Skip to main content

Generative AI (GenAI) and its rapid adoption has fundamentally reshaped industries, and software development is leading the charge. AI now generates more than a quarter of Google’s new code!

This swift embrace of AI offers valuable lessons for other industries grappling with adoption challenges. A recent survey found that 81% of software engineers are using GenAI to automate tasks previously done manually—a dramatic shift from just two years ago.

To explore these insights further, we spoke with Robert Whiteley, CEO of Coder, who shared his perspective on the impact of AI in software development and its potential implications across other fields. In this Q&A, Rob unpacks the opportunities, risks, and evolving dynamics of AI adoption, providing guidance for organizations on how to successfully integrate AI into their workflows while avoiding common pitfalls.

  1. Has AI adoption truly empowered developers, or is it introducing new complexities and pressures that weren’t as present before? Are there any aspects of the developer experience that may have worsened due to AI?

"When implemented correctly, AI can be a game-changer for developer productivity and the overall developer experience. By streamlining tedious coding tasks, reducing errors, and improving code quality, AI enables developers to focus on higher-value work. It’s about amplifying their impact, not replacing their creativity. But while the benefits are undeniable, integrating AI into software development comes with its own set of challenges.

AI adoption in development has been rapid. Just two years ago, most developers weren’t using AI tools; now, 81% of software engineers are leveraging GenAI to automate tasks they previously did manually. This surge has accelerated productivity, but it has also created a balancing act. Developers must learn to incorporate AI to complement their skills while maintaining the human oversight needed for high-quality results.

One of the biggest risks is overreliance on AI. The convenience of delegating tasks to AI can sometimes reduce scrutiny over its outputs, undoing the efficiency gains it promises. At the same time, developers face growing pressure to master new skill sets to work with AI tools effectively. Managing AI in workflows feels increasingly like managing a team—it demands a mix of technical and leadership skills that many developers are still learning to navigate. Think of GenAI as an eager intern looking to please the developer. Coaxing good results from your GenAI companion takes specific prompts, positive reinforcement, and iterative mentoring.

Organizations also struggle with standardization when rolling out AI. Often, they rely on tools from existing partners or adopt piecemeal solutions based on individual preferences or acquisitions. This creates a patchwork of tools that complicates workflows and governance, especially in larger organizations where unsanctioned AI use can quickly spiral out of control.

To fully empower developers, companies need clear policies and guidelines from the start. Developers should feel confident using AI while staying critical of its outcomes. And perhaps most importantly, adoption needs to happen at a pace that supports learning and growth. AI is a powerful tool, but it works best when it enhances—not replaces—human expertise." 

  1. Do you think businesses overestimate AI’s short-term impact but underestimate its long-term risks, like potential biases or overreliance on automation? Are there risks that aren't being talked about enough?

"The rapid adoption of AI tools has outpaced many companies’ readiness to address the risks. While the initial optimism around AI’s benefits is well-founded, too many businesses are moving forward without the infrastructure needed to mitigate critical threats like data exfiltration, intellectual property theft, prompt injection, and data poisoning. With 2025 shaping up to be the year of Generative AI data breaches, investing in proper guardrails isn’t optional—it’s essential to implement AI successfully in today’s increasingly complex cybersecurity landscape.

There’s also the issue of who owns the output. Most GenAI code assistance tools – especially the paid, non-consumer versions – assign intellectual property rights to the developer. They also indemnify against risks associated with the underlying LLMs. However, this is not universal. Companies must carefully understand the terms and conditions of the tools they allow – and block. Otherwise, organizations may end up co-owning the IP.

The risks of AI are real. Companies must balance leveraging AI’s capabilities and maintaining human oversight to ensure quality, accuracy, and safety. Future success begins with thoughtful planning and disciplined execution today. Businesses can’t afford to chase flashy AI use cases or quick wins without aligning these initiatives to the genuine needs of their development teams. The right approach combines clear governance policies, user education, and a focus on solving meaningful problems. That’s how AI’s full potential can be realized safely and effectively."

  1. Which industries might mistakenly assume AI isn’t as relevant to their field but would benefit most from integrating it? Are there any surprising success stories where AI insights from developers are revolutionizing unlikely sectors?

