I dagens teknologidrevne verden er det viktigere enn noen gang å sikre IoT-enhetene dine. Du står overfor utfordringer som datainnbrudd og uautorisert tilgang, og du trenger pålitelige løsninger for å beskytte nettverket ditt. IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer kan hjelpe deg med å overvåke og beskytte enhetene dine, slik at de fungerer på en trygg måte.
Jeg vet at det kan være overveldende å velge riktig plattform. Derfor har jeg testet og gjennomgått de beste alternativene på markedet på en uavhengig måte. Jeg deler mine beste anbefalinger med deg, med fokus på hva de tilbyr og hvordan de kan dekke behovene dine.
I denne artikkelen finner du objektiv innsikt i funksjonene og fordelene ved hver plattform. Målet mitt er å hjelpe deg med å ta en informert beslutning for teamet ditt.
Why Trust Our Software Recommendations
6,700+
Reviews
20
Industry experts
16+
Evaluation factors
14
Years
Our team has been testing and reviewing software since 2012. As tech leaders ourselves, we know how difficult—and important—it is to choose the right software.
For this guide, we evaluated tools using hands-on testing and independent research, scoring tools using our selection criteria.
Our reviews reflect our human editorial judgment, not a sales pitch.
Expert reviewers:
- Paulo Gardini MiguelTech Director
Tim FisherVP of AI
Gabriel RosasTech Lead & Software Architect
Christhian GruhnTech Lead & Platform Architect
Sammenligningstabell: IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer
Denne sammenligningstabellen oppsummerer prisopplysningene for mine beste utvalgte IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer.
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for endpoint protection | From $10/user/month | Website | ||
| 2 | Best for secure device connectivity | Pricing upon request | Website | ||
| 3 | Best for managing, processing, and storing data | From $0.0045/device/month | Website | ||
| 4 | Best for continuous security audits | Free trial available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 5 | Best for smart device security | Free demo + free trial available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 6 | Best for certificate-based security | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 7 | Best for robust identity management | From $9/user/month (min 5 seats) | Website | ||
| 8 | Best for embedded system security | From $5/user/month (min 5 seats) | Website | ||
| 9 | Best for industrial network protection | Pricing upon request | Website | ||
| 10 | Best for cellular IoT network security | From $10/user/month (billed annually) | Website |
Anmeldelser av de beste IoT-sikkerhetsplattformene
Nedenfor finner du mine detaljerte sammendrag av de beste IoT-sikkerhetsplattformene som kom med på kortlisten min. Anmeldelsene mine gir en detaljert gjennomgang av de viktigste funksjonene, fordeler & ulemper, integrasjoner og ideelle bruksområder for hvert verktøy, slik at du kan finne det som passer best for deg.
Microsoft Defender for IoT dashboard sample Microsoft Defender for IoT is a comprehensive security solution specifically designed to protect endpoints within IoT environments. It offers a robust defense against various threats targeting IoT devices and is considered best for endpoint protection due to its advanced capabilities in identifying and mitigating risks at the device level.
Why I Picked Microsoft Defender for IoT: I chose Microsoft Defender for IoT after a thorough comparison of different endpoint protection platforms. What made it stand out was its in-depth focus on IoT security, coupled with Microsoft's reputation for reliability.
It incorporates features tailored for IoT devices, making it the best choice for endpoint protection, particularly for those aiming for top-notch security in an IoT ecosystem.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Microsoft Defender for IoT includes state-of-the-art features such as real-time threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and automated response to attacks. It’s equipped with machine learning algorithms that help in identifying new and evolving threats.
Integration with existing security information and event management (SIEM) systems and Microsoft's other security offerings make it a comprehensive tool, ensuring a well-rounded security stance.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Advanced threat detection capabilities
- Integrates well with other Microsoft security products
- Specialized in endpoint protection for IoT
Cons:
- Potential compatibility issues with non-Microsoft environments
- Pricing might be higher compared to some competitors
- May require technical expertise to fully utilize
Learn more about Microsoft Defender for IoT:
Microsoft Azure Sphere IoT security platform Microsoft Azure Sphere is a comprehensive solution that offers secure and scalable IoT device connectivity. It integrates hardware, software, and cloud services to create a robust security framework for IoT devices, thus earning its reputation as the best for secure device connectivity.
