10 beste Auvik-Alternativen im Test 2026
Auswahl der besten Auvik-Alternativen
Die Verwaltung Ihres Netzwerks kann eine Herausforderung sein, insbesondere wenn Ihr aktuelles Tool Ihre Anforderungen nicht erfüllt. Wenn die Funktionen von Auvik nicht zu Ihren Geschäftszielen passen oder die Preise Ihr Budget überschreiten, suchen Sie möglicherweise nach einer Alternative, die besser zu Ihrem Team passt.
Ich habe verschiedene Netzwerkverwaltungstools getestet und bewertet. In dieser Übersicht stelle ich meine besten Auvik-Alternativen vor. Sie erhalten Einblicke in die Funktionen, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit und die spezifischen Vorteile der einzelnen Tools.
Dieser Leitfaden bietet Ihnen klare, unvoreingenommene Informationen, damit Sie die beste Auvik-Alternative für Ihre Anforderungen auswählen können. Nutzen Sie ihn, um die passende Lösung für Ihr Team zu finden.
Was ist Auvik?
Auvik ist eine Software zur Netzwerkverwaltung, die IT-Fachleuten bei der Überwachung und Verwaltung der Netzwerkinfrastruktur hilft. Sie wird häufig von Netzwerkadministratoren und IT-Managern eingesetzt, die komplexe Netzwerkumgebungen effizient betreuen müssen.
Die automatisierte Netzwerkzuordnung, die Echtzeitüberwachung und die Alarmfunktionen helfen dabei, Probleme schnell zu erkennen und die Netzwerkleistung aufrechtzuerhalten. Insgesamt bietet Auvik einen Mehrwert, indem es Aufgaben der Netzwerkverwaltung vereinfacht und die Transparenz in Ihrem Netzwerk verbessert.
Zusammenfassung der besten Auvik-Alternativen
Diese Vergleichstabelle fasst die Preisdetails meiner besten Auvik-Alternativen zusammen, damit Sie die beste Lösung für Ihr Budget und Ihre geschäftlichen Anforderungen finden können.
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for user-friendly analytics | Free 14-day trial | From $1.50/month/managed device | Website | |
| 2 | Best for network performance | Free 30-day trial | From $7/node/month | Website | |
| 3 | Best for hybrid observability | Free 15-day trial | From $16/hybrid unit/month | Website | |
| 4 | Best for open-source observability | Free download available | From $325/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 5 | Best for security automation | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 6 | Best for customizable alerts | Free demo + 30-day free trial + free plan available | From $2,595/100 node license | Website | |
| 7 | Best for hybrid environments | Free trial + free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 8 | Best for all-in-one monitoring | Free demo + 30-day free trial available | From $179/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 9 | Best for distributed monitoring | Free trial + free demo available | From GBP €590/perpetual (billed annually) | Website | |
| 10 | Best for hybrid cloud monitoring | Free trial available | From $1,169/year (billed annually) | Website |
Warum Sie unseren Software-Bewertungen vertrauen können
Wir testen und bewerten seit 2023 Software. Als Technologie-Führungskräfte wissen wir, wie kritisch und herausfordernd es ist, die richtige Entscheidung bei der Softwareauswahl zu treffen.
Wir investieren viel in gründliche Recherche, um unserer Zielgruppe zu helfen, bessere Kaufentscheidungen zu treffen. Wir haben über 2.000 Tools für verschiedene Technikanwendungsfälle getestet und mehr als 1.000 umfassende Softwarebewertungen geschrieben. Erfahren Sie wie wir transparent bleiben und unsere Methodik der Softwarebewertung.
-
TestDevLab
Visit Website -
Site24x7
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.7 -
GitHub Actions
Visit WebsiteThis rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.4.8
Bewertungen der besten Auvik-Alternativen
Nachfolgend finden Sie meine ausführlichen Zusammenfassungen der besten Auvik-Alternativen, die es in meine Auswahl geschafft haben. Meine Bewertungen bieten einen detaillierten Einblick in die wichtigsten Funktionen, Vor- und Nachteile, Integrationen und idealen Einsatzbereiche jedes Tools, damit Sie die beste Lösung für sich finden können.
