10 alternativas a Zscaler para 2026
Lista de Alternativas a Zscaler
Una buena alternativa a Zscaler ofrece acceso seguro y escalable a la nube, protección avanzada contra amenazas y controles flexibles de políticas que se adaptan a entornos TI complejos. Si estás buscando competidores de Zscaler, probablemente estés comparando opciones que puedan igualar o superar las capacidades de seguridad en la nube de Zscaler—ya sea por mejor integración, gestión más granular o compatibilidad con sistemas híbridos y heredados. Esta lista te ayudará a comparar rápidamente proveedores líderes, entender sus fortalezas particulares e identificar qué solución se adapta mejor a las prioridades de seguridad y necesidades de infraestructura de tu organización.
¿Qué es Zscaler?
Zscaler es una plataforma de ciberseguridad y seguridad en la nube que proporciona acceso seguro a internet y aplicaciones para los usuarios, sin importar su ubicación o dispositivo. Construida sobre una arquitectura de plataforma en la nube, utiliza un enfoque de confianza cero para inspeccionar el tráfico, bloquear amenazas y hacer cumplir políticas de seguridad de datos en tiempo real. Zscaler es ampliamente utilizada por organizaciones para proteger fuerzas de trabajo remotas, híbridas y distribuidas, mejorar la experiencia del usuario y reducir la dependencia de dispositivos de seguridad de red tradicionales.
Resumen de Alternativas a Zscaler
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for rapid deployment at global scale | Free plan + free demo available | From $20/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 2 | Best for secure remote access to legacy apps | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 3 | Best for granular policy management | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 4 | Best for unified security and SD-WAN | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 5 | Best with integrated threat intelligence | Free demo + free trial available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 6 | Best for behavior-based risk analytics | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 7 | Best for real-time data protection in cloud apps | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 8 | Best for hybrid network environments | 30-day free trial + free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 9 | Best for global private backbone connectivity | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 10 | Best with native zero trust architecture | 30-day free trial available | From $13.60/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
Why Trust Our Software Reviews
We’ve been testing and reviewing software since 2023. As tech leaders ourselves, we know how critical and difficult it is to make the right decision when selecting software.
We invest in deep research to help our audience make better software purchasing decisions. We’ve tested more than 2,000 tools for different tech use cases and written over 1,000 comprehensive software reviews. Learn how we stay transparent & our software review methodology.
-
TestDevLab
Visit Website -
Site24x7
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.7 -
GitHub Actions
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.8
Reseñas de Alternativas a Zscaler
A continuación, mis resúmenes detallados de las mejores alternativas a Zscaler que forman parte de mi selección. Mis reseñas ofrecen una visión detallada de las funciones, capacidades y mejores casos de uso de cada plataforma para ayudarte a encontrar la más adecuada para tu organización.
Cloudflare Zero Trust is built for organizations that need to secure users and applications across a distributed, global workforce. IT teams looking for rapid deployment and instant scalability will appreciate Cloudflare’s globally distributed network and one-click onboarding. Unlike Zscaler, Cloudflare lets you roll out zero-trust policies and secure remote access in minutes, even for large, multi-region environments.
Why Cloudflare Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
When you need to deploy cloud security at a global scale without delay, Cloudflare Zero Trust is a strong choice. I picked Cloudflare because its network spans hundreds of cities worldwide, letting you enforce zero-trust policies close to every user and application. The platform’s one-click onboarding and instant policy propagation mean you can secure remote access and web traffic for thousands of users in minutes. This rapid deployment capability makes Cloudflare especially appealing for organizations with distributed teams or urgent rollout needs.
Cloudflare Key Features
Some other features that caught my attention include:
- DNS Filtering: Blocks access to malicious domains and enforces safe browsing policies at the DNS layer.
- Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Monitors and controls data movement across SaaS applications for compliance and visibility.
- Device Posture Checks: Evaluates device health and security status before granting access to applications.
- API Shield: Protects APIs from abuse and unauthorized access using schema validation and mutual TLS.
