Os 10 melhores softwares de prevenção da perda de dados de 2026

Avaliações do melhor software de prevenção contra a perda de dados

1. 

   1

   Strac

   Best for SaaS and GenAI data exfiltration control

   • Free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   

   Strac is a DLP platform that monitors and enforces data protection policies across SaaS apps, cloud storage, endpoints, browsers, and generative AI tools using ML-based classification and OCR.

   Who Is Strac Best For?

   Strac is a strong fit for security teams managing sensitive data across sprawling SaaS environments and organizations actively adopting generative AI tools that need to control what data employees submit to AI models.

   Why I Picked Strac

   I picked Strac as one of the best because it's one of the few DLP platforms that treats generative AI as a first-class exfiltration channel. It monitors and blocks sensitive data submitted to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot at the prompt level, and extends that coverage to MCP agent workflows. I also like that its ML plus OCR engine catches sensitive data embedded in images and scanned PDFs before they leave the environment.

   Strac Key Features

   • Compliance policy templates: Prebuilt templates mapped to HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA, CPRA, ISO 27001, and ISO 27701 for out-of-the-box regulatory coverage.
   • Removable media and print control: Endpoint agents for Windows, macOS, and Linux enforce USB, clipboard, and print restrictions in real time.
   • On-premises self-hosted deployment: Strac can run entirely within your own AWS VPC with zero data egress, supporting strict data residency and FedRAMP requirements.
   • User coaching nudges: At the moment of a potential policy violation, Strac delivers inline nudges that educate employees rather than silently blocking them.

   Strac Integrations

   Strac offers 50+ native integrations, including Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, Jira, AWS, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. It also provides API documentation for custom integrations and supports SIEM connections with Splunk, Sumo Logic, and Microsoft Sentinel.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Performs OCR-based detection for images and PDFs
   • Provides real-time remediation at data source
   • Enforces DLP on generative AI tools

   Cons:

   • No network-layer inline proxy DLP
   • Lacks standalone UEBA for insider threat
   Learn more about Strac:

   • Check out Strac on their website
2. 

   2

   Teramind

   Best for insider threat detection

   • Free demo available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   Customer Rating:4.5/5This rating combines scores from multiple user review sites to reflect overall customer sentiment about the product.

   

   Teramind lands on my shortlist because of how well it covers insider threat detection in real time. I suggest it when you need to monitor risky user behaviors that slip past traditional DLP controls.

   What I like is its strong user activity monitoring and automated risk scoring. In practice, teams can pinpoint unusual actions—like mass file movement or unauthorized access—before data actually leaves the environment.

   Teramind’s Best For

   • Security teams monitoring insider threats and risky users
   • Organizations needing granular user activity tracking

   Teramind’s Not Great For

   • Companies wanting lightweight, hands-off DLP solutions
   • Teams focused solely on automated data classification

   What Sets Teramind Apart

   Teramind focuses on close monitoring of user behavior, treating every action—like file transfers and application usage—as a potential risk indicator you need to track. Unlike most DLP tools that center on content scanning or data tagging, Teramind assumes your biggest threats move through people inside your network. In practice, this works well when you care more about activity patterns than just blocking known data types.

   Tradeoffs with Teramind

   Teramind optimizes for hands-on monitoring and behavioral data, but this brings more setup, ongoing analysis, and noise. If you want automated DLP with minimal tuning, this approach is a heavier lift.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Blocks data leaks proactively, not just detect after
   • Granular risk scoring helps reduce false positives
   • Catches insider threats missed by rule-only systems

   Cons:

   • Requires endpoint agent installation on every device
   • No database fingerprinting of structured data
   Learn more about Teramind:

   • Check out Teramind on their website
3. 

   3

   Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

   Best for threat detection and response

   • From $15/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   

   Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention earns a spot because it consistently catches threats other tools miss, especially across email, cloud, and endpoint channels. I've seen it pinpoint exfiltration attempts and insider risk by combining behavioral analytics and content inspection in one workflow.

   What sets it apart for me is the threat correlation engine. You get actionable alerts and a response workflow that covers everything from real-time blocking to incident review in a single dashboard.

