13 alternatives à Zscaler pour 2026
Liste restreinte des alternatives à Zscaler
Une alternative solide à Zscaler offre un accès cloud sécurisé et évolutif, une protection avancée contre les menaces ainsi que des contrôles de politique flexibles adaptés aux environnements informatiques complexes. Si vous recherchez des concurrents à Zscaler, c'est certainement pour comparer des options capables d'égaler ou de surpasser les fonctionnalités de sécurité cloud de Zscaler — que ce soit pour une meilleure intégration, une gestion plus granulaire ou la prise en charge des systèmes hybrides et hérités. Cette liste vous aidera à comparer rapidement les principaux fournisseurs, à comprendre leurs points forts uniques et à identifier la solution qui correspond le mieux aux priorités de sécurité et aux besoins d’infrastructure de votre organisation.
Qu'est-ce que Zscaler ?
Zscaler est une plateforme de cybersécurité et de sécurité cloud qui fournit un accès sécurisé à Internet et aux applications pour les utilisateurs, quel que soit leur emplacement ou leur appareil. Construit sur une architecture cloud, il adopte une approche "zéro confiance" pour inspecter le trafic, bloquer les menaces et appliquer en temps réel des politiques de sécurité des données. Zscaler est largement utilisé par les organisations pour protéger des effectifs distants, hybrides et distribués, tout en améliorant l’expérience utilisateur globale et en réduisant la dépendance aux appliances de sécurité réseau traditionnelles.
Résumé des alternatives à Zscaler
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for rapid deployment at global scale | Free plan + free demo available | From $20/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 2 | Best for granular policy management | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 3 | Best for secure remote access to legacy apps | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 4 | Best for unified security and SD-WAN | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 5 | Best with integrated threat intelligence | Free demo + free trial available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 6 | Best for behavior-based risk analytics | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 7 | Best for real-time data protection in cloud apps | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 8 | Best with native zero trust architecture | 30-day free trial available | From $13.60/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 9 | Best for global private backbone connectivity | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 10 | Best for hybrid network environments | 30-day free trial + free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website |
Why Trust Our Software Reviews
-
Site24x7
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.6 -
Docker
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.6 -
Pulumi
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.8
Avis sur les alternatives à Zscaler
Vous trouverez ci-dessous mes résumés détaillés des meilleures alternatives à Zscaler qui ont figuré sur ma liste restreinte. Mes critiques offrent un aperçu précis des fonctionnalités, des capacités et des meilleurs cas d’utilisation de chaque plateforme pour vous aider à choisir celle qui conviendra le mieux à votre organisation.
Cloudflare Zero Trust is built for organizations that need to secure users and applications across a distributed, global workforce. IT teams looking for rapid deployment and instant scalability will appreciate Cloudflare’s globally distributed network and one-click onboarding. Unlike Zscaler, Cloudflare lets you roll out zero-trust policies and secure remote access in minutes, even for large, multi-region environments.
Why Cloudflare Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
When you need to deploy cloud security at a global scale without delay, Cloudflare Zero Trust is a strong choice. I picked Cloudflare because its network spans hundreds of cities worldwide, letting you enforce zero-trust policies close to every user and application. The platform’s one-click onboarding and instant policy propagation mean you can secure remote access and web traffic for thousands of users in minutes. This rapid deployment capability makes Cloudflare especially appealing for organizations with distributed teams or urgent rollout needs.
Cloudflare Key Features
Some other features that caught my attention include:
- DNS Filtering: Blocks access to malicious domains and enforces safe browsing policies at the DNS layer.
- Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Monitors and controls data movement across SaaS applications for compliance and visibility.
- Device Posture Checks: Evaluates device health and security status before granting access to applications.
- API Shield: Protects APIs from abuse and unauthorized access using schema validation and mutual TLS.
