Skip to main content

Navigating the intricacies of cloud security can be a daunting task. That's where cloud workload protection platforms come into play. In essence, these tools safeguard your cloud-based assets and infrastructures from potential threats. The beauty of them? They not only bolster security but also simplify the complexities tied to managing multi-cloud environments.

I delved into countless options to address these challenges, and I'm eager to share those that truly stand out in alleviating these pain points.

Best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms Summary

This comparison chart summarizes pricing details for my top cloud workload protection platform selections to help you find the best one for your budget and business needs.

Best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms Reviews

Below are my detailed summaries of the best cloud workload protection platform that made it onto my shortlist. My reviews offer a detailed look at the key features, pros & cons, integrations, and ideal use cases of each tool to help you find the best one for you.

Best for vulnerability management

  • Free trial available
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

Qualys is a leading cloud-based security platform renowned for its meticulous vulnerability management capabilities. It is adept at scanning, detecting, and remediating vulnerabilities across diverse cloud and on-premises environments, solidifying its stance as best for vulnerability management.

Why I Picked Qualys: Navigating through the maze of security platforms, I zeroed in on Qualys for its comprehensive approach to vulnerability scanning and management. While evaluating and comparing, what drew my attention was its unparalleled precision in identifying security flaws and its robust remediation mechanisms. These distinguishing traits positioned Qualys as the definitive choice for vulnerability management in my assessment.

Standout features & integrations:

Qualys showcases a comprehensive cloud security posture management (CSPM) system and is supported by real-time scanning for immediate detection of misconfigurations. Its vulnerability scanning extends to apps and serverless functions, allowing for a thorough assessment of the entire infrastructure. Integrating with a broad spectrum of cloud providers, including AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, its API-driven nature complements automation efforts and fits perfectly within DevOps workflows.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Efficient integration with major cloud services through its API-driven nature
  • Offers cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) for multi-cloud environments
  • Comprehensive vulnerability scanning across cloud and on-premises assets

Cons:

  • Some users might face challenges in navigating its extensive reporting system.
  • There might be complexities in configuration and customization for specific needs
  • The vast range of tools and features might be overwhelming for smaller organizations

Best for integrated security architecture

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing upon request

Fortinet provides a broad range of cybersecurity solutions, covering networks, endpoint, applications, data center, and cloud. With its commitment to integrated security architecture, Fortinet ensures comprehensive protection across various platforms and environments, aligning perfectly with the tag of being "best for integrated security architecture."

Why I Picked Fortinet:

In the realm of cybersecurity, myriad tools promise comprehensive protection, yet choosing Fortinet became evident as I compared and judged its offerings against others. It was the integrated security architecture of Fortinet that truly caught my attention, marking a distinction from its competitors. I believe that Fortinet's robust integrated architecture makes it the "Best for integrated security architecture" because it effectively consolidates multiple security controls, leading to a more unified defense mechanism.

Standout features & integrations:

Fortinet shines with its FortiGate next-generation firewalls, which provide both network and security features in a unified platform. The Fortinet Security Fabric integrates various security tools, allowing for real-time threat intelligence sharing and automated workflows. Beyond this, the platform's capabilities in cloud security posture management (CSPM) and cloud-native application protection ensure secure multi-cloud deployments.

Regarding integrations, Fortinet integrates with public cloud providers such as AWS, Google Cloud, and other IaaS platforms. Furthermore, it collaborates efficiently with VMware for virtualized environments and offers API integrations for improved automation and remediation capabilities.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Fortinet Security Fabric improves the collaboration between security tools for real-time intelligence sharing.
  • Compatibility with major public cloud providers ensures cloud workload security.
  • Comprehensive integrated security architecture, consolidating various security controls.

Cons:

  • Some users might face challenges while implementing specific integrations or features in hybrid environments.
  • The vast array of products and features might be overwhelming for smaller businesses.
  • May require dedicated expertise for configuration and management, especially in complex environments.

Best for comprehensive cloud security posture

  • Pricing upon request.

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks offers a dynamic cloud security solution that caters to public, private, and hybrid environments. Recognizing the expanding attack surface in cloud computing, this platform ensures that cloud workload security and posture are fortified at all layers.

