Gerir a sua rede pode ser um desafio, especialmente se a sua ferramenta atual não estiver a responder às suas necessidades. Se as funcionalidades do Auvik não estiverem alinhadas com os objetivos da sua empresa ou se o preço não se ajustar ao seu orçamento, poderá estar à procura de uma alternativa que se adapte melhor à sua equipa.
Dediquei algum tempo a testar e analisar várias ferramentas de gestão de redes. Neste artigo, partilharei as minhas principais escolhas de alternativas ao Auvik. Encontrará informações sobre as funcionalidades, a facilidade de utilização e os benefícios específicos oferecidos por cada ferramenta.
Este guia fornecer-lhe-á informações claras e imparciais, para que possa escolher a melhor alternativa ao Auvik para as suas necessidades. Utilize-o para encontrar a opção certa para a sua equipa.
O que é o Auvik?
O Auvik é um software de gestão de redes que ajuda os profissionais de TI a monitorizar e gerir a infraestrutura de rede. É habitualmente utilizado por administradores de redes e gestores de TI que precisam de supervisionar ambientes de rede complexos de forma eficiente.
O mapeamento automatizado da rede, a monitorização em tempo real e as funcionalidades de alertas ajudam a identificar rapidamente os problemas e a manter o desempenho da rede. Em geral, o Auvik proporciona valor ao simplificar as tarefas de gestão da rede e melhorar a visibilidade em toda a sua rede.
Tabela de comparação das alternativas ao Auvik
Esta tabela de comparação resume os detalhes de preços das minhas principais escolhas de alternativas ao Auvik:
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for user-friendly analytics | 14-day free trial | From $35/month | Website | |
| 2 | Best for network performance | Free 30-day trial | From $7/node/month | Website | |
| 3 | Best for open-source observability | 5-day free trial | From $50/month | Website | |
| 4 | Best for cloud observability | Free plan available | From $15/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 5 | Best for hybrid observability | 15-day free trial + free demo available | From $19/month | Website | |
| 6 | Best for security automation | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 7 | Best for customizable alerts | Free demo + 30-day free trial + free plan available | From $2,595/100 node license | Website | |
| 8 | Best for hybrid environments | Free trial + free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 9 | Best for all-in-one monitoring | Free plan + 30-day free trial + demo available | From $200/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 10 | Best for distributed monitoring | Free trial + free demo available | From GBP €590/perpetual (billed annually) | Website |
Why Trust Our Software Recommendations
6,700+
Reviews
20
Industry experts
16+
Evaluation factors
14
Years
Our team has been testing and reviewing software since 2012. As tech leaders ourselves, we know how difficult—and important—it is to choose the right software.
For this guide, we evaluated tools using hands-on testing and independent research, scoring tools using our selection criteria.
Our reviews reflect our human editorial judgment, not a sales pitch.
Expert reviewers:
- Paulo Gardini MiguelTech Director
Tim FisherVP of AI
Gabriel RosasTech Lead & Software Architect
Christhian GruhnTech Lead & Platform Architect
Análises das melhores alternativas ao Auvik
Apresentamos abaixo os meus resumos detalhados das melhores alternativas ao Auvik que entraram na minha lista. As minhas análises apresentam uma visão detalhada das principais funcionalidades, vantagens e desvantagens, integrações e casos de utilização ideais de cada ferramenta, para o ajudar a encontrar a melhor opção para si.
Domotz offers network analytics with intuitive dashboards and real-time alerts Domotz is a network monitoring and management software designed for IT professionals and managed service providers. It offers key functions like network monitoring, device tracking, and alert management.
Why Domotz is a good Auvik alternative: Domotz provides dashboards and reporting for monitoring network performance. Compared to Auvik, it focuses on simpler visualizations and alerts. Real-time device tracking keeps teams aware of network activity, helping them identify and address issues more efficiently.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include remote power management that allows you to control devices from afar, SNMP monitoring for real-time data collection, and network topology mapping that provides clear visual insights.
Integrations include Amazon, Sonos, Luxul, Pakedge, Ubiquiti, Crestron, Control4, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Real-time device tracking
- Visual network mapping
- User-friendly interface
Cons:
- Not ideal for large enterprises
- Limited advanced features
Learn more about Domotz:
SolarWinds NPM improves network performance with advanced alerts and path analysis SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor (NPM) is a network monitoring solution designed for IT professionals and network administrators. It helps monitor network performance, spot bottlenecks, and generate alerts.
Why SolarWinds NPM is a good Auvik alternative: SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor provides advanced alerting and network path analysis. It offers insights into network traffic and performance, helping teams identify and resolve issues. Detailed network maps give a clear view of network health for efficient management and troubleshooting.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include intelligent alerts that notify your team of potential issues, customizable dashboards that offer tailored views, and NetPath analysis that provides detailed insights into network paths and performance.