   Proofpoint DLP’s Best For

   • Large enterprises needing threat protection across email, cloud, and endpoints
   • Security teams focused on insider and exfiltration risks

   Proofpoint DLP’s Not Great For

   • Small businesses with minimal IT security resources
   • Organizations wanting lightweight or basic DLP solutions

   What sets Proofpoint DLP apart

   Proofpoint DLP puts threat detection at the center, focusing on behavioral signals before digging into content and policies. Unlike traditional DLP tools that flag based mostly on keywords or patterns, Proofpoint leans into context and real-time activity—flagging risky behavior across email and cloud first. I see this work best in organizations with a mix of insider and external threat concerns, where you want to connect early warning signs with data movement.

   Tradeoffs with Proofpoint DLP

   By optimizing for advanced detection, Proofpoint adds complexity and a steeper learning curve. For teams wanting something simpler or lighter-touch, that extra depth can translate into more work up front and slower onboarding.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Provides comprehensive visibility into data security.
   • Integrates with other Proofpoint solutions.
   • Exceptional threat detection and response capabilities.

   Cons:

   • May be complex for small businesses to deploy and manage.
   • Extra costs may apply for advanced features.
   • Higher starting price compared to other DLP solutions.
   Learn more about Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention:

   • Check out Proofpoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention on their website
4. 

   4

   Symantec Data Loss Prevention

   Best for large-scale enterprise data protection

   • Customized price upon request

   Visit Website

   

   Symantec Data Loss Prevention is on my list because it handles some of the largest, most complex data protection needs I’ve come across. When I’m working with enterprises where confidential data moves across cloud, endpoint, and on-prem systems, Symantec’s unified policy management and automated data discovery really stand out.

   What I like most is how you can customize policies to address regional compliance, insider threats, and third-party risk at scale.

   Symantec DLP’s Best For

   • Large enterprises with diverse and complex data environments
   • Organizations needing granular control over sensitive data movement

   Symantec DLP’s Not Great For

   • Small businesses with simple data protection needs
   • Teams looking for fast, lightweight deployments

   What sets Symantec DLP apart

   Symantec DLP is designed for organizations that need to govern sensitive data moving between endpoints, cloud, and on-prem systems, all under one roof. Unlike simpler tools like Microsoft Purview, which fit smaller or mostly Microsoft-based environments, Symantec expects you to centralize policies and reporting for highly diverse infrastructure.

   In practice, this works well for security teams that need to coordinate risk controls across global operations, regulatory obligations, and mixed platforms.

   Tradeoffs with Symantec DLP

   Symantec DLP optimizes for control over scale and complexity, but onboarding and tuning it takes time and specialized skill. Smaller teams end up with more maintenance than they want.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Integrates deeply with other Symantec products.
   • Offers unified policy management.
   • Can handle large-scale enterprise requirements.

   Cons:

   • Setup and management could be time-consuming.
   • It might be too complex for smaller organizations.
   • Pricing information is not readily available.
   Learn more about Symantec Data Loss Prevention:

   • Check out Symantec Data Loss Prevention on their website
5. 

   5

   IBM Data Security

   Best for holistic data protection across hybrid cloud environments

   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   

   IBM Data Security lands on my list because it brings data loss prevention and encryption together for hybrid and multi-cloud environments. I find the way it automates policy enforcement across Kubernetes, databases, and filesystems saves significant manual effort as environments scale. 

   In testing, what stood out is how precise the policies and monitoring are, without introducing noticeable friction for end users. This is especially valuable in large organizations where the same data needs consistent protection and policy enforcement across on-prem systems, cloud platforms, and containerized workloads.

   IBM Data Security’s Best For

   • Enterprises with complex hybrid or multi-cloud data environments
   • Security teams needing centralized policy and compliance automation

   IBM Data Security’s Not Great For

   • Small organizations with simple, on-premise data storage
   • Teams needing lightweight, plug-and-play DLP tools

   What Sets IBM Data Security Apart

   IBM Data Security stands out by prioritizing unified policy enforcement and monitoring across cloud and on-prem data sources. Instead of layering DLP tools for each environment, you set policies once and apply them everywhere. 

   This works best for organizations juggling sensitive data in both public cloud and local data centers. Compared to something like Symantec DLP, which often assumes more standardized infrastructure, IBM focuses on cross-environment consistency.

   Tradeoffs with IBM Data Security

   It optimizes for broad, centralized control, but that can mean slower rollouts and extra configuration when you only need basic, targeted DLP protection for a single system.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Wide range of compatible integrations.
   • Offers a unified platform for all data security needs.
   • Comprehensive solution for data protection in hybrid cloud environments.

   Cons:

   • Potential learning curve due to its wide array of features.
   • It may be too complex for small businesses.
   • Pricing information is not readily available.
   Learn more about IBM Data Security:

   • Check out IBM Data Security on their website
6. 

