10 Migliori piattaforme di gestione cloud: la shortlist
Gestire i sistemi cloud può diventare complicato man mano che le aziende crescono e utilizzano diversi servizi online contemporaneamente. Le piattaforme di gestione cloud semplificano questo processo integrando tutto in un unico luogo. Aiutano i team a organizzare, monitorare e gestire le attività cloud in modo più fluido, mantenendo i dati al sicuro, i sistemi efficienti e i costi sotto controllo.
Questi strumenti semplificano le attività quotidiane, forniscono preziose informazioni sulle prestazioni e aiutano le aziende a evitare sprechi. Con la piattaforma giusta, il tuo team può concentrarsi su ciò che conta davvero, garantendo operazioni efficienti e sicure.
Table of Contents
Perché Fidarti delle Nostre Recensioni Software
Testiamo e recensiamo software dal 2023. Come leader tecnologici, sappiamo quanto sia cruciale e difficile prendere la decisione giusta nella scelta di un software.
Investiamo in una ricerca approfondita per aiutare il nostro pubblico a effettuare scelte migliori di acquisto software. Abbiamo testato oltre 2.000 strumenti per diversi casi d’uso tecnologici e scritto più di 1.000 recensioni complete. Scopri come restiamo trasparenti e la nostra metodologia di recensione del software.
Riepilogo delle migliori piattaforme di gestione cloud
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for automated endpoint management | 14-day free trial available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 2 | Best cloud management provider for user access control | Free demo available | From $9.99/user/month | Website | |
| 3 | Best open-source cloud management provider | Free plan available | Open source project and Available for free | Website | |
| 4 | Best for working with multiple resource types | Free plan available | Open source project and Available for free | Website | |
| 5 | Best for multi-cloud monitoring and reporting | 14-day free trial | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 6 | Best for container-based application development | 60-day free trial | From $83.33/month (billed annually, exclude AWS infrastructure fees) | Website | |
| 7 | Best for automating cloud management | Free plan available | From $49/month | Website | |
| 8 | Best for hybrid cloud management | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 9 | Best self-service features for cloud management | Free plan available | From $708.33/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 10 | Best for virtual machines (VMs) | 7-day free trial | Pricing upon request | Website |
-
TestDevLab
Visit Website -
Site24x7
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.7 -
GitHub Actions
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.8
Recensioni delle migliori piattaforme di gestione cloud
Nelle prossime sezioni approfondirò le mie piattaforme di gestione cloud preferite, inclusi i pro e contro, le informazioni sui prezzi e i criteri che ho utilizzato per le mie scelte.
NinjaOne is an all-in-one cloud platform designed to simplify IT operations across remote endpoints, providing a centralized system for endpoint management, patching, backup, and remote monitoring.
Why I Picked NinjaOne:
I selected NinjaOne because of how effectively it consolidates routine IT functions into a single, cloud-native interface. It gives teams unified visibility and automation across endpoints, regardless of OS or location. During testing, I appreciated its real-time monitoring, simple deployment, and ease of scaling across devices in hybrid or remote setups.
NinjaOne Standout Features and Integrations:
Features include automated patching, remote monitoring, and backup tools, with mobile device management and endpoint security baked in. You can remotely control endpoints, automate scripts, or trigger workflows from a single pane of glass. Its SaaS backup solution extends coverage to cloud apps like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace.
Integrations include CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, HaloPSA, and other security and service platforms.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Built-in remote access and troubleshooting tools
- Supports both Windows and macOS
- Powerful automation for patching, backups, and remote monitoring
Cons:
- Integration options with niche tools may require additional setup
- Limited customization in certain reporting and alert configurations
New Product Updates from NinjaOne
NinjaOne Adds Windows Agent Deployment to Network Discovery
NinjaOne adds Windows agent deployment directly from Network Discovery. This update helps IT teams move from discovering unmanaged Windows devices to monitoring, patching, and managing them faster. For more information, visit NinjaOne’s official site.
CloudFuze’s main focus with its core product seems to be on cloud migrations, but during the course of my time with it, I found it handles user access very well.