Cloudflare Integrations
Integrations include CrowdStrike, Google Cloud, Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity, SentinelOne, VMware, ServiceNow, Splunk, and IBM Security.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Built-in DNS filtering for threat blocking
- One-click onboarding for rapid policy rollout
- Global network enables low-latency access
Cons:
- No built-in remote browser isolation
- Some features require Cloudflare Gateway deployment
Citrix Secure Private Access is designed for organizations that need to deliver secure remote access to legacy and on-premises applications. This solution is especially useful for IT teams in industries with critical legacy systems that aren’t easily migrated to the cloud. Citrix stands apart by enabling zero-trust access to these older applications without requiring a VPN, helping you modernize security while supporting existing infrastructure.
Why Citrix Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that rely on legacy or on-premises applications, Citrix Secure Private Access offers a unique approach to secure remote connectivity. I picked Citrix because it enables zero-trust access to older apps without forcing a full migration to the cloud or requiring a traditional VPN. The platform supports adaptive authentication and granular policy controls, letting you manage access based on user context and risk. This makes Citrix a strong Zscaler alternative for businesses that need to protect legacy systems while modernizing their security posture.
Citrix Key Features
Some other features in Citrix Secure Private Access that may interest you include:
- Browser isolation: Runs web sessions in a secure, isolated environment to prevent threats from reaching endpoints.
- Single sign-on (SSO): Allows users to access multiple applications with one set of credentials.
- Session recording: Captures user activity within applications for auditing and compliance.
- Device posture checks: Evaluates endpoint security status before granting access to applications.
Citrix Integrations
Integrations include Cisco Duo, Ping, Entra ID, Okta, Microsoft Active Directory, Google Identity, SAML 2.0 IdP, NetScaler Gateway, Citrix StoreFront, and CrowdStrike.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Enables device posture checks before access
- Integrates with major identity providers
- Offers browser isolation for web threats
Cons:
- Complex deployment for hybrid environments
- Some features need separate Citrix licenses
Check Point Harmony SASE is designed for organizations that need precise, customizable security controls across users, devices, and applications. Security teams in regulated industries or those with complex access requirements will find its granular policy management especially useful. Unlike Zscaler, Check Point gives you detailed rule creation and enforcement options for every layer of your network.
Why Check Point Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For teams that need more control over security policies, Check Point Harmony SASE stands out with its granular policy management capabilities. I picked Check Point because it lets you define detailed access rules based on user identity, device posture, application, and even specific data types. The platform’s unified policy engine allows you to enforce consistent security across remote users, branch offices, and cloud resources. This level of customization makes Check Point a strong alternative for organizations with complex compliance or segmentation needs.
Check Point Key Features
In addition to its granular policy controls, I also found these features worth noting:
- Cloud-based Threat Emulation: Analyzes files in a virtual sandbox to detect and block zero-day threats before they reach users.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Opens web content in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malicious code from reaching endpoints.
- Integrated Data Loss Prevention: Monitors and controls sensitive data movement across cloud and web applications.
- Unified Security Dashboard: Provides a single interface for monitoring, managing, and responding to security events across your environment.
Check Point Integrations
Integrations include Splunk Cloud, Microsoft Sentinel, Amazon S3, and ConnectWise PSA.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Advanced threat emulation for file analysis
- Built-in remote browser isolation feature
- Granular policy creation for user and device
Cons:
- Mobile device support is less comprehensive
- Reporting features lack real-time customization
Fortinet brings together security and SD-WAN in a single platform, making it a strong fit for organizations that want unified control over both network connectivity and protection. IT leaders managing distributed offices or remote workforces often choose Fortinet to simplify operations and reduce the need for multiple vendors. Its integrated approach helps you enforce consistent security policies and optimize application performance across all locations.
Why Fortinet Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that want both security and SD-WAN in one solution, Fortinet offers a unified approach that’s hard to match. I like how Fortinet combines next-generation firewall capabilities with integrated SD-WAN, letting you manage network traffic and security policies from a single console. Its centralized management helps you enforce consistent protection and optimize connectivity across branch offices and remote users. This makes Fortinet a strong choice if you’re looking to reduce complexity and avoid juggling multiple vendors for network and security needs.
