Skip to main content

Black box testing tools let you test software like a real user—finding bugs, validating features, and ensuring things work smoothly, all without touching the source code. They’re built to help you simulate real scenarios, uncover critical issues, and confidently meet user expectations.

I’ve spent years hands-on with these tools, so I know what works (and what doesn’t). In this article, I’ll help you zero in on the best black box testing tools to simplify your workflow and improve your results.

Why Trust Our Software Reviews

Best Black Box Testing Tools Summary

This comparison chart summarizes pricing details for my top black box testing tools selections to help you find the best one for your budget and business needs.

Best Black Box Testing Tool Reviews

Below are my detailed summaries of the best black box testing tools that made it onto my shortlist. My reviews offer a detailed look at the key features, pros & cons, integrations, and ideal use cases of each tool to help you find the best one for you.

Best for human-led black box testing

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.9/5

QA Wolf is an automated hybrid testing platform and service designed to simplify and enhance the quality assurance process for web applications. It offers black box testing and automates end-to-end tests, ensuring that applications function correctly from the user's perspective.

Why I picked QA Wolf: QA Wolf offers a unique combination of automation and human oversight. The platform allows for automated end-to-end tests, which mimic real user interactions with the application. This approach ensures that all critical user flows are thoroughly tested without requiring insight into the underlying code. Furthermore, QA Wolf’s human QA engineers provide ongoing support, triage, and maintenance of tests, ensuring reliability and reducing the burden on development teams. 

QA Wolf Standout Features:

  • The platform runs tests in parallel, reducing testing time and accelerating feedback loops.
  • Provides detailed bug reports with video walk-throughs and trace logs, making it easy for developers to diagnose and fix issues.
  • Supports a wide range of test scenarios, including UI interactions, API testing, and third-party integrations
  • Round-the-clock QA engineers provide continuous support, reviewing test failures and maintaining test suites, ensuring consistent quality.

QA Wolf Integrations: Jenkins, CircleCI, GitHub, Jira, Asana, Linear, and more.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Easy to communicate and collaborate with the QA Wolf team
  • All bugs are human-verified
  • Automated end-to-end tests

Cons:

  • Limited flexibility with test customizations
  • Not ideal for teams wanting full control over the testing process

New Product Updates from QA Wolf

QA Wolf Adds Real Media Testing for iOS Apps
QA Wolf simulates real camera and microphone inputs to test iOS app features accurately.
May 3 2026
QA Wolf Adds Real Media Testing for iOS Apps

QA Wolf introduces real media testing for iOS apps using camera and microphone inputs. This update improves test reliability for real-world use cases. For more information, visit QA Wolf’s official site.

Best for AI-driven test maintenance

  • 14-day free trial
  • From $212/month
Visit Website
Rating: 4.8/5

Reflect is a black box testing platform that helps you automate functional tests without needing to access or understand the internal code. Its use of Generative AI lets you create tests by simply describing user interactions in natural language. The platform interprets these inputs and generates tests that focus solely on behavior and outcomes, aligning with black box testing principles.

Why I picked Reflect: I picked Reflect because it takes all the guesswork and technical overhead out of test creation. Instead of dealing with flaky selectors or scripting frameworks, you can type what you want to test and let the tool handle the rest. It’s especially useful when your goal is to validate how your app behaves from the outside—what users actually see and do. Reflect also offers AI-driven maintenance, adapting tests automatically when the UI changes, so you don’t have to do the manual work.

Reflect Standout Features:

  • Turn plain-English prompts into test steps—no need for XPath or selectors
  • Combine visual checks and API validation in a single test
  • Automatically updates tests as the app UI evolves
  • Schedule tests and receive real-time failure alerts via Slack or email
  • Use parameterized inputs to cover more scenarios without duplicating work

Reflect Integrations: GitHub, Slack, Jira, Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOps, Linear, Bitbucket, Codefresh.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • No-code test creation
  • AI-powered test maintenance
  • Comprehensive CI/CD integration

Cons:

  • Limitations to mobile app testing
  • Could offer more customization options for test configurations

Best for graphical user interface (GUI) black box testing

  • Free trial available
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.3/5

Squish by Froglogic is an automated testing framework tool that targets graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and human-machine interfaces (HMIs). Therefore, it is ideal for those who want to test an application’s visual features and elements.