Why I Picked CloudFuze:
I found CloudFuze’s cloud file security features to be quite comprehensive for user access management, with an entire page dedicated to it. You can add and delete user accounts, as well as edit their status to or from administrators. If you have several users you need to keep track of, you can group them into teams that you manage with bulk actions.
CloudFuze Standout Features and Integrations
Features that made me recommend CloudFuze for user access management include API keys and secure cloud access that let you control who can access your cloud from external platforms. There’s also an audit function that shows you how the files you’ve shared are being used, with information on general access and downloads.
Integrations are pre-built for major cloud platforms as well as Slack, Microsoft Teams, Defender, and Sharepoint.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong file security features
- Comprehensive user access control
- Easy migrations
Cons:
- Free trial is often unavailable in favor of a demo
- Web-only, no apps
CloudStack is a free open-source Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) CMP from Apache meant for use on both on-premise and hybrid environments.
Why I Picked Apache CloudStack:
As I’ve mentioned above, CloudStack is an Apache product, meaning it’s completely open-source and has a thriving developer community behind it. This makes it an ideal option for deployments where you need to implement functionality that you can’t find anywhere else but without needing to build everything from scratch.
Apache CloudStack Standout Features and Integrations
Features in CloudStack that I really like for working on open-source software include a powerful and extensively documented API that you can use to extend the functionality of the product with things like custom integrations. CloudStack also allows you to work with the APIs for AWS S3 and EC2.
It’s also hypervisor-agnostic, so you can run it on KVM, VMware, Citrix XenProject and XenServer, BareMetal through IPMI, vSphere through vCenter, and LXC.
Integrations are available via an API that you can use to build custom solutions to connect third-party services.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Completely free
- Robust documentation
- Open source
Cons:
- More prone to bugs than other solutions
- No dedicated customer support; you’ll have to rely on the community
Azure Storage Explorer is one of several products Microsoft offers in its suite of cloud computing tools. It’s used to manage multiple cloud environments both on and off the Azure platform.
Why I Picked Azure Storage Explorer:
I chose Storage Explorer because it supports a comprehensive list of resource types. If you want to use your Azure account, you can connect to queues, blob containers, and Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 directories and containers. If you’re using a shared access signature (SAS) URL, you can connect to all four previously mentioned resources, as well as tables and file shares.
Azure Storage Explorer Standout Features and Integrations
Features I liked in Storage Explorer include the presence of local emulators like Azurite, which allow you to create an environment where you can test out table, queue, and blob storage applications whether you’re on-premise or offline. It’s also extensible, with extensions for services such as Azure Data Factory to connect to third-party services like Google Cloud and AWS S3 for migrations.
Integrations are pre-built for major cloud providers and native for other Azure services such as Azurite, Data Factory, App Configuration, and Active Directory (AD).
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Easy to use after deployment
- Strong security features
- Supports several different resource and object types
Cons:
- Slow performance
- Limited analytics
Best for multi-cloud monitoring and reporting
The first time I heard about CloudHealth was in 2018 when VMware announced it had acquired the multi-cloud management company for an estimated $500 million, so they must have been doing something right. In 2022, VMware rebranded it into VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, and that’s the version I’ve tested for this article.
Why I Picked VMware Aria Cost:
I chose VMware Aria Cost because of its wide support for most major cloud providers, including Google Cloud, Azure, Alibaba Cloud, AWS, Oracle Cloud, and VMware itself. On all these platforms, you can use it to generate in-depth insights into your cloud providers in areas ranging from FinOps to security.
VMware Aria Cost Standout Features and Integrations
Features I liked in VMware Aria Cost for multi-cloud monitoring and reporting include the multi-cloud history report, which gives you information on historical trends and activity within your cloud environments. The FlexReports feature allows you to generate insights from different areas of your cloud environments for in-depth analysis regarding aspects such as assets and costs.
Integrations are available natively with VMware and other Aria offerings, including Operation, Hub, and Automation. You also get built-in integrations for Azure, Google Cloud, AWS, Alert Logic, Logicworks, Ansible, Bulletproof, Shi, New Relic, and Docker.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong monitoring and analytics features
- Easy to deploy
- Supports major cloud service providers
Cons:
- Weak performance on mobile and tablets
- Limited documentation
Best for container-based application development
OpenShift Container Platform is offered by Red Hat, one of the biggest contributors to various projects that support container-based development, including Kubernetes, Docker, and Linux.