Fortinet Key Features
Some other features in Fortinet that may interest you include:
- Zero trust network access (ZTNA): Provides secure, identity-based access to applications regardless of user location.
- Cloud-delivered secure web gateway: Inspects and filters web traffic to block threats and enforce usage policies.
- Integrated sandboxing: Analyzes suspicious files in a secure environment to detect unknown malware.
- Automated threat intelligence sharing: Updates security policies in real time using global threat data from FortiGuard Labs.
Fortinet Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports zero-trust network access policies
- Provides granular application visibility and control
- Combines SD-WAN and security in one platform
Cons:
- Advanced features may need separate licenses
- Requires Fortinet hardware for some features
If your organization needs cloud security with built-in threat intelligence, Palo Alto Networks offers a unified SASE platform that combines network and security functions. IT and security teams in highly regulated industries often turn to Palo Alto Networks for its real-time threat detection and automated response capabilities. The platform also uses automation and advanced analytics to identify and mitigate cyber threats, including ransomware. With its broad portfolio of cloud security solutions, Palo Alto Networks helps organizations address evolving risks across cloud, network, and remote environments.
Why Palo Alto Networks Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Palo Alto Networks is a strong Zscaler alternative if you want integrated threat intelligence as part of your cloud security stack. I like that the platform combines real-time threat detection with automated policy enforcement, helping you respond quickly to emerging risks. Its use of machine learning and global threat data enables proactive identification of advanced threats across cloud and network environments. This approach is especially useful for organizations that need to stay ahead of sophisticated cyberattacks and regulatory demands.
Palo Alto Networks Key Features
Some other features in Palo Alto Networks that may interest you include:
- Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Monitors and controls access to cloud applications and enforces security policies.
- Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Provides secure, identity-based access to applications regardless of user location.
- Secure Web Gateway: Filters and inspects web traffic to block malicious sites and enforce compliance.
- SD-WAN Integration: Optimizes network performance and reliability for distributed sites and remote users.
Palo Alto Networks Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, AWS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Okta, Splunk, Zoom, Box, and Slack.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Automated response to detected threats
- Granular user and application visibility
- Integrated threat intelligence from Unit 42
Cons:
- Support response times can be inconsistent
- Licensing structure is complex to navigate
Forcepoint Secure Private Access is designed for organizations that need to monitor and respond to risky user behavior in real time. Security teams in regulated industries or those managing sensitive data will find its behavior-based analytics especially useful for detecting insider threats and compromised accounts. Unlike Zscaler, Forcepoint emphasizes adaptive access controls that adjust automatically based on user risk profiles.
Why Forcepoint Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that need to go beyond static access controls, Forcepoint stands out with its behavior-based risk analytics. I picked Forcepoint because it continuously monitors user actions and adapts access policies in real time based on detected risk. Features like dynamic risk scoring and automated policy enforcement help security teams quickly respond to insider threats or compromised accounts. This approach gives you more granular control over access decisions compared to traditional cloud security providers like Zscaler.
Forcepoint Key Features
Some other features worth noting include:
- Granular Application Segmentation: Restricts user access to specific applications rather than entire networks.
- Multi-Factor Authentication Integration: Supports integration with leading MFA providers for added login security.
- Cloud-Based Secure Web Gateway: Filters and inspects web traffic to block threats and enforce policies.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Runs web sessions in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malware from reaching endpoints.
Forcepoint Integrations
Integrations include Cisco Duo, Ping Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Google Identity, Active Directory, SAML 2.0 IdP, CrowdStrike, Intune, and Citrix StoreFront.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports multiple identity providers natively
- Remote browser isolation for web threats
- Real-time risk scoring for adaptive access
Cons:
- No built-in CASB functionality
- Limited visibility into encrypted traffic
Netskope offers cloud-native security designed for organizations that need deep visibility and control over cloud app usage. Security teams in industries with strict data protection requirements often choose Netskope for its real-time data loss prevention and advanced threat protection. If you’re looking to secure sensitive information across SaaS, IaaS, and web traffic, Netskope stands out for its granular policy enforcement and analytics.