Integrations include Cisco, Microsoft, VMware, Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, Juniper Networks, Dell, HP, IBM, NetApp, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports large-scale networks
- Advanced alerting system
- Excellent network performance insights
Cons:
- Can be costly as network size grows
- Resource-intensive for smaller networks
Learn more about SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor:
Zabbix provides open-source monitoring with real-time alerts and observability Zabbix is an open-source monitoring solution designed for IT administrators and network teams. It monitors network performance, tracks server health, and generates alerts.
Why Zabbix is a good Auvik alternative: Zabbix offers open-source observability, with real-time monitoring and customizable alerts. Unlike Auvik, it allows your team to tailor the monitoring to specific needs. Its ability to handle high volumes of data makes it ideal for large-scale environments. The customizable nature of Zabbix ensures that your team can adapt it to fit various network configurations.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include trend analysis that helps your team predict future issues, distributed monitoring that supports various locations, and advanced visualization tools that provide clear insights into network performance.
Integrations include VMware, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Cisco, Dell, HP, IBM, Oracle, NetApp, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Customizable monitoring experience
- Handles high data volumes
- Open-source flexibility
Cons:
- Limited automation
- Unintuitive user interface and dashboards
Best for cloud observability- Free plan available
- From $15/month (billed annually)
Visit WebsiteCustomer Rating:4.5/5
Datadog delivers deep cloud observability with infra, app, and log monitoring Datadog is a monitoring and security platform for cloud applications, tailored for developers, IT operations teams, and business users. It performs key functions like monitoring, security, and analytics for infrastructure and applications.
Why Datadog is a good Auvik alternative: Datadog focuses on cloud observability, with infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring, and log management. It is suited for teams managing cloud-based environments. Compared to Auvik, Datadog provides visibility into cloud applications, performance, and security.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include real-time alerts that notify your team of critical issues, customizable dashboards that provide tailored insights, and anomaly detection that identifies unusual patterns in your data.
Integrations include Amazon Web Services, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Kubernetes, Slack, PagerDuty, Jira, Bitbucket, GitHub, Docker, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Scalable for large environments
- Real-time monitoring
- Excellent cloud support
Cons:
- High data storage costs
- Complex setup process
Best for hybrid observability- 15-day free trial + free demo available
- From $19/month
Visit WebsiteCustomer Rating:4.5/5
LogicMonitor offers observability with auto-discovery and predictive alerts Logic Monitor is a cloud-based infrastructure monitoring platform designed for IT teams and service providers. It performs key business functions such as performance monitoring, resource optimization, and alert management.
Why Logic Monitor is a good Auvik alternative: LogicMonitor supports hybrid observability with automated discovery and predictive alerts for monitoring both on-premises and cloud environments. It provides visibility into hybrid infrastructure, making it suitable for organizations managing or transitioning to cloud-based systems.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include customizable dashboards that allow you to tailor views to your needs, anomaly detection that identifies unusual patterns and potential issues, and capacity planning tools that help optimize resource use.
Integrations include Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, VMware, Cisco, Dell, HP, NetApp, ServiceNow, Slack, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Deep insights into performance
- Proactive alerting system
- Strong hybrid infrastructure support
Cons:
- Overkill for teams that only need basic network monitoring
- Dashboard customization requires familiarity with the platform
Learn more about LogicMonitor:
Best for security automation- Free demo available
- Pricing upon request
Visit WebsiteCustomer Rating:4.6/5
BackBox improves security with automated backups, recovery, and compliance BackBox is a cyber resilience platform for network infrastructure, built to automate security, compliance, and lifecycle management. It's mainly used by MSPs, security professionals, IT teams, and compliance officers.
Why Backbox is a good Auvik alternative: BackBox excels in security automation, offering features like automated backup and recovery and compliance management. These capabilities help your team efficiently manage network security tasks. Unlike Auvik, BackBox focuses on automating security processes, which is ideal if you're prioritizing security in your network management. Its device lifecycle management further supports maintaining compliance and security standards effectively.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include configuration management that helps maintain network settings, vulnerability intelligence that keeps your team informed of potential threats, and Zero Trust implementation that enhances security protocols.
Integrations include Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, Juniper Networks, Fortinet, Check Point, F5 Networks, Dell, IBM, VMware, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Efficient lifecycle management
- Supports over 180 vendors
- Strong security automation
Cons:
- Less focus on network performance monitoring
- Requires technical expertise
Learn more about BackBox:
Best for customizable alerts- Free demo + 30-day free trial + free plan available
- From $2,595/100 node license
Visit WebsiteCustomer Rating:4.6/5
Nagios XI offers customizable alerts and device monitoring for tailored oversight Nagios XI is a complete monitoring tool made for IT administrators and network managers. It performs key functions such as network monitoring, alerting, and performance tracking.