Why I Picked Microsoft Azure Sphere: I chose Microsoft Azure Sphere for its cutting-edge approach to IoT security. By combining hardware, operating system, and cloud services, it provides a unified solution that's hard to match. This integration is what makes it stand out and why I think it's best for secure device connectivity.
The ability to manage and update devices securely without compromising usability provides a strong justification for its selection.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Azure Sphere's standout features include its custom-built hardware with built-in Microsoft security technology, an OS with multiple layers of security, and the Azure Sphere Security Service that ensures secure connectivity. Its integrations with other Azure services provide a cohesive environment for managing and monitoring IoT devices.
Additionally, it can integrate with existing business systems, offering flexibility and efficiency in device management.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Flexibility in connecting and managing various IoT devices
- Rich integration capabilities with other Azure services
- Comprehensive security solution integrating hardware, OS, and cloud
Cons:
- Complexity in setup and configuration may require professional assistance
- May require specific hardware compatibility
- Pricing information is not transparent
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Sphere:
Best for managing, processing, and storing data- From $0.0045/device/month
Data overview of how to build a weather station using Google Cloud IoT Core Google IoT Core is a managed service that allows users to connect, manage, and ingest data from globally dispersed devices. This tool's ability to offer a fully integrated service for all facets of IoT data management aligns with its position as the best for managing, processing, and storing data, bridging the gap between various IoT devices and the data-driven intelligence required by businesses today.
Why I Picked Google IoT Core: I chose Google IoT Core after comparing and judging various tools for IoT data management. Its unified approach to managing, process, and storing data from diverse devices, backed by Google's robust infrastructure, stood out to me.
This complete package is why I think it's best for the use case of managing, processing, and storing data in an IoT environment, giving businesses a comprehensive solution.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Google IoT Core's features include secure device connection and management, rich data processing capabilities, and integration with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery and Dataflow.
These integrations enable users to take advantage of Google's machine learning tools, analytics, and other data processing technologies, providing a cohesive experience within the Google Cloud ecosystem.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Robust security features for device connection and management
- Easy integration with other Google Cloud services
- Simplifies the complexity of managing, processing, and storing IoT data
Cons:
- Limited flexibility if you want to use non-Google Cloud services or tools
- Pricing may escalate with a large number of devices
- Can be challenging to implement for those unfamiliar with the Google Cloud Platform
Learn more about Google IoT Core:
Best for continuous security audits- Free trial available
- Pricing upon request
AWS IoT Device Defender metrics AWS IoT Device Defender is a fully-managed service that provides security metrics and conducts continuous audits for IoT configurations. Its ability to continuously monitor and report on the security posture of devices is why it stands out as the best for continuous security audits, a critical requirement in today's connected landscape.
Why I Picked AWS IoT Device Defender: I chose AWS IoT Device Defender due to its relentless focus on auditing and monitoring IoT devices' security configurations. By selecting this tool, I am prioritizing continuous security monitoring which is essential for detecting deviations from security best practices.
This continuous approach to audits is what makes it different from many others and is why I judge it to be the best for continuous security audits.
Standout Features & Integrations:
AWS IoT Device Defender's standout features include continuous monitoring of security metrics from devices and AWS IoT Core, automatic detection of abnormal behavior, and integration with AWS IoT Core for easier device management.
The integration with other AWS services allows it to function within the AWS ecosystem, enhancing the convenience of setting up and maintaining the security parameters for IoT devices.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Highly customizable alerting and reporting
- Integration with AWS IoT Core and other AWS services
- Continuous monitoring and auditing functionality
Cons:
- Specific to AWS ecosystem, limiting flexibility with other providers
- Pricing can become costly depending on the number of devices
- May be complex for smaller organizations or those new to AWS
Learn more about AWS IoT Device Defender:
Best for smart device security- Free demo + free trial available
- Pricing upon request
Palo Alto Networks IoT security platform insights Palo Alto Networks is a cybersecurity company that offers a comprehensive suite of products aimed at safeguarding smart devices. Their focus on IoT security, threat prevention, and adaptive security measures positions them as an industry leader in protecting smart devices, making them the best for smart device security.
