Aikido Security vs. Veracode: Comparison & Expert Reviews For 2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Overview
Why Trust Us
Pricing Comparison
Features
Integrations
Security
Ease of Use
Pros & Cons
Best Use Cases
Differences
Similarities

When choosing between Aikido Security and Veracode, it’s not just about the feature list—it’s about making sure the platform is compatible with the security maturity and development speed of your company. While Veracode has spent more than 20 years building an enterprise-grade security empire trusted by Fortune 500 companies and government agencies, developer-first competitor Aikido Security emerged in 2022 to combine multiple AppSec solutions into one streamlined platform.

I examined the features, costs, integrations, and real-world performance of both platforms to help you cut through the marketing hype. You’ll discover which platform best suits the workflow, financial constraints, and risk tolerance of your team. Additionally, you will learn about the advantages and disadvantages of dealing with security tool sprawl as a rapidly expanding startup or as a large organization that must adhere to FedRAMP and SOC 2 regulations.

Aikido Security vs. Veracode: An Overview

Why Trust Our Software Reviews

Aikido Security vs. Veracode Pricing Comparison

	Aikido Security	Veracode
Free Trial	Free plan available + free demo	Free demo available
Pricing	From $350/month	Pricing upon request

Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.

Get Expert Advice

Aikido Security vs. Veracode Hidden Costs

Aikido’s pricing is fairly straightforward and predictable: you pay a flat monthly fee per plan, with each tier bundling a wide range of AppSec, cloud, and runtime security features and including a set number of users, repos, cloud accounts, container images, AI autofixes, and protected requests. You generally won’t run into classic “gotchas” like per-developer fees or surprise add-ons, but you should watch the built-in usage limits—if you outgrow things like repo counts, cloud accounts, domains, AI AutoFixes, or protected requests, you’ll need to upgrade plans or move to custom Enterprise pricing.

Veracode charges an annual fee, but the real costs come from scan volume limits and application-based pricing. Most businesses need extra features for DAST, manual penetration testing, and more API scanning that aren’t included in the basic packages. You’ll probably also need professional help to set everything up and connect it all. When making your choice, think about how many applications you have, how often you expect to scan them, and whether you need specialized testing like mobile app security or legacy code analysis.

Aikido Security vs. Veracode Feature Comparison

Aikido Security combines over 15 different security scanners into one platform that covers CSPM, IaC scanning, container scanning, malware detection, SAST, DAST, SCA, and secrets detection, so it works as a full replacement for a security tool stack. The most noticeable thing about the platform is its AI-powered AutoTriage system that uses your real software and infrastructure to automatically remove false alarms and explain flaws. If your development team is too tired to care about alerts, Aikido’s AI AutoFix will automatically make pull requests to fix issues with SAST, dependencies, and containers. Plus, the bulk fix feature lets you fix a ton of issues with just one click.

When it comes to SAST, DAST, SCA, and Application Risk Management, Veracode provides deep, enterprise-level support. The platform is excellent at runtime and API security, with almost no false positives due to continuous oversight and useful Security Labs that teach devs about secure code right in their processes. Whether you need FedRAMP-certified scanning for government contracts or are dealing with complex compliance needs, Veracode’s strong policy enforcement, SBOM generation, and third-party risk assessment features give enterprise security teams the oversight and audit trail they need.

	Aikido Security	Veracode
API
Dashboard
Data Export
Data Import
External Integrations
Multi-User
Notifications

Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.