Domotz
Best for user-friendly analytics
Domotz is a network monitoring and management software designed for IT professionals and managed service providers. It offers key functions like network monitoring, device tracking, and alert management.
Why Domotz is a good Auvik alternative: Domotz provides dashboards and reporting for monitoring network performance. Compared to Auvik, it focuses on simpler visualizations and alerts. Real-time device tracking keeps teams aware of network activity, helping them identify and address issues more efficiently.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include remote power management that allows you to control devices from afar, SNMP monitoring for real-time data collection, and network topology mapping that provides clear visual insights.
Integrations include Amazon, Sonos, Luxul, Pakedge, Ubiquiti, Crestron, Control4, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Real-time device tracking
- Visual network mapping
- User-friendly interface
Cons:
- Not ideal for large enterprises
- Limited advanced features
Best for network performance
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM) is a network monitoring solution designed for IT professionals and network administrators. It helps monitor network performance, spot bottlenecks, and generate alerts.
Why SolarWinds NPM is a good Auvik alternative: SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor provides advanced alerting and network path analysis. It offers insights into network traffic and performance, helping teams identify and resolve issues. Detailed network maps give a clear view of network health for efficient management and troubleshooting.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include intelligent alerts that notify your team of potential issues, customizable dashboards that offer tailored views, and NetPath analysis that provides detailed insights into network paths and performance.
Integrations include Cisco, Microsoft, VMware, Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Juniper Networks, Dell, HP, IBM, NetApp, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports large-scale networks
- Advanced alerting system
- Excellent network performance insights
Cons:
- Can be costly as network size grows
- Resource-intensive for smaller networks
Best for hybrid observability
Logic Monitor is a cloud-based infrastructure monitoring platform designed for IT teams and service providers. It performs key business functions such as performance monitoring, resource optimization, and alert management.
Why Logic Monitor is a good Auvik alternative: LogicMonitor supports hybrid observability with automated discovery and predictive alerts for monitoring both on-premises and cloud environments. It provides visibility into hybrid infrastructure, making it suitable for organizations managing or transitioning to cloud-based systems.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include customizable dashboards that allow you to tailor views to your needs, anomaly detection that identifies unusual patterns and potential issues, and capacity planning tools that help optimize resource use.
Integrations include Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, VMware, Cisco, Dell, HP, NetApp, ServiceNow, Slack, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Deep insights into performance
- Proactive alerting system
- Strong hybrid infrastructure support
Cons:
- Overkill for teams that only need basic network monitoring
- Dashboard customization requires familiarity with the platform
Zabbix
Best for open-source observability
Zabbix is an open-source monitoring solution designed for IT administrators and network teams. It monitors network performance, tracks server health, and generates alerts.
Why Zabbix is a good Auvik alternative: Zabbix offers open-source observability, with real-time monitoring and customizable alerts. Unlike Auvik, it allows your team to tailor the monitoring to specific needs. Its ability to handle high volumes of data makes it ideal for large-scale environments. The customizable nature of Zabbix ensures that your team can adapt it to fit various network configurations.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include trend analysis that helps your team predict future issues, distributed monitoring that supports various locations, and advanced visualization tools that provide clear insights into network performance.
Integrations include VMware, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Cisco, Dell, HP, IBM, Oracle, NetApp, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Customizable monitoring experience
- Handles high data volumes
- Open-source flexibility
Cons:
- Limited automation
- Unintuitive user interface and dashboards
BackBox
Best for security automation
BackBox is a cyber resilience platform for network infrastructure, built to automate security, compliance, and lifecycle management. It's mainly used by MSPs, security professionals, IT teams, and compliance officers.