Why Netskope Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Netskope stands out for its real-time data protection in cloud apps, making it a strong choice if you need to secure sensitive information as it moves through SaaS and web environments. I picked Netskope because its cloud-native architecture inspects traffic in-line, allowing for immediate detection and blocking of risky activities. The platform’s advanced data loss prevention and contextual access controls help you enforce granular security policies across cloud services. These capabilities are especially valuable for organizations with strict compliance or data privacy requirements.
Netskope Key Features
Some other features in Netskope that may interest you include:
- Cloud Firewall: Inspects and controls outbound traffic to prevent unauthorized access and data exfiltration.
- User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA): Monitors user activity to detect anomalies and potential insider threats.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Opens risky web content in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malware infections.
- API Security: Scans and protects API traffic to block threats and enforce security policies across cloud services.
Netskope Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, AWS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Box, Slack, Zoom, Okta, CrowdStrike, Splunk, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong visibility into shadow IT activity
- Inline traffic inspection with minimal latency
- Granular policy controls for SaaS and web
Cons:
- Occasional false positives in threat detection
- Reporting dashboards can be slow to load
For organizations managing both on-premises and cloud infrastructure, Cisco Security delivers cybersecurity solutions designed for hybrid network environments. IT teams in large enterprises and distributed businesses often choose Cisco Security for its ability to unify policy enforcement, routing, and threat protection across complex, mixed environments. Its architecture also supports secure access service edge (SASE) capabilities, helping you secure users, devices, and workloads wherever they operate without forcing a full migration to the cloud.
Why Cisco Security Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
If your business needs to secure both on-premises and cloud resources, Cisco Security stands out for its hybrid network capabilities. I appreciate how Cisco Security’s portfolio supports unified policy management and threat detection across physical, virtual, and cloud environments. Features like adaptive security appliances and cloud-delivered firewall services help you maintain consistent protection as your network evolves. This makes Cisco Security a strong choice for organizations that aren’t ready to move everything to the cloud but still want advanced, centralized security.
Cisco Security Key Features
Some other features in Cisco Security that may interest you include:
- DNS-layer security: Blocks malicious domains and prevents phishing attacks at the DNS level.
- Cloud access security broker (CASB): Monitors and controls access to cloud applications and enforces security policies.
- Endpoint detection and response (EDR): Detects, investigates, and responds to threats on endpoints across your network.
- Email security gateway: Filters inbound and outbound email to block spam, malware, and targeted phishing attempts.
Cisco Security Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Includes built-in email security gateway
- Integrates with Cisco hardware appliances
- Offers granular network segmentation controls
Cons:
- Some updates require manual intervention
- Requires multiple products for full coverage
If your organization needs secure, high-performance connectivity across global locations, Cato Networks offers a private backbone that bypasses the public internet. This platform is well-suited for IT teams managing multinational networks who want to reduce latency and improve reliability for users worldwide. Cato Networks stands out by delivering integrated security and networking over its own global infrastructure, not just through cloud-based security layers.
Why Cato Networks Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Unlike most cloud security providers, Cato Networks operates its own global private backbone, which means your traffic avoids the unpredictability of the public internet. I picked Cato Networks for teams that need consistent, low-latency connectivity between international offices and remote users. The platform combines this backbone with built-in security features like a next-generation firewall, secure web gateway, and zero-trust network access. With seamless integration across networking and security functions, this approach gives you both reliable performance and unified protection, making it a strong alternative to Zscaler for global organizations.
Cato Networks Key Features
Some other features in Cato Networks that may interest you include:
- Cloud-based management console: Lets you configure, monitor, and troubleshoot your network from a single interface.
- WAN optimization: Reduces bandwidth consumption and accelerates application performance across sites.
- Mobile client support: Extends secure access to remote and mobile users without additional hardware.
- Automated threat detection and response: Continuously monitors network traffic and responds to threats in real time.
