionable feedback, enabling businesses to strengthen their security posture against evolving cyber threats.
Best BAS Software Summary
Tools | Price | |
---|---|---|
The Picus Complete Security Validation Platform | Pricing upon request | Website |
Elasticito | From $15/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
Infection Monkey | Open source project and Available for free | Website |
Defendify: All-In-One Cybersecurity® | From $15/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
FourCore | Pricing upon request | Website |
CYBERBIT Range | Pricing upon request | Website |
Sophos PhishThreat | From $10/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
vPenTest | From $15/user/month (billed annually) + $30 base fee per month | Website |
Cymulate | From $15/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
Datto SaaS Defense | From $12/user/month (billed annually) + $20 base fee per month | Website |
Compare Software Specs Side by Side
Use our comparison chart to review and evaluate software specs side-by-side.
Compare SoftwareBest BAS Software Reviews
Best for continuous security readiness
The Picus Complete Security Validation Platform provides tools that allow organizations to assess and improve their cybersecurity posture continually. Tailored to fit diverse organizational needs, the platform’s focus is on ensuring that businesses, from large enterprises to small ones, always remain ready against emerging threats.
Why I Picked The Picus Complete Security Validation Platform:
Navigating the broad spectrum of security tools, The Picus Platform stood out due to its comprehensive approach to continuous readiness. I chose this tool based on its strong emphasis on adaptability in the face of evolving threats. Its customizable features make it particularly appealing, ensuring it meets the unique needs of both large corporations and small businesses.
This adaptability, combined with its commitment to readiness, clearly underscores why it's 'best for continuous security readiness.'
Standout Features and Integrations:
One of the foremost features of The Picus Platform is its customizable threat scenarios, allowing organizations to prepare for specific risks tailored to their industry or region. Additionally, it provides real-time analytics, giving teams the insights needed to improve security strategies. Its integrations encompass a wide array of cybersecurity tools, aiding organizations in streamlining their security processes.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Broad range of integrations with prominent cybersecurity tools
- Real-time analytics for enhanced decision-making
- Customizable scenarios suited for both large enterprises and small businesses
Cons:
- Smaller teams might need training to maximize the platform’s capabilities
- Customizations could require additional setup time
- Might be complex for those new to security validation platforms
Elasticito delivers a robust cybersecurity solution, empowering organizations to monitor, detect, and counteract potential threats. By focusing on an all-encompassing threat intelligence framework, Elasticito helps businesses identify vulnerabilities across their digital landscape, positioning it as a leader in comprehensive threat monitoring.
Why I Picked Elasticito:
Out of the numerous cybersecurity solutions I reviewed, I found Elasticito's all-encompassing approach most intriguing. Its focus on comprehensive threat intelligence made it stand out, providing users with a holistic view of potential vulnerabilities, thus justifying its position as 'Best for comprehensive threat intelligence.'
Standout Features and Integrations:
Elasticito boasts a multi-layered threat detection framework, ensuring that no potential risk goes unnoticed. Additionally, its real-time alert system ensures that users are instantly informed about any discrepancies.
As for integrations, Elasticito connects with major SIEM platforms, firewalls, and other essential security tools, ensuring a cohesive defense system.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Extensive integrations with major security platforms
- Real-time alerting system
- Multi-layered threat detection
Cons:
- Limited documentation available online
- Requires consistent updates for optimum performance
- Might have a steeper learning curve for beginners
Infection Monkey is an open-source tool designed to simulate system breaches, helping businesses identify weak points in their network security. By deploying simulated attacks, it provides invaluable insights into potential vulnerabilities, positioning itself as an indispensable asset for organizations, especially startups looking for cost-effective solutions.
Why I Picked Infection Monkey:
Sifting through a myriad of security tools, Infection Monkey emerged as a front-runner for its ingenious approach to vulnerability assessment. I selected it because of its distinct ability to simulate real-world attacks, offering clear insights and remediation steps.
This functionality, tailored for swift vulnerability detection and remedy, positions Infection Monkey as 'best for gauging network vulnerabilities,' particularly for startups that need precise, actionable insights.
