10 alternative a Zscaler per il 2026
Shortlist alternative a Zscaler
Una valida alternativa a Zscaler offre accesso cloud sicuro e scalabile, protezione avanzata contro le minacce e controlli di policy flessibili adatti ad ambienti IT complessi. Se stai cercando concorrenti di Zscaler, probabilmente stai valutando opzioni che possano eguagliare o superare le capacità di sicurezza cloud di Zscaler—sia per una migliore integrazione, una gestione più granulare o il supporto ad ambienti ibridi e sistemi legacy. Questa lista ti aiuterà a confrontare rapidamente i principali vendor, comprendere i loro punti di forza unici e identificare quale soluzione si allinea meglio alle priorità di sicurezza e alle esigenze infrastrutturali della tua organizzazione.
Cos'è Zscaler?
Zscaler è una piattaforma di cybersecurity e sicurezza cloud che fornisce un accesso sicuro a internet e alle applicazioni per gli utenti, indipendentemente da posizione o dispositivo. Basata su un’architettura cloud, adotta un approccio zero-trust per ispezionare il traffico, bloccare le minacce ed applicare in tempo reale policy di sicurezza sui dati. Zscaler è ampiamente utilizzato dalle organizzazioni per proteggere forza lavoro remota, ibrida e distribuita, migliorando al contempo l’esperienza utente complessiva e riducendo la dipendenza dai tradizionali dispositivi di sicurezza di rete.
Riepilogo alternative a Zscaler
| Tool | Best For | Trial Info | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Best for rapid deployment at global scale | Free plan + free demo available | From $20/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 2 | Best for secure remote access to legacy apps | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 3 | Best for granular policy management | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 4 | Best for unified security and SD-WAN | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 5 | Best with integrated threat intelligence | Free demo + free trial available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 6 | Best for behavior-based risk analytics | Not available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 7 | Best for real-time data protection in cloud apps | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 8 | Best for hybrid network environments | 30-day free trial + free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website | |
| 9 | Best with native zero trust architecture | 30-day free trial available | From $13.60/user/month (billed annually) | Website | |
| 10 | Best for global private backbone connectivity | Free demo available | Pricing upon request | Website |
Why Trust Our Software Reviews
We’ve been testing and reviewing software since 2023. As tech leaders ourselves, we know how critical and difficult it is to make the right decision when selecting software.
We invest in deep research to help our audience make better software purchasing decisions. We’ve tested more than 2,000 tools for different tech use cases and written over 1,000 comprehensive software reviews. Learn how we stay transparent & our software review methodology.
-
TestDevLab
Visit Website -
Site24x7
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.7 -
GitHub Actions
Visit WebsiteThis is an aggregated rating for this tool including ratings from Crozdesk users and ratings from other sites.4.8
Recensioni alternative a Zscaler
Di seguito trovi i miei approfondimenti sulle migliori alternative a Zscaler che sono entrate nella mia selezione. Le mie recensioni offrono uno sguardo dettagliato alle funzionalità, alle capacità e ai migliori casi d’uso di ogni piattaforma per aiutarti a trovare quella più adatta alla tua organizzazione.
Cloudflare Zero Trust is built for organizations that need to secure users and applications across a distributed, global workforce. IT teams looking for rapid deployment and instant scalability will appreciate Cloudflare’s globally distributed network and one-click onboarding. Unlike Zscaler, Cloudflare lets you roll out zero-trust policies and secure remote access in minutes, even for large, multi-region environments.
Why Cloudflare Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
When you need to deploy cloud security at a global scale without delay, Cloudflare Zero Trust is a strong choice. I picked Cloudflare because its network spans hundreds of cities worldwide, letting you enforce zero-trust policies close to every user and application. The platform’s one-click onboarding and instant policy propagation mean you can secure remote access and web traffic for thousands of users in minutes. This rapid deployment capability makes Cloudflare especially appealing for organizations with distributed teams or urgent rollout needs.
Cloudflare Key Features
Some other features that caught my attention include:
- DNS Filtering: Blocks access to malicious domains and enforces safe browsing policies at the DNS layer.
- Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Monitors and controls data movement across SaaS applications for compliance and visibility.
- Device Posture Checks: Evaluates device health and security status before granting access to applications.