Why I Picked Palo Alto Networks: I chose Palo Alto Networks after carefully comparing various security platforms and determining their effectiveness in the specific area of smart device protection. Its AI-driven threat analysis, real-time monitoring, and the capacity to adapt to evolving threats make it stand out from other security tools.
These attributes contribute to my judgment that Palo Alto Networks is best for smart device security, particularly in an era where the proliferation of connected devices requires robust security measures.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Palo Alto Networks' platform emphasizes real-time threat prevention, advanced AI-driven analysis, and continuous monitoring of smart devices. Its integration capabilities with existing security infrastructures and compatibility with various operating systems help ensure a cohesive defense strategy.
Furthermore, integrations with third-party security information and event management (SIEM) systems provide greater visibility and control.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Integration with existing security systems and SIEM platforms
- Comprehensive monitoring of smart devices
- Robust AI-driven threat analysis
Cons:
- May require additional resources for optimal utilization
- Pricing information may be less transparent
- Can be complex to configure
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks:
Entrust home page view screenshot Entrust’s IoT security solution is designed to offer robust certificate-based security, providing the necessary digital assurance for devices within the IoT ecosystem. With the rise of IoT devices in various industries, having a platform that specializes in certificate management becomes crucial, making Entrust the best for this specific security concern.
Why I Picked Entrust: I chose Entrust because of its unique focus on certificate-based security, an essential element for authenticating devices within the IoT landscape. Through evaluating and comparing various platforms, Entrust's capability to manage and secure digital certificates stood out.
This specialization makes it best for organizations looking for a strong solution in certificate-based authentication, ensuring trust in connected devices.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Entrust provides a scalable Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) tailored for IoT, allowing for secure device enrollment and certificate management. The platform integrates well with existing enterprise systems and leading IoT platforms, making it adaptable for various use cases. Its commitment to industry standards and compatibility with multiple certificate formats further solidifies its authority in certificate-based security.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong integration with enterprise systems
- Scalable PKI tailored for IoT
- Specialized in certificate-based security
Cons:
- Potential compatibility issues with non-standard certificates
- Focused primarily on certificate security, other areas might be less robust
- May be complex for small-scale implementations
Learn more about Entrust:
Best for robust identity management- From $9/user/month (min 5 seats)
Sectigo IoT Security Platform dashboard Sectigo IoT security platform is designed to safeguard interconnected devices by implementing robust identity management. By focusing on the identification, validation, and securing of devices, it builds a strong defense against unauthorized access.
The platform's best attribute, robust identity management, ensures that only authorized devices and users can interact within the IoT network, thereby enhancing overall security.
Why I Picked Sectigo IoT Security Platform: I chose the Sectigo IoT security platform after evaluating various IoT security tools because of its comprehensive approach to identity management. It uniquely stands out in ensuring that the identity of devices and users is authenticated and secured, providing an added layer of protection against potential threats.
The reason I believe it's best for robust identity management is due to its innovative technology and policies that create an impenetrable defense mechanism against unauthorized access.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Sectigo IoT security platform offers features like digital certificates, embedded device integrity, and strong encryption for complete identity management. These features provide a secure way to validate device identity and integrity, ensuring that only trusted devices can connect to the network.
The platform integrates with existing enterprise systems and various IoT protocols, allowing flexibility and ease of implementation.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Advanced encryption and certificate features
- Integration with existing systems
- Comprehensive identity management solution
Cons:
- The cost may be high for small-scale implementations
- May require technical expertise for optimization
- Complexity in setting up certain integrations
Learn more about Sectigo IoT Security Platform:
Mbed OS code panel overview Mbed OS is a popular open-source operating system specifically designed to enhance security in embedded systems. The focus on embedded security makes Mbed OS a standout in the realm of IoT, aligning perfectly with its stance as best for embedded system security.