Standout Features and Integrations:
Infection Monkey stands out with its detailed post-assault reports, guiding teams on remediation steps to fortify network defenses. Its automated testing ensures continuous evaluation without demanding manual input. The tool also integrates well with other security platforms, amplifying its utility and expanding its coverage.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Ideal for startups requiring robust vulnerability assessment without breaking the bank
- Automated testing offers continuous evaluation
- Provides actionable remediation steps post-simulation
Cons:
- Some organizations might prefer tools with more traditional UI/UX
- Advanced features might be reserved for commercial versions
- Being open-source, it might demand some technical know-how for setup and customization
Defendify offers a holistic solution aimed at addressing various cybersecurity needs in one integrated platform. By providing multiple layers of defense, it ensures that every potential attack path is monitored, keeping vulnerabilities in check.
Why I Picked Defendify: All-In-One Cybersecurity®:
In the vast landscape of cybersecurity tools, Defendify stood out for its comprehensive coverage. I chose it after judging its rich feature set, which integrates various cybersecurity functions into one unified workflow. T
The platform's ability to offer multi-layered protection convinced me that it's 'best for multi-layered cybersecurity', ensuring that every potential vulnerability is addressed.
Standout Features and Integrations:
Defendify's all-in-one platform provides a range of tools that enhance a company's defense mechanisms, from vulnerability assessments to response plans. The integrated workflow ensures that tasks flow from one stage to the next without hitches.
Integrations with other security tools and systems make Defendify versatile, adapting to different organizational needs while maximizing its functionality.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Rich ecosystem of add-ons enhances its functionality
- Integrated workflow streamlines tasks and responses
- Comprehensive multi-layered security coverage addresses every attack path
Cons:
- Some advanced features could require additional costs
- Annual billing might not be preferable for all businesses
- Might be overwhelming for small businesses new to cybersecurity
FourCore is designed to put your cybersecurity measures to the test, simulating attacks just as they happen in the real world. This approach not only identifies vulnerabilities but also provides valuable insights into how they might be exploited.
Why I Picked FourCore:
When examining a plethora of cybersecurity tools, FourCore's commitment to simulating real-world attacks captured my attention. I chose it because it goes beyond merely identifying vulnerabilities to actively demonstrate potential exploitation techniques. In a landscape of various simulation tools, it truly excels, making it 'Best for real-world attack simulations.'
Standout Features and Integrations:
FourCore's distinct edge is its ability to adapt simulations based on current threat landscapes. It incorporates up-to-date attack vectors and methodologies to keep the simulations relevant. Moreover, the platform offers tight integrations with many leading cybersecurity platforms, ensuring that the simulations can work within an organization's existing infrastructure.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Robust integrations with leading cybersecurity platforms
- Reveals not just vulnerabilities but potential exploitation techniques
- Dynamic simulations based on current threats
Cons:
- Some simulations might be too advanced for smaller organizations
- Continuous updates may necessitate regular team training
- Might require a steep learning curve for new users
In the realm of cybersecurity, practice often makes perfect. CYBERBIT Range offers an environment where IT professionals can engage in realistic cybersecurity scenarios, training their skills and reflexes. This dedication to hands-on, real-world training makes it a go-to choice for enhancing cybersecurity prowess.
Why I Picked CYBERBIT Range:
In evaluating numerous training platforms, CYBERBIT Range's emphasis on practical learning set it apart. I selected it because it's not just about theoretical knowledge; it pushes participants to act, react, and adapt in lifelike cyber threat scenarios. From my comparisons, its commitment to realistic training unquestionably positions it as 'best for hands-on cybersecurity training.'
Standout Features and Integrations:
CYBERBIT Range's training environment is meticulously crafted, reflecting the challenges of actual cyber threat landscapes. It incorporates tools and technologies that cybersecurity professionals encounter in real-life scenarios.