Cloudflare Integrations
Integrations include CrowdStrike, Google Cloud, Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity, SentinelOne, VMware, ServiceNow, Splunk, and IBM Security.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Built-in DNS filtering for threat blocking
- One-click onboarding for rapid policy rollout
- Global network enables low-latency access
Cons:
- No built-in remote browser isolation
- Some features require Cloudflare Gateway deployment
Check Point Harmony SASE is designed for organizations that need precise, customizable security controls across users, devices, and applications. Security teams in regulated industries or those with complex access requirements will find its granular policy management especially useful. Unlike Zscaler, Check Point gives you detailed rule creation and enforcement options for every layer of your network.
Why Check Point Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For teams that need more control over security policies, Check Point Harmony SASE stands out with its granular policy management capabilities. I picked Check Point because it lets you define detailed access rules based on user identity, device posture, application, and even specific data types. The platform’s unified policy engine allows you to enforce consistent security across remote users, branch offices, and cloud resources. This level of customization makes Check Point a strong alternative for organizations with complex compliance or segmentation needs.
Check Point Key Features
In addition to its granular policy controls, I also found these features worth noting:
- Cloud-based Threat Emulation: Analyzes files in a virtual sandbox to detect and block zero-day threats before they reach users.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Opens web content in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malicious code from reaching endpoints.
- Integrated Data Loss Prevention: Monitors and controls sensitive data movement across cloud and web applications.
- Unified Security Dashboard: Provides a single interface for monitoring, managing, and responding to security events across your environment.
Check Point Integrations
Integrations include Splunk Cloud, Microsoft Sentinel, Amazon S3, and ConnectWise PSA.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Advanced threat emulation for file analysis
- Built-in remote browser isolation feature
- Granular policy creation for user and device
Cons:
- Mobile device support is less comprehensive
- Reporting features lack real-time customization
Citrix Secure Private Access is designed for organizations that need to deliver secure remote access to legacy and on-premises applications. This solution is especially useful for IT teams in industries with critical legacy systems that aren’t easily migrated to the cloud. Citrix stands apart by enabling zero-trust access to these older applications without requiring a VPN, helping you modernize security while supporting existing infrastructure.
Why Citrix Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that rely on legacy or on-premises applications, Citrix Secure Private Access offers a unique approach to secure remote connectivity. I picked Citrix because it enables zero-trust access to older apps without forcing a full migration to the cloud or requiring a traditional VPN. The platform supports adaptive authentication and granular policy controls, letting you manage access based on user context and risk. This makes Citrix a strong Zscaler alternative for businesses that need to protect legacy systems while modernizing their security posture.
Citrix Key Features
Some other features in Citrix Secure Private Access that may interest you include:
- Browser isolation: Runs web sessions in a secure, isolated environment to prevent threats from reaching endpoints.
- Single sign-on (SSO): Allows users to access multiple applications with one set of credentials.
- Session recording: Captures user activity within applications for auditing and compliance.
- Device posture checks: Evaluates endpoint security status before granting access to applications.
Citrix Integrations
Integrations include Cisco Duo, Ping, Entra ID, Okta, Microsoft Active Directory, Google Identity, SAML 2.0 IdP, NetScaler Gateway, Citrix StoreFront, and CrowdStrike.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Enables device posture checks before access
- Integrates with major identity providers
- Offers browser isolation for web threats
Cons:
- Complex deployment for hybrid environments
- Some features need separate Citrix licenses
Fortinet brings together security and SD-WAN in a single platform, making it a strong fit for organizations that want unified control over both network connectivity and protection. IT leaders managing distributed offices or remote workforces often choose Fortinet to simplify operations and reduce the need for multiple vendors. Its integrated approach helps you enforce consistent security policies and optimize application performance across all locations.
Why Fortinet Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that want both security and SD-WAN in one solution, Fortinet offers a unified approach that’s hard to match. I like how Fortinet combines next-generation firewall capabilities with integrated SD-WAN, letting you manage network traffic and security policies from a single console. Its centralized management helps you enforce consistent protection and optimize connectivity across branch offices and remote users. This makes Fortinet a strong choice if you’re looking to reduce complexity and avoid juggling multiple vendors for network and security needs.
Fortinet Key Features
Some other features in Fortinet that may interest you include:
- Zero trust network access (ZTNA): Provides secure, identity-based access to applications regardless of user location.
- Cloud-delivered secure web gateway: Inspects and filters web traffic to block threats and enforce usage policies.