Why I Picked Prisma Cloud: In my journey of selecting the most capable tools, Prisma Cloud consistently surfaced as a top contender. I chose it because of its comprehensive approach to cloud security posture management (CSPM). When comparing and judging various platforms, Prisma Cloud stood out because of its expansive feature set and dedication to securing all types of cloud architectures. Given its dedication to a comprehensive cloud security framework, it’s clear to see why it's best for a robust cloud security posture.

Standout features & integrations:

Prisma Cloud boasts cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) capabilities which tackle both CSPM and runtime protection for apps. Features like real-time threat detection, prioritizing misconfigurations, and swift remediation mechanisms are part of its core offering. Integration-wise, the platform thrives with robust API connections, collaborating smoothly with major cloud services and providers such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Prioritization of vulnerabilities coupled with remediation tools
  • API integrations with major cloud providers improve its utility
  • Expansive multi-cloud security platform

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve for those new to cloud security tools.
  • Granular controls for specific cloud services might be a wish for certain advanced users
  • Some users may find the dashboard a tad intricate

Best for threat detection in AWS environment

  • Pricing upon request

Amazon Web Services (AWS) GuardDuty is a cloud-native application protection platform that offers intelligent threat detection for AWS accounts and workloads. Leveraging machine learning, GuardDuty continuously analyzes AWS data sources to identify unusual activities, making it indispensable for AWS security.

Why I Picked AWS GuardDuty: When it came to selecting the right tool for threat detection within the AWS environment, AWS GuardDuty was my foremost choice. Judging its capabilities against other cloud security solutions, I observed its distinct advantage in terms of native integration and its specialization in the AWS ecosystem. My opinion is that this tool is the "Best for threat detection in AWS environment" due to its adeptness at identifying AWS-specific threats and its in-depth understanding of AWS architectures.

Standout features & integrations:

AWS GuardDuty shines in real-time threat detection, identifying potential threats from sources such as VPC Flow Logs, AWS CloudTrail event logs, and DNS logs. Its use of machine learning allows for the pinpointing of potential threats without the need for user-defined rules or custom configurations. Additionally, its native integration with other AWS services ensures streamlined security operations and easier remediation workflows within the AWS environment.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integration with a broad array of AWS services for comprehensive security controls.
  • Utilizes machine learning for advanced threat detection without custom rules.
  • Native to AWS, allowing for specialized threat detection tailored to AWS services.

Cons:

  • While it offers automated findings, some organizations may require manual review and verification of these findings.
  • Requires an understanding of AWS-specific configurations and structures.
  • Limited to the AWS environment, potentially making it less suitable for multi-cloud or hybrid deployments.

Best for visibility into cloud assets

  • Pricing upon request

Sophos Cloud Optix delivers a potent cloud security platform that provides organizations with comprehensive visibility and analytics for their cloud environments. Its prowess in offering unparalleled insight into cloud assets and their configurations underscores its designation as "best for visibility into cloud assets."

Why I Picked Sophos Cloud Optix:

Navigating the vast landscape of cloud security tools, I found myself selecting Sophos Cloud Optix, given its impressive feature set and customer feedback. Its distinct focus on providing crystal-clear visibility into cloud assets, coupled with intelligent analytics, marked it as unique in my judgment. I determined that Sophos Cloud Optix stands tall as the "Best for visibility into cloud assets" primarily due to its unparalleled prowess in monitoring and visualizing cloud assets across multiple platforms.

Standout features & integrations:

Sophos Cloud Optix boasts advanced features like cloud security posture management (CSPM) that identifies misconfigurations and prioritizes remediation efforts. Moreover, its machine learning-powered analytics help security teams monitor the entire cloud environment, detect anomalies, and reduce the attack surface by eliminating vulnerabilities.

In terms of integrations, Sophos Cloud Optix collaborates with major public cloud providers, including AWS, GCP, and VMware. It also offers API integrations, improving automation and streamlining cloud services for real-time data syncing and monitoring.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Integration with major cloud providers and API support facilitates improved monitoring and automation.
  • Robust CSPM capabilities to identify and rectify misconfigurations swiftly.
  • Comprehensive visibility into cloud assets across multiple cloud providers.

Cons:

  • While it integrates with major cloud providers, organizations with hybrid environments may require additional configuration or tools.
  • Some users may desire more granular control over specific features or configurations.
  • May have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with cloud-native application protection platforms (CNAPP).