Why I Picked Mbed OS: I chose Mbed OS because of its distinct concentration on security for embedded systems. The embedded systems in IoT devices present unique challenges, and while examining different solutions, Mbed OS's architecture demonstrated specific capabilities to mitigate these challenges.
I found it to be the best for embedded system security due to its robustness, adaptability, and dedicated focus on this specific area.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Mbed OS has an extensive set of features, including support for various microcontroller units (MCUs) and a comprehensive suite of security functionalities. It offers real-time operating system (RTOS) capabilities and integrates with popular development environments and tools, ensuring a streamlined workflow.
The support for industry-standard protocols and extensive documentation makes it highly adaptable for various embedded security applications.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong integration with popular development tools
- Comprehensive support for various MCUs
- Tailored for embedded system security
Cons:
- Some learning curves for new developers
- Requires technical expertise in embedded systems
- May be overkill for non-embedded use cases
Learn more about Mbed OS:
Nozomi Networks IoT security platform's monitoring dashboard Nozomi Networks is a leading security provider focused on safeguarding industrial networks. The platform offers an array of features to detect and counter threats in critical infrastructure environments, making it the best solution for industrial network protection due to its specialization in securing complex industrial systems.
Why I Picked Nozomi Networks: I chose Nozomi Networks after a careful assessment of tools designed for industrial security. Its commitment to protecting critical infrastructure and ability to adapt to the specific needs of industrial environments made it stand out among the competitors.
Its strong focus on industrial network protection aligns with the growing need for robust security in sectors like manufacturing, energy, and transportation, justifying why it is best for this particular use case.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Nozomi Networks offers features like real-time asset tracking, threat detection, and vulnerability management tailored to industrial networks. Its anomaly detection technology helps in identifying unusual patterns that might signify a breach.
Integration with existing SCADA systems, IT security tools, and industrial protocols ensures a well-rounded defense mechanism.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Continuous monitoring and real-time threat detection
- Integration with existing industrial systems and protocols
- Specialized in industrial network environments
Cons:
- Limited applicability outside of industrial contexts
- May require extensive customization for specific industrial setups
- Pricing information is not publicly disclosed
Learn more about Nozomi Networks:
Emnify device sample dashboard Emnify is a cloud-native communications platform that specializes in secure connectivity for cellular IoT networks. By providing secure data routing and real-time analytics, it ensures the safety and integrity of cellular IoT connections, making it best for cellular IoT network security.
Why I Picked Emnify: I selected Emnify after extensively comparing various platforms designed for IoT security. Its focus on cellular IoT network protection, coupled with powerful analytics and cloud-based architecture, marks it as distinct in the security landscape.
These unique characteristics justify why I think Emnify is best for securing cellular IoT networks, where traditional security measures might not suffice.
Standout Features & Integrations:
Emnify’s platform provides multi-layered security, featuring end-to-end encryption, firewall policies, and real-time monitoring for IoT devices connected via cellular networks. The system is designed to integrate with major cloud providers, such as AWS and Azure, to facilitate efficient management and scaling of IoT networks.
Moreover, APIs are available for custom integrations, extending their reach and adaptability.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Easy integrations with major cloud platforms
- Cloud-native architecture facilitates scalability
- Specialized focus on cellular IoT network security
Cons:
- Potentially higher learning curve for those unfamiliar with cellular IoT security measures
- May be over-specialized for broader IT security needs
- Annual billing may not suit all businesses
Learn more about Emnify:
Andre IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer
Her er noen flere alternativer for IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer som ikke kom med på kortlisten min, men som likevel er verdt å se nærmere på:
- 11KeyScalerBest for device authentication protocols
- 12BugProveBest for bug tracking and monitoring
- 13IBM Watson IoT PlatformGood for AI-powered IoT analytics
- 14Microsoft Azure IoT HubGood for reliable device-to-cloud communication
- 15ForescoutGood for visibility and control over IoT devices
- 16CybeatsGood for real-time defense against threats
- 17Qualys Cloud PlatformGood for continuous security and compliance monitoring
- 18McAfee Embedded ControlGood for embedded systems security
- 19Symantec Industrial Control Systems (ICS) SecurityGood for protecting industrial control systems
- 20FortiNACGood for network access control and visibility
- 21CyberbitGood for cybersecurity training and simulation
- 22Trustwave TrustKeeper IoT SecurityGood for comprehensive IoT landscape security
- 23Trend Micro IoT SecurityGood for securing IoT environments across devices
- 24DigiCert IoT Device ManagerGood for managing and securing IoT device certificates
- 25Kaspersky IoT Infrastructure SecurityGood for safeguarding IoT infrastructures
How I Evaluate IoT Security Platforms
I evaluate IoT security platforms in two layers: core capabilities every tool must offer—like agentless device discovery and CVE detection—and differentiators that set the best apart.