Get Expert Advice

Aikido Security vs. Veracode Integrations

Aikido Security vs. Veracode Security, Compliance & Reliability

Aikido Security vs. Veracode Ease of Use

Factor	Aikido Security	Veracode
Interface and User Experience	Clean, developer-first dashboard with a centralized feed prioritizing vulnerabilities by severity, featuring AI-generated TL;DR summaries and one-click ticket creation.	Enterprise-grade interface with comprehensive analytics and policy management, though it requires familiarity with SAST tools to navigate effectively.
Setup and Configuration	Remarkably fast setup advertised as “10 minutes” with OAuth-based Git integration requiring no complex agents or configuration files to install.	More complex setup requiring significant time and resources to implement effectively, with configuration challenges noted for teams unfamiliar with enterprise security platforms.
Onboarding and Learning Curve	Onboarding is done in minutes, with developer teams being trained in an average of 45 minutes due to the platform’s intuitive CI/CD integrations.	Steeper learning curve, particularly for teams new to application security testing tools, requiring dedicated training time.
Documentation and Resources	Comprehensive help documentation covering account setup, scanning capabilities, integrations, and vulnerability management with step-by-step guides.	Extensive documentation and Security Labs offering hands-on secure coding training directly within developer workflows to reduce knowledge gaps.
Customer Support	Email support with alert capabilities for security events and automated notifications through Slack and Microsoft Teams integrations.	Tiered support packages with enterprise customers receiving dedicated support resources, through specific response times vary by licensing level.

Aikido Security’s fast training process puts speed-to-value first, letting development teams begin to scan files right after signing up. Users can see a significant noise reduction, which is a massive productivity and sanity boost for your team. Veracode’s enterprise-grade platform has more features, but it requires a lot of time and money to train developers and set up, so it’s better for companies that have a security team that can use its advanced policy management and hands-on Security Labs training modules. If users need to do security scanning on their own without having AppSec resources available, Aikido’s simple and easy design with a short learning curve will get your team up and running faster, whereas Veracode has more features to help companies that are willing to spend time and money on training and implementation.

Aikido Security vs Veracode: Pros & Cons

Best Use Cases for Aikido Security and Veracode

Aikido Security

Unified AppSec scans code, cloud, secrets, IaC and runtime.

Small to Mid-Sized Development Teams Junior developers can fix their own security bugs thanks to Aikido’s clear step-by-step guides and ready-to-use patch snippets—even without any security background.
DevOps and Platform Engineer Teams DevOps teams integrating Aikido with Jenkins or GitHub Actions catch more critical vulnerabilities pre-production, slashing emergency patching and stopping security issues from derailing their release timelines.
B2B SaaS Providers SaaS providers who connect Aikido to their GitHub repos see vendor security questionnaires practically vanish because its auto-generated SBOMs automatically answer assessment questions without manual work.
Cloud-Native Startups and Scale-Ups Startups with fewer than five team members get Aikido for free, then scale with affordable per-month pricing, so you can avoid that budget-crushing security hire during your critical growth phase.
HealthTech and MedTech Companies Healthcare teams rely on Aikido to monitor patient data protection at every stage—from initial code commits through cloud deployments, resulting in a reduction in HIPAA violations.
FinTech and Financial Services Financial firms have cut compliance paperwork using Aikido, with encrypted audit trails that actually satisfy the strict requirements of SEC and FINRA regulators.

Veracode

Custom Software Shops You can keep your code safe during fast releases with automated, reliable scans.
Security Analysts You can dig into results with detail that helps you prioritize real issues fast.
Regulated Industries You can meet compliance needs easily thanks to structured reports and policy controls.
DevSecOps Teams You can fold security into your workflow with tools that support continuous testing.
Finance Firms You can reduce risk with strict testing that helps protect sensitive financial data.
Large Enterprises You get scalable scanning and policies that help your work stay consistent across big teams.

Get free help from our project management software advisors to find your match.

Get Expert Advice

Who Should Use Aikido Security, and Who Should Use Veracode?

Aikido Security is made for small to medium-sized companies that are just starting out or growing quickly and need to combine their security tools while keeping up with development speed. It makes it easy to collect evidence automatically and get teams up and running quickly, so they can start scanning in minutes instead of weeks. If your team is led by developers and doesn’t have any dedicated AppSec resources, or if you’re tired of getting too many false positives from different point solutions, Aikido’s unified approach and noise reduction will let your engineers focus on shipping features instead of sorting through security alerts.

Veracode is the best choice for big businesses, Fortune 500 companies, and government contractors who need FedRAMP approval or who have to deal with a lot of compliance issues across a lot of applications. The platform has 19 years of vulnerability data and advanced policy management features that help organizations with dedicated security teams that need to make sure that hundreds or thousands of applications follow the same security rules. Veracode’s full reporting, third-party risk assessment, and hands-on Security Labs training make the higher cost worth it if you work in a highly regulated field like healthcare, financial services, or the public sector, where showing a mature security posture opens up new revenue streams and meets strict federal guidelines.