- API Shield: Protects APIs from abuse and unauthorized access using schema validation and mutual TLS.
Cloudflare Integrations
Integrations include CrowdStrike, Google Cloud, Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity, SentinelOne, VMware, ServiceNow, Splunk, and IBM Security.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Built-in DNS filtering for threat blocking
- One-click onboarding for rapid policy rollout
- Global network enables low-latency access
Cons:
- No built-in remote browser isolation
- Some features require Cloudflare Gateway deployment
Citrix Secure Private Access is designed for organizations that need to deliver secure remote access to legacy and on-premises applications. This solution is especially useful for IT teams in industries with critical legacy systems that aren’t easily migrated to the cloud. Citrix stands apart by enabling zero-trust access to these older applications without requiring a VPN, helping you modernize security while supporting existing infrastructure.
Why Citrix Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that rely on legacy or on-premises applications, Citrix Secure Private Access offers a unique approach to secure remote connectivity. I picked Citrix because it enables zero-trust access to older apps without forcing a full migration to the cloud or requiring a traditional VPN. The platform supports adaptive authentication and granular policy controls, letting you manage access based on user context and risk. This makes Citrix a strong Zscaler alternative for businesses that need to protect legacy systems while modernizing their security posture.
Citrix Key Features
Some other features in Citrix Secure Private Access that may interest you include:
- Browser isolation: Runs web sessions in a secure, isolated environment to prevent threats from reaching endpoints.
- Single sign-on (SSO): Allows users to access multiple applications with one set of credentials.
- Session recording: Captures user activity within applications for auditing and compliance.
- Device posture checks: Evaluates endpoint security status before granting access to applications.
Citrix Integrations
Integrations include Cisco Duo, Ping, Entra ID, Okta, Microsoft Active Directory, Google Identity, SAML 2.0 IdP, NetScaler Gateway, Citrix StoreFront, and CrowdStrike.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Enables device posture checks before access
- Integrates with major identity providers
- Offers browser isolation for web threats
Cons:
- Complex deployment for hybrid environments
- Some features need separate Citrix licenses
Check Point Harmony SASE is designed for organizations that need precise, customizable security controls across users, devices, and applications. Security teams in regulated industries or those with complex access requirements will find its granular policy management especially useful. Unlike Zscaler, Check Point gives you detailed rule creation and enforcement options for every layer of your network.
Why Check Point Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For teams that need more control over security policies, Check Point Harmony SASE stands out with its granular policy management capabilities. I picked Check Point because it lets you define detailed access rules based on user identity, device posture, application, and even specific data types. The platform’s unified policy engine allows you to enforce consistent security across remote users, branch offices, and cloud resources. This level of customization makes Check Point a strong alternative for organizations with complex compliance or segmentation needs.
Check Point Key Features
In addition to its granular policy controls, I also found these features worth noting:
- Cloud-based Threat Emulation: Analyzes files in a virtual sandbox to detect and block zero-day threats before they reach users.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Opens web content in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malicious code from reaching endpoints.
- Integrated Data Loss Prevention: Monitors and controls sensitive data movement across cloud and web applications.
- Unified Security Dashboard: Provides a single interface for monitoring, managing, and responding to security events across your environment.
Check Point Integrations
Integrations include Splunk Cloud, Microsoft Sentinel, Amazon S3, and ConnectWise PSA.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Advanced threat emulation for file analysis
- Built-in remote browser isolation feature
- Granular policy creation for user and device
Cons:
- Mobile device support is less comprehensive
- Reporting features lack real-time customization
Fortinet brings together security and SD-WAN in a single platform, making it a strong fit for organizations that want unified control over both network connectivity and protection. IT leaders managing distributed offices or remote workforces often choose Fortinet to simplify operations and reduce the need for multiple vendors. Its integrated approach helps you enforce consistent security policies and optimize application performance across all locations.
Why Fortinet Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that want both security and SD-WAN in one solution, Fortinet offers a unified approach that’s hard to match. I like how Fortinet combines next-generation firewall capabilities with integrated SD-WAN, letting you manage network traffic and security policies from a single console. Its centralized management helps you enforce consistent protection and optimize connectivity across branch offices and remote users. This makes Fortinet a strong choice if you’re looking to reduce complexity and avoid juggling multiple vendors for network and security needs.