Cato Networks Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Automated threat detection with real-time response
- Mobile client supports secure remote access
- Private backbone reduces latency for global sites
Cons:
- Advanced analytics features are still maturing
- Requires Cato edge devices for connectivity
Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform is built for organizations that want security deeply integrated across their cloud, endpoint, and identity environments. This solution is especially relevant for IT teams already invested in Microsoft 365, Azure, or Windows ecosystems and looking to enforce granular, adaptive access controls. What sets Microsoft Security apart from Zscaler and others is its native zero-trust architecture that unifies identity, device, and application security under a single framework.
Why Microsoft Security Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Unlike many cloud security providers, Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform is built directly into its cloud, identity, and endpoint services. I picked Microsoft Security for teams that want a native zero-trust architecture, since it lets you enforce conditional access, continuous risk assessment, and automated threat response across your entire Microsoft environment. Features like unified policy management and real-time device compliance checks help you secure access at every layer. This makes Microsoft Security a strong Zscaler alternative for organizations that want to consolidate security controls within a single, integrated ecosystem.
Microsoft Security Key Features
Some other features in Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform that may interest you include:
- Defender for Cloud Apps: Monitors and controls user activity across cloud applications for better visibility and threat detection.
- Privileged Identity Management: Manages, monitors, and controls access to critical resources with just-in-time and just-enough-access policies.
- Information Protection: Classifies and encrypts sensitive data across emails, documents, and cloud storage.
- Endpoint Detection and Response: Provides advanced threat detection and investigation tools for managed devices.
Microsoft Security Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft Entra, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Purview, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Built-in identity protection and risk assessment
- Native zero-trust controls for all endpoints
- Deep integration with Microsoft 365 services
Cons:
- Policy changes may impact legacy on-prem systems
- Limited visibility into non-Microsoft cloud apps
Otros Competidores de Zscaler
Aquí tienes algunas opciones adicionales de competidores de Zscaler que no llegaron a mi selección principal, pero que igual vale la pena considerar:
- CrowdStrike
With AI-driven threat detection
- F5
For advanced web application firewall controls
- Kaspersky Next
For SMB-focused security solutions
Criterios de Selección de Alternativas a Zscaler
Al seleccionar las mejores alternativas a Zscaler para incluir en esta lista, consideré las necesidades comunes de los compradores y los puntos de dolor relacionados con los proveedores de seguridad en la nube, como la gestión de acceso remoto seguro y la detección de amenazas avanzadas. También utilicé el siguiente marco para mantener mi evaluación estructurada y justa:
Funcionalidad Básica (25% de la puntuación total)
Para ser consideradas en esta lista, cada solución debía cubrir estos casos de uso habituales:
- Acceso remoto seguro a aplicaciones en la nube
- Detección y prevención de amenazas
- Autenticación de usuarios y gestión de identidades
- Controles de acceso basados en políticas
- Monitorización de actividad en tiempo real
Otras Características Destacadas (25% de la puntuación total)
Para acotar aún más la lista de competidores, también busqué funciones únicas como:
- Análisis de riesgos basado en el comportamiento
- Aislamiento remoto de navegador
- Adaptación automática de políticas
- Integración con múltiples proveedores de identidad
- Segmentación a nivel de aplicación
Usabilidad (10% de la puntuación total)
Para tener una idea de la usabilidad de cada sistema, consideré lo siguiente:
- Diseño de panel de control claro e intuitivo
- Navegación lógica entre módulos
- Pasos mínimos para configurar funciones básicas
- Accesibilidad de la documentación dentro de la plataforma
- Alertas y notificaciones personalizables
Incorporación (10% de la puntuación total)
Para evaluar la experiencia de incorporación en cada plataforma, consideré lo siguiente:
- Disponibilidad de guías de configuración paso a paso
- Acceso a videos de capacitación y seminarios web
- Recorridos interactivos del producto para nuevos usuarios
- Plantillas de políticas predefinidas para una implementación rápida
- Equipo de soporte para incorporación que responda con agilidad
Soporte al Cliente (10% de la puntuación total)
Para evaluar los servicios de soporte al cliente de cada proveedor de software, consideré lo siguiente:
- Disponibilidad de soporte 24/7
- Múltiples canales de soporte incluyendo chat y teléfono
- Acceso a una base de conocimientos o centro de ayuda
- Rapidez de respuesta ante incidencias críticas
- Disponibilidad de gestores de cuenta dedicados
Relación Calidad-Precio (10% de la puntuación total)
Para evaluar la relación calidad-precio de cada plataforma, consideré lo siguiente:
- Estructura de precios transparente
- Opciones de suscripción flexibles
- Funciones incluidas en cada nivel de precios
- Costo comparado con soluciones similares
- Descuentos por contratos anuales o de varios años
Opiniones de los Clientes (10% de la puntuación total)
Para tener una idea de la satisfacción general del cliente, consideré lo siguiente al leer las reseñas de los usuarios:
- Consistencia de comentarios positivos
- Frecuencia de incidencias técnicas reportadas
- Calidad de las experiencias con el soporte
- Facilidad de implementación y gestión
- Satisfacción con los resultados en seguridad
¿Por qué buscar una alternativa a Zscaler?