Differences Between Aikido Security and Veracode

	Aikido Security	Veracode
AI-Powered Noise Reduction	Aikido Security’s AI AutoTriage technology gets rid of most false positives and automatically submits pull requests to correct security gaps in SAST, dependencies, and containers without developers having to do anything.	Veracode tells developers how to prioritize and repair vulnerabilities in the usual way, but it doesn’t generate code for solutions automatically; developers have to do it themselves.
FedRAMP Authorization	Aikido Security is focused on commercial compliance standards like SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, which are better for enterprises in the private sector than for those in the public sector; however, it does not have FedRAMP accreditation.	The U.S. SEC has issued Veracode FedRAMP Moderate Authorization to Operate, indicating that the company may engage with federal government contracts and agencies that need to comply with NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5.
Pricing Model	Aikido’s website shows they offer clear tiered membership prices, with the lowest being for up to 10 engineers.	Veracode has its own enterprise licensing system, and yearly contracts can start in the tens of thousands range, with the number of apps, scans, and feature modules affecting the price.
Setup Complexity	According to Aikido Security, it takes 10 minutes to set up, and OAuth-based repository connections don’t require any agents or difficult setup.	Setting up Veracode requires a lot of effort and money, and setting up is often best left to a dedicated security team.
Third-Party Tool Aggregation	Aikido Security doesn’t only combine findings from several scanners; it sells itself as a comprehensive substitute for numerous security products—its objective is to get rid of tool sprawl completely.	The Universal Connector from Veracode gathers data from various security products like Snyk, Checkmarx, Fortify, and Aqua Security and puts it all in one place on its Risk Manager platform.
	Visit Aikido SecurityOpens new window	Read Veracode ReviewOpens new window

Similarities Between Aikido Security and Veracode

Comprehensive Coverage	Both systems use SAST, DAST, and SCA to check code, apps that are running, and dependencies that are open source.
Container and Infrastructure Security	Both platforms extend beyond application code to scan container images for vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, plus IaC templates like Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes manifests.
Developer-Focused Remediation	Aikido Security and Veracode provide the tools devs need to fix issues by giving them useful repair ideas, code samples, and advice based on the situation.
Enterprise Compliance	Both platforms support enterprise compliance requirements through SOC 2 Type II certification, role-based access controls, audit logging, and policy enforcement capabilities that organizations need for regulatory frameworks.
Native CI/CD Integration	With Aikido Security and Veracode, continuous development and release processes can automatically check for code changes, pull requests, and build methods.
Visit Aikido SecurityOpens new window Read Veracode ReviewOpens new window

Tool	Aikido Security	Veracode
GitHub	✅	✅
GitLab	✅	✅
Bitbucket	✅	❌
Azure DevOps	✅	✅
Jira	✅	✅
Slack	✅	❌
Jenkins	✅	✅
CircleCI	✅	✅
AWS	✅	✅
Google Cloud	✅	✅
Microsoft Teams	✅	❌
ServiceNow	❌	✅
Snyk	❌	✅
Checkmarx	❌	✅
JFrog Artifactory	❌	✅

Factor	Aikido Security	Veracode
Compliance Certifications	SOC Type II certified with automated evidence generation for ISO 27001:2022, PCI, HIPAA, DORA, and NIS2 compliance frameworks.	SOC 2 Type II certified, FedRAMP Moderate ATO from the U.S. SEC, and compliant with NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with over 300 security controls.
Data Encryption	Encrypts sensitive data at rest and in transit using TLS, with configuration evidence available for compliance audits.	Implements encryption controls meeting FedRAMP requirements for data at rest and in transit, with detailed controls documented in SOC 2 reports.
Access Controls	Role-based access control with MFA support, least privilege enforcement, and access review logs for audit evidence.	Comprehensive access controls meeting FedRAMP standards, including physical and logical access restrictions, identity management, and session controls.
Monitoring and Logging	Comprehensive logging for systems and applications with anomaly detection, security event monitoring, and automated alert configurations.	Continuous audit logging and incident response capabilities aligned with NIST 800-53 standards, with detailed logging for federal compliance.
Uptime and Reliability	SLA-based vulnerability management with automated due dates and severity-based resolution timeframes tracked in calendar days.	High availability commitments meeting federal standards with system availability and operational effectiveness verified in SOC 2 Type II attestations.