Fortinet Key Features
Some other features in Fortinet that may interest you include:
- Zero trust network access (ZTNA): Provides secure, identity-based access to applications regardless of user location.
- Cloud-delivered secure web gateway: Inspects and filters web traffic to block threats and enforce usage policies.
- Integrated sandboxing: Analyzes suspicious files in a secure environment to detect unknown malware.
- Automated threat intelligence sharing: Updates security policies in real time using global threat data from FortiGuard Labs.
Fortinet Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports zero-trust network access policies
- Provides granular application visibility and control
- Combines SD-WAN and security in one platform
Cons:
- Advanced features may need separate licenses
- Requires Fortinet hardware for some features
If your organization needs cloud security with built-in threat intelligence, Palo Alto Networks offers a unified SASE platform that combines network and security functions. IT and security teams in highly regulated industries often turn to Palo Alto Networks for its real-time threat detection and automated response capabilities. The platform also uses automation and advanced analytics to identify and mitigate cyber threats, including ransomware. With its broad portfolio of cloud security solutions, Palo Alto Networks helps organizations address evolving risks across cloud, network, and remote environments.
Why Palo Alto Networks Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Palo Alto Networks is a strong Zscaler alternative if you want integrated threat intelligence as part of your cloud security stack. I like that the platform combines real-time threat detection with automated policy enforcement, helping you respond quickly to emerging risks. Its use of machine learning and global threat data enables proactive identification of advanced threats across cloud and network environments. This approach is especially useful for organizations that need to stay ahead of sophisticated cyberattacks and regulatory demands.
Palo Alto Networks Key Features
Some other features in Palo Alto Networks that may interest you include:
- Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB): Monitors and controls access to cloud applications and enforces security policies.
- Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Provides secure, identity-based access to applications regardless of user location.
- Secure Web Gateway: Filters and inspects web traffic to block malicious sites and enforce compliance.
- SD-WAN Integration: Optimizes network performance and reliability for distributed sites and remote users.
Palo Alto Networks Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, AWS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Okta, Splunk, Zoom, Box, and Slack.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Automated response to detected threats
- Granular user and application visibility
- Integrated threat intelligence from Unit 42
Cons:
- Support response times can be inconsistent
- Licensing structure is complex to navigate
Forcepoint Secure Private Access is designed for organizations that need to monitor and respond to risky user behavior in real time. Security teams in regulated industries or those managing sensitive data will find its behavior-based analytics especially useful for detecting insider threats and compromised accounts. Unlike Zscaler, Forcepoint emphasizes adaptive access controls that adjust automatically based on user risk profiles.
Why Forcepoint Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
For organizations that need to go beyond static access controls, Forcepoint stands out with its behavior-based risk analytics. I picked Forcepoint because it continuously monitors user actions and adapts access policies in real time based on detected risk. Features like dynamic risk scoring and automated policy enforcement help security teams quickly respond to insider threats or compromised accounts. This approach gives you more granular control over access decisions compared to traditional cloud security providers like Zscaler.
Forcepoint Key Features
Some other features worth noting include:
- Granular Application Segmentation: Restricts user access to specific applications rather than entire networks.
- Multi-Factor Authentication Integration: Supports integration with leading MFA providers for added login security.
- Cloud-Based Secure Web Gateway: Filters and inspects web traffic to block threats and enforce policies.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Runs web sessions in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malware from reaching endpoints.
Forcepoint Integrations
Integrations include Cisco Duo, Ping Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta, Google Identity, Active Directory, SAML 2.0 IdP, CrowdStrike, Intune, and Citrix StoreFront.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Supports multiple identity providers natively
- Remote browser isolation for web threats
- Real-time risk scoring for adaptive access
Cons:
- No built-in CASB functionality
- Limited visibility into encrypted traffic
Netskope offers cloud-native security designed for organizations that need deep visibility and control over cloud app usage. Security teams in industries with strict data protection requirements often choose Netskope for its real-time data loss prevention and advanced threat protection. If you’re looking to secure sensitive information across SaaS, IaaS, and web traffic, Netskope stands out for its granular policy enforcement and analytics.
