Corgea vs. ZeroPath: Comparison & Expert Reviews For 2026
You’ve been reviewing security findings, comparing new tools, and trying to figure out which AppSec platform actually fits your team’s workflow without adding more noise or overhead.
The shortlist got smaller, the stakes got higher, and now the real comparison begins.
This guide breaks down Corgea vs. ZeroPath so you can understand how each platform approaches security, workflows, and scaling in practice.
Corgea vs. Zeropath: An Overview
Zeropath
Visit ZeropathOpens new windowWhy Trust Our Software Reviews
Corgea vs. Zeropath Pricing Comparison
| Corgea | Zeropath | |
|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing | From $34/developer/month | From $200/month |
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowCorgea vs. ZeroPath Pricing & Hidden Costs
Corgea follows a per-developer pricing model with a free tier and progressively higher tiers that add workflow integrations, reporting, governance, and enterprise controls.
The entry tier already includes broad scanning capabilities, but most teams will need higher plans for analytics, team management, and policy enforcement. Because pricing scales with engineering headcount and key enterprise features sit in top tiers, costs can increase significantly as teams grow or require SSO, audit logs, and advanced support.
ZeroPath uses a platform subscription model with a limited free plan and paid tiers that unlock full scanning, automated patching, integrations, dashboards, and collaboration features.
This structure can be more predictable for larger teams since pricing isn’t tied to the number of developers, but repository limits and enterprise requirements can push organizations toward higher tiers sooner as their codebase and compliance needs expand.
Corgea vs. Zeropath Feature Comparison
Corgea focuses on AI-driven vulnerability detection, triage, and remediation within developer workflows. Its core capabilities include AI SAST, OSS dependency scanning, secrets detection, malware scanning, IaC scanning, and PII/PHI detection, alongside standout features such as automated AI-generated fixes, false-positive detection, source-and-sink tracing, policy management, and integrations through its GitHub app and VS Code extension.
ZeroPath centers on a broad AI AppSec platform that combines SAST, SCA, secrets detection, and IaC security with workflow automation. Notable features include automated patch generation, PR security reviews, policy enforcement, risk prioritization, and a policy engine designed to support CI/CD pipelines and collaboration across engineering and security teams.
| Corgea | Zeropath | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Factor Authentication | ||
| API | ||
| Access Management | ||
| Anti-Virus | ||
| Audit Management | ||
| Audit Trail | ||
| Batch Permissions & Access | ||
| Compliance Tracking | ||
| DDoS Protection | ||
| Dashboard | ||
| Data Export | ||
| Data Import | ||
| External Integrations | ||
| File Sharing | ||
| File Transfer | ||
| Firewall | ||
| Incident Management | ||
| Malware Protection | ||
| Multi-User | ||
| Notifications | ||
| Password & Access Management | ||
| Policy Management | ||
| Real-time Alerts | ||
| Report & Compliance | ||
| Risk Assessment | ||
| Security Migration | ||
| Threat Detection | ||
| Workflow Management |
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowCorgea vs. ZeroPath Integrations
| Integration | Corgea | ZeroPath |
| Jira | ✅ | ✅ |
| Slack | ✅ | ✅ |
| GitHub | ✅ | ✅ |
| GitLab | ✅ | ✅ |
| Bitbucket | ✅ | ✅ |
| Azure DevOps | ✅ | ✅ |
| Visual Studio | ✅ | ✅ |
| Linear | ❌ | ✅ |
| API | ✅ | ✅ |
| Zapier | ✅ | ❌ |
Both platforms provide integrations with common developer and DevOps tools such as Jira, Slack, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Visual Studio, and APIs, indicating support for CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, and developer workflows.
