Skip to main content

Les solutions Platform as a Service (PaaS) aident les équipes de développement à créer et déployer des applications sans avoir à gérer l'infrastructure sous-jacente.

De nombreuses équipes se tournent vers les PaaS lorsqu'elles passent trop de temps sur la configuration de serveurs, la mise à l’échelle ou les pipelines de déploiement plutôt que sur l’écriture de code. La bonne plateforme peut simplifier votre flux de travail, accélérer vos livraisons et permettre à votre équipe de se concentrer sur le produit plutôt que sur la configuration.

J’ai collaboré avec des équipes d’ingénierie qui évaluent des fournisseurs PaaS pour soutenir tout, des prototypes en phase de démarrage aux applications à forte croissance. Ce guide est basé sur ces expériences et met l’accent sur ce qui rend réellement une plateforme utile dans des environnements de développement concrets.

Résumé des meilleurs services PaaS

Avis sur les meilleurs services PaaS

Voici mon avis sur les 10 meilleurs services PaaS, fondé sur leurs fonctionnalités distinctives, leurs avantages et leurs plans tarifaires.

Best for enterprise-grade apps

  • Free plan available
  • From $58/user/month (5 seats included, billed annually)
Visit Website
Rating: 4.4/5

Mendix is a low-code PaaS solution that is best suited for enterprises, thanks to a host of tools that ease development work, such as collaboration tools that developers can use to build apps in real-time and rapid prototyping functionalities that let you release apps faster.

Why I picked Mendix: A compelling reason for me to choose Mendix is that it allows developers to drag and drop components onto a visual application model instead of writing code to build and deploy applications. It also offers responsive design functionality, where applications built on Mendix are automatically optimized for all device types.

Mendix Standout Features and Integrations:

Features that I want to highlight are its pre-built machine learning models that can be easily integrated into applications, custom widgets to extend the functionality of Mendix applications, and offline capabilities where users can continue to work even when their connection is lost.

Integrations for Mendix include SAP and Salesforce (native) and comes with other tools like REST services, Web services, mappings, OData, connector kit, and data hub to handle your integrations.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Real-time monitoring to identify and resolve issues
  • Built-in security
  • Data governance and compliance

Cons:

  • Styling pages or forms can be hard
  • Need for stronger documentation and community support

Best for app deployment to AWS

  • 14-day free trial
  • From $270/month
Visit Website
Rating: 3.6/5

Since Engine Yard has over a decade of AWS and Ruby experience, it can be the ideal platform for businesses looking to leverage the full potential of AWS while minimizing the complexity of their infrastructure. It’s also a great option for businesses that need to comply with industry regulations such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, and SOC 2, as well as for teams that require support for multiple cloud providers.

Why I picked Engine Yard: One powerful reason that I put Engine Yard on this list is that it ensures maximum safety and security by providing every customer with a dedicated AWS account and a set of Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs) housed within a private, fully-configured Kubernetes cluster. This setup protects all customer data by eliminating potential security risks associated with public internet connections.

Engine Yard Standout Features and Integrations:

Features that differentiate Engine Yard include automated notifications of application failure or abnormalities, and support for Ruby, Java, Python, PHP, and Java. I also appreciated that you don’t need to deploy hooks—just using the GIT repository link is enough.

Integrations are native and include Amazon VPC, New Relic for monitoring performances, Github, and PostgreSQL.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Multi-cloud support
  • 24/7 support
  • Easy deployment

Cons:

  • Custom styling is difficult without knowing CSS
  • Limited customization

Best for high-performance computing work

  • 30-day free trial + free demo available
  • Pricing upon request

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) offers cloud services to let you build and run various applications and services in a high-compute environment with secure storage capacity.

Why I picked Oracle Cloud Infrastructure: OCI stands out for me because it not only offers the standard cloud services like migration and storage, but also includes a wide array of capacities like analytics, databases, data lakes, AI, business intelligence, and FEDRAMP-complaint government clouds. In addition, it provides high data availability that reduces failures and downtimes.

OCI Standout Features and Integrations:

Features that I believe make OCI noteworthy are bare metal and virtual machine compute, vulnerability audit to scan common vulnerabilities and exposures (CVEs), and automated CI/CD pipelines and repository management processes to optimize app development.