Why Nagios XI is a good Auvik alternative: Nagios XI offers highly customizable alerting, allowing your team to define specific conditions and thresholds. It supports monitoring across a wide range of devices and applications, giving you broad visibility into network and system performance.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include advanced reporting tools for in-depth insights into network performance, a user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation, and a plugin system that extends monitoring capabilities.
Integrations are not publicly listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Wide range of plugins
- Extensive device monitoring
- Highly customizable alerts
Cons:
- Limited native cloud monitoring
- Heavy manual configuration
Learn more about Nagios XI:
Best for hybrid environments- Free trial + free demo available
- Pricing upon request
FortiManager centralizes hybrid security with unified policies and automation FortiManager by Fortinet is a centralized management solution for enterprise networks, used by network administrators and IT security teams. It provides key functions such as device management, network monitoring, and security policy management.
Why FortiManager by Fortinet is a good Auvik alternative: FortiManager is well-suited for hybrid environments, with features like centralized policy management and automated device configuration. These capabilities help your team ensure consistent security policies across both on-premises and cloud environments. Unlike Auvik, FortiManager focuses more on security management, making it a strong option to maintain a secure network infrastructure. Its automation tools also support your ability to manage complex network setups efficiently.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include advanced reporting that provides insights into network activities, role-based access control for secure management, and change management that tracks and controls network changes.
Integrations are not publicly listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Centralized policy management
- Supports hybrid environments
- Strong security management
Cons:
- Requires access to the Fortinet ecosystem
- Limited out-of-the-box usability
Learn more about Fortinet FortiManager:
Best for all-in-one monitoring- Free plan + 30-day free trial + demo available
- From $200/month (billed annually)
Paessler PRTG provides unified monitoring for bandwidth, uptime, and network traffic Paessler PRTG is a network monitoring tool for IT administrators and network managers. It monitors network performance, sends alerts when issues occur, and generates detailed reports.
Why Paessler PRTG is a good Auvik alternative: Paessler PRTG provides all-in-one monitoring with bandwidth monitoring, uptime monitoring, and traffic analysis. It allows teams to monitor multiple network metrics from a single platform. Compared to Auvik, Paessler PRTG offers customizable dashboards and maps for tailored monitoring views, helping teams identify and address network issues more efficiently.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include distributed monitoring for multiple locations, sensor-based monitoring for detailed data collection, and customizable alerts for critical issues.
Integrations include Amazon Web Services, VMware, Cisco, Dell, IBM, NetApp, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Sensor-based data collection
- Customizable dashboards
- Complete monitoring capabilities
Cons:
- Licensing model can become costly as the number of sensors grows
- Limited scalability for large networks
Learn more about Paessler PRTG:
Best for distributed monitoring- Free trial + free demo available
- From GBP €590/perpetual (billed annually)
Pandora FMS offers distributed monitoring with remote oversight Pandora FMS is a flexible monitoring solution designed for IT administrators and network managers. It performs key functions such as monitoring network devices, applications, and servers across distributed environments.
Why Pandora FMS is a good Auvik alternative: Pandora FMS excels in distributed monitoring, offering capabilities like remote monitoring and customizable dashboards. These features help your team manage multiple sites from a single location. Unlike Auvik, Pandora FMS offers greater flexibility in setting up and managing your monitoring environment. Its adaptability to various network configurations makes it a solid choice for businesses with complex infrastructures.
Standout features and integrations:
Features include real-time monitoring for quick issue response, alerts for critical events, and reporting tools for network performance insights.
Integrations include Cisco, Microsoft, VMware, Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, IBM, Oracle, Dell, HP, NetApp, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Customizable dashboards
- Supports multiple sites
- Flexible monitoring setup
Cons:
- May require technical expertise
- Can be complex for beginners
Learn more about Pandora FMS:
Outras alternativas ao Auvik
Eis algumas alternativas adicionais ao Auvik que não entraram na minha lista, mas que vale a pena conhecer:
- 11Progress WhatsUp GoldBest for hybrid cloud monitoring
- 12OpManager PlusBest for IT operations management
- 13LinkEyeBest for AI-driven diagnostics
- 14Quantum Spark Security Management PortalBest for security management
- 15NinjaOneBest for endpoint management
- 16AteraBest for all-in-one IT management
- 17ManageEngine OpManagerBest for real-time network monitoring
- 18LibreNMSBest for open-source network monitoring
- 19ObkioBest for continuous network performance
- 20Azure Virtual WANBest for global network management
- 21FindIT Network ManagerBest for small business networks
- 22Open NMSBest for scalable network monitoring
- 23VM Cloud FoundationBest for hybrid cloud infrastructure
How I Evaluate Auvik Alternatives
I split every tool into two layers: the baseline capabilities (automated discovery, multi-tenant dashboards, SNMP support) that earn inclusion, and the differentiators that set the best options apart.