Core Functionality (Table Stakes For This List)
When I'm selecting tools for my list, I rank each one on a scale from 0 (does not offer the functionality) to 5 (excels in this area) for each core functionality listed below. Then, I calculate the tool's total score into a percentage. Each tool needs to achieve a minimum total score of 65% to be considered for inclusion.
- Device Discovery & Inventory: I check whether the platform can passively fingerprint and classify unmanaged devices—IP cameras, infusion pumps, PLCs—without requiring agents on resource-constrained endpoints.
- Vulnerability & Risk Assessment: Each tool should surface CVEs, weak credentials, and firmware gaps with contextual risk scoring so teams can prioritize patching for the most exposed devices first.
- Threat Detection & Behavioral Monitoring: I evaluate how well a platform baselines normal device behavior and flags anomalies like unexpected lateral movement from a sensor to an internal database server.
- Network Segmentation & Policy Enforcement: I look for the ability to define and push microsegmentation policies through integrations with firewalls and NAC systems like Cisco ISE or Aruba ClearPass.
- Device Identity & Certificate Management: Strong platforms handle cryptographic identity provisioning, certificate rotation, and revocation across device fleets without manual intervention at each endpoint.
- Compliance & Reporting: I evaluate whether the platform maps device posture to frameworks like NIST 800-213 or IEC 62443 and generates audit-ready reports that security directors can hand to regulators.
Once I have a list of tools that meet this criteria, I consider what sets each platform apart.
Differentiating Factors (What Sets Vendors Apart)
Here's how I compare and contrast different vendors:
Standout Features
Deep OT/ICS protocol support matters when your environment includes PLCs running Modbus or BACnet—without it, a large portion of your device fleet stays invisible. I also evaluate firmware analysis capabilities, especially SBOM generation that reveals hidden third-party component risks before devices ship. Automated incident response is another differentiator, where platforms can quarantine a compromised device or revoke its credentials through integrated playbooks rather than waiting on manual triage.
Beyond Features
Ecosystem integrations are a major consideration—I check whether a platform connects natively to your SIEM, SOAR, and NAC stack so device alerts flow into existing SOC workflows without custom development. Industry specialization also shapes my evaluation. A hospital deploying IoMT devices has very different device libraries and compliance needs than a factory running SCADA systems, so I look for pre-tuned vertical profiles. Deployment flexibility matters too, particularly for air-gapped OT environments where cloud-only architectures simply aren't viable.