Why I Picked OpenShift Container Platform:
When I was working with OpenShift Container Platform, I found out that it provides access to the source-to-image (S2I) framework that lets you create container images using your application’s source code. It supports some of the most popular languages and frameworks used in app development, including Python, Node.js, Java, PHP, .NET, Go, Ruby, and Perl.
OpenShift Container Platform Standout Features and Integrations
Features that made me recommend OpenShift Container Platform for developers include the inbuilt CI/CD pipeline that allows for rapid development over sustained periods. It also uses Prometheus, a tool that gives you monitoring capabilities and metrics for applications and clusters so you can ensure whatever you’re working on remains healthy throughout the process.
Integrations are available natively with other Red Hat products like the OpenShift Platform, Ansible, and Enterprise Linux. There’s also a REST API that allows you to build your own integrations if you need them.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Extensive documentation
- Flexible customization options
- Built-in source-to-image framework for containerization
Cons:
- Steep learning curve
- Limited deployment options
TotalCloud is a CMP from Qualys, a company that also specializes in other cloud-related solutions covering security and compliance.
Why I Picked TotalCloud:
TotalCloud came with Qualys Flow, which I used during my tests to automate several functions, and it worked very well, in my opinion. For instance, I used it to orchestrate security-related tasks, and it handled them from end to end, from scanning my deployment for vulnerabilities all the way to remediation.
TotalCloud Standout Features and Integrations
Features that stood out to me when I was examining TotalCloud include the built-in security provisions that echo the rest of the offerings from Qualys, most of which you can leave to run automatically.
For example, FlexScan gives you agentless security scans but also allows you to run network and agent-based scanning if you want more detailed reports. TruRisk uses a risk-based approach to security for your cloud environments to protect you from threats like malware and ransomware.
Integrations are pre-built for major cloud providers and available natively with other Qualys products such as InstaProtect, FlexScan, Flow, and TruRisk.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Useful native integrations for security
- Strong automation features
- Free plan available
Cons:
- Costly to bring in other Qualys integrations
- Limited customizability
The team that built Morpheus Data was looking for a solution that fit their DevOps pipeline at an application factory and decided to make their own when they couldn’t find one.
Why I Picked Morpheus Data:
I chose Morpheus Data because of its support for open-container orchestration. When you pair this with its standard cloud management features, it becomes a useful unified tool for anyone looking to run hybrid setups.
Morpheus Data Standout Features and Integrations
Features in Morpheus Data that caught my attention include the no-code setup for Kubernetes and private clouds, making it easy for non-technical people to get started with their own deployments. It can also integrate tools like load balancers, DNS, and networks to convert hypervisors like KVM, Nutanix, and VMware into private clouds with full multi-tenancy.
Integrations are pre-built for Microsoft DNS, Github, Docker, Chef, Ansible, Puppet, Remedy, Jenkins, PowerDNS, and ServiceNow, as well as major cloud platforms.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong one-click functionality
- Allows you to build a true private cloud
- Several pre-built integrations for third parties
Cons:
- Weak customer support
- No free plan
CloudBolt is a multi and hybrid cloud management platform that supports various deployment options, including containers.
Why I Picked CloudBolt:
CloudBolt won me over with its self-service features that let me order resources like storage, compute, and application stacks and have them available almost immediately. For most of the time I spent with it, I wasn’t worried about shadow IT, when employees use hardware or software that hasn’t been approved by the IT department, because I never had to wait too long for things to get moving.
CloudBolt Standout Features and Integrations
Features I liked under CloudBolt’s self-service include what they call blueprints, which allow DevOps teams to set up and provision resources within only minutes on any deployment. You also get catalogs of your environments that make it easier to manage resources, from provisions to user roles.