- Integrated sandboxing: Analyzes suspicious files in a secure environment to detect unknown malware.
- Automated threat intelligence sharing: Updates security policies in real time using global threat data from FortiGuard Labs.
Fortinet Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports zero-trust network access policies
- Provides granular application visibility and control
- Combines SD-WAN and security in one platform
Cons:
- Advanced features may need separate licenses
- Requires Fortinet hardware for some features
If your organization needs cloud security with built-in threat intelligence, Palo Alto Networks offers a unified SASE platform that combines network and security functions. IT and security teams in highly regulated industries often turn to Palo Alto Networks for its real-time threat detection and automated response capabilities. The platform also uses automation and advanced analytics to identify and mitigate cyber threats, including ransomware. With its broad portfolio of cloud security solutions, Palo Alto Networks helps organizations address evolving risks across cloud, network, and remote environments.
Why Palo Alto Networks Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Palo Alto Networks is a strong Zscaler alternative if you want integrated threat intelligence as part of your cloud security stack. I like that the platform combines real-time threat detection with automated policy enforcement, helping you respond quickly to emerging risks. Its use of machine learning and global threat data enables proactive identification of advanced threats across cloud and network environments. This approach is especially useful for organizations that need to stay ahead of sophisticated cyberattacks and regulatory demands.
Palo Alto Networks Key Features
Some other features in Palo Alto Networks that may interest you include:
- Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Monitors and controls access to cloud applications and enforces security policies.
- Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Provides secure, identity-based access to applications regardless of user location.
- Secure Web Gateway: Filters and inspects web traffic to block malicious sites and enforce compliance.
- SD-WAN Integration: Optimizes network performance and reliability for distributed sites and remote users.
Palo Alto Networks Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, AWS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Okta, Splunk, Zoom, Box, and Slack.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Automated response to detected threats
- Granular user and application visibility
- Integrated threat intelligence from Unit 42
Cons:
- Support response times can be inconsistent
- Licensing structure is complex to navigate
Forcepoint Secure Private Access is designed for organizations that need to monitor and respond to risky user behavior in real time. Security teams in regulated industries or those managing sensitive data will find its behavior-based analytics especially useful for detecting insider threats and compromised accounts. Unlike Zscaler, Forcepoint emphasizes adaptive access controls that adjust automatically based on user risk profiles.
Why Forcepoint Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that need to go beyond static access controls, Forcepoint stands out with its behavior-based risk analytics. I picked Forcepoint because it continuously monitors user actions and adapts access policies in real time based on detected risk. Features like dynamic risk scoring and automated policy enforcement help security teams quickly respond to insider threats or compromised accounts. This approach gives you more granular control over access decisions compared to traditional cloud security providers like Zscaler.
Forcepoint Key Features
Some other features worth noting include:
- Granular Application Segmentation: Restricts user access to specific applications rather than entire networks.
- Multi-Factor Authentication Integration: Supports integration with leading MFA providers for added login security.
- Cloud-Based Secure Web Gateway: Filters and inspects web traffic to block threats and enforce policies.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Runs web sessions in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malware from reaching endpoints.
Forcepoint Integrations
Integrations include Cisco Duo, Ping Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Google Identity, Active Directory, SAML 2.0 IdP, CrowdStrike, Intune, and Citrix StoreFront.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports multiple identity providers natively
- Remote browser isolation for web threats
- Real-time risk scoring for adaptive access
Cons:
- No built-in CASB functionality
- Limited visibility into encrypted traffic
Netskope offers cloud-native security designed for organizations that need deep visibility and control over cloud app usage. Security teams in industries with strict data protection requirements often choose Netskope for its real-time data loss prevention and advanced threat protection. If you’re looking to secure sensitive information across SaaS, IaaS, and web traffic, Netskope stands out for its granular policy enforcement and analytics.
Why Netskope Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Netskope stands out for its real-time data protection in cloud apps, making it a strong choice if you need to secure sensitive information as it moves through SaaS and web environments. I picked Netskope because its cloud-native architecture inspects traffic in-line, allowing for immediate detection and blocking of risky activities. The platform’s advanced data loss prevention and contextual access controls help you enforce granular security policies across cloud services. These capabilities are especially valuable for organizations with strict compliance or data privacy requirements.