   6

   Imperva

   Best for database security and compliance

   • 30-day free trial available
   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   

   Imperva is here because its approach to database security and compliance solves a problem I see often: patchy visibility into where sensitive data lives and how it’s being accessed. When I evaluate data loss prevention options, Imperva stands out for its agentless activity monitoring and ability to enforce granular policies directly at the data store. 

    In testing, what stood out is how easily you can set real-time alerts for risky data access while still meeting compliance audit requirements. If you’ve ever had to trace who touched sensitive records or pull logs under pressure, this kind of visibility makes a real difference—without having to stitch together multiple tools.

   Imperva’s Best For

   • Regulated industries with complex database compliance needs
   • Security teams needing real-time monitoring of sensitive data

   Imperva’s Not Great For

   • Organizations focused on endpoint-based data loss prevention
   • Teams with small-scale or file storage-only environments

   What sets Imperva apart

   Imperva is designed around the idea that database security needs to be granular, continuous, and independent of where your data lives. Unlike traditional DLP solutions that focus on endpoints or network traffic, Imperva assumes your most valuable data lives inside databases and cloud stores—and that’s where it monitors and enforces controls.

   I could see how this works well when you need tight policies for regulated workloads or database environments. It takes the view that data-centric controls should drive your security approach, not just network perimeters or endpoints.

   Tradeoffs with Imperva

   Imperva optimizes for database and cloud data protection, but that focus means you lose full visibility into file and endpoint risks. Teams with data spread across many systems may need another DLP tool for broader coverage.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Integrates with other security tools for comprehensive protection.
   • Helps in achieving compliance with regulatory standards.
   • Strong focus on database security.

   Cons:

   • Depending on the size of the database, system performance may be affected.
   • Customization options may be complex for beginners.
   • Pricing might be high for small businesses.
   Learn more about Imperva:

   • Check out Imperva on their website
7. 

   7

   Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

   Best for advanced machine learning-based protection

   • Pricing upon request

   Visit Website

   

   Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention earns its place on my list for its advanced machine learning approach to data loss risks. I’ve seen how the tool identifies nuanced patterns in user behavior that many traditional rules-based systems miss. I like the precision of its automated policy enforcement, especially in complex and heavily regulated environments.

   This is a go-to when your team deals with large volumes of sensitive data and you need deeper, contextual insight to stop leaks before they happen.

   Forcepoint DLP's Best For

   • Enterprises with complex data flows and strict compliance needs
   • Security teams demanding contextual, ML-driven data protection

   Forcepoint DLP's Not Great For

   • Small organizations needing simple, out-of-the-box DLP
   • Teams without resources for ongoing tuning and management

   What sets Forcepoint DLP apart

   Forcepoint DLP is built for organizations that need more than simple content rules. In practice, it expects you to set up policies that consider user context and behavior, not just file types or keywords. Unlike tools such as Symantec DLP, which rely heavily on static patterns, Forcepoint pushes you toward risk-adaptive workflows that change based on what users actually do over time.

   You end up working with alerts and controls that adapt to your environment—not just block the same violations over and over.

   Tradeoffs with Forcepoint DLP

   By focusing on risk-adaptive protection, Forcepoint adds more setup and calibration work upfront, so you give up the easy onboarding you’d get with a basic DLP tool.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Provides integrations with other Forcepoint solutions.
   • Offers a comprehensive suite of features.
   • Utilizes advanced machine learning for protection.

   Cons:

   • Machine learning models may require time for optimal calibration.
   • It might be overly complex for smaller businesses.
   • Pricing is not transparent and requires direct contact.
   Learn more about Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention:

   • Check out Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention on their website
8. 

   8

   Egress Data Loss Prevention

   Best for context-aware data security

   • From $10/user/month (billed annually)

   Visit Website

   

   Egress Data Loss Prevention makes my shortlist for the way it applies contextual awareness to email data security. What stands out is how it analyzes message content and recipient context in real time, flagging or blocking risky data events before they happen. 

   I like how teams can set policy so sensitive information gets handled differently based on content, recipient, or user action—especially in financial or legal settings where context matters most.

   Egress’s Best For

   • Organizations sending confidential data by email
   • Teams needing policy-driven, context-aware data controls

   Egress’s Not Great For

   • Companies looking for non-email DLP coverage
   • Small businesses with straightforward, low-volume email needs

   What sets Egress apart

   Egress stands out by building email security around context, not just basic content detection. Instead of tagging keywords or blocking attachments like some DLP tools, it analyzes both the message and its recipients before taking action. For organizations where sensitive details might change meaning depending on who sends it, or where mistakes with outbound data are common, this tool is a solid choice.