Why Backbox is a good Auvik alternative: BackBox excels in security automation, offering features like automated backup and recovery and compliance management. These capabilities help your team efficiently manage network security tasks. Unlike Auvik, BackBox focuses on automating security processes, which is ideal if you're prioritizing security in your network management. Its device lifecycle management further supports maintaining compliance and security standards effectively.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include configuration management that helps maintain network settings, vulnerability intelligence that keeps your team informed of potential threats, and Zero Trust implementation that enhances security protocols.
Integrations include Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, Juniper Networks, Fortinet, Check Point, F5 Networks, Dell, IBM, VMware, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Efficient lifecycle management
- Supports over 180 vendors
- Strong security automation
Cons:
- Less focus on network performance monitoring
- Requires technical expertise
Best for customizable alerts
Nagios XI is a complete monitoring tool made for IT administrators and network managers. It performs key functions such as network monitoring, alerting, and performance tracking.
Why Nagios XI is a good Auvik alternative: Nagios XI offers highly customizable alerting, allowing your team to define specific conditions and thresholds. It supports monitoring across a wide range of devices and applications, giving you broad visibility into network and system performance.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include advanced reporting tools for in-depth insights into network performance, a user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation, and a plugin system that extends monitoring capabilities.
Integrations are not publicly listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Wide range of plugins
- Extensive device monitoring
- Highly customizable alerts
Cons:
- Limited native cloud monitoring
- Heavy manual configuration
FortiManager by Fortinet is a centralized management solution for enterprise networks, used by network administrators and IT security teams. It provides key functions such as device management, network monitoring, and security policy management.
Why FortiManager by Fortinet is a good Auvik alternative: FortiManager is well-suited for hybrid environments, with features like centralized policy management and automated device configuration. These capabilities help your team ensure consistent security policies across both on-premises and cloud environments. Unlike Auvik, FortiManager focuses more on security management, making it a strong option to maintain a secure network infrastructure. Its automation tools also support your ability to manage complex network setups efficiently.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include advanced reporting that provides insights into network activities, role-based access control for secure management, and change management that tracks and controls network changes.
Integrations are not publicly listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Centralized policy management
- Supports hybrid environments
- Strong security management
Cons:
- Requires access to the Fortinet ecosystem
- Limited out-of-the-box usability
Paessler PRTG is a network monitoring tool for IT administrators and network managers. It monitors network performance, sends alerts when issues occur, and generates detailed reports.
Why Paessler PRTG is a good Auvik alternative: Paessler PRTG provides all-in-one monitoring with bandwidth monitoring, uptime monitoring, and traffic analysis. It allows teams to monitor multiple network metrics from a single platform. Compared to Auvik, Paessler PRTG offers customizable dashboards and maps for tailored monitoring views, helping teams identify and address network issues more efficiently.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include distributed monitoring for multiple locations, sensor-based monitoring for detailed data collection, and customizable alerts for critical issues.
Integrations include Amazon Web Services, VMware, Cisco, Dell, IBM, NetApp, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Sensor-based data collection
- Customizable dashboards
- Complete monitoring capabilities
Cons:
- Licensing model can become costly as the number of sensors grows
- Limited scalability for large networks
Pandora FMS is a flexible monitoring solution designed for IT administrators and network managers. It performs key functions such as monitoring network devices, applications, and servers across distributed environments.
Why Pandora FMS is a good Auvik alternative: Pandora FMS excels in distributed monitoring, offering capabilities like remote monitoring and customizable dashboards. These features help your team manage multiple sites from a single location. Unlike Auvik, Pandora FMS offers greater flexibility in setting up and managing your monitoring environment. Its adaptability to various network configurations makes it a solid choice for businesses with complex infrastructures.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include real-time monitoring for quick issue response, alerts for critical events, and reporting tools for network performance insights.