Integrations are pre-built for major cloud providers, as well as Veeam, ServiceNow, Puppet, Ansible, Chef, SolarWinds, Datadog, SAML, Spunk, and New Relic.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Several pre-built integrations
- Robust self-service features
- Flexible deployment options
Cons:
- Weaker support on lower tiers
- Bare-bones logging
Snow Commander is a cloud management platform from Snow Software that focuses mainly on hybrid clouds and puts automation at its forefront.
Why I Picked Snow Commander:
I chose Snow Commander because of its automated service management feature, which allows you to set timed windows after which resources are decommissioned. This makes it easy to manage virtual machines like the ones I’d built with VMware where I was running my tests. You get notifications and have the option to delay this, so you can keep resources available for as long as you need them without worrying about sprawl.
Snow Commander Standout Features and Integrations
Features that made managing my environments with Snow Commander easy include a self-service portal where you can request new VMs from a service catalog or changes to existing instances, so it’s easier to operate these environments. It also provides reporting and analytics, and I found the information on VM sprawl and growth important for keeping my environments under control.
Integrations are pre-built for major cloud providers as well as ServiceNow, Ansible, Jenkins, BMC Helix, Topdesk, Puppet, Chef, Saltstack, Cherwell, and Slack.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Customizable service catalog
- Automated lifecycle management
- Several integrations
Cons:
- Slow customer service response
- Costs can add up
Altre piattaforme di gestione cloud
Di seguito trovi un elenco di ulteriori piattaforme di gestione cloud che non hanno raggiunto la mia top 10 ma che restano comunque ottimi prodotti.
- CoreStack
For multi-cloud FinOps
- Concierto Cloud
For cloud migration
- AWS Storage Gateway
For multiple storage solutions
- Turbo360
For monitoring Azure cloud environments
- CloudKeeper
For cloud financial management services
- IBM Turbonomic
For automating critical actions in real time
- Rubrik
For cloud administrative control
- Flexera One
For hybrid cloud visibility
- ServiceNow Cloud Management
For reducing cloud spending
- Zesty
For dynamic cloud management
Recensioni correlate su software cloud
- Fornitori di servizi cloud
- Strumenti di sicurezza cloud
- Piattaforme cloud come servizio
- Strumenti di archiviazione cloud
- Piattaforme di sviluppo cloud
How I Evaluate Cloud Management Platforms
I split my evaluation into baseline requirements—like unified multi-cloud visibility and cost governance—and differentiators that separate a truly capable platform from a glorified billing dashboard.
Core Functionality (Table Stakes For This List)
When I'm selecting tools for my list, I rank each one on a scale from 0 (does not offer the functionality) to 5 (excels in this area) for each core functionality listed below. Then, I calculate the tool's total score into a percentage. Each tool needs to achieve a minimum total score of 75% to be considered for inclusion.
- Multi-Cloud Support: I check whether a platform can manage resources across AWS, Azure, and GCP from one console—and whether hybrid or private cloud coverage is included.
- Cost Management & Optimization: Each tool should surface spend breakdowns, budget alerts, and rightsizing recommendations so teams can track waste across accounts.
- Provisioning & Automation: I evaluate how a platform handles resource lifecycle—whether it supports IaC tools like Terraform, offers blueprints, or enables self-service workflows.
- Governance & Policy Enforcement: Strong platforms let you set guardrails, enforce tagging standards, and run compliance audits across hundreds of cloud accounts at once.
- Monitoring & Resource Inventory: I look for unified dashboards that map deployed assets, track utilization metrics, and give real-time visibility without toggling between providers.
- Security & Compliance Controls: Misconfiguration detection, posture scoring, and mapping to frameworks like SOC 2 or ISO 27001 are what I evaluate for each tool here.
Once I have a list of tools that meet this criteria, I consider what sets each platform apart.
Differentiating Factors (What Sets Vendors Apart)
Here's how I compare and contrast different vendors:
Standout Features
AI-driven recommendations are a big differentiator—I look for platforms that go beyond static reports and actively flag rightsizing opportunities or predict spend anomalies before they hit your bill. A self-service portal also matters when platform teams need to let developers provision pre-approved resources without filing tickets. I also evaluate Kubernetes and container management, since teams running microservices across clouds need cluster-level visibility baked into the same console.