   Tradeoffs with Egress

   Egress optimizes for nuanced, policy-driven controls on email, but that comes at the cost of limited coverage for non-email channels. If you need to monitor data in cloud drives or chat, you’ll need a second tool.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Utilizes advanced machine learning for threat detection.
   • Integrates well with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace.
   • Offers context-aware data security.

   Cons:

   • The setup might require a learning curve.
   • It may be overwhelming for small businesses.
   • Advanced features might result in extra costs.
   Learn more about Egress Data Loss Prevention:

   • Check out Egress Data Loss Prevention on their website
9. 

   9

   Trellix Data Loss Prevention

   Best for integrated endpoint and network security

   • From $15/user/month

   Visit Website

   

   Trellix Data Loss Prevention lands on my list for how it unifies endpoint and network security into a coordinated system. I’ve worked with teams who want to catch both accidental data leaks and serious insider threats without jumping between separate tools, and this fits that use case well.

   What I like is the way Trellix combines real-time content inspection with automated policy enforcement across devices and network layers. You can define and apply consistent controls in one place, making gaps between endpoint and network less likely.

   Trellix’s Best For

   • Organizations needing unified endpoint and network data protection
   • Teams with strict regulatory or insider threat monitoring needs

   Trellix’s Not Great For

   • Small businesses without dedicated security staff
   • Teams wanting lightweight or plug-and-play DLP solutions

   What sets Trellix apart

   Trellix takes a coordinated approach by managing data loss prevention at both endpoints and the network. This is different from tools like Symantec DLP, which often keep those layers siloed. In practice, I see Trellix expecting you to design policies that track sensitive data moving across your whole environment, including endpoints, network traffic, and cloud channels.

   This works well if you want consistent controls and unified incident response, but you do need to plan for policy alignment across multiple surfaces.

   Tradeoffs with Trellix

   Trellix optimizes for deep policy control across endpoints and networks, but that complexity slows down deployment and requires ongoing admin effort. If you want something quick to set up with minimal tuning, this isn’t a good fit.

   Pros and Cons

   Pros:

   • Easy integration with other security and IT platforms.
   • Real-time visibility into data movement.
   • Provides both endpoint and network security.

   Cons:

   • The interface may require help to navigate for beginners.
   • Requires time for setup and policy configuration.
   • It might be pricey for smaller businesses.
   Learn more about Trellix Data Loss Prevention:

   • Check out Trellix Data Loss Prevention on their website
10. 

    10

    Nightfall DLP

    Best for cloud-native environments

    • From $10/user/month (billed annually)

    Visit Website

    

    Nightfall DLP makes the cut for how thoroughly it addresses cloud-native data protection. When I tested its automated detection, content inspection works right inside tools like Google Drive, Slack, and Jira, flagging sensitive data with minimal setup.

    What I appreciate here is the prebuilt detection pack for common data types. It’s a smart way to handle data loss risk without manual tuning, especially as your team scales cloud adoption.

    Nightfall DLP's Best For

    • Security teams protecting sensitive data in cloud apps
    • Organizations needing automated compliance and data classification

    Nightfall DLP's Not Great For

    • Companies with mostly on-prem or legacy infrastructure
    • Small teams that need basic endpoint DLP only

    What sets Nightfall DLP apart

    Nightfall DLP stands out because it’s built with cloud platforms like Google Workspace, Slack, and Jira in mind, not as an afterthought. While legacy DLP tools lean on endpoint or network controls, Nightfall expects you to work across SaaS apps and APIs directly. In practice, this is a good fit when you need continuous scanning inside the tools your teams already use.

    Tradeoffs with Nightfall DLP

    Nightfall optimizes for cloud-first environments, but you lose direct support for controlling on-prem data channels, which makes it less helpful if your data still lives mainly on local endpoints or file servers.

    Pros and Cons

    Pros:

    • Extensive cloud platform integrations.
    • Machine learning-enhanced detection.
    • Excellent cloud-native environment protection.

    Cons:

    • The user interface may take time to master.
    • Some advanced features might come with extra costs.
    • It might be over-specialized for non-cloud-native businesses.
    Learn more about Nightfall DLP:

    • Check out Nightfall DLP on their website