"AI is transforming every industry, from healthcare to manufacturing and even entertainment. Despite their differences, many of these industries significantly overlap pain points. Whether matching bed capacity with fluctuating patient demand in an emergency department or optimizing a product supply chain, the root of those challenges often lies in inefficient data management. AI tools can lend a mighty hand in streamlining these processes through automation, much like they do for developers when it comes to writing code.

In the case of Coder, I’ve been most surprised by the auto industry. Carmakers employ large populations of developers to create and maintain increasingly smart and autonomous automobiles. It’s not unusual for a major manufacturer to have 10,000 or more developers. The largest Coder deployments are from auto manufacturers; they all use more than one GenAI solution."

  1. How do you address leaders who worry that AI adoption could lead to job displacement or a loss of human intuition? Could the first step in AI adoption be more about mindset than technology?

"The right mindset and messaging are essential to get an AI initiative off the ground. Resistance to change is normal, especially when that change comes with as many rumors and potential risks as AI. Decision-makers must demonstrate the real-world value of AI and its impact on developers’ day-to-day.

Developers will always be problem solvers, and that won’t change with the implementation of AI. What will change is how they solve problems. As AI is introduced, each developer will essentially become a manager of their own team of bots, asking them to think differently about how to break down a problem and pass the subsequent task along to an AI agent. This requires a shift from a purely hard skill set to soft skills – instead of valuing deep expertise in a particular set of coding languages, developers need to ask, “Can I communicate effectively?” 

Developers will also have an increasing level of autonomy when problem-solving, as it will be up to each individual to decide how they structure their team of AI bots. For example, deciding whether they want to assign bots to different stages of the software development lifecycle, split the work by coding language, and so on. Providing training or upskilling opportunities to help developers foster these new, soft skill sets is an essential step in their success in the long term.

It’s also important for decision-makers to acknowledge that AI still isn’t ready to replace human input completely, debunking myths and correctly positioning new initiatives as a helpful tool, not a replacement. AI has taken impressive strides in recent years, but these tools can only get developers 80% of the way there. Human touch is required to refine the remaining 20% and reap time savings and quality benefits. By positioning AI as an assistant for accelerating digital transformation, leaders can better prepare their teams to not only begrudgingly accept AI tools but embrace them and uplevel their overall experience and skill sets."

  1. Has the "shift left" movement truly been accelerated by AI, or is it just following the broader trend toward DevOps and automation? Are there areas where shifting left has backfired or created new bottlenecks?

"The ‘shift left’ approach has long been used to solve problems in software development before they begin. However, in recent years, so much has been ‘shifted left’ that developers are spending less and less time on actual coding projects. It’s time for CIOs and CTOs to rethink their strategies.

While DevOps and DevSecOps can drive tremendous automation and time savings, they often come at a tax to the developer. Shifting operations earlier in the software development lifecycle leads to an increase in cognitive load and a decrease in developer productivity. GenAI has arisen, in part, as a response to this problem. It’s a new tool in the toolbox for leaders to offset developer productivity and developer experience woes.

DevOps and Platform Engineering leaders can lean on Cloud Development Environments as a way of automating GenAI at scale. They make sure GenAI is always connected, patched, and versioned correctly, which streamlines access for third-party contract developers, enables data science teams to leverage cloud computing resources, and reduces onboarding time for developers on new projects. We see the most successful companies using CDEs to “shift left” tools – especially GenAI – for developers without adding a productivity tax."

What's Next?

The journey of AI adoption in software development offers a powerful blueprint for other industries. While GenAI has unlocked new levels of productivity, it also highlights the importance of human oversight, thoughtful implementation, and a mindset shift toward collaboration with AI as a partner.

As businesses in other sectors contemplate integrating AI, Rob Whiteley's insights underscore a key takeaway: successful adoption isn't just about leveraging cutting-edge technology but empowering people to work smarter, not harder. 

By fostering transparent governance, enabling upskilling, and prioritizing seamless integration, organizations can navigate the challenges of AI adoption and unlock its transformative potential.

Subscribe to The CTO Club’s newsletter for more AI insights.

Katie Sanders

As a data-driven content strategist, editor, writer, and community steward, Katie helps technical leaders win at work. Her 14 years of experience in the tech space makes her well-rounded to provide technical audiences with expert insights and practical advice through Q&As, Thought Leadership, Ebooks, etc.