Why I picked Froglogic Squish: the tool provides testers and DevOps with behavioral-driven development (BDD) and testing. It also supports agile methodology testing, which helps bridge collaboration among technical and business stakeholders. In addition to its IDE, it has robust cross-platform, cross-device compatibility with desktop, mobile, embedded, and web GUI tests.

Probably due to its prohibitive price tag, the tool is popular among enterprise users. It tests various platforms and operating systems, including programming languages like Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby, and Tcl. 

Froglogic Squish Standout Features

  • Capabilities include refactoring scripts to suit use cases with Squish Verification Points and the ability to perform image comparisons to validate table values. 
  • You can create, debug, and edit tests in the Squish IDE. It also includes powerful features such as recording and playback capabilities, along with image-based and object-based recognition capabilities.
  • With its comprehensive documentation and customizable qualification tool to ensure test processes meet safety standards, Froglogic Squish allows you to execute test suites reliably. 
  • Froglogic Squish seamlessly integrates and facilitates multi-technology applications from more than one toolkit. These are as varied as iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java), Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, and Mac.

Froglogic Squish Integrations: Squish by Froglogic supports frameworks and platforms such as Windows, Android, iOS, Qt, Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets, Java, and more.

Price: Squish Tester floating license is priced at $589/month, paid annually. A 10-day free trial is available with no CC required.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Supports audio recording of test scripts
  • Equipped with a centralized dashboard and monitoring system
  • In addition to working with more obscure QT applications, it can cross-cut from Windows to Mac

Cons:

  • A lot of time consumption due to the manual testing involved

Best for black box testing microservices and container-based applications

  • 14-day free trial + free demo available
  • Pricing upon request
Visit Website
Rating: 4.5/5

Gremlin is an automation framework for systematic and resilience testing based on chaos testing, a subset of chaos engineering. It is geared toward the modern era of computing, as it is helpful for testing cloud apps, microservices, and container-based applications.

Why I picked Gremlin: the tool deliberately breaks things in the tested app and then learns how to make it resilient. It does this by executing tests that allow testers to manipulate inter-service messages at the network level. 

The tool’s zero-regression approach helps to minimize service disruptions and code rollbacks that typically attend poorly resilient software products. 

Gremlin Standout Features

  • Testing failure handling capabilities in cloud infrastructure and applications such as containers and microservices.
  • Gremlin’s test automation allows you to test each application layer of infrastructure rigorously, including safely halting and automatically rolling back.
  • It comes with a well-documented API and CI/CD to prepare ship quality code fast by running tests that magnify system reliability.  
  • With Gremlin, you can use a set of 12 Chaos engineering experiments to test for weaknesses in an underlying system.

Gremlin Integrations: Gremlin integrates with LoadRunner Professional 2022. 

Price: Gremlin’s pricing starts at $300 per month per service. A 30-day free trial is available.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Its testing helps improve outcomes across your technology stack
  • Provides engineering teams with reliable, high-velocity testing
  • Easy to learn and use

Cons:

  • Gremlin only provides limited support for on-premise chaos injection

Best for creating black box test scripts with a test recorder

  • Free demo available
  • Pricing upon request

The IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated testing framework from IBM for regression, functional, and GUI testing. It can be used for different programming languages and environments, such as Java, AJAX, Power Builder, SAP, .Net, Dojo Toolkit, and Siebel, while encompassing both web-based and terminal emulator-based applications.

Why I picked IBM RFT: the tool gives test engineers the ability to record, playback, and export test scripts with Robotic Response Time agents. In addition, it provides intelligent script maintenance capabilities and various customization options. 

When manual testing is impossible to scale effectively, RFT is ideal for a broad range of scenarios. It benefits businesses and organizations of various types, from freelancers, and SMBs, to enterprises. The tool has reporting capabilities that support communication and collaboration in hybrid environments. 