Why Netskope Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Netskope stands out for its real-time data protection in cloud apps, making it a strong choice if you need to secure sensitive information as it moves through SaaS and web environments. I picked Netskope because its cloud-native architecture inspects traffic in-line, allowing for immediate detection and blocking of risky activities. The platform’s advanced data loss prevention and contextual access controls help you enforce granular security policies across cloud services. These capabilities are especially valuable for organizations with strict compliance or data privacy requirements.
Netskope Key Features
Some other features in Netskope that may interest you include:
- Cloud Firewall: Inspects and controls outbound traffic to prevent unauthorized access and data exfiltration.
- User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA): Monitors user activity to detect anomalies and potential insider threats.
- Remote Browser Isolation: Opens risky web content in a secure, isolated environment to prevent malware infections.
- API Security: Scans and protects API traffic to block threats and enforce security policies across cloud services.
Netskope Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, AWS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Box, Slack, Zoom, Okta, CrowdStrike, Splunk, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Strong visibility into shadow IT activity
- Inline traffic inspection with minimal latency
- Granular policy controls for SaaS and web
Cons:
- Occasional false positives in threat detection
- Reporting dashboards can be slow to load
For organizations managing both on-premises and cloud infrastructure, Cisco Security delivers cybersecurity solutions designed for hybrid network environments. IT teams in large enterprises and distributed businesses often choose Cisco Security for its ability to unify policy enforcement, routing, and threat protection across complex, mixed environments. Its architecture also supports secure access service edge (SASE) capabilities, helping you secure users, devices, and workloads wherever they operate without forcing a full migration to the cloud.
Why Cisco Security Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
If your business needs to secure both on-premises and cloud resources, Cisco Security stands out for its hybrid network capabilities. I appreciate how Cisco Security’s portfolio supports unified policy management and threat detection across physical, virtual, and cloud environments. Features like adaptive security appliances and cloud-delivered firewall services help you maintain consistent protection as your network evolves. This makes Cisco Security a strong choice for organizations that aren’t ready to move everything to the cloud but still want advanced, centralized security.
Cisco Security Key Features
Some other features in Cisco Security that may interest you include:
- DNS-layer security: Blocks malicious domains and prevents phishing attacks at the DNS level.
- Cloud access security broker (CASB): Monitors and controls access to cloud applications and enforces security policies.
- Endpoint detection and response (EDR): Detects, investigates, and responds to threats on endpoints across your network.
- Email security gateway: Filters inbound and outbound email to block spam, malware, and targeted phishing attempts.
Cisco Security Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Includes built-in email security gateway
- Integrates with Cisco hardware appliances
- Offers granular network segmentation controls
Cons:
- Some updates require manual intervention
- Requires multiple products for full coverage
Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform is built for organizations that want security deeply integrated across their cloud, endpoint, and identity environments. This solution is especially relevant for IT teams already invested in Microsoft 365, Azure, or Windows ecosystems and looking to enforce granular, adaptive access controls. What sets Microsoft Security apart from Zscaler and others is its native zero-trust architecture that unifies identity, device, and application security under a single framework.
Why Microsoft Security Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Unlike many cloud security providers, Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform is built directly into its cloud, identity, and endpoint services. I picked Microsoft Security for teams that want a native zero-trust architecture, since it lets you enforce conditional access, continuous risk assessment, and automated threat response across your entire Microsoft environment. Features like unified policy management and real-time device compliance checks help you secure access at every layer. This makes Microsoft Security a strong Zscaler alternative for organizations that want to consolidate security controls within a single, integrated ecosystem.
Microsoft Security Key Features
Some other features in Microsoft Security’s Zero Trust platform that may interest you include:
- Defender for Cloud Apps: Monitors and controls user activity across cloud applications for better visibility and threat detection.
- Privileged Identity Management: Manages, monitors, and controls access to critical resources with just-in-time and just-enough-access policies.
- Information Protection: Classifies and encrypts sensitive data across emails, documents, and cloud storage.
- Endpoint Detection and Response: Provides advanced threat detection and investigation tools for managed devices.