Core Functionality (Table Stakes For This List)
When I'm selecting tools for my list, I rank each one on a scale from 0 (does not offer the functionality) to 5 (excels in this area) for each core functionality listed below. Then, I calculate the tool's total score into a percentage. Each tool needs to achieve a minimum total score of 65% to be considered for inclusion.
- Network Discovery & Mapping: I evaluate how quickly and accurately a tool scans subnets, identifies devices, and renders a live topology map—especially across VLANs and remote sites.
- Real-Time Performance Monitoring: Each tool should surface device health metrics like CPU, memory, bandwidth, and uptime with polling intervals fast enough to catch issues before users report them.
- Multi-Site & Multi-Tenant Support: I check whether network administrators and MSP teams can segment clients or locations into isolated views with role-based access and separate dashboards.
- Configuration Backup & Management: I look for automated config snapshots, version history, and diff comparisons—helpful when a switch config change takes down a branch office at 2 a.m.
- SNMP & Protocol Support: Broad protocol coverage matters. I evaluate support for SNMP v1/v2/v3, syslog, and flow protocols like NetFlow or sFlow across common vendors like Cisco, Meraki, and Fortinet.
- Alerting & Notification System: I consider how flexible alert thresholds are and whether notifications route to the right channels—email, Slack, Teams, or directly into a PSA ticketing queue.
Once I have a list of tools that meet this criteria, I consider what sets each platform apart.
Differentiating Factors (What Sets Vendors Apart)
Here's how I compare and contrast different vendors:
Standout Features
PSA and RMM integrations matter a lot for MSP teams. I look for native connectors to tools like ConnectWise or Autotask so alerts auto-generate tickets without manual intervention. NetFlow traffic analysis is another differentiator—it helps pinpoint which applications or endpoints are consuming bandwidth during a slowdown, going well beyond basic SNMP polling. I also evaluate automated documentation capabilities, since tools that continuously update device inventories and IP address records save hours of manual work each week.
Beyond Features
Pricing structure is a big one. I evaluate whether a tool charges per device, per node, or per billable endpoint—because for MSPs managing hundreds of client sites, the wrong model can crush margins fast. I also consider whether a platform fits MSP workflows or internal IT teams better, since multi-tenant isolation and white-labeled reporting aren't priorities for every buyer. Deployment matters too. A cloud-native tool with quick discovery scans gets you to value in hours, while on-premise options may suit teams with strict data residency requirements.
Por que procurar uma alternativa ao Auvik?
Embora o Auvik seja uma boa opção de software de gestão de redes, existem vários motivos pelos quais alguns utilizadores procuram soluções alternativas. Alguns desses motivos podem incluir:
- A sua equipa precisa de funcionalidades de segurança avançadas
- Precisa de suporte para redes de maiores dimensões
- Precisa de opções de preços mais flexíveis
- A sua empresa opera numa região com restrições
- Pretende uma melhor integração com ferramentas específicas
Se alguma destas situações lhe é familiar, veio ao lugar certo. A minha lista inclui várias opções de software de gestão de redes mais adequadas para equipas que enfrentam estes desafios com o Auvik e procuram soluções alternativas.
Funcionalidades
Eis algumas das principais funcionalidades do Auvik, para o ajudar a contrastar e comparar o que estas plataformas de gestão oferecem:
- Descoberta e mapeamento automatizados da rede: Identifica e mapeia dispositivos de rede em tempo real, proporcionando-lhe uma visão clara da disposição da sua rede.
- Gestão contínua do inventário: Atualiza regularmente as alterações aos dispositivos para manter o inventário da sua rede atualizado.
- Gestão de configurações: Fornece cópias de segurança de hora a hora e controlo de versões para as configurações dos dispositivos, apoiando a conformidade e simplificando a recuperação.
- Monitorização e alertas proativos: Disponibiliza mais de 50 alertas pré-configurados para detetar e resolver problemas numa fase inicial.
- Análise do tráfego: Fornece métricas sobre a utilização da largura de banda e o desempenho das aplicações para otimizar a eficiência da rede.
- Segurança da rede: Proporciona visibilidade e alertas em tempo real relativamente a potenciais ameaças, ajudando-o a manter a segurança da rede.
- Documentação da rede: Mantém os registos atualizados para auditorias e orçamentação, simplificando as tarefas de gestão.
- Gestão distribuída da rede: Permite a gestão centralizada de redes em vários locais para prestadores de serviços geridos.
- Automatização da rede: Facilita a descoberta, a documentação e a monitorização de servidores para poupar tempo à sua equipa.