RFT Standout Features

  • IBM Rational Functional Tester provides capabilities for the end-to-end testing of seemingly diverse systems, which yields a broad range of coverage for QA teams. It allows the flexibility to test legacy and modern applications in different business scenarios.
  • RFT facilitates the acceleration of shorter test cycles because it enables test engineers to reuse the same tests with different data sets.
  • RFT’s advanced test scripting features, like its Rational Performance Tester. It lets you view and analyze the response time, events, and other metrics during playback. With its ScriptAssure technology, you can handle frequent user interface changes remarkably without incurring much maintenance overhead. 

RFT Standout Integrations: RFT provides integrations with other IBM products, such as IBM Jazz® integration, which supports collaborative application lifecycle management. It also integrates with non-native enterprise messaging solutions like JMS and TIBCO EMS.

Price: Pricing is only available upon request. RFT’s Starter Edition is free.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Works well with mainframes
  • The ability to easily switch between languages and platforms
  • Provides reliable testing at scale

Cons:

  • It is difficult to get optimal results with complex Java apps.

Best record and playback automated IDE

  • Free
  • Open source and free

Selenium IDE is an open-source integrated development environment with automated testing capabilities. It is a turn-key, web-ready tool that provides easy debugging with its record and playback features. 

Why I picked Selenium IDE: By recording your interaction with websites, the tool allows you to generate site automation tests seamlessly. The tool’s capabilities eliminate the need for developers to repeat these manual steps in the programming environment. In addition, it allows DevOps and testers to manage these actions by recording, editing, and debugging tests.  

As an accessory to your test environment, the tool is lightweight, providing web browser extensions with minimal overhead and digital footprint. 

Selenium IDE Standout Features

  • Create, manage and organize test cases and test suites for easy deployment by test teams.
  • Ability to execute cross-browser tests with the aid of Selenium WebDriver
  • Execute resilient tests that can record and be run from multiple locators for each element
  • Seamless recording and playback on popular browsers like Chrome and Firefox
  • Saving scripts and loading them up for execution on demand
  • Allows you to reuse one test case inside another and Speed control 

Selenium IDE Integrations: Apart from its browser plugins, Selenium IDE integrates with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and IntelliJ. 

Pricing: Selenium IDE is open-source and free.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Provides the flexibility to write advanced tests
  • It doesn’t require any programming language to use it
  • Easy to use

Cons:

  • It doesn’t support data-driven testing.

Best black box automation tool for regression and functionality testing

  • Free demo
  • Pricing upon request

Silk Test is an automation testing tool from Micro Focus International. It is designed to perform regression and functionality testing effectively. Through its cross-platform and cross-browser testing, it aims to provide collaborative test design to promote a full range of test coverages.

Why I picked Silk Test: Along with its portability, the tool maintains rigorous quality standards with lower complexity. The tool’s collaborative testing also allows business and technical groups in an organization to work together more effectively. 

User can leverage both manual and automated testing capabilities for web, mobile, and enterprise applications. The tool also permits testing desktop and mobile browsers using Selenium scripts to record steps.

Silk Test Standout Features

  • Silk Test provides the ability to support your continuous integration (CI) and continuous-deployment (CD) pipelines. Containers can be scrutinized with parallel and dockerized testing. 
  • Using Skill Test’s Record Testcase command, testers can record actions and verification steps as they navigate the application being tested. Skill Test provides enhanced module reuse capabilities to facilitate manual testing with script files that can contain one or more related test cases. 
  • Instead of creating multiple test suites for different environments, Skill Test allows you to use a single test script to conduct both web, desktop, and browser tests. 
  • With Silk Test back-end visualization, testers can save time while producing realistic simulations of service behavior. 

Silk Test Integrations: Test teams use Silk Test for mobile and desktop platforms such as Java, DOM, iOS, Android, and Firefox.

Price: Pricing is customized and available upon request. A free demo is available.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Supports cross-platform and browser testing
  • Easy and intuitive to use
  • Speed and quality with continuous testing

Cons:

  • A complex setup that might confuse non-tech-savvy users

Best automated testing tool with minimal system monitoring

  • Pricing upon request

QTP/UFT is designed to operate without the need for monitoring systems to intervene. It is designed by Micro Focus and focuses on functional, regression, and service testing.

QTP/UFT (Unified Functional Testing) serves both technical and non-technical users. This unified testing paradigm tests both the front-end and back-end components of a system, supporting both GUI and API testing using virtualized facilities. 