Microsoft Security Integrations
Integrations include Microsoft Entra, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Purview, and more.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Built-in identity protection and risk assessment
- Native zero-trust controls for all endpoints
- Deep integration with Microsoft 365 services
Cons:
- Policy changes may impact legacy on-prem systems
- Limited visibility into non-Microsoft cloud apps
If your organization needs secure, high-performance connectivity across global locations, Cato Networks offers a private backbone that bypasses the public internet. This platform is well-suited for IT teams managing multinational networks who want to reduce latency and improve reliability for users worldwide. Cato Networks stands out by delivering integrated security and networking over its own global infrastructure, not just through cloud-based security layers.
Why Cato Networks Is a Good Zscaler Alternative
Unlike most cloud security providers, Cato Networks operates its own global private backbone, which means your traffic avoids the unpredictability of the public internet. I picked Cato Networks for teams that need consistent, low-latency connectivity between international offices and remote users. The platform combines this backbone with built-in security features like a next-generation firewall, secure web gateway, and zero-trust network access. With seamless integration across networking and security functions, this approach gives you both reliable performance and unified protection, making it a strong alternative to Zscaler for global organizations.
Cato Networks Key Features
Some other features in Cato Networks that may interest you include:
- Cloud-based management console: Lets you configure, monitor, and troubleshoot your network from a single interface.
- WAN optimization: Reduces bandwidth consumption and accelerates application performance across sites.
- Mobile client support: Extends secure access to remote and mobile users without additional hardware.
- Automated threat detection and response: Continuously monitors network traffic and responds to threats in real time.
Cato Networks Integrations
Native integrations are not currently listed.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Automated threat detection with real-time response
- Mobile client supports secure remote access
- Private backbone reduces latency for global sites
Cons:
- Advanced analytics features are still maturing
- Requires Cato edge devices for connectivity
Altri concorrenti di Zscaler
Ecco ulteriori opzioni tra i concorrenti di Zscaler che non sono entrate nella mia shortlist, ma che meritano comunque di essere prese in considerazione:
- CrowdStrike
With AI-driven threat detection
- Kaspersky Next
For SMB-focused security solutions
- F5
For advanced web application firewall controls
Criteri di selezione delle alternative a Zscaler
Nella scelta delle migliori alternative a Zscaler da includere in questa lista, ho considerato le esigenze e i problemi comuni degli acquirenti in relazione ai prodotti di fornitori di sicurezza cloud, come la gestione dell’accesso remoto sicuro e il rilevamento di minacce avanzate. Ho inoltre utilizzato il seguente quadro di valutazione per mantenere un'analisi strutturata e imparziale:
Funzionalità principali (25% del punteggio totale)
Per essere incluse in questa lista, le soluzioni dovevano coprire questi casi d’uso comuni:
- Accesso remoto sicuro alle applicazioni cloud
- Rilevamento e prevenzione delle minacce
- Autenticazione utente e gestione delle identità
- Controlli di accesso basati su policy
- Monitoraggio delle attività in tempo reale
Caratteristiche distintive aggiuntive (25% del punteggio totale)
Per restringere ulteriormente la selezione, ho cercato anche funzionalità uniche, come:
- Analisi del rischio basata sul comportamento
- Isolamento remoto del browser
- Adattamento automatico delle policy
- Integrazione con molteplici provider di identità
- Segmentazione a livello di applicazione
Usabilità (10% del punteggio totale)
Per valutare la facilità d’uso di ogni sistema, ho considerato i seguenti aspetti:
- Design della dashboard chiaro e intuitivo
- Navigazione logica tra i moduli
- Pochi passaggi per configurare le funzionalità principali
- Accessibilità della documentazione all'interno della piattaforma
- Alert e notifiche personalizzabili
Onboarding (10% del punteggio totale)
Per valutare l’esperienza di onboarding di ciascuna piattaforma, ho considerato i seguenti aspetti:
- Disponibilità di guide passo-passo per la configurazione
- Accesso a video formativi e webinar
- Tour interattivi del prodotto per i nuovi utenti
- Modelli di policy preimpostati per una distribuzione rapida
- Team di supporto onboarding reattivo
Assistenza clienti (10% del punteggio totale)
Per valutare i servizi di assistenza clienti di ciascun fornitore software, ho considerato:
- Disponibilità di supporto 24/7
- Molteplici canali di assistenza, incluso chat e telefono
- Accesso a una knowledge base o a un centro assistenza
- Tempi di risposta rapidi per problemi critici
- Disponibilità di account manager dedicati
Rapporto qualità-prezzo (10% del punteggio totale)
Per valutare il rapporto qualità-prezzo di ciascuna piattaforma, ho considerato:
- Struttura dei prezzi trasparente
- Opzioni di abbonamento flessibili
- Funzionalità incluse in ogni fascia di prezzo
- Costo rispetto a soluzioni simili
- Sconti per contratti annuali o pluriennali
Recensioni clienti (10% del punteggio totale)
Per comprendere la soddisfazione globale dei clienti ho valutato, leggendo le recensioni:
- Coerenza dei feedback positivi
- Frequenza dei problemi tecnici segnalati
- Qualità delle esperienze con il supporto
- Semplicità di implementazione e gestione
- Soddisfazione per i risultati in termini di sicurezza
Perché cercare un’alternativa a Zscaler?