Integrations are available natively for most popular tools, including Grafana for metrics, Slack for communication, GitLab for pipelines, and Terraform to deploy infrastructure as code.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Simple to get started
  • Good customer support
  • Isolated network virtualization for self-service

Cons:

  • Expensive compared to other providers
  • Complicated configurations

Best for working in a variety of programming languages

  • Free trial available
  • Contact AWS for pricing

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is Amazon’s PaaS service provider, which leverages AWS services like Amazon S3 and Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (EC2), and which supports both web and worker applications.

Why I picked AWS Elastic Beanstalk: The headline feature that made Elastic Beanstalk stand out to me is flexibility. I found deploying and scaling web apps easy thanks to support for popular servers like IIS, Apache, and Nginx and the flexibility of working with many programming languages, such as Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Ruby, and Go. You also have the freedom to deploy your code from multiple options like Visual Studio, AWS Management Console, and Eclipse.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk Standout Features and Integrations:

Features I like in Beanstalk include automatic load balancing, capacity provisioning, health monitoring with 40+ key attributes, and CPU usage and latency performance metrics.

Integrations are pre-built for all Amazon services like Amazon RDS that help manage relational databases, AmazonS3 for storage and backup, AWS VPC for isolated networks, and AWS Identity and Access Management for setting access controls.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • ISO, PCI, SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 compliance
  • Robust security with multi-factor authentication and SSL/TLS
  • Intuitive user interface

Cons:

  • Customizations can be hard
  • Documentation and tutorials are scattered

Best for Windows-based applications

  • Free plan + free demo + 30-day free trial available
  • Pricing upon request

Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform that allows you to build, deploy, and manage applications and services through 200+ data centers in 60+ regions. It integrates with all the Microsoft services, so users who develop Microsoft applications can manage their tech stack in one place. I also noted that Azure presents a wide range of cloud services, including compute, storage, networking, and databases.

Why I picked Microsoft Azure: I selected Azure because it comes with hybrid, on-premises, multi-cloud, and edge capabilities, and developers can work with open-source frameworks and languages that they prefer. It also impresses me that Azure covers so many service areas, including AI, machine learning, blockchain, DevOps, the Internet of Things, mixed reality, and mobile.

Microsoft Azure Standout Features and Integrations:

Features I feel that differentiate Azure from other PaaS providers include auto-scaling, elastic pools to adjust resources, provision virtual machines for Red Hat, Ubuntu, and other Linux distributions, and single sign-on and multi-factor identification.

Integrations include Microsoft services like Dynamics 365 and Power BI (native), third-party services like GitHub, and 600+ out-of-the-box connectors and workflows to connect to SaaS apps.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Supportive technical team
  • Built-in support for Git
  • Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime

Cons:

  • Out-of-date technical documentation
  • Expensive for small-scale organizations

Best for companies that use Salesforce for CRM

  • Free demo available
  • From $5/month

Heroku offers fully-managed data services that handle configuration, orchestration, failovers, load balancing, and security.

Why I picked Heroku: I suggest Heroku for developers who want a straightforward solution to build, maintain, and distribute web apps, especially if they use Salesforce data. However, they can also scale their applications, and Heroku adapts to the infrastructure changes—its scalability ranges from simple hobby assignments to complex enterprise-grade apps.

Heroku Standout Features and Integrations:

Features that I want to recommend here are PostgreSQL as a service that enables encryption at rest and database forking; measurement of app metrics like throughput, CPU load, and response times; build packs that let you customize your stack; and “dynos,” which are managed containers in which you can run and monitor your apps continuously.

Integrations include 200+ add-ons, including Rollbar for responding to errors, Logtail for querying logs, and CloudRail for integrating Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Can run apps in various languages
  • Responsive SLAs
  • Fine-grained access controls

Cons:

  • Lack of customization
  • Apps with large datasets may face performance issues

Best for integration with other Google Cloud services

  • 90-day, $300 free trial offer
  • From $0.06 per hour per instance

Google App Engine (GAE) is a cloud computing technology for building and hosting secure and scalable web applications. I ranked this highly because it offers a fully-managed serverless platform where development teams can focus on writing their code and not bother with managing the underlying infrastructure.

Why I picked Google App Engine: I was impressed by GAE for its ease of integration with Google services like BigQuery and DataStore, which makes it easy for developers to build and manage services from one central place if they are already using Google services.

I also appreciated that GAE supports many programming languages, such as Python, Ruby, C#, and JavaScript. Moreover, developers can import frameworks and libraries via docker containers, which are standalone, lightweight executable packages with code, libraries, and system tools that can easily move between different environments. You may also appreciate that the service provides software developer kits (SDKs) so you can build and test your apps before releasing them.