Aunque Zscaler es una buena opción como proveedor de seguridad en la nube, existen varias razones por las que algunos usuarios buscan soluciones alternativas. Puede que estés buscando una alternativa a Zscaler porque…
- Necesitas análisis de riesgos basados en comportamiento más detallados
- Tu organización requiere opciones de implementación local o híbrida
- Quieres una integración más profunda con proveedores de identidad específicos
- Necesitas una personalización de políticas más flexible
- Tu equipo opera en regiones con centros de datos Zscaler limitados
- Requieres capacidades avanzadas de informes y auditoría
Si te identificas con alguno de estos puntos, has llegado al lugar indicado. Mi lista incluye varias opciones de proveedores de seguridad en la nube que se adaptan mejor a equipos que enfrentan estos desafíos con Zscaler y buscan soluciones alternativas.
Características Clave de Zscaler
A continuación, algunas de las características principales de Zscaler para ayudarte a comparar y contrastar con lo que ofrecen las soluciones alternativas:
- Acceso a la red de confianza cero: Aplica un acceso con privilegios mínimos a las aplicaciones, verificando usuarios y dispositivos antes de permitir el ingreso, reduciendo el riesgo de movimientos laterales en tu entorno.
- Pasarela web segura basada en la nube: Inspecciona y filtra todo el tráfico web en tiempo real, bloqueando sitios maliciosos, intentos de phishing y contenido inapropiado antes de que llegue a los usuarios.
- Prevención de amenazas en línea: Detecta y bloquea malware, ransomware y amenazas avanzadas en el perímetro de la red, utilizando análisis por firmas y comportamental.
- Inspección SSL/TLS: Descifra e inspecciona el tráfico cifrado para identificar amenazas ocultas sin comprometer la privacidad o el rendimiento de los usuarios.
- Prevención de pérdida de datos: Supervisa y controla el movimiento de datos sensibles en canales en la nube y web, ayudando a las organizaciones a cumplir con las normativas de protección de datos.
- Segmentación de aplicaciones: Limita el acceso de los usuarios únicamente a las aplicaciones que necesitan, reduciendo superficies de ataque y previniendo accesos no autorizados.
- Integración con proveedores de identidad: Se conecta con las principales plataformas de identidad para aplicar inicio de sesión único y autenticación multifactor para una verificación segura de usuarios.
- Gestión centralizada de políticas: Permite a los administradores definir, actualizar y aplicar políticas de seguridad desde una única consola basada en la nube.
- Informes y análisis completos: Ofrece visibilidad detallada de la actividad de los usuarios, amenazas e infracciones de políticas a través de paneles e informes personalizables.
- Infraestructura global en la nube: Proporciona seguridad consistente y experiencias de usuario rápidas a nivel mundial, aprovechando una red distribuida de centros de datos.
¿Qué sigue?
Si te encuentras investigando competidores de Zscaler, conéctate con un asesor de SoftwareSelect para recibir recomendaciones gratuitas.
Completa un formulario y tendrás una breve charla donde profundizarán en los detalles de tus necesidades. Luego recibirás una lista corta de software para revisar. Incluso te apoyarán durante todo el proceso de compra, incluyendo la negociación de precios.