In terms of integrations, CYBERBIT Range aligns well with many industry-standard threat detection and prevention platforms, ensuring the training remains relevant and up-to-date.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Continuous updates to reflect the evolving threat landscape
- Incorporates industry-standard tools and technologies
- Real-world cybersecurity training scenarios
Cons:
- Not suited for those looking for purely theoretical training
- Requires regular sessions for continuous skill improvement
- Might be overwhelming for beginners without guidance
Sophos PhishThreat is a security tool specifically designed to emulate phishing attacks, providing organizations with insights into their susceptibility. By reproducing these attacks, the tool offers a practical approach to understanding and mitigating potential security gaps, aligning it perfectly with the tag 'best for phishing attack simulations.'
Why I Picked Sophos PhishThreat:
When it came to choosing a tool for simulating phishing attacks, I was drawn to Sophos PhishThreat for its precision and relevance. Its design and functionalities, in my comparison and judgment, seemed to prioritize real-world application, setting it apart from other contenders. This level of dedication to realistic simulations is why I consider it 'best for phishing attack simulations.'
Standout Features and Integrations:
One of Sophos PhishThreat's prime features is its ability to emulate a variety of phishing scenarios, from simple deceptive emails to more complex malware-laden attacks. This diversity in simulation allows businesses to prioritize their defense mechanisms effectively.
In terms of integrations, Sophos PhishThreat smoothly interacts with many enterprise security platforms, especially those that align with red team operations, further strengthening its utility in real-world attack simulations.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Integrates well with red team operation platforms
- Helps organizations prioritize their defenses against identified security gaps
- Diverse phishing scenario simulations, including malware threats
Cons:
- Requires continuous updates to simulate the latest phishing techniques
- Might require dedicated training for non-technical staff
- Focused specifically on phishing, so might not address other security concerns
vPenTest offers specialized tools tailored for virtual penetration testing. Designed to assess vulnerabilities in virtual environments, it has grown essential for organizations adapting to an increasingly digital landscape.
Why I Picked vPenTest:
In the process of judging various penetration testing tools, I determined that vPenTest was a cut above the rest. My choice hinged on its profound attention to the nuances of virtual environments. Its unique features, combined with my personal opinion after comparing it with peers, clarified that it's 'best for virtual penetration testing needs'.
Standout Features and Integrations:
vPenTest prides itself on its robust endpoint detection mechanisms, ensuring that every access point in a virtual environment is tested. Another pivotal feature is its exfiltration analysis, which carefully scrutinizes data leakage points.
As for integrations, vPenTest smoothly collaborates with most virtualization platforms, making it ideal for diverse infrastructures.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Exfiltration analysis identifies potential data leakage points
- Strong endpoint detection offers a more rounded perspective on vulnerabilities
- Specialized tools for virtual environments ensure comprehensive assessment
Cons:
- Might require a learning curve for those new to virtual penetration testing
- Limited to virtual environments, not ideal for physical infrastructure testing
- Base fee might increase costs for smaller organizations or freelancers
Cymulate offers a comprehensive tool for simulating a wide range of cyber-attacks, helping businesses identify and address potential security risks. The tool's focus on thoroughness makes it aptly suited for its label as 'best for complete attack simulations.'
Why I Picked Cymulate:
In my journey of selecting the ideal tool for a holistic understanding of security vulnerabilities, Cymulate consistently ranked high in my evaluations. Comparing its functionalities and breadth, I determined that Cymulate's platform stands out due to its comprehensive range of templates and its commitment to simulating a broad spectrum of threats.
This comprehensive coverage is why I see it as 'best for complete attack simulations.'
Standout Features and Integrations:
Cymulate's notable features include a wide array of attack templates, allowing for diverse simulation scenarios. Moreover, its user interface is user-friendly, ensuring that even those without deep technical knowledge can navigate and understand the results.
Integration-wise, Cymulate collaborates with a variety of security platforms, making it easier for businesses to interpret results and implement recommended actions.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Effective integrations with other security platforms
- User-friendly interface facilitates ease of use
- Extensive range of attack simulation templates
Cons:
- Some simulations could be too technical for average users without proper training
- Might be overwhelming for smaller businesses with limited security resources
- Requires regular updates to address evolving threat landscapes
Datto SaaS Defense is a dedicated tool that focuses on securing Software as a Service (SaaS) applications. With an increasing number of businesses relying on SaaS solutions, it becomes paramount to ensure these applications are fortified against potential threats, and that's where Datto SaaS Defense shines.