Google App Engine Standout Features and Integrations:

Features I believe that can help you if you are looking for Google-based integrations are that GAE includes support for some of the most popular languages like Go, Python, or PHP, powerful application security with SSL/TLS certificates on your custom domain, diagnostics functionalities that track app health and performance, and Cloud Debugger and Error Reporting to identify and fix bugs.

Integrations are pre-built for Google Cloud Platform services, such as Cloud SQL, Cloud Storage, and Cloud Datastore, and are natively available for popular developer platforms like Bitbucket and GitHub.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Can create scheduled tasks and task queue factors
  • Can add or subtract instances as needed
  • Minimal server maintenance

Cons:

  • Documentation and tutorials are insufficient
  • Reliance on custom runtimes for unsupported languages

Best easy-to-use platform for quick deployment

  • There’s a 60-day free trial
  • Simple, bolt-on pricing based on usage and requirements

With DigitalOcean, developers can provision application stacks, deploy code, and monitor application performance. DigitalOcean's intuitive user interface, robust API, and extensive documentation make it a top choice for developers who want to release apps quickly.

Why I picked DigitalOcean: I immediately appreciated DigitalOcean’s ease of use, thanks to a great user interface. DigitalOcean is also popular for a feature called “Droplets,” which are Linux-based virtual machines you can set up in seconds. They’re highly scalable and come with 99.99% SLAs and uptime. You can also configure alerts from the control panel so that you know how the app is functioning.

DigitalOcean Standout Features and Integrations:

Features that I feel businesses can find useful are managed Kubernetes clusters, quick installation for CMS tools, support for various server-side coding frameworks, languages, and databases like MySQL and Redis.

Integrations are native to the most commonly used tools by DevOps teams like Chef, Ansible, Puppet, Rancher, SaltStack, and Slack. It also has Zapier connection to over 300+ apps.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Backups and snapshots functionalities
  • Virtual networking capabilities
  • Powerful security tools

Cons:

  • Limited regions for data centers
  • Slow customer support response

Best for Drupal applications

  • Free trial depends on the product you choose + Free demo and walkthrough available
  • Starts $148/user/month

Acquia Cloud Platform comes with a set of tools optimized for the Drupal CMS. This makes it easier for developers, site builders, and content editors to build and manage Drupal sites.

Why I picked Acquia: I like how Acquia Cloud Platform is a comprehensive solution for hosting web applications that prioritizes reliability, scalability, security, and user experience with DevOps integration, application monitoring, backups, workflow management, and site access control.

Acquia Standout Features and Integrations:

Features that I recommend are its Content Delivery Network (CDN) that lets you provide high-speed content delivery to users across regions and a global load balancer that distributes traffic across regions to maintain optimal performance. It also comes with a site factory feature lets you manage multiple sites for various languages, brands, regions, or campaigns which can make work easier for Drupal developers.

Integrations include many native options like LiveRamp, Facebook, Salesforce, Zendesk, Shopify, SAP, MailChimp, Eventbrite, Adobe Analytics, and Informatica and Platform APIs for custom integrations.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • PCI, HIPAA, and SOC 1&2 compliant
  • Expert support and training services specifically tailored for Drupal
  • Disaster recovery services

Cons:

  • Expensive compared to other solutions with similar features
  • Multi-site structure can be difficult to manage

Best for Kubernetes platform

  • Free trial available
  • Pricing upon request

OpenShift is Red Hat’s cloud computing PaaS solution that comes in multiple flavors: OpenShift Container Platform provides Kubernetes platform for clients who want to deploy containerized applications; OpenShift Dedicated gives turn-key access to high-availability clusters hosted on Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud; and Red Hat on Microsoft Azure provides an enterprise-grade Kubernetes environment in a Microsoft ecosystem.

Why I picked OpenShift: If you are looking for a PaaS solution that’s fully compatible with Kubernetes, OpenShift can be a good choice. During my evaluation, I found that because OpenShift leverages Kubernetes’ features of container orchestration, automatic scaling, and integrated registry for storing and managing container images, it is easy for developers to build and deploy containerized applications using Kubernetes.

OpenShift Standout Features and Integrations:

Features that made me recommend OpenShift include built-in Jenkins pipelines that help automation of the software delivery process, a faster feedback loop for developers; edge computing capabilities so that you can use application services even in remote locations and perform analysis in real-time; and runtimes and libraries that help developers ship out apps quickly.