Netskope Key Features
Some other features in Netskope that may interest you include:
- Cloud Firewall: Inspects and controls outbound traffic to prevent unauthorized access and data exfiltration.
- User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA): Monitors user activity to detect anomalies and potential insider threats.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Opens risky web content in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malware infections.
- API Security: Scans and protects API traffic to block threats and enforce security policies across cloud services.
Netskope Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, AWS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Box, Slack, Zoom, Okta, CrowdStrike, Splunk, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong visibility into shadow IT activity
- Inline traffic inspection with minimal latency
- Granular policy controls for SaaS and web
Cons:
- Occasional false positives in threat detection
- Reporting dashboards can be slow to load
Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform is built for organizations that want security deeply integrated across their cloud, endpoint, and identity environments. This solution is especially relevant for IT teams already invested in Microsoft 365, Azure, or Windows ecosystems and looking to enforce granular, adaptive access controls. What sets Microsoft Security apart from Zscaler and others is its native zero-trust architecture that unifies identity, device, and application security under a single framework.
Why Microsoft Security Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Unlike many cloud security providers, Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform is built directly into its cloud, identity, and endpoint services. I picked Microsoft Security for teams that want a native zero-trust architecture, since it lets you enforce conditional access, continuous risk assessment, and automated threat response across your entire Microsoft environment. Features like unified policy management and real-time device compliance checks help you secure access at every layer. This makes Microsoft Security a strong Zscaler alternative for organizations that want to consolidate security controls within a single, integrated ecosystem.
Microsoft Security Key Features
Some other features in Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform that may interest you include:
- Defender for Cloud Apps: Monitors and controls user activity across cloud applications for better visibility and threat detection.
- Privileged Identity Management: Manages, monitors, and controls access to critical resources with just-in-time and just-enough-access policies.
- Information Protection: Classifies and encrypts sensitive data across emails, documents, and cloud storage.
- Endpoint Detection and Response: Provides advanced threat detection and investigation tools for managed devices.
Microsoft Security Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft Entra, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Purview, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Built-in identity protection and risk assessment
- Native zero-trust controls for all endpoints
- Deep integration with Microsoft 365 services
Cons:
- Policy changes may impact legacy on-prem systems
- Limited visibility into non-Microsoft cloud apps
If your organization needs secure, high-performance connectivity across global locations, Cato Networks offers a private backbone that bypasses the public internet. This platform is well-suited for IT teams managing multinational networks who want to reduce latency and improve reliability for users worldwide. Cato Networks stands out by delivering integrated security and networking over its own global infrastructure, not just through cloud-based security layers.
Why Cato Networks Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Unlike most cloud security providers, Cato Networks operates its own global private backbone, which means your traffic avoids the unpredictability of the public internet. I picked Cato Networks for teams that need consistent, low-latency connectivity between international offices and remote users. The platform combines this backbone with built-in security features like a next-generation firewall, secure web gateway, and zero-trust network access. With seamless integration across networking and security functions, this approach gives you both reliable performance and unified protection, making it a strong alternative to Zscaler for global organizations.
Cato Networks Key Features
Some other features in Cato Networks that may interest you include:
- Cloud-based management console: Lets you configure, monitor, and troubleshoot your network from a single interface.
- WAN optimization: Reduces bandwidth consumption and accelerates application performance across sites.
- Mobile client support: Extends secure access to remote and mobile users without additional hardware.
- Automated threat detection and response: Continuously monitors network traffic and responds to threats in real time.
Cato Networks Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Automated threat detection with real-time response
- Mobile client supports secure remote access
- Private backbone reduces latency for global sites
Cons:
- Advanced analytics features are still maturing
- Requires Cato edge devices for connectivity
For organizations managing both on-premises and cloud infrastructure, Cisco Security delivers cybersecurity solutions designed for hybrid network environments. IT teams in large enterprises and distributed businesses often choose Cisco Security for its ability to unify policy enforcement, routing, and threat protection across complex, mixed environments. Its architecture also supports secure access service edge (SASE) capabilities, helping you secure users, devices, and workloads wherever they operate without forcing a full migration to the cloud.