Best for advanced threat prevention

  • Pricing upon request

Check Point CloudGuard is a prominent cloud security solution dedicated to safeguarding public and multi-cloud deployments. With its primary focus on advanced threat prevention, it effectively minimizes the attack surface, making it a formidable tool against sophisticated cyber threats.

Why I Picked Check Point CloudGuard: In the realm of cloud security, I selected Check Point CloudGuard for its reputation in combatting intricate threats. Through meticulous comparison and evaluation, it was evident that this platform possesses unparalleled capabilities in threat prevention. The depth and sophistication of its security tools, combined with the advanced threat intelligence it offers, solidified my judgment. This makes me confident in saying it's the best for advanced threat prevention.

Standout features & integrations:

Check Point CloudGuard shines with its cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) and real-time cloud security posture management (CSPM), crucial for rectifying misconfigurations swiftly. Its cybersecurity measures prioritize threat remediation, significantly reducing the potential attack surface. On the integration front, CloudGuard boasts an API-driven architecture, connecting with major cloud providers, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, and aligning with DevOps practices and workflows.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Utilizes cloud security posture management to swiftly address vulnerabilities
  • Integration capabilities with major cloud services via its advanced API
  • Comprehensive advanced threat prevention mechanisms backed by rigorous security controls

Cons:

  • Some businesses might find the platform more complex than needed for their operations.
  • Initial setup and configuration might require a more specialized skill set
  • The broad scope of features might present a steeper learning curve for newcomers

Best for multi-layered security modules

  • Free plan available
  • From $1.25/month

Bitdefender is a global cybersecurity leader offering a range of protection solutions for both individuals and organizations. Known for its robust, multi-layered security modules, Bitdefender provides comprehensive defense against a wide array of threats, making it a top pick for those seeking intricate and reliable security layers.

Why I Picked Bitdefender: In my journey of evaluating various security tools, Bitdefender stood out, compelling me to select it for its reputation and performance. Judging by its features, customer feedback, and my own comparative analysis, it's evident that Bitdefender's intricate security modules set it apart. I am convinced that Bitdefender is the "Best for multi-layered security modules" due to its ability to offer numerous protective layers, effectively reducing the attack surface and guarding against diverse threats.

Standout features & integrations:

Bitdefender is lauded for its multi-layered approach to cybersecurity, encompassing anti-malware, firewall, endpoint protection, and cloud security posture management (CSPM). Its real-time protection capabilities combined with advanced machine learning techniques ensure swift detection and remediation of threats.

On the integration front, Bitdefender collaborates effectively with major public cloud providers, allowing for improved cloud security solutions. Its API integrations facilitate automation and improve workflows, catering to both on-premises and cloud-based environments.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Advanced machine learning techniques bolstering real-time threat detection.
  • Effective integrations with major cloud providers and versatile API support.
  • Comprehensive multi-layered security offering protection against a variety of threats.

Cons:

  • Requires periodic updates to ensure protection against the latest threats, which might disrupt some users.
  • While its cloud integrations are commendable, some businesses might require specific configurations for hybrid environments.
  • The plethora of features might be overwhelming for users seeking simple protection solutions.

Best for container security

  • Pricing upon request.

Aqua Security is a leading name when it comes to securing containerized applications throughout their lifecycle. It specializes in safeguarding workloads in cloud-native environments, making it an ideal choice for container security.

Why I Picked Aqua Security: When I was selecting a tool for container security, Aqua Security consistently came up as a top choice based on numerous comparisons and opinions from industry experts. Judging its capabilities, it’s evident that its dedication to securing containers and the broader cloud-native ecosystem sets it apart. The decision to recognize Aqua Security as "Best for container security" stems from its advanced features and the security controls it places around these digital assets.

Standout features & integrations:

Aqua Security offers real-time monitoring and remediation of containerized applications, allowing security teams to identify and rectify vulnerabilities promptly. The platform's robust cloud security posture management (CSPM) helps in detecting and addressing misconfigurations before they can be exploited. Aqua integrates with various cloud providers, including AWS, GCP, and Azure, as well as with numerous DevOps tools through its versatile API.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Strong integrations with major cloud services, making implementation smoother for hybrid environments.
  • Provides cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) capabilities, ensuring holistic security for cloud-native ecosystems.
  • Comprehensive container security, covering everything from image scanning to runtime protection.