QTP/UFT Standout Features

  • QTP/UFT allows users to automate actions, then identify and test bugs in real time. 
  • Testing activities without monitoring the system in intervals while also applying uniformity of actions on different users, data sets, and various browsers on Windows operating systems.
  • QTP/UFT provides all services under a common IDE, including GUI testing and non-GUI using API Service Test. 
  • QTP/UFT uses VB Script as a scripting language.

QTP/UFT Integrations: QTP/UFT uses ALM to integrate with other HP products. It also integrates with SAP and Oracle.

Price: QTP/UFT is provided upon request.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Enables both API and GUI testing elements
  • Requires no to minimal monitoring to function effectively

Cons:

  • Limited to desktop applications and Windows OS
  • Its execution time is relatively high compared to other testing tools

Best Windows macro-creation automation tool for keyboard and mouse functions

  • Free plan available
  • Open-source and free

AutoHotkey is a free and open-source scripting utility that allows you to automate repeated tasks. The tool is designed for Microsoft Visual Studio Community 2022 and is lightweight, fast, and stable. 

Why I picked AutoHotkey: As a macro-creation software, the tool allows you to send user-generated mouse clicks and keystrokes to an application easily. Besides reducing data-entry tasks, the tool enables developers to perform sophisticated tasks such as creating form fillers. Moreover, AutoHotkey is fully programmable, supporting various concepts like arrays, matrices, and component object models (COM). 

AutoHotkey Standout Features

  • With its scripts and macros, AutoHotkey allows users to customize shortcuts and remap keys with lightweight automation.
  • You can create small and complex scripts to accomplish various productivity tasks like user-entry forms. 
  • The internal language command allows you to parse script files with programming paradigms like object orientation, procedural programming, and command-based programming. 
  • AutoHotkey allows you to structure its scripts as independent modules, especially with subroutines such as functions, Hotstrings, and Hotkeys with portable auto-execute sections. 

AutoHotkey Integrations: AutoHotkey can integrate with platforms like Git, VSCode, and PowerShell.

Price: AutoHotkey is open-source and free.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Fully programmable
  • Good documentation
  • Powerful, yet easy to learn

Cons:

  • It doesn’t offer embedded compiler options like similar macro software

Best end-to-end test management platform

  • 30-day free trial + free plan + free demo available
  • From $84/user/month (billed annually)

Katalon Studio is a free, comprehensive automation testing toolkit with a Selenium-based engine, although it has introduced priced upgrades. 

Why I picked Katalon: It is an  AI-augmented platform to produce automated tests and uses Groovy as a language. However, Katalon allows you to reuse automated scripts without coding. It provides web, API, visual, desktop, and mobile testing. Powered by its end-to-end software development ecosystem, Katalon enables DevOps to deliver solutions quickly.

Katalon Standout Features

  • Katalon also offers beginners a low-code experience with reusable test artifacts and a unified IDE to test all apps. 
  • With a runtime engine that streamlines execution, Katalon fosters scheduling, self-healing, smart waits so you can run parallel execution in browsers, devices, and OS.
  • Katalon’s extensive data and keyword-driven testing, coupled with autonomous script generation, provides actionable insights and effective root-cause analysis.
  • Native CI/CD offers real-time notifications and holistic end-to-end pipeline visibility while providing experts an abundant DevOps integrations.
  • Fast and auto-record-and-playback that quickly responds to real-world scenarios.

Katalon Integrations: Katalon can be integrated with CI/CD tools such as Jira, Bamboo, and Jenkins. 

Price: Katalon is free, but it also has Premium and Ultimate plans. The Premium plan starts at $25 per month, and you need to contact Katalon for a quote on its Ultimate plans.

Free trial: In addition to a forever free plan, the Premium plan offers a 30-day free trial period. 