Why Cisco Security Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
If your business needs to secure both on-premises and cloud resources, Cisco Security stands out for its hybrid network capabilities. I appreciate how Cisco Security’s portfolio supports unified policy management and threat detection across physical, virtual, and cloud environments. Features like adaptive security appliances and cloud-delivered firewall services help you maintain consistent protection as your network evolves. This makes Cisco Security a strong choice for organizations that aren’t ready to move everything to the cloud but still want advanced, centralized security.
Cisco Security Key Features
Some other features in Cisco Security that may interest you include:
- DNS-layer security: Blocks malicious domains and prevents phishing attacks at the DNS level.
- Cloud access security broker (CASB): Monitors and controls access to cloud applications and enforces security policies.
- Endpoint detection and response (EDR): Detects, investigates, and responds to threats on endpoints across your network.
- Email security gateway: Filters inbound and outbound email to block spam, malware, and targeted phishing attempts.
Cisco Security Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Includes built-in email security gateway
- Integrates with Cisco hardware appliances
- Offers granular network segmentation controls
Cons:
- Some updates require manual intervention
- Requires multiple products for full coverage
Autres concurrents de Zscaler
Voici quelques autres options de concurrents de Zscaler qui n’ont pas été retenues dans ma liste restreinte mais qui valent tout de même le détour :
- CrowdStrike
With AI-driven threat detection
- F5
For advanced web application firewall controls
- Kaspersky Next
For SMB-focused security solutions
Critères de sélection des alternatives à Zscaler
Pour sélectionner les meilleures alternatives à Zscaler à inclure dans cette liste, j’ai pris en compte les besoins courants et les difficultés des acheteurs concernant les fournisseurs de solutions de sécurité cloud, telles que la gestion de l'accès distant sécurisé et la détection de menaces avancées. J’ai également utilisé le cadre d'évaluation suivant pour structurer mon analyse et la rendre équitable :
Fonctionnalités essentielles (25 % du score total)
Pour être retenue dans cette sélection, chaque solution devait répondre à ces cas d’usage courants :
- Accès distant sécurisé aux applications cloud
- Détection et prévention des menaces
- Authentification des utilisateurs et gestion de l'identité
- Contrôles d’accès basés sur des politiques
- Surveillance des activités en temps réel
Fonctionnalités différenciantes (25 % du score total)
Pour affiner davantage la sélection, j’ai également recherché les fonctionnalités uniques suivantes :
- Analytique du risque basée sur le comportement
- Isolation distante du navigateur
- Adaptation automatisée des politiques
- Intégration avec plusieurs fournisseurs d'identité
- Ségrégation au niveau des applications
Facilité d’utilisation (10 % du score total)
Pour évaluer la convivialité de chaque système, j’ai pris en considération les éléments suivants :
- Conception du tableau de bord claire et intuitive
- Navigation logique entre les modules
- Étapes minimales pour configurer les fonctionnalités principales
- Accessibilité de la documentation au sein de la plateforme
- Alertes et notifications personnalisables
Intégration initiale (10 % du score total)
Pour évaluer l’expérience d’intégration de chaque plateforme, j’ai pris en compte les éléments suivants :
- Disponibilité de guides d’installation étape par étape
- Accès à des vidéos de formation et des webinaires
- Visites interactives du produit pour les nouveaux utilisateurs
- Modèles de politiques préétablis pour un déploiement rapide
- Équipe de support d’intégration réactive
Service client (10 % du score total)
Pour évaluer les services client de chaque fournisseur de logiciel, j’ai pris en compte les éléments suivants :
- Disponibilité du support 24h/24 et 7j/7
- Multiples canaux de support incluant chat et téléphone
- Accès à une base de connaissances ou un centre d’aide
- Temps de réponse rapide pour les problèmes critiques
- Disponibilité de gestionnaires de compte dédiés
Rapport qualité-prix (10 % du score total)
Pour évaluer le rapport qualité-prix de chaque plateforme, j’ai pris en compte les éléments suivants :
- Structure tarifaire transparente
- Options d’abonnement flexibles
- Fonctionnalités incluses à chaque niveau de tarification
- Coût comparé à des solutions similaires
- Réductions pour les contrats annuels ou pluriannuels
Avis clients (10 % du score total)
Pour comprendre le niveau de satisfaction global des clients, j’ai pris en compte les éléments suivants lors de la lecture des avis :
- Cohérence des retours positifs
- Fréquence des problèmes techniques signalés
- Qualité des expériences avec le support
- Facilité de déploiement et de gestion
- Satisfaction concernant les résultats en matière de sécurité
Pourquoi chercher une alternative à Zscaler ?