Why I Picked Datto SaaS Defense:
After comparing a myriad of security solutions, I selected Datto SaaS Defense primarily because of its targeted approach to SaaS security. What made it stand out to me was its emphasis as an attack simulation tool coupled with a built-in BAS (breach and attack simulation) tool.
This dual functionality convinced me that it's 'best for SaaS application security'.
Standout Features and Integrations:
One of Datto SaaS Defense's paramount features is its robust attack simulation tool, allowing businesses to gauge their vulnerability levels. Its integrated bas tool provides insights into potential breach scenarios, ensuring preparedness. As for integrations, it smoothly ties in with prominent SaaS platforms, thereby enhancing its ease of use and relevance to users.
Pros and cons
Pros:
- Built-in bas tool offers valuable insights into potential threats
- Incorporates an effective attack simulation tool for comprehensive assessment
- Targeted approach specifically for SaaS application security
Cons:
- Some users might require a learning curve given its specialized features
- May not be suitable for non-SaaS-focused businesses
- Additional base fee might be an extra cost for some businesses
Other BAS Software
Below is a list of additional BAS software that I shortlisted, but did not make it to the top 10. They are definitely worth checking out.
- SafeBreach Platform
Best for proactive breach predictions
- Chariot Detect
Best for IoT security monitoring
- Threat Simulator
Good for identifying network vulnerabilities
- XM Cyber
Good for visualizing attack paths
- NopSec
Good for threat and vulnerability risk management
- AttackIQ
Good for continuous security validation
- Fidelis Elevate
Good for integrated network and endpoint security
- Rapid7 Metasploit
Good for exploit development and research
- Aqua Security Trivy
Good for comprehensive container vulnerability scanning
- NetSPI Breach and Attack Simulation
Good for penetration test orchestration
- FortiTester
Good for performance testing of network security
- Scythe
Good for emulating adversary tactics
Selection Criteria For Choosing The Best BAS Software
When I started researching breach and attack simulation tools, my mission was clear: identify software that would provide the most comprehensive security assessments for various business processes. Having tested and scrutinized a myriad of tools in this category, I've narrowed down the criteria that truly matter.
I've evaluated dozens of such tools, focusing especially on their ability to cater to specific business needs and their relevance to today's cyber threat landscape.
Core Functionality
- Threat Emulation: The ability to mimic real-world cyber threats in a controlled environment.
- Continuous Validation: Continuous checks to ensure security measures remain effective over time.
- Automated Security Testing: The tool should automatically test security measures against evolving threats.
- In-depth Reporting: Generate detailed reports highlighting potential vulnerabilities and offering mitigation recommendations.
- Scenario Customization: Customize threat scenarios based on the specific business process or accounting solution in place.
Key Features
- Integration with Accounting Systems: Absolute syncing with various business accounting software to ensure financial data remains protected.
- Real-time Feedback: Immediate alerts or feedback as soon as a vulnerability is detected.
- Bank Account Safety Checks: Features that test for vulnerabilities specifically related to bank accounts and financial transactions.
- Adaptive Learning: The tool should learn from previous simulations to continually improve its threat detection capabilities.
- Multi-environment Testing: Capabilities to test across multiple platforms and environments, ensuring a holistic security stance.
Usability
- Intuitive Dashboard: Given the complexities often associated with security tools, an easy-to-navigate dashboard is essential. Ideally, one that provides a quick snapshot of the security posture and any ongoing simulations.
- Role-Based Access: Recognizing that not all users should have access to all functionalities or data, the software must offer easy-to-configure role-based access.
- Training and Support: With the evolving nature of cyber threats, a tool should come equipped with an up-to-date learning library, training programs, and top-tier customer support to ensure users are always a step ahead.