Integrations include Cisco, Microsoft, VMware, Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, IBM, Oracle, Dell, HP, NetApp, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Customizable dashboards
- Supports multiple sites
- Flexible monitoring setup
Cons:
- May require technical expertise
- Can be complex for beginners
Progress WhatsUp Gold is a network monitoring software for IT professionals and network administrators. It provides key functions such as network performance monitoring, alerting, and data visualization.
Why Progress WhatsUp Gold is a good Auvik alternative: Progress WhatsUp Gold supports hybrid cloud monitoring, offering features like real-time network mapping and customized alerts. These capabilities monitor both on-premises and cloud-based systems efficiently. Unlike Auvik, it provides a dynamic dashboard that allows you to visualize network performance at a glance. These features help your team manage a diverse range of network configurations with ease.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include network traffic analysis for bandwidth usage, virtual monitoring for VMware and Hyper-V, and application performance monitoring for critical applications.
Integrations are not publicly listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Customizable alerts
- Real-time network mapping
- Effective hybrid cloud monitoring
Cons:
- User interface can feel dated
- Limited scalability for very large networks
- Customizable alerts
Weitere Auvik-Alternativen
Hier sind einige weitere Auvik-Alternativen, die es nicht in meine Auswahl geschafft haben, aber dennoch einen Blick wert sind:
- OpManager Plus
For IT operations management
- LinkEye
For AI-driven diagnostics
- Quantum Spark Security Management Portal
For security management
- NinjaOne
For endpoint management
- Datadog
For cloud observability
- Atera
For all-in-one IT management
- ManageEngine OpManager
For real-time network monitoring
- LibreNMS
For open-source network monitoring
- Obkio
For continuous network performance
- Azure Virtual WAN
For global network management
- FindIT Network Manager
For small business networks
- Open NMS
For scalable network monitoring
- VM Cloud Foundation
For hybrid cloud infrastructure
How I Evaluate Auvik Alternatives
I split every tool into two layers: the baseline capabilities (automated discovery, multi-tenant dashboards, SNMP support) that earn inclusion, and the differentiators that set the best options apart.
Core Functionality (Table Stakes For This List)
When I'm selecting tools for my list, I rank each one on a scale from 0 (does not offer the functionality) to 5 (excels in this area) for each core functionality listed below. Then, I calculate the tool's total score into a percentage. Each tool needs to achieve a minimum total score of 65% to be considered for inclusion.
- Network Discovery & Mapping: I evaluate how quickly and accurately a tool scans subnets, identifies devices, and renders a live topology map—especially across VLANs and remote sites.
- Real-Time Performance Monitoring: Each tool should surface device health metrics like CPU, memory, bandwidth, and uptime with polling intervals fast enough to catch issues before users report them.
- Multi-Site & Multi-Tenant Support: I check whether network administrators and MSP teams can segment clients or locations into isolated views with role-based access and separate dashboards.
- Configuration Backup & Management: I look for automated config snapshots, version history, and diff comparisons—helpful when a switch config change takes down a branch office at 2 a.m.
- SNMP & Protocol Support: Broad protocol coverage matters. I evaluate support for SNMP v1/v2/v3, syslog, and flow protocols like NetFlow or sFlow across common vendors like Cisco, Meraki, and Fortinet.
- Alerting & Notification System: I consider how flexible alert thresholds are and whether notifications route to the right channels—email, Slack, Teams, or directly into a PSA ticketing queue.
Once I have a list of tools that meet this criteria, I consider what sets each platform apart.
Differentiating Factors (What Sets Vendors Apart)
Here's how I compare and contrast different vendors:
Standout Features
PSA and RMM integrations matter a lot for MSP teams. I look for native connectors to tools like ConnectWise or Autotask so alerts auto-generate tickets without manual intervention. NetFlow traffic analysis is another differentiator—it helps pinpoint which applications or endpoints are consuming bandwidth during a slowdown, going well beyond basic SNMP polling. I also evaluate automated documentation capabilities, since tools that continuously update device inventories and IP address records save hours of manual work each week.