Integrations include Red Hat’s native integration, where you can connect data and applications with solutions like APIcast, Istio Adapter, Camel K, AMQ Streams, AMQ Broker, Debezium, and Service Registry.

Pros and cons

Pros:

  • Runtime threat detection and risk profiling
  • Advanced security with built-in scanner
  • Easy user interface

Cons:

  • Can be pricey for small deployments
  • Complicated setup

Autres services PaaS

Voici quelques fournisseurs supplémentaires qui n’ont pas intégré la liste principale des PaaS ; toutefois, si vous souhaitez découvrir d’autres outils, consultez ceux-ci.

  1. Heirloom Computing

    For companies that need to migrate to modern architectures

  2. OutSystems

    For multi-experience user interfaces

  3. Clever Cloud

    Sustainable option to deploy apps on a carbon-neutral data center

  4. Platform.sh

    For scaling organizations in need of rapid development

  5. Render

    For deployment from Git with free TLS certificates and a global CDN

  6. Vercel

    For front-end teams

  7. OutSystems

    For multi-experience user interfaces

  8. Cloudways

    For small businesses

  9. Scalingo

    To deploy development from GitLab and GitHub libraries

  10. Qoddi

    For unlimited builds and savings on backups, load balancers, and bandwidth

  11. Python Anywhere

    For businesses who want to host websites with Python code

  12. Tsuru

    Open-source PaaS platform

Qu'est-ce qu’un service PaaS ?

Les services PaaS sont des plateformes cloud qui permettent aux développeurs de créer, exécuter et gérer des applications sans se soucier de la configuration des serveurs ou de l’infrastructure. Ils sont utilisés par les ingénieurs logiciels, les équipes DevOps et les développeurs de produits qui souhaitent se concentrer sur l’écriture de code et le lancement rapide des fonctionnalités. Les outils intégrés de déploiement, de mise à l’échelle et de surveillance facilitent l’accélération du développement, la gestion des variations de trafic et la réduction des tâches de configuration manuelle. Ces services offrent aux équipes un moyen plus simple de concevoir et de livrer des applications sans être bloquées par la gestion des systèmes backend.

Critères de sélection pour les services PaaS

Voici un court résumé des principaux critères de sélection et d'évaluation que j'ai utilisés pour établir ma liste.

Fonctionnalités principales

En ce qui concerne les services PaaS, voici les fonctionnalités essentielles à posséder pour figurer dans ma sélection :

  • Offres PaaS standards comme le déploiement rapide, le stockage et les solutions de sauvegarde
  • Simplicité d’utilisation afin que les développeurs ne perdent pas de temps à se mettre à niveau
  • Capacités d’intégration avec les outils et frameworks populaires existants pour améliorer l’utilisabilité de la plateforme
  • Intégrations préconçues pour un développement et un déploiement d’applications rentables et rapides

Fonctionnalités clés

Les fonctionnalités clés que j'ai évaluées pour cette liste sont :

  • Fonctionnalités serverless entièrement gérées pour que tout le travail manuel et la gestion de l'infrastructure soient assurés par le fournisseur PaaS
  • Fonctionnalités de sécurité telles que l’authentification multifacteur et la conformité avec les principales réglementations informatiques
  • Équilibrage de charge et évolutivité afin que la plateforme PaaS puisse s’adapter à vos besoins, garantissant ainsi qu’aucun goulot d’étranglement n’apparaisse à mesure que votre application se développe et reste performante

Utilisabilité

Les services PaaS doivent disposer d'une interface utilisateur simple et épurée afin que les développeurs puissent se concentrer sur leur tâche principale, à savoir écrire du code. C'est pourquoi j'ai accordé une attention particulière au choix de solutions offrant une interface intuitive, ainsi qu'une documentation efficace disponible sur leur site web.

Les gens demandent aussi

Vous avez encore des questions ? Voici les réponses à quelques-unes des questions les plus courantes.

Et après ?

Le choix de la meilleure solution PaaS dépend de facteurs tels que le modèle de déploiement, la prise en charge des langages, l'évolutivité, la tarification, l'intégration, la fiabilité et la sécurité. En gardant ces critères à l'esprit, vous pouvez prendre une décision éclairée qui correspond aux besoins et au budget de votre organisation.

Pour plus de conseils et de ressources utiles à destination des CTO et autres dirigeants technologiques, abonnez-vous à la newsletter The CTO Club .