Corgea vs. ZeroPath Security, Compliance & Reliability
| Factor | Corgea | ZeroPath |
| Data Privacy | Customer data and code are protected through encryption in transit and at rest, with secure cloud infrastructure and access controls. | Fully GDPR compliant with transparent data handling and minimal data retention. |
| Regulatory Compliance | Follows SOC 2 security best practices and is currently undergoing SOC 2 auditing. | SOC 2 Type II certified, demonstrating a commitment to security, availability, and confidentiality. |
| Incident Response | Maintains a vulnerability disclosure program and a defined process for reporting and addressing security issues. | Documented response plan, 72-hour breach notification, and post-incident reports on request. |
| System Uptime | Publicly reports service status and uptime, showing 100% uptime in its recent uptime history. | Provides a public status page showing about 99.894% uptime and operational services. |
With Corgea, customer data and code are encrypted in transit and at rest. They follow SOC 2 security best practices while undergoing SOC 2 auditing and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program, publicly reporting 100% uptime in its recent status history.
ZeroPath highlights full GDPR compliance with minimal data retention, SOC 2 Type II certification, a documented incident response process with 72-hour notification, and a public status page showing about 99.894% uptime and operational services.
Corgea vs. ZeroPath Ease of Use
| Factor | Corgea | ZeroPath |
| User Interface | Developer-focused interface for reviewing vulnerabilities, managing scans, and applying AI-generated fixes within existing workflows. | Provides a dashboard for viewing scan results, tracking metrics, managing policies, and reviewing findings directly within pull requests. |
| Onboarding Experience | Offers a guided setup with a wizard, GitHub app installation, and step-by-step onboarding. | Offers a Quick Start guide for creating an account, connecting repositories, and starting scans. |
| Setup | Lets users connect or upload a repo, run scans, review findings, and apply fixes via PRs, IDE integrations, or downloads. | Setup involves connecting a repository, configuring scan settings, and running automated scans. |
| Support | Offers a help center, documentation, contact options, and premium support in higher tiers. | Provides documentation, email support, and a community Discord for help and guidance. |
Corgea provides a developer-focused interface for reviewing vulnerabilities, managing scans, and applying AI-generated fixes. It includes a guided setup with a wizard and GitHub app installation, and its workflow covers connecting or uploading repositories, running scans, reviewing findings, and applying fixes through pull requests, IDE integrations, or downloads. Support includes documentation, a help center, contact options, and premium support tiers.
ZeroPath’s dashboard is good for non-technical users as it provides a quick view for scan results, tracking metrics, managing policies, and reviewing findings within pull requests. It offers a Quick Start guide for creating an account, connecting repositories, and starting scans, with setup focused on connecting repositories, configuring scan settings, and running automated scans. Support is available through documentation, email, and a community Discord.
Corgea vs Zeropath: Pros & Cons
Corgea
- Built to integrate into developer workflows and existing toolchains.
- Strong automation helps streamline vulnerability detection and prioritization.
- AI-generated security fixes help reduce manual remediation work.
- Reporting and analytics are limited to higher-tier plans, so teams that need deeper visibility may have to upgrade sooner.
- Newer vendor with a limited track record.
- Primarily designed for technical teams.
Zeropath
- Gives you clear fixes that speed up your security reviews.
- Cuts down noisy findings so your team can focus on real issues.
- It catches logic flaws and hidden risks you might miss in normal scans.
- You won’t get a lightweight experience if you only want simple vulnerability checks.
- Integration options may not be extensive enough for complex enterprise environments.
- You may need time to adjust your workflow around its automation.
Best Use Cases for Corgea and Zeropath
Corgea
- Security Teams Supporting Developer Productivity Policies and automated remediation help AppSec and DevSecOps teams enforce security standards with minimal manual effort.
- Organizations Handling Sensitive Data Businesses working with personal or healthcare data benefit from using PII/PHI and secret scanning to detect exposed sensitive information.
- Companies Using Open-Source Dependencies Teams that rely on third-party libraries benefit from OSS dependency scanning that detects vulnerable packages early.
- Teams With Large Security Backlogs Auto-triage helps engineering and security teams prioritize real risks and reduce false positives.