Cons:

  • Its focus on cloud-native might leave teams with more traditional setups looking for additional tools.
  • Depending on the configuration and the environment, there might be occasional false positives in vulnerability scanning.
  • For smaller organizations, the plethora of features might seem overwhelming.

Best for hybrid cloud protection

  • 30-day free trial + free demo available
  • From $39.95/device (billed annually)

Trend Micro provides a robust cloud security platform, designed to integrate with both on-premises and cloud environments. Its ability to merge traditional and cloud-based security measures positions it as a leader in hybrid cloud protection.

Why I Picked Trend Micro: During my analysis and selection process, Trend Micro's approach to cloud security consistently caught my attention. The decision to pick this tool was influenced by its vast security features tailored specifically for hybrid environments. When judging and comparing with other security platforms, Trend Micro’s commitment to providing unparalleled protection in both on-premises and public cloud scenarios made it distinctly superior. Given these attributes, it’s evident why I hold the opinion that it's best for hybrid cloud protection.

Standout features & integrations:

Trend Micro offers real-time cloud workload security coupled with a specialized cloud security posture management (CSPM) system to quickly identify and remedy misconfigurations. Its vulnerability scanning tools and native security features further cement its position as a comprehensive security solution. In terms of integrations, Trend Micro excels with its API-centric approach, effortlessly collaborating with key cloud providers like AWS, GCP, and Azure, while also supporting tools used by DevOps and security teams.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Advanced cloud security posture management features for misconfiguration detection and remediation
  • Strong API integrations, facilitating better collaboration with major cloud services
  • Comprehensive hybrid security model encompassing both cloud and on-premises environments

Cons:

  • Some users might prefer a more streamlined dashboard experience.
  • More integration documentation may be required for custom setups
  • For smaller businesses, the plethora of features might be overwhelming

Best for native Azure integrations

  • Pricing upon request

Microsoft Azure Defender is a comprehensive cloud security solution designed to offer protection for Azure workloads, including virtual machines, databases, and other Azure services. It's specially built for Azure, ensuring tailored security controls and native integrations within the Azure ecosystem.

Why I Picked Microsoft Azure Defender: In determining the best tool for Azure-native security, I couldn't overlook Microsoft Azure Defender. Comparing its features and native integrations with those of other security platforms, it was clear that Azure Defender stood out. This tool was particularly selected for the "Best for native Azure integrations" title due to its integration and optimized functionalities within the Azure environment.

Standout features & integrations:

Azure Defender excels in offering real-time threat protection, ensuring that cloud workloads remain secure against the ever-evolving cyber threat landscape. With its robust cloud security posture management (CSPM) capabilities, it can identify and prioritize misconfigurations, making remediation more streamlined. Given that it's a product of Microsoft, Azure Defender offers unparalleled integrations within the Azure environment, from Azure VMs to serverless functions and other Azure cloud services.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Offers real-time threat protection for a range of Azure resources.
  • Provides robust cloud security posture management (CSPM) capabilities.
  • Deeply integrated with the Azure ecosystem, offering native security features tailored for Azure services.

Cons:

  • For users new to the Azure platform, there could be a learning curve in understanding and managing its features.
  • The focus on Azure-native integrations means organizations not using Azure as their primary cloud might find limited utility.
  • May not be as effective for multi-cloud or hybrid environments that use multiple cloud providers.

Other Cloud Workload Protection Platforms

Below is a list of additional cloud workload protection platforms that I shortlisted, but did not make it to the top 10. Definitely worth checking them out.