- Filtering and Tagging Interface: For larger businesses, a system to easily filter, categorize, and tag vulnerabilities based on their type, severity, or related business process becomes indispensable.
Most Common Questions Regarding BAS Software (FAQs)
What are the benefits of using breach and attack simulation (BAS) tools?
Breach and attack simulation tools offer a range of advantages, including:
- Proactive Threat Assessment: They allow businesses to understand their vulnerabilities before attackers exploit them.
- Continuous Security Validation: Ensure that security measures are always up-to-date and effective against evolving threats.
- Tailored Threat Scenarios: Customize simulations based on specific business environments or processes.
- Detailed Reporting: Receive in-depth insights and actionable recommendations to enhance security posture.
- Cost-Efficiency: By identifying and addressing vulnerabilities early, businesses can avoid the hefty costs associated with potential breaches.
How much do these tools typically cost?
The pricing of BAS tools varies widely based on their features, scalability, and target audience. While some tools cater to small businesses with budget-friendly prices, others are designed for larger enterprises and come with a higher price tag.
What are the common pricing models for BAS software?
Most BAS tools adopt one or more of the following pricing models:
- Per User: Pricing based on the number of users or accounts.
- Per Simulation: Charges based on the number of threat simulations run.
- Flat Monthly/Annual Fee: A consistent fee irrespective of usage.
- Custom Pricing: Tailored pricing based on the specific needs and requirements of the business.
What's the typical range of pricing for these tools?
While prices can start as low as $10 per user per month for basic packages, enterprise solutions might cost upwards of $1,000 per month. It’s essential to balance budget constraints with required features and scalability.
Which are some of the most expensive BAS tools on the market?
Tools like Rapid7 Metasploit and Fidelis Elevate often come with a higher price tag, given their extensive feature sets and the advanced security solutions they offer.
Are there any affordable or budget-friendly BAS tools available?
Yes, tools like Aqua Security Trivy offer valuable features at more budget-friendly rates, making them accessible to smaller businesses or startups.
Are there any free BAS software options?
While most BAS tools come with a price, some, like Aqua Security Trivy, offer a basic free version. However, free versions typically come with limited features and are more suitable for initial assessments rather than comprehensive security evaluations.
Why is there such a significant price variation between different BAS tools?
The cost disparity arises from the range of features offered, the scalability of the tool, the target audience, and the reputation of the brand. More advanced tools catering to larger enterprises with complex requirements will naturally cost more than simpler solutions designed for smaller businesses.
Other Cybersecurity Software Reviews
- Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems
- Cybersecurity Software
- Network Intrusion Detection Systems
Summary
In today's rapidly evolving cyber landscape, the significance of utilizing the best breach and attack simulation (BAS) software cannot be overstated. Data breaches have become increasingly common, and they can severely impact businesses, both in terms of financial losses and reputation damage.
By leveraging the right BAS software, organizations can identify vulnerabilities in their systems before malicious actors do.
Key Takeaways
- Data Breaches Impact: It's essential to understand the real consequences of data breaches. They not only lead to immediate financial implications but can erode trust and brand value over time. A good BAS tool will provide security teams with actionable insights to prevent such breaches.
- Security Control and Functionality: Not all BAS tools are made equal. Your chosen software should offer comprehensive security control features, enabling your security teams to pinpoint weaknesses, test various scenarios, and ultimately fortify your defenses.
- Integrating Expense Tracking: While the primary purpose of BAS tools is to bolster security, some advanced platforms also incorporate expense tracking. This feature allows businesses to ensure their investments in security measures are efficient and well-allocated.
In sum, the right BAS software will empower organizations to be proactive, allowing them to stay a step ahead of potential threats and ensuring that their defense mechanisms are robust and up-to-date.
What Do You Think?
While I strive to provide a comprehensive overview of the best BAS software available, the tech landscape is vast and ever-evolving. If you're using or know of a tool that I might have missed, I'd love to hear from you. Your insights and recommendations are invaluable in ensuring this guide remains updated and useful for all readers. Please reach out with your suggestions, and together, I can make this resource even better!