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Integration with other DevOps platforms
  • Parallel test execution
  • Fast script creation time

Cons:

  • It has a significant learning curve, so not suited for beginners

Other Black Box Testing Tools

Here are some additional black box testing tools options that didn’t make it onto my shortlist, but are still worth checking out:

  1. Ranorex

    All-in-one test automation framework for black box testing

  2. Watir

    Web application black box testing tool In Ruby

  3. MbUnit

    C# Automated Unit Testing Framework

  4. Selendroid

    Automated black box testing framework for native, web, and hybrid Android apps

  5. Mobot

    For outsourcing tough black box tests

How I Evaluate Black Box Testing Tools

I split my evaluation into baseline requirements—like input/output testing and CI/CD integration—and differentiators that separate enterprise-grade tools from those built for smaller QA teams.

Core Functionality (Table Stakes For This List)

When I'm selecting tools for my list, I rank each one on a scale from 0 (does not offer the functionality) to 5 (excels in this area) for each core functionality listed below. Then, I calculate the tool's total score into a percentage. Each tool needs to achieve a minimum total score of 65% to be considered for inclusion.

  • Input-Output Testing: I check whether a tool can execute tests purely through external inputs and expected outputs—like submitting form data or API requests—without needing source code access.
  • Functional Test Automation: The ability to automate regression and acceptance tests matters here, whether through scripted, codeless, or hybrid approaches like those in Selenium or Katalon.
  • Test Case Management: I evaluate how each tool handles organizing, tagging, and versioning test suites so QA teams can maintain and reuse cases across multiple release cycles.
  • Cross-Environment Support: Tools that cover browser, OS, and device combinations earn higher marks, especially for teams running the same test suite against both web and mobile apps.
  • Defect Reporting & Logs: I look for detailed failure output—screenshots, execution logs, and trace data—that gives testers enough context to reproduce a bug without rerunning the entire suite.
  • CI/CD Integration: Whether it's Jenkins, GitLab CI, or GitHub Actions, I evaluate how each tool plugs into existing pipelines to trigger test runs automatically on every build or merge.

Once I have a list of tools that meet the criteria, I consider what sets each platform apart.

Differentiating Factors (What Sets Vendors Apart)

Here's how I compare and contrast different vendors:

Standout Features

AI-powered test generation stands out because it cuts maintenance overhead. When a button's locator changes after a UI redesign, self-healing tests adapt without manual updates. Codeless test authoring matters too, especially for teams where manual QA testers need to build automated suites through record-and-playback or visual builders without writing scripts. I also evaluate visual regression testing, which flags pixel-level UI shifts between builds that functional assertions alone would miss entirely.

Beyond Features

Integration ecosystem depth is one of the first things I evaluate. A tool that connects natively to Jira, TestRail, and your CI/CD pipeline saves hours of custom configuration. I also consider how well a platform supports mixed-skill teams—some tools offer strong documentation and community resources that help manual testers ramp up on automation without formal training. Licensing flexibility matters as well, since a per-user model can become expensive fast as your QA team scales across projects.

How to Choose Black Box Testing Tool

It’s easy to get bogged down in long feature lists and complex pricing structures. To help you stay focused as you work through your unique software selection process, here’s a checklist of factors to keep in mind:

FactorWhat to Consider
ScalabilityWill the tool grow with your team? Consider if it can handle an increase in projects or users without a drop in performance.
IntegrationsDoes it work with your existing tools? Check for compatibility with your development and project management software.
CustomizabilityCan you tailor it to fit your workflow? Look for options to adjust features to suit your specific needs without over-complicating the process.
Ease of useIs it user-friendly for your team? Ensure the interface is intuitive and requires minimal training to get started.
Implementation and onboardingHow long will it take to set up? Consider the time and resources required to get up and running, including any training materials provided by the vendor.
CostDoes it fit your budget? Compare the pricing structure with your financial limits and check for hidden fees or additional costs for extra features.
Security safeguardsAre your data protected? Evaluate the security measures in place, such as encryption and compliance with data protection regulations.
Support availabilityWill you get help when needed? Assess the level of support offered, including response times and available support channels like chat, email, or phone.

What Are Black Box Testing Tools?

Black box testing tools are software used to test the functionality of other software without any knowledge of the internal workings or code structure. These tools focus on examining the input and output of the software under test, assessing its behavior and functionality as experienced by the end user.

They are used for various types of tests, including functional, system, and acceptance testing, without requiring access to the source code.