Slik velger du en IoT-sikkerhetsplattform
Det er lett å gå seg vill i lange lister over funksjoner og kompliserte prismodeller. For å hjelpe deg med å holde fokus mens du går gjennom den unike programvareutvelgelsesprosessen din, får du her en sjekkliste over faktorer du bør ha i bakhodet:
| Faktor | Hva du bør vurdere |
|---|---|
| FaktorSkalerbarhet | Hva du bør vurdereKan plattformen håndtere det økende antallet enheter? Ta hensyn til fremtidig vekst og om løsningen kan skaleres tilsvarende uten at det kreves større oppgraderinger. |
| FaktorIntegrasjoner | Hva du bør vurdereFungerer den med de eksisterende systemene dine? Kontroller kompatibiliteten med andre verktøy teamet ditt bruker, slik at du unngår integrasjonsproblemer. |
| FaktorTilpasningsmuligheter | Hva du bør vurdereKan du tilpasse den til behovene dine? Se etter alternativer som gjør det mulig å gjøre justeringer for å oppfylle spesifikke krav til arbeidsflyten. |
| FaktorBrukervennlighet | Hva du bør vurdereEr grensesnittet brukervennlig? Sørg for at teamet ditt enkelt kan navigere i og bruke plattformen uten omfattende opplæring. |
| FaktorImplementering og oppstart | Hva du bør vurdereHvor lang tid tar det å sette den opp? Vurder oppstartsprosessen, inkludert tilgjengelig støtte og ressurser, for å sikre en smidig overgang. |
| FaktorKostnad | Hva du bør vurderePasser den inn i budsjettet ditt? Sammenlign prismodeller og vurder de totale eierkostnadene, inkludert skjulte gebyrer eller langsiktige utgifter. |
| FaktorSikkerhetstiltak | Hva du bør vurdereEr sikkerhetstiltakene tilstrekkelige? Sørg for at plattformen gir robust beskyttelse mot trusler og overholder bransjestandarder. |
| FaktorEtterlevelseskrav | Hva du bør vurdereOppfyller den regulatoriske krav? Kontroller om plattformen støtter nødvendige standarder for etterlevelse i bransjen din, som GDPR eller HIPAA. |
Hva er IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer?
IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer er verktøy som er utviklet for å beskytte internettilkoblede enheter mot trusler. IT-fagfolk, nettverksadministratorer og sikkerhetseksperter bruker vanligvis disse plattformene til å sikre enheter og sørge for trygg dataoverføring. Funksjoner for enhetsautentisering, nettverksovervåking og trusseldeteksjon bidrar til å håndtere sårbarheter og opprettholde sikker drift. Alt i alt gir disse verktøyene viktig beskyttelse for tilkoblede miljøer.
Funksjoner
Når du velger en IoT-sikkerhetsplattform, bør du se etter følgende nøkkelfunksjoner:
- Enhetsautentisering: Bekrefter identiteten til enheter som kobler seg til nettverket ditt, og forhindrer uautorisert tilgang.
- Nettverksovervåking: Overvåker kontinuerlig nettverkstrafikken for å oppdage uvanlig aktivitet og potensielle trusler.
- Trusseldeteksjon: Identifiserer og varsler brukere om potensielle sikkerhetsbrudd og sårbarheter.
- Datakryptering: Beskytter sensitiv informasjon ved å konvertere den til et sikkert format under overføring.
- Tilgangskontroll: Administrerer brukertillatelser for å sikre at bare autoriserte personer får tilgang til bestemte data eller enheter.
- KI-drevet analyse: Bruker kunstig intelligens til å analysere data og forutsi potensielle sikkerhetsrisikoer.
- Samsvarsrapportering: Gir rapporter for å sikre overholdelse av bransjeregler og standarder.
- Skyintegrasjon: Kobler seg til skytjenester og IoT-testverktøy for å øke fleksibiliteten og datatilgjengeligheten.
- Tilpassbare instrumentpaneler: Gjør det mulig for brukere å tilpasse grensesnittet for bedre oversikt over og kontroll av sikkerhetsmålinger.
- Sanntidsvarsler: Sender umiddelbare varsler om sikkerhetshendelser, slik at man raskt kan reagere og begrense konsekvensene.
Fordeler
Implementering av en IoT-sikkerhetsplattform gir flere fordeler for teamet og virksomheten din. Her er noen av fordelene du kan se frem til:
- Forbedret sikkerhet: Beskytter enheter og data mot uautorisert tilgang og sikkerhetsbrudd gjennom funksjoner som enhetsautentisering og datakryptering.
- Bedre samsvar: Sikrer overholdelse av bransjeregler gjennom samsvarsrapportering, noe som reduserer juridisk risiko.
- Effektiv trusselhåndtering: Identifiserer og håndterer potensielle trusler raskt ved hjelp av sanntidsvarsler og funksjoner for trusseldeteksjon.
- Bedre nettverkssynlighet: Gir innsikt i nettverksaktiviteter gjennom nettverksovervåking, slik at du kan oppdage avvik raskere.