  1. Cisco Tetration

    For data center protection

  2. CrowdStrike

    For endpoint security integration

  3. Alert Logic

    Good for managed threat detection

  4. Juniper Networks

    Good for scalable network infrastructure solutions

  5. Sysdig Secure

    Good for container and Kubernetes security

  6. Nutanix Flow

    Good for software-defined networking

  7. Lacework

    Good for polygraph-based anomaly detection

  8. Fugue

    Good for cloud infrastructure drift prevention

  9. Tanium

    Good for unified endpoint management

  10. Intezer

    Good for genetic malware analysis

Cloud Workload Protection Platform Selection Criteria

When selecting the best cloud workload protection platform to include in this list, I considered common buyer needs and pain points like ensuring data security and maintaining compliance with industry regulations. I also used the following framework to keep my evaluation structured and fair:

Core Functionality (25% of total score)
To be considered for inclusion in this list, each solution had to fulfill these common use cases:

  • Threat detection and response
  • Vulnerability scanning
  • Compliance monitoring
  • Access control management
  • Data protection

Additional Standout Features (25% of total score)
To help further narrow down the competition, I also looked for unique features, such as:

  • AI-driven threat analysis
  • Automated policy generation
  • Container security capabilities
  • Cross-cloud environment support
  • Real-time compliance alerts

Usability (10% of total score)
To get a sense of the usability of each system, I considered the following:

  • Intuitive interface design
  • Customizable dashboards
  • Clear navigation paths
  • Minimal learning curve
  • Efficient workflow integration

Onboarding (10% of total score)
To evaluate the onboarding experience for each platform, I considered the following:

  • Availability of training videos
  • Interactive product tours
  • Access to templates and guides
  • Responsive chatbots and support
  • Comprehensive webinars and workshops

Customer Support (10% of total score)
To assess each software provider’s customer support services, I considered the following:

  • 24/7 support availability
  • Multiple support channels
  • Responsive live chat service
  • Access to a knowledge base
  • Dedicated account managers

Value For Money (10% of total score)
To evaluate the value for money of each platform, I considered the following:

  • Competitive pricing models
  • Flexible subscription plans
  • Transparent pricing structures
  • Cost vs. feature set analysis
  • Discounts for annual commitments

Customer Reviews (10% of total score)
To get a sense of overall customer satisfaction, I considered the following when reading customer reviews:

  • Overall satisfaction ratings
  • Feedback on support services
  • Comments on feature effectiveness
  • Insights into usability and ease
  • Reports on performance and reliability

How to Choose Cloud Workload Protection Platform

It’s easy to get bogged down in long feature lists and complex pricing structures. To help you stay focused as you work through your unique software selection process, here’s a checklist of factors to keep in mind:

FactorWhat to Consider
ScalabilityCan the platform grow with your business? Consider if it can handle increased workloads and users without performance issues. Look for flexible scaling options.
IntegrationsDoes it integrate with your existing tools? Check for compatibility with your current tech stack, such as AWS, Azure, or on-premise systems.
CustomizabilityHow much can you tailor the platform? Assess if you can modify settings and dashboards to fit your specific workflows and preferences.
Ease of useIs the platform user-friendly? Evaluate the interface and navigation. Consider the learning curve and whether it suits your team's tech proficiency.
Implementation and onboardingHow smooth is the startup process? Look for clear setup guidelines, training resources, and support availability. Consider any potential downtime during onboarding.
CostDoes the pricing fit your budget? Compare subscription models, additional fees, and the value provided. Check for hidden costs or long-term contracts.
Security safeguardsWhat security measures are in place? Evaluate encryption, data protection, and compliance with industry standards. Ensure it meets your security requirements.
Compliance requirementsDoes it support your compliance needs? Check for features that assist with GDPR, HIPAA, or other relevant regulations to your industry.

What Is Cloud Workload Protection Platform?

Cloud workload protection platform is a type of security software designed to protect applications and data in cloud environments. IT security professionals and cloud administrators generally use these tools to safeguard workloads from threats and ensure compliance with regulations. Threat detection, vulnerability scanning, and compliance monitoring features help with maintaining security and operational integrity. Overall, these tools provide essential protection for businesses operating in cloud-based environments.

Features

When selecting cloud workload protection platform, keep an eye out for the following key features:

  • Threat detection and response: Identifies potential threats in real-time and responds to mitigate risks, keeping your cloud environment secure.
  • Vulnerability scanning: Regularly scans for vulnerabilities in your workloads, helping you address security gaps before they are exploited.
  • Compliance monitoring: Ensures your cloud operations adhere to industry regulations, assisting in maintaining compliance and avoiding penalties.
  • Access control management: Manages user permissions and access to sensitive data, preventing unauthorized access and potential breaches.
  • Data protection: Safeguards your data through encryption and other security measures, ensuring data integrity and confidentiality.
  • Risk management: Prioritizes threats based on impact, allowing you to focus on the most critical security issues.
  • Policy enforcement: Automates the application of security policies across your environment, ensuring consistent protection measures.
  • Automated alerting: Notifies your team about security incidents promptly, enabling quick response and resolution.
  • Security analytics: Provides insights into security events and trends, helping you make informed decisions about your security posture.