Features

When selecting black box testing tools, keep an eye out for the following key features:

  • Automated test case generation: Automatically creates test cases based on user requirements, saving time and reducing manual effort.
  • Compatibility testing: Ensures the software works across different devices and operating systems, enhancing user accessibility.
  • User interface validation: Checks the application's interface for usability, ensuring a positive user experience.
  • Integration with CI/CD pipelines: Allows seamless integration into continuous integration and delivery workflows, boosting efficiency.
  • Customizable dashboards: Offers tailored views of testing results and metrics, aiding in quick decision-making.
  • AI-driven test analysis: Utilizes artificial intelligence to analyze test results, identifying patterns and potential issues.
  • Real-time reporting: Provides immediate feedback on test outcomes, allowing for faster problem resolution.
  • Security safeguards: Protects sensitive data during testing, ensuring compliance with data protection standards.
  • Training resources: Includes videos and interactive tours to help users get started quickly and effectively.
  • 24/7 support availability: Offers round-the-clock assistance to resolve issues and maintain productivity.

Benefits

Implementing black box testing tools provides several benefits for your team and your business. Here are a few you can look forward to:

  • Improved software quality: By detecting bugs and issues early, these tools help ensure your software meets user expectations.
  • Time savings: Automated test case generation reduces manual testing efforts, allowing your team to focus on other tasks.
  • Enhanced user experience: User interface validation ensures your application is intuitive and user-friendly.
  • Greater flexibility: Compatibility testing across devices and platforms increases your software's accessibility.
  • Efficient workflows: Integration with CI/CD pipelines enables smoother development and deployment processes.
  • Data protection: Security safeguards ensure that sensitive information is protected during testing.
  • Informed decision-making: Real-time reporting and customizable dashboards provide valuable insights for quick resolutions.

Costs & Pricing

Selecting black box testing tools requires an understanding of the various pricing models and plans available. Costs vary based on features, team size, add-ons, and more. The table below summarizes common plans, their average prices, and typical features included in black box testing tools solutions:

Plan Comparison Table for Black Box Testing Tools

Plan TypeAverage PriceCommon Features
Free Plan$0Basic testing capabilities, limited test cases, and community support.
Personal Plan$10-$30/user/monthAutomated test generation, basic reporting, and email support.
Business Plan$40-$70/user/monthAdvanced analytics, integration options, and priority email support.
Enterprise Plan$100-$200/user/monthCustomizable dashboards, dedicated account manager, and 24/7 support.

Black Box Testing Tools FAQs

Here are some answers to common questions about black box testing tools:

What is the difference between black box and white box testing?

Black box testing focuses on testing the software’s functionality without knowing the internal code structure, while white box testing involves testing the internal logic and structure of the code. In black box testing, you simulate user interactions to identify bugs, whereas white box testing requires knowledge of the code to test specific paths and conditions. Black box testing is typically done by testers, while developers often perform white box testing to ensure code quality.

Can black box testing tools integrate with my existing software?

Yes, many black box testing tools offer integration options with popular software development and project management tools. Look for tools that provide APIs or built-in connectors for seamless integration with platforms like Jira, GitHub, or Jenkins. Integration helps streamline your workflow by allowing you to manage tests and bugs within your existing systems, saving time and reducing errors.

How can my team test if a black box testing tool works for both web and mobile?

Check if it supports browsers, mobile devices, and hybrid apps in one test suite. This saves time managing separate tools. Make sure it works with emulators, device clouds, or cross-platform scripts.

What’s Next:

If you're in the process of researching black box testing tools, connect with a SoftwareSelect advisor for free recommendations.

You fill out a form and have a quick chat where they get into the specifics of your needs. Then you'll get a shortlist of software to review. They'll even support you through the entire buying process, including price negotiations.

Paulo Gardini Miguel
By Paulo Gardini Miguel

I've spent 15+ years at the intersection of engineering leadership, infrastructure, and technical strategy. As Director of Technology at Black & White Zebra, I lead a 20-person team, shape AI-driven workflows, and oversee cloud architecture across multiple digital publishing brands. Previously, I managed large-scale data platforms at Navegg, partnering with Google, Oracle, and Adobe. I hold a degree in Computer Engineering from Universidade Positivo.