- Økt driftseffektivitet: Forenkler sikkerhetsadministrasjonen med tilpassbare instrumentpaneler og KI-drevet analyse.
- Skalerbarhet: Støtter nettverk med et økende antall enheter og sørger for at sikkerhetstiltakene utvides i takt med virksomhetens behov.
- Kostnadsbesparelser: Reduserer potensielle økonomiske tap som følge av sikkerhetsbrudd og bøter for manglende samsvar.
Kostnader og priser
Valg av en IoT-sikkerhetsplattform krever en forståelse av de ulike prismodellene og abonnementene som er tilgjengelige. Kostnadene varierer basert på funksjoner, teamstørrelse, tillegg og mer. Tabellen nedenfor oppsummerer vanlige abonnementer, gjennomsnittsprisene deres og typiske funksjoner som er inkludert i løsninger for IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer:
Sammenligningstabell for IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer
| Abonnementstype | Gjennomsnittspris | Vanlige funksjoner |
|---|---|---|
| AbonnementstypeGratisabonnement | Gjennomsnittspris$0 | Vanlige funksjonerGrunnleggende trusseldeteksjon, begrenset enhetsstøtte og brukerstøtte fra fellesskapet. |
| AbonnementstypePersonlig abonnement | Gjennomsnittspris$10-$30/bruker/måned | Vanlige funksjonerEnhetsautentisering, nettverksovervåking og brukerstøtte via e-post. |
| AbonnementstypeBedriftsabonnement | Gjennomsnittspris$50-$100/bruker/måned | Vanlige funksjonerAvansert trusseldeteksjon, datakryptering og brukerstøtte via telefon. |
| AbonnementstypeStorbedriftsabonnement | Gjennomsnittspris$150-$300/bruker/måned | Vanlige funksjonerTilpassbare instrumentpaneler, samsvarsrapportering og en dedikert kundeansvarlig. |
Vanlige spørsmål om IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer
Her er noen svar på vanlige spørsmål om IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer:
Hvordan håndterer en IoT-sikkerhetsplattform programvareoppdateringer?
IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer støtter ofte trådløse oppdateringer for å installere sikkerhetsoppdateringer på en effektiv måte. Dette sørger for at enhetene dine forblir beskyttet mot sårbarheter etter hvert som nye trusler oppstår. Sørg for at plattformen du velger, tilbyr oppdateringer i tide og en enkel oppdateringsprosess for å opprettholde sikkerheten.
Hvilke kontroller for brukertilgang er tilgjengelige i IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer?
IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer tilbyr vanligvis robuste protokoller for autentisering og autorisasjon, som OAuth2 og rollebasert tilgangskontroll. Disse kontrollene hindrer uautorisert tilgang til enheter og data og beskytter nettverket ditt. Vurder hvor fleksible og robuste disse kontrollene er, slik at de passer til behovene dine.
Er sikkerhetsfunksjoner aktivert som standard i IoT-plattformer?
Mange IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer aktiverer viktige sikkerhetsfunksjoner som standard, for eksempel sterke standardpassord og deaktiverte funksjoner som kan utgjøre en risiko. Dette er avgjørende for å redusere sårbarheter fra starten av. Kontroller at plattformen du velger, følger denne praksisen for bedre sikkerhet.
Hvilket overordnet sikkerhetsrammeverk bruker IoT-plattformer?
IoT-plattformer benytter vanligvis sikkerhetsstrategier med flere lag, blant annet prinsippene om dybdeforsvar og nulltillit. Disse rammeverkene er utformet for å håndtere de unike sårbarhetene i IoT-systemer. Å forstå hvilket rammeverk en plattform bruker, kan hjelpe deg med å vurdere hvor effektiv sikkerheten er.
Kan IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer integreres med andre verktøy og systemer?
Ja, mange IoT-sikkerhetsplattformer tilbyr integrasjon med eksisterende forretningssystemer, tredjepartsapplikasjoner og andre IoT-analyseplattformer. Denne fleksibiliteten sørger for at IoT-sikkerhetssystemet kan inngå i den eksisterende teknologiske infrastrukturen din.