Bien que Zscaler soit un bon fournisseur de sécurité cloud, il existe plusieurs raisons pour lesquelles certains utilisateurs recherchent des solutions alternatives. Vous pourriez chercher une alternative à Zscaler parce que…
- Vous avez besoin d’analyses de risque basées sur le comportement, plus fines
- Votre organisation a besoin d’options de déploiement sur site ou hybride
- Vous souhaitez une intégration plus poussée avec certains fournisseurs d’identité
- Vous avez besoin d’une personnalisation plus flexible des politiques
- Votre équipe travaille dans des régions où les centres de données Zscaler sont limités
- Vous exigez des capacités avancées de reporting et d’audit
Si l’un de ces points vous décrit, vous êtes au bon endroit. Ma liste contient plusieurs fournisseurs de sécurité cloud plus adaptés aux équipes confrontées à ces difficultés avec Zscaler et en quête de solutions alternatives.
Fonctionnalités clés de Zscaler
Voici quelques-unes des fonctionnalités clés de Zscaler pour vous aider à comparer et contraster ce que proposent les solutions alternatives :
- Accès réseau sans confiance : Applique un accès aux applications selon le principe du moindre privilège en vérifiant utilisateurs et appareils avant d’accorder l’accès, réduisant ainsi le risque de déplacements latéraux dans votre environnement.
- Passerelle web sécurisée basée sur le cloud : Analyse et filtre tout le trafic web en temps réel, bloquant les sites malveillants, les tentatives de phishing et les contenus inappropriés avant qu’ils n’atteignent les utilisateurs.
- Prévention des menaces en ligne : Détecte et bloque les logiciels malveillants, ransomwares et menaces avancées à la périphérie du réseau, grâce à une analyse comportementale et basée sur les signatures.
- Inspection SSL/TLS : Déchiffre et inspecte le trafic chiffré afin d’identifier les menaces dissimulées sans compromettre la confidentialité ou la performance utilisateur.
- Prévention de la perte de données : Surveille et contrôle la circulation des données sensibles via les canaux cloud et web, aidant les organisations à se conformer aux réglementations sur la protection des données.
- Segmentation des applications : Limite l’accès des utilisateurs uniquement aux applications nécessaires, réduisant la surface d’attaque et empêchant les accès non autorisés.
- Intégration des fournisseurs d’identité : Se connecte avec les principales plateformes d’identités pour appliquer l’authentification unique et l’authentification multi-facteurs garantissant une vérification sûre des utilisateurs.
- Gestion centralisée des politiques : Permet aux administrateurs de définir, mettre à jour et appliquer les politiques de sécurité à partir d’une seule console basée sur le cloud.
- Rapports et analyses complets : Offre une visibilité détaillée de l’activité des utilisateurs, des menaces et des violations de politiques via des tableaux de bord et rapports personnalisables.
- Infrastructure cloud mondiale : Fournit une sécurité homogène et une expérience utilisateur rapide partout dans le monde, grâce à un réseau distribué de centres de données.
Prochaine étape :
Si vous êtes en train de rechercher des alternatives à Zscaler, contactez gratuitement un conseiller SoftwareSelect pour des recommandations personnalisées.
Vous remplissez un formulaire et échangez brièvement afin de préciser vos besoins spécifiques. Vous recevrez ensuite une liste restreinte de logiciels à examiner. Ils vous accompagnent même tout au long du processus d’achat, y compris la négociation des prix.