Beyond Features
Pricing model matters here—some platforms charge per resource, others take a percentage of managed cloud spend, and that difference compounds fast at scale. I also evaluate integration depth, especially with ITSM tools like ServiceNow and CI/CD pipelines, since a cloud management platform that sits outside your operational workflows creates more friction than it solves. Compliance certifications are another factor I check, particularly whether a vendor supports audit-ready reporting mapped to frameworks your organization already follows.
Come scegliere una piattaforma di gestione cloud
È facile perdersi in lunghe liste di funzionalità e strutture di prezzo complesse. Per aiutarti a mantenere il focus durante il processo di selezione del software più adatto alle tue esigenze, ecco un elenco di fattori da tenere a mente:
| Fattore | Cosa considerare |
|---|---|
| Scalabilità | La piattaforma supporta la tua crescita? Considera possibili aumenti di carico in futuro e come lo strumento li gestisce senza costi aggiuntivi o cali di prestazioni. |
| Integrazioni | La piattaforma si connette con i tuoi strumenti esistenti? L’assenza di integrazioni potrebbe comportare lavoro manuale o maggiore complessità. |
| Personalizzazione | Puoi adattare la piattaforma ai tuoi flussi di lavoro? Cerca impostazioni regolabili e modelli definiti dall’utente. |
| Facilità d’uso | L’interfaccia è intuitiva? Un apprendimento difficile potrebbe rallentare la tua squadra. Considera i feedback degli utenti sull’usabilità. |
| Implementazione e onboarding | Quanto velocemente puoi iniziare? Valuta la disponibilità di risorse formative e il supporto durante la fase di transizione. |
| Costo | Confronta le strutture di prezzo. Attenzione a eventuali costi nascosti e assicurati che il costo sia in linea col tuo budget e il ROI atteso. |
| Tutele di sicurezza | Le funzionalità di sicurezza sono sufficientemente robuste per le tue necessità? Considera crittografia, controlli di accesso e conformità agli standard del settore. |
| Disponibilità del supporto | Quali canali di supporto sono disponibili? Verifica la presenza di assistenza 24/7, chat live e account manager dedicati per assistenza rapida. |
Cosa sono le piattaforme di gestione cloud?
Le piattaforme di gestione cloud sono strumenti che aiutano le aziende a gestire e ottimizzare le proprie risorse e servizi cloud. Questi strumenti sono solitamente utilizzati da professionisti IT e amministratori cloud per aumentare l'efficienza operativa e ridurre i costi. Le funzionalità di automazione, monitoraggio e integrazione facilitano la gestione dei carichi di lavoro, assicurano la sicurezza e mantengono la conformità. In generale, questi strumenti offrono alle aziende maggiore controllo sui propri ambienti cloud.
Caratteristiche
Quando scegli una piattaforma di gestione cloud, presta attenzione alle seguenti caratteristiche chiave:
- Automazione: Automatizza le attività di routine per risparmiare tempo e ridurre gli errori umani, consentendo al tuo team di concentrarsi su iniziative più strategiche.
- Gestione dei costi: Fornisce informazioni sulle spese cloud e aiuta a identificare le aree in cui è possibile ridurre i costi e ottimizzare l'uso delle risorse.
- Capacità di integrazione: Si collega senza problemi agli strumenti esistenti come le piattaforme di protezione dei carichi di lavoro cloud, migliorando l'efficienza del flusso di lavoro e riducendo le attività manuali.
- Salvaguardie di sicurezza: Garantisce la protezione dei dati tramite crittografia e controlli di accesso, mantenendo la conformità agli standard di settore.
- Monitoraggio: Offre un monitoraggio in tempo reale delle risorse cloud per rilevare anomalie e mantenere le prestazioni.
- Personalizzazione: Consente di adattare la piattaforma alle proprie esigenze specifiche e ai flussi di lavoro, offrendo flessibilità e adattabilità.
- Scalabilità: Supporta la crescita aziendale gestendo carichi di lavoro crescenti senza compromettere le prestazioni.
- Monitoraggio della conformità: Mantiene le operazioni allineate alle normative di settore, riducendo il rischio di non conformità.