Benefits

Implementing cloud workload protection platform provides several benefits for your team and your business. Here are a few you can look forward to:

  • Enhanced security: Protects against threats and vulnerabilities, reducing the risk of data breaches and cyberattacks.
  • Regulatory compliance: Helps maintain adherence to industry regulations through compliance monitoring, avoiding potential fines.
  • Operational efficiency: Automates security tasks like threat detection and policy enforcement, freeing up your team's time for other priorities.
  • Data integrity: Ensures the confidentiality and safety of your data through encryption and access controls, preventing unauthorized access.
  • Risk reduction: Identifies and prioritizes potential threats, allowing you to focus on mitigating the most significant risks.
  • Cost savings: Prevents financial losses associated with data breaches and non-compliance penalties, contributing to overall cost efficiency.
  • Improved decision-making: Provides valuable security insights and analytics, helping you make informed decisions about your security strategy.

Costs & Pricing

Selecting cloud workload protection platform requires an understanding of the various pricing models and plans available. Costs vary based on features, team size, add-ons, and more. The table below summarizes common plans, their average prices, and typical features included in cloud workload protection platform solutions:

Plan Comparison Table for Cloud Workload Protection Platform

Plan TypeAverage PriceCommon Features
Free Plan$0Basic threat detection, limited data protection, and basic compliance monitoring.
Personal Plan$5-$25/user/monthEnhanced threat detection, vulnerability scanning, and basic access control management.
Business Plan$30-$50/user/monthAdvanced threat detection, full compliance monitoring, and detailed security analytics.
Enterprise Plan$60-$100/user/monthComprehensive threat management, integration with existing systems, and advanced risk management.

Cloud Workload Protection Platform FAQs

Here are some answers to common questions about cloud workload protection platform:

How does CWPP work?

CWPP includes vulnerability scanning, threat detection, and compliance enforcement for workloads across your cloud environments. It covers physical servers, virtual machines, containers, and serverless functions. By monitoring these areas, it helps you identify and mitigate security risks effectively.

What does cloud workload protection provide protection for?

Cloud workload protection secures various workloads like servers, virtual machines, containers, databases, and APIs. It protects against threats like vulnerabilities and unauthorized access, ensuring your data’s privacy and business continuity across multi-cloud environments.

What is the difference between CWPP and CSPM?

CWPP focuses on securing workloads within cloud environments, providing threat detection and vulnerability management. CSPM, on the other hand, ensures that your cloud infrastructure complies with security policies and best practices. Both are essential for a comprehensive cloud security strategy.

Can CWPP handle multi-cloud environments?

Yes, CWPP is designed to manage security across multiple cloud platforms. It provides consistent protection, regardless of whether you’re using AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. This flexibility allows your team to maintain a unified security posture across diverse environments.

Are there any limitations to using CWPP?

CWPP focuses on workload security and may not provide full visibility into the cloud control plane. It’s essential to complement it with other security tools like CSPM for a holistic approach. Understanding these limitations helps your team implement a more effective cloud security strategy.


What’s Next:

If you're in the process of researching cloud workload protection platform, connect with a SoftwareSelect advisor for free recommendations.

You fill out a form and have a quick chat where they get into the specifics of your needs. Then you'll get a shortlist of software to review. They'll even support you through the entire buying process, including price negotiations.

Paulo Gardini Miguel
By Paulo Gardini Miguel

Paulo is the Director of Technology at the rapidly growing media tech company BWZ. Prior to that, he worked as a Software Engineering Manager and then Head Of Technology at Navegg, Latin America’s largest data marketplace, and as Full Stack Engineer at MapLink, which provides geolocation APIs as a service. Paulo draws insight from years of experience serving as an infrastructure architect, team leader, and product developer in rapidly scaling web environments. He’s driven to share his expertise with other technology leaders to help them build great teams, improve performance, optimize resources, and create foundations for scalability.