Beyond Features
Pricing structure is a big one. I evaluate whether a tool charges per device, per node, or per billable endpoint—because for MSPs managing hundreds of client sites, the wrong model can crush margins fast. I also consider whether a platform fits MSP workflows or internal IT teams better, since multi-tenant isolation and white-labeled reporting aren't priorities for every buyer. Deployment matters too. A cloud-native tool with quick discovery scans gets you to value in hours, while on-premise options may suit teams with strict data residency requirements.
Warum nach einer Auvik-Alternative suchen?
Auvik ist zwar eine gute Wahl für Netzwerkverwaltungssoftware, aber es gibt mehrere Gründe, warum manche Benutzer nach alternativen Lösungen suchen. Dazu können folgende Gründe gehören:
- Ihr Team benötigt erweiterte Sicherheitsfunktionen
- Sie benötigen Unterstützung für größere Netzwerke
- Sie benötigen flexiblere Preisoptionen
- Ihr Unternehmen ist in einer Region mit Einschränkungen tätig
- Sie wünschen eine bessere Integration mit bestimmten Tools
Wenn einer dieser Punkte auf Sie zutrifft, sind Sie hier richtig. Meine Liste umfasst mehrere Optionen für Netzwerkverwaltungssoftware, die besser für Teams geeignet sind, die mit diesen Herausforderungen bei Auvik konfrontiert sind und nach alternativen Lösungen suchen.
Funktionen
Hier sind einige der wichtigsten Funktionen von Auvik, damit Sie die Angebote dieser Verwaltungsplattformen gegenüberstellen und vergleichen können:
- Automatisierte Netzwerkerkennung und -zuordnung: Identifiziert und ordnet Netzwerkgeräte in Echtzeit zu und verschafft Ihnen einen klaren Überblick über den Aufbau Ihres Netzwerks.
- Laufende Bestandsverwaltung: Aktualisiert Änderungen an Geräten regelmäßig, damit Ihr Netzwerkbestand stets aktuell bleibt.
- Konfigurationsverwaltung: Bietet stündliche Sicherungen und Versionskontrolle für Gerätekonfigurationen, unterstützt so die Compliance und vereinfacht die Wiederherstellung.
- Proaktive Überwachung und Alarmierung: Bietet mehr als 50 vorkonfigurierte Alarme, um Probleme frühzeitig zu erkennen und zu beheben.
- Datenverkehrsanalyse: Liefert Kennzahlen zur Bandbreitennutzung und Anwendungsleistung, um die Netzwerkeffizienz zu optimieren.
- Netzwerksicherheit: Bietet Echtzeittransparenz und Warnmeldungen zu potenziellen Bedrohungen und hilft Ihnen so, die Sicherheit Ihres Netzwerks zu gewährleisten.
- Netzwerkdokumentation: Hält Aufzeichnungen für Audits und Budgetplanung aktuell und vereinfacht Verwaltungsaufgaben.
- Verteilte Netzwerkverwaltung: Ermöglicht MSPs die zentrale Verwaltung von Netzwerken an mehreren Standorten.
- Netzwerkautomatisierung: Erleichtert die Erkennung, Dokumentation und Serverüberwachung, damit Ihr Team Zeit spart.
Wie geht es weiter?
Wenn Sie gerade Netzwerkverwaltungssoftware recherchieren, können Sie sich kostenlos mit einem SoftwareSelect-Berater in Verbindung setzen und Empfehlungen erhalten.
Sie füllen ein Formular aus und führen ein kurzes Gespräch, in dem die Besonderheiten Ihrer Anforderungen besprochen werden. Anschließend erhalten Sie eine Auswahlliste von Software, die Sie prüfen können. Die Berater unterstützen Sie sogar während des gesamten Kaufprozesses, einschließlich der Preisverhandlungen.