- DevOps and CI/CD-Driven Workflows Teams using GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, or Azure DevOps benefit from native integrations that run security checks directly in pipelines and pull requests.
- Fast-Moving Software Development Teams Frequent release teams benefit from continuous scanning and auto-fix, which detect vulnerabilities and generate remediation pull requests automatically.
Zeropath
- Project Managers Provides visibility into the security status of ongoing work, helping PMs track risk areas without needing to dive into technical details.
- Enterprise AppSec You need dashboards, compliance insights, and automated tracking that make large-scale oversight easier.
- Software Developers Developers get clear, actionable scan results that reduce guesswork during remediation and make it easier to prioritize fixes.
- Cybersecurity Departments ZeroPath’s scanning and reporting tools provide an efficient way to track vulnerabilities across repositories and keep security reviews consistent.
- Agile Teams Automated checks and real-time alerts fit naturally into sprint-based development, helping teams resolve issues without disrupting release timing.
- Tech Startups ZeroPath’s clean interface helps early-stage teams adopt security workflows quickly, even if they don’t have a dedicated AppSec specialist. It supports fast setup, so you can introduce scanning without adding process overhead.
Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.
Get Expert AdviceOpens new windowWho Should Use Corgea, and Who Should Use ZeroPath?
Overall, Corgea is best for developer-led teams since its AI SAST, auto-triage, and automated pull-request fixes are aimed at reducing backlogs and embedding security into daily workflows. It is also good for CI/CD-driven teams since its integrations run security checks directly in pipelines and pull requests.
ZeroPath, on the other hand, is good for security, DevSecOps, and enterprise teams (including non-technical users) looking for a unified AppSec platform. It combines SAST, SCA, secrets scanning, IaC security, and automated patch generation into one platform designed to secure code and support compliance across repositories.
Differences Between Corgea and Zeropath
| Corgea | Zeropath | |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | Highlights SOC 2 best practices, vulnerability disclosure processes, and developer-focused security enforcement through policies. | Highlights SOC 2 Type II certification, GDPR compliance, automated compliance workflows, and breach notification processes. |
| Integrations | Includes Zapier and strong IDE tooling support, reflecting an emphasis on automation and developer workflows. | Includes Linear and collaboration-focused tooling, reflecting emphasis on cross-team coordination and security operations. |
| Pricing Model | Corgea uses a per-developer, tiered pricing model where higher plans unlock governance, analytics, SSO, audit logs, and enterprise controls. Costs scale as engineering teams grow. | ZeroPath uses a platform subscription model where pricing is tied to repositories, scans, and platform usage rather than headcount. |
| Setup and Onboarding | Provides guided onboarding with a setup wizard and GitHub app installation, focused on getting developers scanning quickly. | Provides a Quick Start flow centered on connecting repositories, configuring scans, and running automated PR reviews. |
| Vulnerability Management | Strong emphasis on AI-generated fixes, false-positive reduction, and source-and-sink tracing to help developers resolve issues quickly. | Emphasizes automated patch generation, PR security reviews, and risk prioritization across the broader security lifecycle. |
| Read Corgea ReviewOpens new window | Visit ZeropathOpens new window |
Similarities Between Corgea and Zeropath
| AI-Driven AppSec | Both position themselves as AI-powered application security platforms designed to detect and fix vulnerabilities earlier in development. |
|---|---|
| CI/CD Pipeline Integration | Both integrate scanning directly into repositories, pull requests, and CI/CD pipelines. |
| Multi-Layer Security Testing | Both provide SAST, SCA, secrets detection, and IaC security to cover multiple layers of the software supply chain. |
| Visibility | Both offer dashboards and reporting for tracking vulnerabilities, scans, and security posture across projects. |
| Workflow Automation | Both focus on reducing manual security work through automation and continuous scanning. |
| Read Corgea ReviewOpens new window Visit ZeropathOpens new window | |