- Interfaccia intuitiva: Propone un design intuitivo che semplifica la navigazione e riduce la curva di apprendimento del tuo team.
- Analisi predittiva: Fornisce informazioni su tendenze future e potenziali problemi, aiutandoti a prendere decisioni consapevoli.
Vantaggi
L'implementazione di piattaforme di gestione cloud offre numerosi vantaggi per il tuo team e la tua azienda. Ecco alcuni benefici che potrai riscontrare:
- Risparmio sui costi: Ottimizzando l'uso delle risorse e riducendo gli sprechi, queste piattaforme aiutano ad abbassare le spese cloud.
- Aumento dell'efficienza: L'automazione delle attività di routine libera tempo al tuo team, permettendo di concentrarsi su progetti strategici e aumentando la produttività.
- Sicurezza avanzata: Le funzionalità di sicurezza integrate proteggono i tuoi dati e assicurano la conformità agli standard di settore.
- Miglioramento delle decisioni: Il monitoraggio in tempo reale e l'analisi predittiva offrono informazioni che aiutano a prendere decisioni consapevoli.
- Scalabilità: Queste piattaforme sono in grado di gestire carichi di lavoro crescenti, supportando la crescita della tua azienda.
- Flessibilità: La personalizzazione permette di adattare la piattaforma alle esigenze specifiche e ai flussi di lavoro.
- Migliore conformità: Il monitoraggio della conformità garantisce che le operazioni soddisfino le normative di settore, riducendo i rischi legali.
Costi e prezzi
Per scegliere una piattaforma di gestione cloud è importante comprendere i diversi modelli e piani tariffari disponibili. I costi variano in base alle funzionalità, alla dimensione del team, agli add-on e ad altri fattori. Considera di consultare i confronti tra NinjaOne e ManageEngine per dettagli sulle tariffe. La tabella seguente riassume i piani più comuni, i prezzi medi e le funzionalità tipiche incluse nelle soluzioni di piattaforme di gestione cloud:
Tabella di confronto tra piani per piattaforme di gestione cloud
| Tipologia piano | Prezzo medio | Funzionalità comuni |
|---|---|---|
| Piano gratuito | $0 | Monitoraggio base, automazione limitata e supporto della community. |
| Piano personale | $5-$25/user/month | Monitoraggio avanzato, automazione base e integrazioni limitate. |
| Piano business | $30-$75/user/month | Automazione completa, reportistica dettagliata e supporto prioritario. |
| Piano enterprise | $100-$200/user/month | Integrazioni personalizzate, account manager dedicato e funzionalità di sicurezza avanzate. |
Domande frequenti sulle piattaforme di gestione cloud
Ecco alcune risposte alle domande più comuni sulle piattaforme di gestione cloud:
Una sola piattaforma può gestire diversi servizi cloud?
Sì. Molte piattaforme di gestione cloud consentono di controllare diversi provider cloud come AWS, Azure o Google Cloud da un’unica dashboard. Questo aiuta i team a lavorare in modo più efficiente e a mantenere un migliore controllo sui propri sistemi.
In che modo queste piattaforme aiutano a migliorare la sicurezza?
Forniscono un controllo centralizzato e impostazioni di sicurezza coerenti su tutti gli ambienti collegati. Funzionalità come la gestione degli accessi degli utenti, il monitoraggio delle attività e gli avvisi aiutano a proteggere i dati e a ridurre i rischi.
Queste piattaforme sono adatte a team piccoli o di medie dimensioni?
Sì. La maggior parte delle piattaforme è progettata per essere flessibile e facile da usare, rendendole adatte a team di qualsiasi dimensione. Aiutano a semplificare le operazioni quotidiane e a ridurre il lavoro manuale grazie all’automazione e all’organizzazione.
Cosa succede dopo:
Se stai cercando informazioni sulle piattaforme di gestione cloud, contatta un consulente SoftwareSelect per ricevere consigli gratuiti.
Compila un modulo e fai una breve chiacchierata dove approfondiranno le tue esigenze specifiche. Riceverai poi una lista selezionata di software da valutare. Ti supporteranno anche durante tutto il processo di acquisto, inclusa la negoziazione dei prezzi.