Sebbene Zscaler sia una valida scelta come provider di sicurezza cloud, esistono diversi motivi per cui alcuni utenti cercano soluzioni alternative. Potresti essere alla ricerca di un’alternativa a Zscaler perché…
- Hai bisogno di analisi del rischio basate sul comportamento più granulari
- La tua organizzazione richiede opzioni di distribuzione on-premises o ibride
- Vuoi un’integrazione più approfondita con provider d’identità specifici
- Hai bisogno di una personalizzazione delle policy più flessibile
- Il tuo team opera in regioni con data center Zscaler limitati
- Richiedi funzionalità avanzate di reportistica e audit
Se ti riconosci in una di queste situazioni, sei nel posto giusto. Il mio elenco include diverse opzioni di provider di sicurezza cloud più adatte alle esigenze di team che riscontrano queste difficoltà con Zscaler e sono alla ricerca di soluzioni alternative.
Funzionalità principali di Zscaler
Ecco alcune delle principali funzionalità di Zscaler, per aiutarti a confrontarle con ciò che propongono le soluzioni alternative:
- Zero trust network access: Impone l’accesso privilegiato minimo alle applicazioni verificando utenti e dispositivi prima di concedere l’accesso, riducendo così il rischio di spostamenti laterali nell’ambiente.
- Gateway web sicuro basato su cloud: Ispeziona e filtra tutto il traffico web in tempo reale, bloccando siti dannosi, tentativi di phishing e contenuti inappropriati prima che raggiungano gli utenti.
- Prevenzione delle minacce in linea: Rileva e blocca malware, ransomware e minacce avanzate al perimetro della rete, utilizzando analisi basate su firme e comportamenti.
- Ispezione SSL/TLS: Decifra e analizza il traffico crittografato per individuare minacce nascoste senza compromettere la privacy o le prestazioni degli utenti.
- Prevenzione della perdita di dati: Monitora e controlla la movimentazione di dati sensibili su canali cloud e web, aiutando le aziende a rispettare le normative sulla protezione dei dati.
- Segmentazione delle applicazioni: Limita l’accesso degli utenti solo alle applicazioni di cui hanno bisogno, riducendo la superficie di attacco e prevenendo accessi non autorizzati.
- Integrazione con provider d’identità: Si collega alle principali piattaforme di gestione delle identità per applicare single sign-on e autenticazione a più fattori e garantire una verifica sicura degli utenti.
- Gestione centralizzata delle policy: Consente agli amministratori di definire, aggiornare e applicare le policy di sicurezza da un’unica console cloud-based.
- Reportistica e analisi complete: Offre una visibilità dettagliata sulle attività degli utenti, sulle minacce rilevate e sulle violazioni delle policy attraverso dashboard e report personalizzabili.
- Infrastruttura cloud globale: Garantisce sicurezza costante e prestazioni rapide a livello mondiale grazie a una rete distribuita di data center.
Cosa succede dopo:
Se stai cercando informazioni sui concorrenti di Zscaler, mettiti in contatto con un consulente di SoftwareSelect per ricevere consigli gratuiti.
Compila un modulo e fai una breve chiacchierata in cui entreranno nei dettagli delle tue esigenze. Poi riceverai una lista ristretta di software da valutare. Ti assisteranno anche durante l'intero processo di acquisto, comprese le negoziazioni sul prezzo.